Project monitoring model in central governmental administration

Tomasz, Janka

doi:10.29119/1641-3466.2024.194.8

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Project monitoring model in central governmental administration

Autorzy

Tomasz Janka

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.194.8

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Purpose: The aim of this article is to present the project monitoring model in the central government administration as a set of interrelated, complementary elements that influence the implementation of strategic projects on a nationwide scale and affect tens of millions of Polish citizens. Design/methodology/approach: Based on a literature review and analysis of the existing system, prospective directions for the monitoring of strategic projects were selected. As a result of this work, a model was created that was assessed for significance and replicability. The most experienced group of experts and practitioners in this field took part in the CAWI survey. Findings: The high level of significance of all areas of the model has been proven and its universal nature has been confirmed, thanks to the possibility of being used in other administrative units. Research limitations/implications: Due to limitations resulting from security procedures for research conducted in central government administration units, only closed questions were used in the research. In the future, the study can be carried out on another, larger population, having previously prepared it appropriately. Practical implications: The practical use of the model in administration units can contribute to increasing transparency, efficiency and automation of planning and implementation of projects. Social implications: Increasing the quality of implemented projects in accordance with the presented model may have a large, positive impact on the final beneficiaries - society, in terms of effective use of public funds, shortened project implementation time, and obtaining project results consistent with expectations. Originality/value: The article presents a new model of project monitoring in central government administration, which may be useful for scientists conducting research in the area of project monitoring and management in other countries. The article falls into the area of projectification of the public sector.

Słowa kluczowe

project management central government administration Project Management Office PMO feasibility assessment significance assessment

zarządzanie projektami centralna administracja rządowa Biuro Zarządzania Projektami PMO ocena wykonalności

Wydawca

Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej

Czasopismo

Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska

Rocznik

2024

Tom

z. 194

Strony

131--157

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 100 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Tomasz Janka

