Określanie zmienności mineralogicznej utworów kajpru za pomocą metod petromagnetycznych

• Autorzy: Kobyliński Kamil

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7306/2022.10

Warianty tytułu

EN

Determination of mineralogical variability of Keuper deposits using rock magnetic methods

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Measurements of the magnetic susceptibility (MS) in sedimentary sequences can quickly provide information on the variability of their mineral composition. A typical application of MS is the reconstruction of the supply of terrigenous material in car¬bonate rocks or the variability of the ratio of ferromagnetic to paramagnetic /diamagnetic minerals in clastic rocks. The article discusses the practical aspects of using the Bartington's portable apparatus for magnetic susceptibility probing along with the correlation of these results with the mineral composition obtained from X-ray diffraction tests. The analysed rock material was red and green clays from the vicinity of Częstochowa, assigned to the mud-evaporite Ozimek Member, Grabowa Formation (Keuper facies, Upper Triassic). The obtained results indicate the possibility of a correlation between the MS and the composition of rock-forming minerals in the studied sediments, where in green clays the magnetite/maghemite with pyrrhotite(?) does not substantially affect the MS, and para- and/or diamagnetic minerals have a decisive role. In the red clays the dominant MS carrier is the hematite.Measurements of the magnetic susceptibility (MS) in sedimentary sequences can quickly provide information on the variability of their mineral composition. A typical application of MS is the reconstruction of the supply of terrigenous material in car¬bonate rocks or the variability of the ratio of ferromagnetic to paramagnetic /diamagnetic minerals in clastic rocks. The article discusses the practical aspects of using the Bartington's portable apparatus for magnetic susceptibility probing along with the correlation of these results with the mineral composition obtained from X-ray diffraction tests. The analysed rock material was red and green clays from the vicinity of Częstochowa, assigned to the mud-evaporite Ozimek Member, Grabowa Formation (Keuper facies, Upper Triassic). The obtained results indicate the possibility of a correlation between the MS and the composition of rock-forming minerals in the studied sediments, where in green clays the magnetite/maghemite with pyrrhotite(?) does not substantially affect the MS, and para- and/or diamagnetic minerals have a decisive role. In the red clays the dominant MS carrier is the hematite.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

podatność magnetyczna; dyfrakcja rentgenowska; Kajper; Bartington; minerały magnetyczne

EN

magnetic susceptibility; X-ray diffraction; Keuper; Bartington; magnetic minerals

• Wydawca: Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
• Czasopismo: Przegląd Geologiczny
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 70, nr 3
• Strony: 221--229
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz., fot, wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Kobyliński Kamil

• Wydział Geologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, ul. Żwirki i Wigury 93, 02-089 Warszawa

