Risk Assessment of Using a Contactless Method for Railway Surface Inspection as Alternative for Staff Inspection of Infrastructure

• Autorzy: Batko Michał , Konieczny Jarosław , Butor Anna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.36137/1981E

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Railway infrastructure managers are obliged to check technical condition of infrastructure in order to maintain safe traffic. Usually this is done using conventional methods and tools or directly through the inspections made by the technical staff . Technological development which is currently being experienced indicates the availability of new measurement methods that can be used to monitor the condition of railway infrastructure. However, the introduction of new methods for monitoring the infrastructure is usually a change affecting safety, which requires an assessment of the significance of the change for the maintenance of the required level of railway traffic safety. The authors assessed the significance of the change in the method of infrastructure monitoring and related risk assessment as a result of the use of the contactless method of checking the railway surface as an alternative method to staff inspections. Additional control measures or preventive measures for potential threats have also been indicated.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

staff; inspection; infrastructure; monitoring; UAV

• Wydawca: Instytut Kolejnictwa
• Czasopismo: Problemy Kolejnictwa
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Z. 198
• Strony: 98--95
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Batko Michał

• DB Cargo Polska S.A.

autor

Konieczny Jarosław

• PŚ Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering

autor

Butor Anna

• DB Cargo Polska S.A.

Bibliografia

• 1. Hessami A.G.: A Systems View of Railway Safety and Security, in K. Zboinski (ed.), Railway Research – Selected Topics on Development, Safety and Technology, IntechOpen, 2015, London,10.5772/62080.
• 2. Pieniak-Lendzion K., Stefaniak R.: Selected issues in rail transport safety in Poland. Scientific Papers of The Silesian University of Technology, Organisation and Management Series. 2019, 134, s. 203−213.
• 3. Wigger P.: Independent Safety Assessment – Benefits and Methodology, Transport Research Arena – Europe 2012, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science 48 (2012) 3361−3370.
• 4. Zhang Z., Liu X., Hu H.: Passenger rail station safety improvement and analysis of end-of-track collisions based on systems-theoretic accident modeling and processes, Smart and Resilient Transport,3(2)/2021, s. 94−117.
• 5. Directive 2004/49/WE of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004 on safety on the Community’s railways and amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certifi cation (Railway Safety Directive). Offi cial Journal of the European Union, L 164, tom 47, 2004, s. 44.
• 6. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 402/2013 of 30 April 2013 on the common safety method for risk evaluation and assessment and repealing Regulation (EC) No 352/2009 as well as art. 6 of Directive 2004/49/WE of the European Parliament and the Council on safety on the Community’s railways. Offi cial Journal of the European Union, L 121, tom 56, 2013, s. 8.
• 7. Błaszkiewicz D., Urbanek M.: Kolejowe pojazdy pomiarowe [Measurement railway vehicles], Logistyka, 2015 nr 6, s. 987.
• 8. Soni A., Robson S., Gleeson B.: Optical Non-Contact Railway Track Measurement with Static Terrestrial Laser Scanning to Better Th an 1.5mm RMS (7493), FIG Working Week 2015, Sofi a, Bulgaria,17−21 May 2015.
• 9. Richards P.: Network Rail’s Train-borne Infrastructure Condition Monitoring Fleet, Presentation to the IMechE, Worcestershire Branch, 15 listopada 2016, https://nearyou.imeche.org/docs/defaultsource/Worcester-Area/2016-11-15-network-railinfrastructure-condition-monitoring-presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=0 [dostęp 08.05.2022].
• 10. Cafiso S. et.al.: Application of NDT to Railway Track Inspection. International Conference on Traffic and Transport Engineering – Belgrade, 24−25 listopada, 2016.
• 11. PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A., Instrukcja diagnostyki nawierzchni kolejowej Id-8 [Instruction on railway surface diagnostics Id-8], Appendix to Regulation No 5/2005 of the Management Board of PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe SA. Warszawa: PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe SA Centrala Biuro Dróg Kolejowych.
• 12. Rail Transit Track Inspection and Maintenance, APTA Standards Development Program. American Public Transportation Association. 2017. https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uploads/Standards_Documents/APTA-RT-FS-S-002-02-Rev-1.pdf [dostęp 09.05.2022].
• 13. Liu X. et.al.: CPL Optimization of Ultrasonic RailDefect Inspection forImproving Railway Transportation Safety and Efficiency. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 2014. 140;10.
• 14. Osman, M.H., Kaewunruen S., Jack A.: Optimisation of schedules for the inspection of railway tracks, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F, Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 232(6):095440971772163; 2017.
• 15. Witayangkurn A. et.al.: Real-time monitoring system using unmanned aerialvehicle integrated with sensor observation service, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.
• 16. Mukhamediev R.I. et.al.: Review of Some Applications of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Technology in the Resource-Rich Country, Applied Science. 2021, 11, 10171, https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110171.
• 17. Gabara G., Sawicki P.: A New Approach for Inspection of Selected Geometric Parameters of a Railway Track Using Image-Based Point Clouds. Sensors 2018, 18, 791; doi:10.3390/s18030791.
• 18. Muinde M.S.: Railway track geometry inspection optimization. Maintenance Engineering, master’s level, 2018, Luleå University of Technology. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1257286/ FULLTEXT01.pdf [dostęp 09.05.2022].
• 19. Milosevic M.D.G. et.al.: Condition Monitoring of Railway Crossing Geometry via Measured and Simulated Track Responses, Sensors 2022, 22, 1012.https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031012.
• 20. Ustawa o transporcie kolejowym z dnia 28 marca 2003. (2003), Journal of Laws No. 87. pos. 789 with subsequent amendments.
• 21. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1158/2010 of 9 December 2010 on a common safety method for assessing conformity with the requirements for obtaining railway safety certifi cates.
• 22. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1169/2010 of 10 December 2010 on a common safety method for assessing conformity with the requirements for obtaining a railway safety authorisation.
• 23. Feroz, S., Abu Dabous Saleh: UAV Based Remote Sensing Applications for Bridge Condition Assessment. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1809. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091809.
• 24. Catelani M.et.al.: FMECA Assessment for Railway Safety-Critical Systems Investigating a New Risk Threshold Method [dostęp IEEE, 2021. 9], pp. 86243−86252.
• 25. Szkoda M., Kaczor G.: Application of fmea analysis to assessthe safety of rail vehicles, EURO – ZEL 2015, 23rd International Symposium June 2–3, 2015, Žilina.
• 26. Szkoda M., Satora M.: Th e application of failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) for the risk assessment of changes in the maintenance system of railway vehicles, Technical Transactions 8/2019. s. 159−171.
• 27. Dinmohammadi F. et.al.: Risk Evaluation of Railway Rolling Stock Failures Using FMECA Technique: A Case Study of Passenger Door System. Urban Rail Transit (2016) 2(3–4):128–145.
• 28. Folejewska A.: Analiza FMEA – zasady, komentarze, arkusze, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Verlag Dashofer, Sp. z o.o., 2010.
• 29. Sitarz M., Chruzik K., Wachnik R.: Aplication of rams and FMEA methods in safety management system of railway transport, Journal of KONBiN. 2012. 4(24). s. 149−160.
• 30. Siudecki J.: Stosowanie rozporządzenia wykonawczego Komisji (UE) nr 402/2013, Warszawa, 2018, Warsztaty SIRTS.