tomasz.janka.dokt@pw.edu.pl

Faculty of Management, Warsaw University of Technology

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9632-1180

Bibliografia

1 Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J. (2015). Stakeholder dynamics during the project front-end: the case of nuclear waste repository projects. Project Management Journal, 46(6), 15-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21549
2 Aleinikova, O., Kravchenko, S., Hurochkina, V., Zvonar, V., Brechko, O., Buryk, Z. (2020). Project Management Technologies in Public Administration. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 23(5), 564-576.
3 Ariyanti, V. (2023). A readiness assessment of an Indonesian pilot project: Case study Kedungputri, a premium irrigation area, Central Java. Irrigation and Drainage. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2796
4 Artto, K.A., Dietrich, P.H. (2007). Strategic Business Management through Multiple Projects. In: The Wiley Guide to Managing Projects. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172391.ch7
5 Artto, K., Martinsuo, M., Gemünden, H.G., Murtoaro, J. (2009). Foundations of program management: A bibliometric view. International Journal of Project Management, 27(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.10.007 Avny, A. (2022). Public Administration in the Post-modern Era. Journal of Economics & Management Research, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.47363/JESMR/2022(3)166
7. Axelos. (2013). Portfolio, Programme and Project Offices. The Stationery Office.
8. Babbie, E. (2010). Practice of Social Research. Practice of, Vol. 54, Iss. 2. https://www.worldcat.org/title/662584565
9. Bertot, J., Estevez, E., Janowski, T. (2016). Universal and contextualized public services: Digital public service innovation framework. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2016.05.004
10. Bianchi, C., Nasi, G., Rivenbark, W.C. (2021). Implementing collaborative governance: models, experiences, and challenges. Public Management Review, 23(11), 1581-1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1878777
11. BiznesAlert (2020). Tauron appreciated for its level of project management. https://biznesalert.pl/tauron-nagroda-zarzadzanie-energetyka/
12. Blasco, A., Jung, O.S., Lakhani, K.R., Menietti, M. (2016). Motivating Effort in Contributing to Public Goods Inside Organizations: Field Experimental Evidence. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2769721
13. Bukłaha, E., Trzeciak, M. (2023). HR controlling in project management - selected issues. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management, 185.
14. CMMI (2010). Capability Maturity Model Integration. Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University. https://resources.sei.cmu.edu/library/asset-view.cfm?assetid=9661
15. Correia, A., Água, P.B. (2023). Innovation, strategy, and transformation frameworks for the modern enterprise. In: Innovation, Strategy, and Transformation Frameworks for the Modern Enterprise. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0458-7
16. Crawford, J.K. (2010). The Strategic Project Office. In: The Strategic Project Office. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10153
17. Crawford, L. (2004). Patterns of support for corporate delivery capabilities. PMSA Global Knowledge, 1-13.
18. De Chastelain Finnigan, K., Anzum, F., Rokne, J., Gavrilova, M.L. (2022). Weighted Lexicon-based Sentiment Analysis for Women Career Traits in Information Technology. Proceedings of 2022 IEEE 21st International Conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing, ICCI*CC 2022, 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCICC57084.2022.10101520
19. Dick-Sagoe, C., Lee, K.Y., Odoom, D., Boateng, P.O. (2023). Stakeholder perceptions on causes and effects of public project failures in Ghana. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01497-7
20. Dinsmore, P.C. (1999). Winning in Business with Enterprise Project Management. American Management Association.
21. Donovan, B. (2013). Policing the Agile Expressway. Project Management Journal, 2(1).
22. Drahošová, S., Čajková, A. (2022). Stop bureaucracy reforms — case study in public administration in Slovakia, 244-255. https://doi.org/10.56889/HUHS2803
23. du Toit, J. (2016). Can we augment web responses with telephonic responses to a graduate destination survey? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(4), 560-574. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1033613
24. Elmualim, A., Gilder, J. (2014). BIM: Innovation in design management, influence and challenges of implementation. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 10(3-4), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2013.821399
25. Eskerod, P., Huemann, M., Savage, G. (2015). Project stakeholder management-past and present. Project Management Journal, 46(6), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21555
26. Fedchenko, E., Gusarova, L., Timkin, T., Gryzunova, N., Bilczak, M., Frumina, S. (2023). Methodology for an Audit of Institutional Projects in the Energy Sector. Energies, 16(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083535
27. Freeman, R.E., Martin, K., Parmar, B. (2007). Stakeholder capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9517-y
28. Fujitsu (2020). Client Challenges Taking Control of IT-Enabled Investments Project Management Expertise.
29. García-Gutiérrez, F.M., Pino-Zavaleta, F., Romero-Robles, M.A., Patino-Villena, A.F., Jauregui-Cornejo, A.S., Benites-Bullón, A., Goméz-Mendoza, A., Alarcon-Ruiz, C.A., Huapaya-Huertas, O. (2023). Self-reported perceptions and knowledge of telemedicine in medical students and professionals who enrolled in an online course in Peru. BMC Medical Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04058-x
30. Geldres-Weiss, V.V., Gambetta, N., Massa, N.P., Geldres-Weiss, S.L. (2021). Materiality Matrix Use in Aligning and Determining a Firm’s Sustainable Business Model Archetype and Triple Bottom Line Impact on Stakeholders. Sustainability, Vol. 13, 13(3), 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13031065
31. Geraldi, J., Lechter, T. (2012). Gantt charts revisited: A critical analysis of its roots and implications to the management of projects today. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 578-594. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371211268889
32. Greve, C., Ejersbo, N., L^greid, P., Rykkja, L.H. (2020). Unpacking Nordic Administrative Reforms: Agile and Adaptive Governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(8), 697-710. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1645688
33. Gutiérrez, E., Magnusson, M. (2014). Dealing with legitimacy: A key challenge for Project Portfolio Management decision makers. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2013.01.002
