Research 2.0, research data services and academic libraries

• Autorzy: Koltay T.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Badania 2.0, bazy danych badawczych i biblioteki akademickie

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of this paper is to provide a literature based inventory of tasks and roles that academic libraries have to fulfil in order to react to the developments brought in by the appearance and growing importance of Research 2.0, the main features of which are identified in its relationship to data-intensive research. The role of social media tools for researchers, the nature of research data management and research data services, questions of data quality and the need for standardized data citation are examined. The tasks, faced by libraries include providing research data services, information literacy education and support to individual faculty members. Libraries also should be involved in raising awareness of different services and movements, mainly not offered directly by the libraries themselves, even if this is a nontraditional activity for them. New role models for academic librarians, required by the new environment are also part of the discussion.

PL

Celem artykułu jest udowodnienie poglądu, że biblioteki akademickie muszą sprostać zadaniom, jakie przyniosło zastosowanie badań 2.0 w nauce. Przeanalizowano przede wszystkim zagadnienia: rola społecznych instrumentów medialnych dla pracowników naukowych, natura zarządzania danymi badawczego i obsług danych badawczych, jakość danych i konieczność standaryzowania danych. Zadania postawione przed bibliotekami to zapewnianie obsług danych badawczych, dostosowanie swoich usług do poszczególnych użytkowników oraz wydziałów. Biblioteki akademickie powinny również włączać się w zadania, które nie są standardowymi zadaniami bibliotek uczelnianych, a które są realizowane w procesie badawczym.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

research data services; academic libraries; research 2.0

PL

badawcze bazy danych; biblioteka akademicka; badania 2.0

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Informacji Naukowej
• Czasopismo: PTINT Praktyka i Teoria Informacji Naukowej i Technicznej
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: T. 23, nr 4
• Strony: 3--12
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 48 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Koltay T.

• Department of Information and Library Studies. Szent István University. Jászberény 5100. Hungary

