Research into Comparative Performance of Different Tillage and Fertilization Systems Applied to Grey Forest Soil of Forest Steppe in Grain Crop Rotation

• Autorzy: Kaminskyi Viktor , Bulgakov Volodymyr , Tkachenko Mykola , Kolomiіets Mykola , Kaminska Valentina , Ptashnik Mykhailo , Ivanovs Semjons , Kiernicki Zbigniew

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/155057

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper summarises the results of the comprehensive scientific research carried out in the form of a two-factor stationary experiment (5 primary tillage systems × 3 fertilization systems) with rotation (2016–2020) of cereal crops (winter wheat – grain maize – spring barley – soybean) in grey forest fine sand and light loam soil. The effectiveness of the tested agricultural production method has been proven by the amplitudes of the actual cropping capacities: winter wheat – 2.80–5.00 t∙ha^–1; grain maize – 4.16–8.89 t∙ha^–1; spring barley – 1.78–4.45 t∙ha^–1; soybean – 1.02–3.17 t∙ha^–1. The rehabilitation of the physical, agrochemical and biological status of the edatope and the consolidation of the physiological processes in the grain cenoses achieved by the systemic approach to the soil tillage and fertilisation have provided for an increase in the natural biological potential of the plough land by a factor of 1.3–1.8 (from 2.96 to 5.21 t∙ha^–1 of grain units, units for the equivalent measuring of different plant cultivation products). Factographic justification has been provided for the environmental, technological and technical-and-economic feasibility of implementing agronomic technologies based on the adaptive combination of mouldboard and non-mouldboard tillage (to a depth of 6–45 cm) and organic and mineral fertilization system (6.5–7.0 t∙ha^–1 of plant cultivation by-products + N₇₀P₅₈K₆₈). In this case, the effective fertility of an area unit in crop rotation reaches 5.72 t∙ha^–1 in grain units, the production cost of raised grain – 117 €∙t^–1, the earning capacity – 788 € (ha∙year) ^–1, the level of plant cultivation profitability – 139%. In the comparable alternatives of the system-based soil tillage (every-year ploughing, subsurface blade tillage and especially tillage with disk implements), the indices estimated above are significantly lower.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

agrotechnology; alternative tillage; fertilization; productivity; soil physics

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 23, nr 12
• Strony: 163--178
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 28 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kaminskyi Viktor

• National Science Center, Institute of Agriculture of NAAS of Ukraine, 2-b, Mashynobudivinіkiv Str., Chabany vil., Kyiv-Sviatoshyn Dist., UA 08162, Kyiv Region, Ukraine

autor

Bulgakov Volodymyr

• National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 15, Heroyiv Oborony Str., Kyiv, UA 03041, Ukraine

autor

Tkachenko Mykola

• National Science Center, Institute of Agriculture of NAAS of Ukraine, 2-b, Mashynobudivinіkiv Str., Chabany vil., Kyiv-Sviatoshyn Dist., UA 08162, Kyiv Region, Ukraine

autor

Kolomiіets Mykola

• National Science Center, Institute of Agriculture of NAAS of Ukraine, 2-b, Mashynobudivinіkiv Str., Chabany vil., Kyiv-Sviatoshyn Dist., UA 08162, Kyiv Region, Ukraine

autor

Kaminska Valentina

• National Science Center, Institute of Agriculture of NAAS of Ukraine, 2-b, Mashynobudivinіkiv Str., Chabany vil., Kyiv-Sviatoshyn Dist., UA 08162, Kyiv Region, Ukraine

autor

Ptashnik Mykhailo

• National Science Center, Institute of Agriculture of NAAS of Ukraine, 2-b, Mashynobudivinіkiv Str., Chabany vil., Kyiv-Sviatoshyn Dist., UA 08162, Kyiv Region, Ukraine

autor

Ivanovs Semjons

• Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Cakstes Blvd. 5, LV 3001 Jelgava, Latvia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9072-1340