34. Haut, E.R., Kirby, J.P., Bailey, J.A., Phuong, J., Gavitt, B., Remick, K.N., Staudenmayer, K., Cannon, J.W., Price, M.A., Bulger, E.M., Arabian, S.S., Winchell, R. (2023). Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the trauma systems and informatics panel Delphi survey. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 94(4), 584591. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003867
35. Heerkens, G. (2003). How to manage projects. RM.
36. Heldal, E., Cruz, J.R., Arnadottir, T., Tardencilla, A., Enarson, D.A. (1997). Successful management of a National Tuberculosis Programme under conditions of war. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 1(1), 16-24.
37. Hosseinzadeh, K., Rafiei, H. (2019). Nursing Student Attitudes toward Euthanasia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nursing Ethics, 26(2), 496-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017718393
38. IAASB (2013). International Standard on Auditing.
39. IIRC (2021). The international Integrated Reporting framework. The International Framework, 37.
40. Ika, L.A. (2012). Project Management for Development in Africa: Why Projects are Failing and What Can be Done about It. Project Management Journal, 43(4), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/PMJ.21281
41. Ika, L.A., Hodgson, D. (2014). Learning from international development projects: Blending Critical Project Studies and Critical Development Studies. International Journal of Project Management, 32(7), 1182-1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2014.01.004
42. Internacional Project Management Association. (2015). IPMA Competence Baseline. Internacional Project Management Association.
43. Janka, T., Szymborska, M., Kwiatek, K., Nocoń, M., Duma, J., Charchuła, P., Karpińska, A. (2020). Recommendations for managing strategic projects.
44. Jonas, D. (2010). Empowering project portfolio managers: How management involvement impacts project portfolio management performance. International Journal of Project Management, 28(8), 818-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2010.07.002
45. Jorgensen, M., Welde, M., Halkjelsvik, T. (2023). Evaluation of Probabilistic Project Cost Estimates. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(10), 3481-3496. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3067050
46. Joslin, B., Langman, C., Nishi, L., Ghossein, C. (2020). Assessing success in transitioning of young adults from pediatric to adult kidney practice. BMC Nephrology, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1665-7
47. Kaye, L.K., Darker, G.M., Rodriguez-Cuadrado, S., Wall, H.J., Malone, S.A. (2022). The Emoji Spatial Stroop Task: Exploring the impact of vertical positioning of emoji on emotional processing. Computers in Human Behavior, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107267
48. Khwaja, N., O’Brien, W.J., Martinez, M., Sankaran, B., O’Connor, J.T., Hale, W.B. (2018). Innovations in Project Delivery Method Selection Approach in the Texas Department of Transportation. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(6). https://doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000645
49. Killen, C.P., Hunt, R.A. (2010). Dynamic capability through project portfolio management in service and manufacturing industries. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3(1), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371011014062
50. Ko, O.-Y., Paek, J.-H. (2008). Korea experience project management consortium on the U.S. Forces Korea Relocation Program. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 7(1), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.7.85
51. Kosieradzka, A., Janka, T. (2019). The New Approach to the Strategic Project Management in the Polish Public Administration. Foundations of Management. https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2019-0012
52. Kuczyńska, E., Nepelski, M. (2021). Project Management in Public Administration. Risks and Challenges. Internal Security, 13(2), 23-24. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.6555
53. Kupi, M., McBride, K. (2021). Agile Development for Digital Government Services: Challenges and Success Factors. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 12849, LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82824-0_11
54. Lakanmaa, R.-L., Suominen, T., Ritmala-Castrén, M., Vahlberg, T., Leino-Kilpi, H. (2015). Basic competence of intensive care unit nurses: Cross-sectional survey study. BioMed Research International, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/536724
55. Lechler, T.G., Thomas, J.L. (2015). Examining new product development project termination decision quality at the portfolio level: Consequences of dysfunctional executive advocacy. International Journal of Project Management, 33(7), 1452-1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2015.04.001
56. Lima, A., Fernandes, G., Machado, R.J. (2018). Mapping between PMI and OGC Artefacts for Project Portfolio Management. 9th International Conference on Intelligent Systems 2018: Theory, Research and Innovation in Applications, IS 2018 - Proceedings, 754-762. https://doi.org/10.1109/IS.2018.8710566
57. Lundqvist, S. (2017). Are PMOs really that momentous for public authorities? International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 5(3), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm050303
58. Lycett, M., Rassau, A., Danson, J. (2004). Programme management: A critical review. International Journal of Project Management, 22(4), 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijproman.2003.06.001
59. Lyudmila, P., Anzhela, H. (2022). Main directions for improving public administration mechanisms in Ukraine. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 9(8), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.21833/IJAAS.2022.08.005
60. Ma, W., Hong, S., Reed, W.R., Duan, J., Luu, P. (2023). Yield effects of agricultural cooperative membership in developing countries: A meta-analysis. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12411
61. Marocco, M., Cacciaguerra, E., Garofolo, I. (2023). An operational framework for implementing digital systems in public administrations’ processes in the design phase, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2187752
62. Martinsuo, M. (2013). Project portfolio management in practice and in context. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 794-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/ J.IJPROMAN.2012.10.013
63. Martinsuo, M., Ahola, T. (2022). Multi-project management in inter-organizational contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 40(7), 813-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.09.003
64. Martinsuo, M., Hoverfält, P. (2018). Change program management: Toward a capability for managing value-oriented, integrated multi-project change in its context. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 134-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman. 2017.04.018