Bibliografia

• [1] Acord S. K., Harley D.: Credit, time, and personality: The human challenges to sharing scholarly work using Web 2.0. “New media & Society” 2013 Vol. 5 No. 3, p. 379–397.
• [2] Altman M., Crosas M.: The evolution of data citation: From principles to implementation. “IASSIST Quarterly” 2013 Vol. 37 p. 62–70.
• [3] Auckland M.: Re-skilling for research: An investigation into the role and skills of subject and liaison librarians required to effectively support the evolving information needs of researchers. London 2012.
• [4] Ball A., Duke M.: How to cite datasets and link to publications? Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre, 2015 http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides
• [5] Berger M., Cirasella J.: Beyond Beall’s List: Better understanding predatory publishers,“College & Research Libraries News” 2015 Vol. 76 No. 3, p. 132–135.
• [6] Bittner S., Müller A.: Social networking tools and research information systems: Do they compete? “Webology” 2011 Vol. 8 No 1, Article 82, http://www.webology.org/2011/v8n1/a82.html
• [7] Brown J. M., Tucker C.: Expanding Library Support of Faculty Research: Exploring Readiness. “portal: Libraries and the Academy” 2013 Vol. 13 No 3, p. 257–271.
• [8] Brydges B., Clarke K.: Is it time to re-envision the role of academic librarians in faculty research? “Library Connect” 2013 Vol. 13 No. 7, available at: http://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/articles/2015-07/it-time-re-envision-role-academic-librariansfaculty-research
• [9] Candela L., Castelli D., Manghi P., Tani A.: Data journals: A survey. “Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology” 2015 Vol. 66 No. 9, p. 1747–1762.
• [10] Common Ground at the Nexus of Information Literacy and Scholarly Communication. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2013
• [11] English R.: The ACRL Scholarly Communications Initiative: A Progress Report, “College and Research Libraries News” 2004 Vol. 65 No. 8, p. 450–453.
• [12] Erway, R.: Starting the Conversation: University-wide Research Data Management Policy, “Educause Review Online”, December 6, 2013, http://er.educause.edu/articles/ 2013/12/startingthe-conversation-universitywide-research-datamanagement-policy
• [13] Federer L.: Emerging Trends in Librarianship: Exploring New Roles for Librarians: The Research Informationist. San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool Publishers, 2014.
• [14] Foster N.F.: Information literacy and research practices. NY 2014.
• [15] Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Chicago, IL.: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2015.
• [16] Future Libraries. Workshops Summary and Emerging Insights. London 2015.
• [17] Genoni P., Merrick H., Willson M.A.: Scholarly communities, e-research literacy and the academic librarian, “The Electronic Library” 2006. Vol. 24 No. 6, p. 734–746.
• [18] Giarlo M.: Academic Libraries as Quality Hubs, “Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication” 2013. Vol. 1 No. 3, p. 1–10.
• [19] Gwyer R.: Identifying and Exploring Future Trends Impacting on Academic Libraries: A Mixed Methodology Using Journal Content Analysis, Focus Groups, and Trend Reports, “New Review of Academic Librarianship” 2013. Vol. 21 No. 3, p. 269–285.
• [20] Hswe P., Holt A.: A New Leadership Role for Libraries. Washington 2012.
• [21] Information literacy and competency standards for higher education. Chicago, IL.: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2013. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.cfm
• [22] Intersections of scholarly communication and information literacy: Creating strategic collaborations for a changing academic environment. Chicago, IL.: Association of College and Research
• [23] Jahnke L., Asher A., Keralis S. D.: The problem of data. Washington 2012.
• [24] Koltay T.: New developments in scholarship: lessons for the information professional, “Praktyka i Teoria Informacji Naukowej i Technicznej” 2013. Vol. 21 No 4, 10–15.
• [25] LERU Roadmap for Research Data. Leuven: League of European Research Universities Research Data Working Group, 2013 http://www.leru.org/index.php/public/publications/year/2013/
• [26] Maatta S. L.: Placements & Salaries 2013: The Emerging Databrarian, “Library Journal” 2013. Vol. 138 No. 17, p. 26–33.
• [27] Maceviciute E.: Research libraries in a modern environment, “Journal of Documentation” 2014. Vol. 70 No: 2, p. 282–302
• [28] MacMillan D.: Developing data literacy competencies to enhance faculty collaborations, “LIBER Quarterly” 2013. Vol. 24 No. 3, p. 140–160
• [29] McCluskey C.: Being an embedded research librarian: supporting research by being a researcher, “Journal of Information Literacy” 2013. Vol. 7 No. 2, p. 4–14.
• [30] McLure M., Level A.V., Cranston, C.L., Oehlerts, B., Culbertson M.: Data Curation: A Study of Researcher Practices and Needs, “portal: Libraries and the Academy” 2014. Vol. 14 No. 2, p. 139–164.
• [31] Marcum D.: Educating the Research Librarian: Are We Falling Short? New York 2015.
• [32] Molloy L., Snow K.: The data management skills support initiative: Synthesising postgraduate training in research data management, “International Journal of Digital Curation” 2012. Vol. 7 No. 2, p. 101–109.
• [33] Mooney H., Newton M.P.: The anatomy of a data citation: Discovery, reuse, and credit. “Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication” 2012 Vol. 1 No 1, p. 1–14.
• [34] Nicholas D., Watkinson A., Volente R., Allard S., Levine K., Tenopir C.: Trust and Authority in Scholarly Communications in the Light of the Digital Transition, “Learned Publishing” 2014 Vol. 27 No. 2, p. 121–134.
• [35] Nicholas D., Watkinson A., Jamali H., Herman E., Tenopir C., Volente R.: Peer review: still king in the digital age, “Learned Publishing” 2015 Vol. 28 No. 1, p. 15–21.
• [36] Riley A. C.: Data management and curation Professional development for librarians needed, “College & Research Libraries News” 2015 Vol. 76 No. 9, 504–506.
• [37] Schneider R.: Research Data Literacy. In Kurbanoglu, S. et al. (Eds.), “Worldwide Commonalities and Challenges in Information Literacy Research and Practice” Cham: Springer International, 2013. p. 134–140.
• [38] SCONUL Seven Pillars of Information Literacy. Core Model for Higher Education. London: Society of College, National and University Libraries Working Group on Information Literacy, 2011.
• [39] Sharma S., Qin J.: Data management: Graduate student's awareness of practices and policies. “Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology” 2014 Vol. 51 No 1 p. 1–3.
• [40] Si L., Zhuang X., Xing W., Guo W.: The cultivation of scientific data specialists: Development of LIS education oriented to e-science service requirements, “Library Hi Tech” 2013 Vol. 31 No. 4, p. 700–724.
• [41] Starr J., Gastl A.: isCitedBy: A metadata scheme for DataCite, “D-LIB Magazine” 2011 Vol. 17 No. 1, http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january11/starr/01starr.html.
• [42] Ten recommendations for libraries to get started with research data management. LIBER, 2012. http://www.libereurope.eu/ news/tenrecommendations-for-libraries-to-get-startedwith-research-data-management
• [43] Tenopir C., Birch B., Allard S.: Academic Libraries and Research Data Services. Current Practices and Plans for the Future. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2012.
• [44] Tenopir C, Dalton ED, Allard S, Frame M, Pjesivac I, Birch B.: Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide, “PLoS ONE” 2015 Vol. 10 No. 8 e0134826. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134826
• [45] Tenopir C., Sandusky R.J., Allard S., Birch B.: Research data management services in academic research libraries and perceptions of librarians, “Library and Information Science Research” 2014. Vol. 36 No. 2, p. 84–90.
• [46] Vitae Research Development Framework, 2011 http://www.vitae.ac.uk/researchers/428241/Researcher-Development-Framework.html
• [47] Xia J., Li Y.: Changed Responsibilities in Scholarly Communication Services: An Analysis of Job Descriptions, “Serials Review” 2015. Vol. 41 No. 1, p. 15–22.
• [48] Xia J., Wang M.: Competencies and Responsibilities of Social Science Data Librarians: An Analysis of Job Descriptions, “College and Research Libraries” 2014. Vol. 75 No. 3, p. 362–388.