Remote work in society 5.0 – employee’s perspective, motives and frequency of use

• Autorzy: Słupska Urszula

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.193.30

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The purpose of the article is to diagnose the motives of remote work among working students in the context of creating a 5.0 society. The study focuses on analyzing the motives that lead young employees to choose remote work, and on determining the frequency of use of this form of employment. Design/methodology/approach: The reseach was a pilot study and included professionally active and working students of the Faculty of Management at the University of Technology in Bydgoszcz. The research method was an electronic survey. Among the data analysis methods used were structure analysis and cluster analysis. Findings: The results of the research indicate that young employees mostly prefer stationary work, especially if the tasks assigned to them require social interaction. In assessing the importance of motives for working remotely, respondents disagreed. However, the motives of greatest importance in their opinion turned out to be time saving, easier reconciliation of work and family life and flexible working hours. Research limitations/implications: The study was limited to a small group of WZ PBŚ students, so future research may include a wider group of employees from different organizations. Practical implications: The article provides information on the employee's perspective on the motives for using remote work and its frequency. Social implications: The article addresses issues of work-life balance implications, employee well-being, changing the way we interact socially and sustainability. Originality/value: The study provides empirical evidence on how young workers perceive aspects of remote work, what motivates them to work remotely and with what frequency they use it in a post-pandemic environment.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

remote work; society 5.0; super-intelligent society

PL

praca zdalna; społeczeństwo 5.0; superinteligentne społeczeństwo

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: z. 193
• Strony: 545--560
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 46 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Słupska Urszula

• Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6140-9713

Bibliografia

• 1. Abujarour, S., Ajjan, H., Fedorowicz, J., Owens, D. (2021). How Working from Home during COVID-19 Affects Academic Productivity. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 48, pp. 55-64.
• 2. Asatiani, A. Norström, L. (2023). Information systems for sustainable remote workplaces, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 32(3), 101789.
• 3. Bouziri, H., Smith, D., Descatha, A., Dab, W., Jean, K. (2020). Working from home in the time of COVID-19: how to best preserve occupational health? Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 77, 509-510.
• 4. Canals, J., Heukamp, F. (2020). The Future of Management in an AI World Redefining Purpose and Strategy in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Redefining Purpose and Strategy in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Imprint: Palgrave.
• 5. Carayannis, E.G., Ackidilli G., Ziemnowicz, C. (2020). Creative destruction in international trade: Insights from the quadruple and quintuple innovation helix models. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Vol. 11, pp. 1489-1508.
• 6. Carayannis, E.G., Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2022). The Futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as Driving Forces of Future Universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13, pp. 3445-3471.
• 7. Czapran, T. (2023). Management and Society 5.0. Journal of Scientific Papers, Social Development and Security, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 81-90.
• 8. Dolot, A. (2020). Wpływ pandemii COVID-19 na pracę zdalną – perspektywa pracownika. e-mentor, 1(83), pp. 35-43.
• 9. Drewniak, R., Słupska, U., Posadzińska, I. (2020). Leadership and internal relational capital of enterprises. European Research Studies Journal, 23(1), pp. 373-388.
• 10. Du Wall, M. (2019). A superintelligent people-centered society, a few words about the idea of Society 5.0. State and Sosiety, Vol. XIX, No. 2, pp. 11-31.
• 11. Dziennik Ustaw z 2023 r. poz. 240, https://www.dziennikustaw.gov.pl, 15.09.2023.
• 12. Edvardsson, I.R., Oskarsson, G.K. (2011). Knowledge Management and Value Creation in Service Firms. Measuring Business Excellence, 15(4), pp. 7-15.
• 13. Fujiwara, M. (2017). Society 5.0: Japan’s newsociety after Industry 4.0. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Vol. 44, pp. 73-83.
• 14. Gladden, M.E. (2019). Who Will Be the Members of Society 5.0? Towards an Anthropology of Technologically Posthumanized Future Societies. Social Sciences, 8(5), 148.
• 15. Haque, S. (2023). The impact of remote work on HR practices: navigating challenges, embracing, opportunities. European Journal of Human Resource Management Studies, 7(1), pp. 56-83.
• 16. Krogh, G., Nonaka, I. Aben, M. (2001). Making the Most of Your Company's Knowledge: A Strategic Framework. Long Range Planning, 34(4), pp. 421-439.
• 17. Mavrodieva, A.V., Shaw, R. (2020). Disaster and Climate Change Issues in Japan’s Society 5.0 – A Discussion. Sustainability, 12.
• 18. Michaelides, N. (2021). Remote Working and Cyber Security. Literature Review. London: RISCS Research Institiute for Sociotechnikal Cyber Security.
• 19. Milasi, S., González-Vázquez, I., Fernández-Macías, E. (2020). Telework in the EU before and after the COVID-19: where we were, where we head to. Science for Policy Brief, 2-5.
• 20. Modrzyński P., Kolemba, A., Reuben A. (2023). Evolution of the labour market organization – the role and potential of hybrid work for the generation Z. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, Organization and Management, No. 179, pp. 365-393.
• 21. Paliszkiewicz, J., Gołuchowski, J., Koohang, A. (2015). Leadership, trust, and knowledge management in relation to organizational performance: Developing an instrument. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 3(2), pp. 19-35.
• 22. PARP (2021). Aspekty pracy zdalnej z perspektywy pracownika, pracodawcy i gospodarki. Retrieved from: https://www.parp.gov.pl/storage/publications/pdf/Praca_zdalna_last.pdf, 10.10.2023.
• 23. Pereira, A.G., Lima, T.M., Santos, F.C. (2020). Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0:Opportunities and threats. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(5), pp. 3305-3308.
• 24. Pietruszka-Ortyl, A., Ćwiek, M. (2021). Social Facilitators of Specialist Knowledge Dispersion in the Digital Era. Sustainability, 13, 5759.
• 25. Reisinger, H., Fetterer, D. (2021). Forget Flexibility. Your Employees Want Autonomy. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2021/10/forget-flexibility-your-employees-want-autonomy, 20.08.2023.
• 26. Romanowski, R. (2015). Wpływ wsparcia systemów innowacji na rozwój lokalny. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu.
• 27. Saad, L., Jones, J. (2021). Seven in 10 U.S. White-Collar Workers Still Working Remotely. Retrieved from: https://news.gallup.com/poll/348743/seven-u.s.-white-collar-workers-still-working-remotely.aspx, 10.10.2023.
• 28. Shirmohammadi, M., Chan Au, W., Beigi, M. (2022). Remote work and work-life balance: Lessons learned from the covid-19 pandemic and suggestions for HRD practitioners. Human Resource Development International, 25(2), pp. 163-181.
• 29. Shiroishi, Y., Uchiyama, K., Suzuki, N. (2018). Society 5.0: For Human Security and Well-Being. IEE Computer Society, Vol. 51, No. 7, pp. 91-95.
• 30. Ślężak, A. (2012). Przegląd badań dotyczących telepracy. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, No. 30, pp. 219-232.
• 31. Słupska, U. (2023). Knowledge And Relational Competences In Virtual Organisations. Journal of Positive Management, 13(1), pp. 61-74.
• 32. Słupska, U., Drewniak, Z., Karaszewski, R. (2020). Improving internal relations versus shaping the external relations of the enterprise. European Research Studies Journal, 23(1), pp. 572-585.
• 33. Słupska, U., Posadzińska, I., Karaszewski, R. (2019). Knowledge Management and Internal Relational Capital versus the Development of Environmental Relations. Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance, ECMLG 2019, Portugal, pp. 349-356.
• 34. Sokolic, D. (2022). Remote Work and Hybrid Work Organizations. 78th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development, Portugal, pp. 202-213.
• 35. Spreitzer, G., Cameron, L., Garrett, L. (2017). Alternative Work Arrangements: Two Images of the New World of Work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, pp. 473-499.
• 36. StatSoft Poland – data mining, analizy statystyczne, spc, badania innowacyjne, business intelligence. Retrieved from: http://www.statsoft.pl, 15.09.2023.
• 37. Sułkowski, Ł., Kolasinska-Morawska, K., Seliga, R., Morawski, P. (2021). Smart learning technologization in the Economy 5.0—The Polish perspective. Applied Science, 11, 5261.
• 38. Wigert, B. (2022). The Future of Hybrid Work: 5 Key Questions Answered With Data. Retrieved from: https://www.gallup.com/workplace/390632/future-hybrid-work-key-questions-answered-data.aspx, 10.10.2023.
• 39. Wróbel, P. (2021). Zarządzanie zdalnymi pracownikami. Specyfika, wyzwania i rozwiązania. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
• 40. Wróbel, P. (2023). Implementing Full-Time Remote Work in the IT Sector: Consequences and Solution. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, Organization and Management, No. 178, pp. 771-792.
• 41. Wu, S.Z, Zhao, Q., Wu, Y., Jang, J., Huang, X. (2023). Critical Array of Society 5.0. Frontiers of Urban and Rural Planning, 1, 12.
• 42. Yang, L., Holtz, D., Jaffe, S., Suri, S., Sinha, S., Weston, J., Joyce, C., Shah, N., Sherman, K., Hecht, B., Teevan, J. (2022). The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature Human Behaviour, Vol. 6, pp. 43-54.
• 43. Yogesh, K.D., Hughes, D.L., Coombs, C., Constantiou, I., Duan, Y., Edwards, J.S., Gupta, B., Lal, B., Misra, S., Prashant, P., Raman, R., Rana, N.P., Sharma, S.K., Upadhyay, N. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: transforming education, work and life. International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 55, 102211.
• 44. Zalega, T. (2009). Praca zdalna – obraz przemian w Polsce i wybranych krajach Unii Europejskiej. Master of Business Administration, 17(4), pp. 35-45.
• 45. Zhang, X., Ma, Z., Geng, Y., Li, J. (2020). A Study on the Relationship Between Industry 4.0 and the Ecological Civilization Construction. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computers in Education, Springer, pp. 692-700.
• 46. Ziółkowska, K. (2023). Praca zdalna po zmianach w Kodeksie pracy. Radca Prawny. Zeszyty Naukowe, 2(35), pp. 55-72.