Bibliografia

• 1. AFRIYENI P., RIFAI H., MAISONNEUVE C.B., FORNI F., EISELE S., PHUA M., PUTRA R. 2020 - Identification of magnetic minerals in peatland at the section of DD REP B 693 lake Diatas using XRD (X-ray Diffraction). J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1481 012027.
• 2. AYOUBI S., ADMAN Y. 2019 - Iron Mineralogy and Magnetic Susceptibility of Soils Developed on Various Rocks in Western Iran. Clays and Clay Minerals, 67 (3): 217-227.
• 3. BARTINGTON INSTRUMENTS LTD 2020a - Operation Manual for MS2 Magnetic Susceptibility System. Oxford, The United Kingdom. OM408 (49): 30-34.
• 4. BARTINGTON INSTRUMENTS LTD 2020b - Operation Manual for Bartsoft for Windows (PC version). Oxford, The United Kingdom. OM2647 (3): 10-17, 24-25.
• 5. BILAN W. 1976 - Stratygrafia górnego triasu wschodniego obrzeżenia Górnośląskiego Zagłębia Węglowego. Zesz. Nauk. AGH, Geologia, 2 (3): 4-73.
• 6. BUNACIU A.A., UDRIŞTIOIU E.G., ABOUL-ENEIN H.Y. 2015 - X-Ray Diffraction: Instrumentation and Applications. Critic. Rev. Analytic. Chem., 45 (4): 289-299.
• 7. CERVI E.C., DA COSTA A.C.S., DE SOUZA I.G. 2014 – Magnetic susceptibility and the spatial variability of heavy metals in soils developed on basalt. Junior J. Appl. Geophys., 111: 377-383.
• 8. CHUNG F. H. 1974a - Quantitative interpretation of X-ray diffraction patterns of mixtures. I. Matrix-flushing method for quantitative multicomponent analysis. J. Appl. Crystallograph., 7: 519-525.
• 9. CHUNG F.H. 1974b - Quantitative Interpretation of X-ray Diffraction Patterns of Mixtures. II. Adiabatic Principle of X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Mixtures. J. Appl. Crystallograph, 7: 526-531.
• 10. DA SILVA A. C., WHALEN M. T., HLADIL J., CHADIMOVA L., CHEN D., SPASSOV S., BOULVAIN F., DEVLEESCHOUWER X. 2015 - Magnetic Susceptibility Application: A Window onto Ancient Environments and Climatic Variations. Geol. Soc., Spec. Publ., 414.
• 11. DADLEZ R., MAREK S., POKORSKI S. 2000 - Geological Map of Poland without Cenozoic Deposits 1 : 1 000 000. Państw. Inst. Geol., Warszawa.
• 12. DEARING J. 1999 - Environmental Magnetic Susceptibility. Using the Bartington MS2 System, second ed. England. Chi Publishing. DEKKERS M.J. 1988 - Magnetic properties of natural pyrrhotite Part I: Behaviour of initial susceptibility and saturation-magnetization-related rock-magnetic parameters in a grain-size dependent framework. Physic. Earth Planet. Inter., 52: 376-393.
• 13. DEKKERSM.J. 1989 - Magnetic properties of natural pyrrhotite Part II: High- and low-temperature behavior of Jrs and TRM as function of grain size. Physic. Earth Planet. Inter., 57: 266-283.
• 14. DUNLOP D.J. 1972 - Magnetic Mineralogy of Unheated and Heated Red Sediments by Coercivity Spectrum Analysis. Geophys. J. Inter., 27: 37-55.
• 15. DUNLOP D.J., ÖZDEMIR Ö. 1997 - Rock Magnetism: Fundamentals and frontiers. The United Kingdom. Cambrid. Univ. Press., 51: 56-60, 452-460.
• 16. ELLWOOD B.B., HARROLD F.B., BENOIST S.L., STRAUS L. G., MORALES M. G.,BICHO N. F. 2001 - Paleoclimate and Intersite Correlations from Late Pleistocene/Holocene Cave Sites: Results from Southern Europe. Geoarchaeology, 16 (4): 433-463.
• 17. ELLWOOD B.B., HARROLD F.B., BENOIST S.L., THACKER P., OTTE M., BONJEAN D., LONG G.J., SHAHIN A.M., HERMANN R. P., GRANDJEAN F. 2004 - Magnetic susceptibility applied as an age-depth-climate relative dating technique using sediments from Scla- dina Cave, a Late Pleistocene cave site in Belgium. J. Archaeolog. Sci., 31: 283-293.
• 18. FRANCE D. E., OLDFIELD F. 2000 - Identifying goethite and hematite from rock magnetic measurements of soils and sediments. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 105(B2): 2781-2795.
• 19. GRABOWSKI J., BAKHMUTOV V., KDÝR Š., KROBICKI M., PRUNER P., REHÁKOVÁ D., SCHNABL P., STOYKOVA K., WIERZBOWSKI H. 2019 - Integrated stratigraphy and palaeoenviron- mental interpretation of the Upper Kimmeridgian to Lower Berriasian pelagic sequences of the Velykyi Kamianets section (Pieniny Klippen Belt, Ukraine). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 532(109216).
• 20. GUBBINS D., HERRERO-BERVERA E. (red.). 2007 - Encyclopedia of geomagnetism and paleomagnetism. AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Springer: 566-571, 589-593.
• 21. GUINIER A. 1963 - X-ray diffraction in Crystals, Imperfect Crystals and Amorphous Bodies. The USA.W.H. Freeman & Co.
• 22. HUNT C.P., MOSKOWITZ B.M., BANERJEE S.K. 1995 - Magnetic properties of rocks and minerals. In: Rock Physics and Phase Relations: a Hand book of Physical Constants (red. T.J. Ahrens). The USA. AGU Reference Shelf, 3: 189-204.
• 23. JOVANE L., SPROVIERI M., FLORINDO F., ACTON G., COCCIONI R., DALL'ANTONIA B., DINARES-TURELL J. 2007 - Eocene-Oligocene paleoceanographic changes in the stratotype section, Massignano, Italy: Clues from rock magnetism and stable isotopes. J. Geophys. Res., 112(B11101).
• 24. LIU Q., ROBERTS A.P., TORRENT J., HORNG C.S., LARRASOANA J.C. 2007 - What do the HIRM and S-ratio really measure in environmental magnetism? Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 8(Q09011).-
• 25. LOWRIE W. 1990 - Identification of ferromagnetic minerals in a rock by coercivity and unblocking temperature properties. Geophys. Res. Lett., 17 (2): 159-162.
• 26. MENDYK Ł., HULISZ P., KUSZA G., ŚWITONIAK M., GERSZTYN L., KALISZ B. 2016 - Sediment origin and pedogenesis in the former mill pond basin of Turznice (north-central Poland) based on magnetic susceptibility measurements. Bulletin of Geography. Physic. Geograph. Ser., 11: 55-69.
• 27. NAWROCKI J., JEWUŁA K., STACHOWSKA A., SZULC J. 2015 - Magnetic polarity of Upper Triassic sediments of the Germanic Basin in Poland. Ann. Soc. Geolog. Pol., 85: 663-674.
• 28. O'REILLY W. 1984 - Rock and Mineral Magnetism. Glasgow, Scotland. Blackie & Son Ltd: 172-179.
• 29. SZULC J., RACKI G. 2015 - Formacja grabowska - podstawowa jednostka litostratygraficzna kajpru Górnego Śląska. Prz. Geol., 63(2): 103-113.
• 30. TARLING D.H., HROUDAF. 1993 - The Magnetic Anisotropy of Rock. London, The United Kingdom. Chapman & Hall: 28-54.
• 31. WÓJCIK K., KOŁBUK D., SOBIEŃ K., ROSOWIECKA O., ROSZKOWSKA-REMIN J., NAWROCKI J., SZYMKOWIAK A. 2017 - Keuper magnetostratigraphy in the southern Mesozoic margin of the Holy Cross Mts. (southeastern edge of the German Basin). Geol. Quart., 61(4): 946-961.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).