The use of network analysis in the process of delimitation as exemplifi ed by the administrative division of Poland

• Autorzy: Borowska-Stefańska M. , Wiśniewski S.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/geocart-2017-0019

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The cognitive aim of this study is to point to the optimum number of local government units and the optimum boundaries of spatial units in Poland with the assumption of minimizing the cumulated theoretical travel time to all settlement units in the country. The methodological aim, in turn, is to present the use of the ArcGIS location-allocation tool for the purposes of delimitation processes as exemplifi ed by administrative boundaries in Poland. The rationale for the implementation of this study is that number and the boundaries of units of all levels of Poland’s current territorial division are far from optimum in the light of minimization of accumulated theoretical travel time to all settlement units in the country. It may be concluded that it would be justifi able to increase the number of voivodships from the current number of 16 to 18. Besides it would be necessary to introduce modifi cations in relation to units with regional functions. In contrast, the number of districts and communes should be reduced. A continuation of this research may go in the direction of including analysis of public transport network in the research, creating in this way a multimodal set of network data. This would illustrate, apart from the potential itself resulting from the infrastructure, also the actually existing connections.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

spatial accessibility; administrative division; network analysis; GIS; Poland

PL

podział administracyjny Polski; dostępność przestrzenna; analiza sieci

• Wydawca: Komitet Geodezji PAN
• Czasopismo: Geodesy and Cartography
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 66, no. 2
• Strony: 155--170
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 67 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Borowska-Stefańska M.

• University of Łódź Institute of the Built Environment and Spatial Policy 90–142 Łódź, Kopcińskiego Street 31, Poland

autor

Wiśniewski S.

