Possible drivers of high performance of European mutual ESG funds - an fsQCA view on sustainable investing

• Autorzy: Welling Fanni , Stoklasa Jan

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15439/2021B2

• Konferencja: International Scientific Conference Knowledge on Economics and Management KNOWCON 2021, (17 ; 11-12.11.2021 ; Olomuniec, Czechy)
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper applies the tools of fsQCA and their recent modifications by Stoklasa, Luukka and Talášek to analyze the possible drivers of high performance of European ESG funds. 429 mutual equity growth ESG funds from the European area are being analyzed. We focus mainly on the connection of Morningstar sustainability rating with the performance of the funds during 2018-2021 measured by Jensen's alpha and the Sharpe ratio. Other possible drivers of the success of these funds are also being explored. We identify the prevailing assumed relationships between funds' sustainability and other characteristics with their performance and formulate rules to be investigated using the fsQCA methodology. More specifically the possibility of high performance being associated with a high sustainability rating of the funds is explored in detail. Our results indicate that although the high performance cannot be clearly associated with the high sustainability rating of a fund, high sustainability rating seems to be preventing the low performance of the fund.

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Informatyczne
• Czasopismo: Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 29
• Strony: 63--73
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 37 poz., wz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Welling Fanni

• School of Business and Management, LUT University, Yliopistonkatu 34, 53851 Lappeenranta, Finland

autor

Stoklasa Jan

• School of Business and Management, LUT University, Yliopistonkatu 34, 53851 Lappeenranta, Finland
• Palacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Arts Department of Economic and Managerial Studies