autor

Kiernicki Zbigniew

• Lublin University of Technology, ul. Nadbystrzycka 38 D, 20–618 Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Baig, M.N., Gamache P.M. 2009. The Economic, Agronomic and Environmental Impact of No-Till on the Canadian Prairies. Alberta Reduced Tillage Linkages. Canada, 135.
• 2. Baker, J.C., Saxton, E.K., Ritchie, R.W., Chamen, T.C.W., Reicosky, C.D., Ribeiro, F., Justice, S.E., Hobbs, P.R. 2007. No-tillage seeding in conservation agriculture, 2nd Edition, Edited by Baker JC, Saxton EK, Typeset by AMA DataSet Ltd, Preston, UK, 326. Link: https://bit.ly/3fMw2y7
• 3. Borys, N., Küüt, A. 2016. The influence of basic soil tillage methods and weather conditions on the yield of spring barley in forest-steppe conditions. Agronomy Research, 14(2), 317−326.
• 4. Daponte, P., De Vito, L., Glielmo, L., Iannelli, L., Liuzza, D., Picariello F., Silano, G. 2019. A review on the use of drones for precision agriculture. – IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 275, 012022. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/275/1/012022.
• 5. Derpsch, R., Friedrich, T. 2009. Global Overview of Conservation Agriculture Adoption. Proceedings, Lead Paper, 4th World Congress on Conservation Agriculture,. 4–7 February 2009, New Delhi, India, 429–438.
• 6. FAO. 2014. The three principles of conservation agriculture. http://www.fao.org/assets/infographics/CA-principles-infographic.pdf.
• 7. FAO. 2015. Status of the World ́s Soil Resources: Main Report. ITPS, Global Soil Partnership, Rome, Italy, 650.
• 8. Farooq, M., Siddique, K.H.M. (Eds). 2014. Conservation Agriculture. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 665. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11620-4
• 9. Friedrich, T., Kassam, A.H. 2009. Adaption of Conservation Agriculture Technologies: Constraints and Opportunities. IV.
• 10. Glinski, J., Horabik, J., Lipiec, J. 2013. Agrophysics – physics in agriculture and environment. Soil Science Annual, 64(2), 67–80. DOI: 10.2478/ssa-2013-0012
• 11. Gonzalez-Sanchez, E.J., Veroz-Gonzalez, O., Blanco-Roldan, G.L., Marquez-Garsia, F., Carbonell-Bojollo, R. 2015. A renewed view of conservation agriculture and its evolution over the last decade in Spain. Soil & Tillage Research 146, 204–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2014.10.016
• 12. Jury, W.A., Horton, R. 2004. Soil Physics, 6th Edition. Wiley, 384.
• 13. Kaminskyi, V., Gadzalo, J.M., Saiko, V.F., Kornichuk, M.S. 2015. Farming in the 21st century – problems and solutions. Edelweiss, 272. (in Ukrainian)
• 14. Kaminskyi, V., Kolomiiets, L., Bulgakov, V., Olt, J. 2021. An investigation into the state of agricultural lands under water erosion conditions. Agronomy Research, 19(2), 458−471. DOI: 10.15159/AR.21.029
• 15. Kassam A., Friedrich T., Derpsch R., Kienzle J. 2015 Overview of the worldwide spread of agriculture. Field Actions Science Reports 8, 1–11. htpps://jornals.openedition.org/facts.reports/3966
• 16. Kolomiiets, L.P., Shevchenko, I.P., Tereshchenko, O.M. 2019. Agroecological effectiveness of soil protection technologies in the system of contour-reclamation organization of land use. Bulletin of Agricultural Science 12, 5–12. (in Ukrainian) DOI: 10.31073/agrovisnyk201912-01
• 17. Kravchuk, V.I., Novohatsky, M.L., Gusar, V.G. 2019. Synthesis of technical and technological decisions for opening and use of resources of agrarian biosphere. Proceedings of UkrNDIP-VT, 24(38), 193-2001. (in Ukrainian). DOI: 10.31473/2305-59-87-2019-1-24
• 18. Larocque, G.R. 2020. Ecological Forest Management handbook. 1st Ed. CRC Press, 624.
• 19. Lindwall, C.W., Sonntag, B. (Eds). 2010. Landscape Transformed: The History of Conservation Tillage and Direct Seeding. Knowledge Impact in Society. Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan, 220.
• 20. Marandola D., Belligiano A., Romagnoli L., Ievoli C. 2019. The spread of no-till in conservation agriculture systems in Italy: indicators for rural development policy-making. Agricultural and Food Economics, 7. DOI: 10.1186/S40100-019-0126-8
• 21. Marshall, T.J., Holmes, J.W., Rose, C.W. 1996. Soil Physics. 3dr Edition. Cambridge University Press, UK, 472.
• 22. Medvedev, V.V. 2013. Agro- and ecophysics. Harkov, Polesataya Publishing, 312. (in Russian)
• 23. Morgan, R.P.C. 2005. Soil Erosion and Conservation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 304.
• 24. Morgan, R.P.C. 2006. Managing sediment in the landscape: Current practices and future vision. Soil erosion and Sediment Redistribution in River Catchments: Measurement, Modelling and Management, 287–295.
• 25. Shukla, M.K. 2014. Soil Physics. An Introduction. CRC Press, 478.
• 26. Souza, R., Hartzell, S., Ferraz, A.P.F., Almeida, A.Q., Lima, J.R.S.L., Antonino, A.C.D., Souza, E.S. 2021. Dynamics of soil penetration resistance in water-controlled environments. Soil and Tillage Research, 205, 104768, DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104768
• 27. Stanojevic, A.B. 2021. Conservation agriculture and its principles. Annals of Environmental Science and Toxicology 5(1), 018.022. DOI: 10.17352/aest.00031
• 28. Tarariko, O.H., Ilienko, T.V., Kuchma, T.L., Novakovska, I.O. 2019. Satellite agroecological monitoring within the system of sustainable environmental management. Agricultural Science and Practice 6(1), 18–27.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).