• University of Łódź Institute of the Built Environment and Spatial Policy 90–142 Łódź, Kopcińskiego Street 31, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Agarwal, S., Kodialam, M. and Lakshman, T. V. (2013). Traffi c engineering in software defi ned networks. In INFOCOM, 2013 Proceedings IEEE, pp. 2211-2219, IEEE. DOI 10.1109/INFCOM.2013.6567024.
• [2] Aucoin, P. (1990). Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums, Governance, 3 (2), pp. 115-137. DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0491.1990.tb00111.x.
• [3] Balaguer-Coll, M. T., Prior, D. and Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2007). On the determinants of local government performance: A two-stage nonparametric approach. European Economic Review, 51(2), 425-451. DOI 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.01.007.
• [4] Baradaran, S. and Ramjerdi, F. (2001). Performance of Accessibility Measures in Europe, Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 4 (2/3), 31-48.
• [5] Barzelay, M. (2001). The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue. Berkeley California & New York: University of California Press & Russell Sage Foundation.
• [6] Biosca, O., Spiekermann, K. and Stępniak, M. (2013). Transport accessibility at regional scale. Europa XXI, 24, 5-17. DOI /10.7163/Eu21.2013.24.1.
• [7] Bronisz, U., Heijman, W. and Miszczuk, A. (2008). Regional competitiveness in Poland: Creating an index. Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, 28 (2), 133-143. DOI 10.1007/s10037-008-0026-y.
• [8] Bruinsma, F.R. and Rietveld P. (1998). The Accessibility of European Cities: Theoretical Framework and Comparison of Approaches. Environment and Planning, 30 (3), pp. 499-521. DOI 10.1068/a300499.
• [9] Cichociński, P. (2012). Ocena przydatności OPENSTREETMAP jako źródła danych dla analiz sieciowych. Roczniki Geomatyki, 10.7 (57), 15-24.
• [10] Dalvi, M.Q. and Martin, K.M. (1976). The measurement of accessibility: some preliminary results. Transportation, 5 (1), 17-42.
• [11] Du, H. and Mulley, C. (2006). Relationship between transport accessibility and land value: Local model approach with geographically weighted regression. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1977), 197-205. DOI 10.3141/1977-25.
• [12] Dunleavy, P.J. and Hood, C. (1994). From Old Public Administration to New Public Management’. Public Money and Management, 14 (3), pp. 9-16. DOI 10.1080/09540969409387823.
• [13] Ferlie, E., Pettigrew, A., Ashburner, L. and Fitzgerald, L. (1996). The New Public Management in Action, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• [14] Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. E. and Politt, Ch., (2005) (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford University Press.
• [15] Ford, A. C., Barr, S. L., Dawson, R. J. and James, P. (2015). Transport accessibility analysis using GIS: Assessing sustainable transport in London. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(1), 124-149. DOI 10.3390/ijgi4010124.
• [16] Friend, J. and Jessop, N. (2013). Local Government and Strategic Choice (Routledge Revivals): An Operational Research Approach to the Processes of Public Planning. Routledge.
• [17] Gaca, S., Suchorzewski, W. and Tracz, M. (2011). Inżynieria ruchu drogowego: teoria i praktyka. Wydawnictwa Komunikacji i Łączności.
• [18] Geurs, K.T. and van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility Evaluation of Land-use and Transport Strategies: Review and Research Directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12 (2), 127-140. DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005.
• [19] Geurs, K.T. and Ritsema van Eck (2001). Accessibility Measures: Review and Applications. RIVM report 408505 006, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven.
• [20] Gęsiarz, Z. (1982). Zarys geografi i transportu. WSiP, Warsaw.
• [21] Gould, P. (1969). Spatial Diffusion. Resource Paper No. 17, Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
• [22] Gruchociak, H. (2012). Odległość w wyodrębnianiu stref wpływu wielkich miast w Polsce, [in:] E. Gołata (ed.), Analiza wielowymiarowa w badaniach społeczno-ekonomicznych. Zeszyty Naukowe 227, 107-125.
• [23] Gutiérrez, J. (2001). Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Journal of transport geography, 9(4), 229-242. DOI 10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00017-5.
• [24] Haklay, M. and Weber, P. (2008). OpenStreetMap: User-Generated Street Maps. IEEE Pervasive Computing, October-December, 7 (4), 12-18. DOI 10.1109/MPRV.2008.80.
• [25] Handy, S.L. and Niemeier, D.A. (1997). Measuring Accessibility: an Exploration of Issues and Alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29 (7), 1175-1194. DOI 10.1068/a291175.
• [26] Hansen, W.G. (1959). How Accessibility Shapes Land-use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2), 73-76.
• [27] Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons?, Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19. DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.
• [28] Hood, C. (1995). The ‘new public management’ in the 1980s: variations on a theme, Accounting. Organizations and Society, 20 (2-3), 93-109.DOI 10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W.
• [29] Ingram, D.R. (1971). The Concept of Accessibility: a Search for an Operational Form. Regional Studies, 5 (2), 101-107.
• [30] Jacoby, W. (2004). The Enlargement of the European Union and NATO: Ordering from the Menu in Central Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• [31] Kelley, J. (2004a). Ethnic Politics in Europe: The Power of Norms and Incentives, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• [32] Kelley, J. (2004b). International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions. International Organization, 58 (3), 425-457. DOI 10.1017/S0020818304583017.
• [33] Kelley, J. (2006). New wine in Old Wineskins: Promoting Political Reforms through the New European Neighbourhood Policy. JCMS, 44 (1), 29-55. DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00613.x.