Bibliografia

• 1. J. Tomar, S. Agarwal, and K. R. Chaturvedi, “Relationship between Employer Branding and Corporate Social Responsibility,” in S. Agarwal, D. N. Burrell, and V. K. Solanki (eds.) Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Research in Management & Technovation, ACSIS, vol. 24, pp. 123-127, 2020, http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2020KM19
• 2. H. D. Hai, and C. N. Huu, “The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Factor on the Sustainable Development of Industrial SMEs: A Case Study in Hanoi-Vietnam,” in S. Agarwal, D. N. Burrell, and V. K. Solanki (eds.) Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Research in Management & Technovation, ACSIS, vol. 24, pp. 57-62, 2020, http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2020KM23
• 3. P. C. Fiss, “Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 393-420, 2011.
• 4. P. C. Fiss, “A Set-Theoretical Approach to Organizational Configurations,” Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1180-1198, 2007.
• 5. J. Stoklasa, P. Luukka, and T. Talášek, “Set-theoretic methodology using fuzzy sets in rule extraction and validation - consistency and coverage revisited,” Inf. Sci., vol. 412-413, pp. 154-173, 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.05.042
• 6. J. Stoklasa, T. Talášek, and P. Luukka, “On consistency and coverage measures in the fuzzified set-theoretic approach for social sciences: dealing with ambivalent evidence in the data,” in Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Economics, 2018, pp. 521-526.
• 7. M. M. Kumbure, A. Tarkiainen, P. Luukka, J. Stoklasa, and A. Jantunen, “Relation between managerial cognition and industrial performance: An assessment with strategic cognitive maps using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 114, no. June 2020, pp. 160-172, 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.001
• 8. M. M. Kumbure, P. Luukka, A. Tarkiainen, J. Stoklasa and A. Jantunen, “An investigation of hidden shared linkages among perceived causal relationships in cognitive maps,” in P. Luukka and J. Stoklasa (eds.), Intelligent Systems and Applications in Business and Finance, Springer, in press.
• 9. S. Tomer, and G. Rana, “Green Human Resource Management: A Conceptual Study,” in S. Agarwal, D. N. Burrell, and V. K. Solanki (eds.) Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Research in Management & Technovation, ACSIS, vol. 24, pp. 147-150, 2020, http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2020KM10
• 10. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Inf. Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965.
• 11. G. J. Klir and B. Yuan, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Aplications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1995.
• 12. C. C. Ragin, Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
• 13. M. C. Jensen, “The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964”, J. Financ., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 389-416, 1968.
• 14. W. F. Sharpe, “Mutual Fund Performance”, J. Bus. (Chicago, Ill.), vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 119-138, 1966.
• 15. H. W. H. Chan, R. W. Faff, D. R. Gallagher and A. Looi, “Fund Size, Transaction Costs and Performance: Size Matters”, Aust. J. Manage., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 73-96, 2009.
• 16. X. Yan, “Liquidity, Investment Style, and the Relation between Fund Size and Fund Performance”, J. Financ. Quant. Anal., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 741-767, 2008.
• 17. J. Chen, H. Hong, M. Huang and J. D. Kubik, “Does Fund Size Erode Mutual Fund Performance? The Role of Liquidity and Organization”, Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1276-1302, 2004.
• 18. S. E. Beckers and G. Vaughan, “Small Is Beautiful”, J. Portfolio Manage., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 9-17, 2001.
• 19. P. Tufano and M. Sevick, “Board structure and fee-setting in the U.S. mutual fund industry”, J. Financ. Econ., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 321-355, 1997.
• 20. J. Golec, “The effects of mutual fund managers’ characteristics on their portfolio performance, risk and fees”, Financ. Serv. Rev. (Greenwich, Conn.), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 133-147, 1996.
• 21. A. F. Perold and R. S. Salomon, “The Right Amount of Assets under Management”, Financ. Analysts J., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 31-39, 1991.
• 22. T. F. Loeb. “Trading Cost: The Critical Link between Investment Information and Results.” Financ. Analysts J., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 39-44, 1983.
• 23. F. Welling, “The role of sustainability, manager tenure, and fund size in European mutual growth fund performance,” BSc thesis, LUT University, 2021.
• 24. R. Kjetsaa and M. Kieff, “Impact of Expenses, Turnover and Manager Tenure on Blend Fund Performance”, J. Bus. Account., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 99-115, 2016.
• 25. B. A. Costa, K. Jakob and G. E. Porter, “Mutual Fund Performance and Changing Market Trends 1990-2001: Does Manager Experience Matter?”, J. Investing, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 79-86, 2006.
• 26. G. Filbeck and D. L. Tompkins, “Management Tenure and Risk-Adjusted Performance of Mutual Funds”, J. Investing, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 72-80, 2004.
• 27. M. Brooks and D. L. Tompkins, “Mutual funds’ risk adjusted performance”, J. Commercial Bank. Financ., Vol. 1, pp. 111-121, 2002.
• 28. R. Fortin, S. Michelson and J. Jordan-Wagner, “Does mutual fund manager tenure matter?”, J. Financ. Plan., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 72-79, 1999.
• 29. D. Lemak and P. Satish, “Mutual Fund Performance and Managers’ Terms of Service: Are There Performance Differences?” J. Investing, Winter 1996, pp. 59-63, 1996.
• 30. Morningstar Research, “Morningstar Sustainability Rating Methodology,” Morningstar, 2019. [Web document] [Accessed 20.3.2021]. Available: https://www.morningstar.com/content/dam/marketing/shared/research/methodology/744156_Morningstar_Sustainability_Rating_for_Funds_Methodology.pdf
• 31. M. Steen, J. T. Moussawi and O. Gjolberg, “Is there a relationship between Morningstar’s ESG ratings and mutual fund performance?”, J. Sustain. Financ. Invest., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 349-370, 2020.
• 32. S. Dolvin, J. Fulkerson and A. Krukover, “Do “Good Guys” Finish Last? The Relationship between Morningstar Sustainability Ratings and Mutual Fund Performance”, J. Investing, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 77-91, 2019.
• 33. H. Henke, “The effect of social screening on bond mutual fund performance”, J. Bank. Financ., vol. 67, pp. 69-84, 2016.
• 34. Z. Nagy, A. Kassam and L. Lee, “Can ESG Add Alpha? An Analysis of ESG Tilt and Momentum Strategies”, J. Investing, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 113-124, 2016.
• 35. J. Nofsinger and A. Varma, “Socially responsible funds and market crises”, J. Bank. Financ., vol. 48, pp. 180-193, 2014.
• 36. Z. Y. Bello, “Socially Responsible Investing and Portfolio Diversification”, J. Financ. Res., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 41-57, 2005.
• 37. S. Hamilton, H. Jo and M. Statman, “Doing Well While Doing Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds”, Financ. Analysts J., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 62-66, 1993.