• [34] Kettl, D.F. (2000). Public administration at the millennium: the state of the fi eld. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10 (1), 7-34. DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024267.
• [35] Komornicki, T., Śleszyński, P., Rosik, P. and Pomianowski, W. (2009): Dostępność przestrzenna jako przesłanka kształtowania polskiej polityki transportowej. Biuletyn KPZK PAN 241, Warsaw.
• [36] Lijewski, T. (2003). Koncentracja ośrodków aktywności gospodarczej w Polsce w świetle list 500 fi rm. Przegląd Geografi czny, 75 (3), 433-447.
• [37] Lynn, L.E. (1996). Public Management as Art, Science and Profession, Chatham House, Chatham N.J.
• [38] Martin, J. C., Gutierrez, J., and Román, C. (2004). Data envelopment analysis (DEA) index to measure the accessibility impacts of new infrastructure investments: The case of the highspeed train corridor Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Regional Studies, 38(6), 697-712. DOI 10.1080/003434042000240987.
• [39] Nikos, M. (2000). Trends of Administrative Reform in Europe: towards administrative convergence? Paper presented at the First Regional Interactional Conference of the International Institute of Administrative Sciences, University of Bologna, 19-22 June.
• [40] Nowak Da Costa, J. (2016). Towards building data semantic similarity analysis: OpenStreetMap and the Polish Database of Topographic Objects. Geodetic Congress (Geomatics), Baltic, 2-4 June 2016, Gdansk, Poland. DOI: 10.1109/BGC.Geomatics.2016.55.
• [41] Ongaro, E. (2009). Public Management Reform and Modernization. Trajectories of Administrative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain, Cheltenham and Northampton, Mass., Edward Elgar.
• [42] O’Sullivan, D., Morrison, A., and Shearer, J. (2000). Using desktop GIS for the investigation of accessibility by public transport: an isochrone approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(1), 85-104. DOI 10.1080/136588100240976.
• [43] Peters, G. and Olsen, J. (1996). Lessons From Experience: Experiential Learning in Administrative Reforms in Eight Democracies, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
• [44] Pollitt, C. (1993). Managerialism and tbe Publk Services Tbe Anglo-American Ekperhce, 2nd Edn, Oxford: Blackwell.
• [45] Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2nd edition).
• [46] Preston, J. and Rajé, F. (2007). Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(3), 151-160. DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002.
• [47] Roberts, P., Sykes, H. and Granger, R. (Eds.). (2016). Urban regeneration. Sage.
• [48] Rosik, P. (2012). Dostępność lądowa przestrzeni Polski w wymiarze europejskim, Prace Geografi czne, IGiPZ PAN, Warsaw.
• [49] Schimmelfennig, F. (2003). The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• [50] Schürmann, C., Spiekermann, K. and Wegener, M. (1997). Accessibility Indicators: Model and Report, SASI Deliverable D5. Institute of Spatial Planning, Dortmund.
• [51] Sokołowski, D. (2014). Niektóre uwarunkowania korekty podziału Polski na województwa, Przegląd Geografi czny, 86 (4), 567-590. DOI 10.7163/PrzG.2014.4.6.
• [52] Spiekermann, K. and Neubauer, J. (2002). European Accessibility and Peripherality: Concepts, Models and Indicators. Nordregio Working Paper, Stockholm.
• [53] Spiekermann, K. and Wegener, M. (1996). Trans-European Networks and Unequal Accessibility in Europe. European Journal of Regional Development, 4 (96), 35-42.
• [54] Śleszyński, P. (2007). Gospodarcze funkcje kontrolne w przestrzeni Polski, Prace Geografi czne, IGiPZ PAN, 213, Warsaw.
• [55] Śleszyński, P. (2008). Ocena powiązań gospodarczych i kapitałowych miedzy miastami, [in:] K. Saganowski, M. Zagrzejewska-Fiedorowicz, P. Żuber (ed.), Ekspertyzy do Koncepcji Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju 2008-2033. Tom I, Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego, Warsaw, pp. 332-391.
• [56] Śleszyński, P. (2011). Social linkages, [in:] T. Komornicki, P. Siłka (ed.), Functional Linkages between Polish Metropolises, Studia Regionalia, 29.
• [57] Śleszyński, P. (2013). Warszawa jako ośrodek dojazdów pracowniczych. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 1 (51), pp. 5-25. DOI 10.7366/150949954500.
• [58] Śleszyński, P. (2014). Delimitation and typology of functional urban regions in Poland based on commuting, 2006, Geographia Polonica, 87 (2), 317-320. DOI 10.7163/GPol.2014.20.
• [59] Śleszyński, P. (2015). W sprawie optymalnego podziału terytorialnego Polski: zastosowanie analizy grawitacyjnej. Przegląd Geografi czny, 87 (2), 343-359. DOI 10.7163/PrzG.2015.2.7.
• [60] Śleszyński, P. (2017). Dostępność ekonomiczna miast wojewódzkich w świetle kosztów dojazdu samochodem osobowym. Prace Komisji Geografi i Komunikacji PTG, 2017, 20(1), 7-18. DOI 10.4467/2543859XPKG.17.001.6730.
• [61] Werwicki, A. (1973). Struktura przestrzenna średnich miast ośrodków wojewódzkich w Polsce. Prace Geografi czne, Nr 101, PAN, Wroclaw, Warsaw.
• [62] Wiśniewski, S. (2017). The accessibility of Poland’s Space to the Trans-European Transport Network. Miscellanea Geographica. 21 (3), 1-11. DOI 10.1515/mgrsd-2016-0030.
• [63] Zaborowski, Ł. (2014). Sieć ośrodków regionalnych w Koncepcji Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju 2030. Próba uporządkowania według czynników wielkości i odległości. Przegląd Geografi czny, 86 (4), 591-619. DOI 10.7163/PrzG.2014.4.7.
• [64] Zaborowski, Ł. (2016a). Próba przebudowy układu województw z wykorzystaniem sieci ośrodków regionalnych. Przegląd Geografi czny, 88 (2), 159-182. DOI 10.7163/PrzG.2016.2.2.
• [65] Zaborowski, Ł. (2016b). Żeby Polska była Polską - a nie tylko Warszawą, Komentarz nr 177, Instytut Sobieskiego, Warszawa.
• [66] Vachudova, M. (2005). Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• [67] Vickerman, R.W., Spiekermann, K. and Wegener, M. (1999). Accessibility and Economic Development in Europe, Regional Studies 33, pp. 1-15. DOI 10.1080/00343409950118878.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018)