65. Maylor, H. (1996). Project management. Pitman Publishing.
66. Mergel, I., Dickinson, H., Stenvall, J., Gasco, M. (2023). Implementing AI in the public sector. Public Management Review, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2231950
67. Meyers, D.J., Filkins, M., Bangura, A.H., Sharma, R., Baruwal, A., Pande, S., Halliday, S., Schwarz, D., Schwarz, R.K., Maru, D.S.R. (2017). Management challenges in mHealth: Failures of a mobile community health worker surveillance programme in rural Nepal. BMJ Innovations, 3(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2015-000102
68. Montenegro, T.M., Celente, A.L.I. (2016). The Public-Sector Auditing as an Accountability Instrument - A Case Study in the Brazilian Navy. Revista de Gestao e Projetos, 7(3), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.5585/GEP.V7I3.345
69. Mulder, L. (1997). The importance of a common project management method in the corporate environment. R and D Management, 27(3), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00056
70. Munns, A.K., Bjeirmi, B.F. (1996). The role of project management in achieving project success. International Journal of Project Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00057-7
71. Office Of Government Commerce (2009). Managing Successful Projects With Prince2, Vol. 6, Iss. 10.
72. Office Of Government Commerce (2011). Management of portfolios. AXELOS. https://books.google.pl/books?hl=pl&lr=&id=JwvwHxnt9TEC&oi=fnd&pg=PP7&dq=ma nagement+of+portfolios&ots=oBzki5Y5kR&sig=M5fi3T2UasIpHDQcv1vS_zymFTY&r edir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=management of portfolios&f=false
73. Olander, S., Landin, A. (2005). Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23(4), 321-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.002
74. Pellegrinelli, S. (2011). What’s in a name: Project or programme? International Journal of Project Management, 29(2), 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2010.02.009
75. Pinto, J.K. (1998). Power and politics in project management. Project Management Institute.
76. SRD Resolution, 206 (in Polish: “Uchwała Rady Ministrów w sprawie przyjęcia Strategii na rzecz Odpowiedzialnego Rozwoju do roku 2020 (z prespektywą do 2030 r.)”) (2017). http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WMP20170000260/O/M20170260.pdf
77. The Act on Government Administration Parts - Dz.U.2022.2512 (2022). https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20220002512
78. Priyanta, M., Zulkarnain, C.S.A. (2023). Sustainable Infrastructure Legal Policy in Indonesia: A National Strategic Project Approach for National Development. Sriwijaya Law Review, 7(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss1.1108.pp1-18
79. Project Management Institute (2001). Management de projet un référentiel de connaissances. AFNOR, 8.
80. Project Management Institute (2008). Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). In: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) -Fourth Edition. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
81. Project Management Institute (2013). The Standard for Portfolio Management - Third Edition. www.PMI.org
82. Project Management Institute (2014). Project Management Institute Annual Report 2014. http://www.pmi.org/default.aspx
83. Project Management Institute (2019, June). Strefa PMI. https://doi.org/ISSN 2353-3137
84. Radvanský, M., Lichner, I., Frank, K. (2022). Performance management of European Structural and Investment Funds—The case of Slovakia. Public Money & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2022.2144542
85. Raikou, N., Konstantopoulou, G. (2021). Tracing emerging adulthood on university students: the case of medicine school at a greek university. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 6(4), https://doi.org/10.46827/EJSSS.V6I4.1074
86. Rose, K.H. (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) - Fifth Edition. Project Management Journal, 44(3), e1-e1. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21345
87. Sukma, D.R., Hardianto, R., Studi Kehutanan, P., Kehutanan, F., Lancang Kuning, U. (2022). Perencanaan Wisata Air Terjun Aek Martua Dengan Konsep Media Digital. Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Multidisiplin (JURKIM), 2(1), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.31849/ JURKIM.V2I1.9169
88. Tomo, A. (2018). Bureaucracy, Post-Bureaucracy, or Anarchy? Evidence from the Italian Public Administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(6), 482-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1485045
89. Trocki, M., Grucza, B. (2004). Analiza interesariuszy. Bizzare.
90. Trois, C., Weingaertner, D., Pasqualin, D., Maciel, E., Almeida, E., Silva, F., Tissot, H., Bona, L.C.E., Castilho, M., Didonet, M., Sunye, M. (2017). Transparency meets management: A monitoring and evaluating tool for governmental projects. Proceedings of IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA, 2017-October, 1429-1435. https://doi.org/10.1109/AICCSA.2017.17
91. Turner, R., Zolin, R. (2012). Forecasting success on large projects: Developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21289
92. Vargas, C., Brimblecombe, J., Allender, S., Whelan, J. (2023). Co-creation of healthenabling initiatives in food retail: academic perspectives. BMC Public Health, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15771-z
93. Vento, I. (2023). The consequences of the temporary employment of project managers for public innovation: An analysis of EU projects in Finland. Public Money & Management, 43(4), 349-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1971868
94. Villalobos, K., Ishino, F.A.M., McNeel, T.S., Williams, F. (2022). Examining the relationship of sociodemographic factors, neighborhood cohesion and abnormal sleep duration among U.S. foreign-born subpopulations in the National Health Interview Survey. BMC Public Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13523-z
95. Wanapaisan, S., Suwannasart, T., Methawachananont, A. (2013). An approach for monitoring software development using timesheet and project plan. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science, 2202, 511-515.
96. Wankel, C., DeFillippi, B. (2005). Educating managers through real world projects. In: Research in management education and development.
97. Wirtz, B.W., Müller, W.M. (2019). An integrated artificial intelligence framework for public management. Public Management Review, 21(7), 1076-1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1549268
98. Wolniak, R. (2022). Project Management Standards. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management, 160, 639. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.160.41
99. Wyskwarski, M. (2022). Responsibilites of project managers. A text mining analysis of job advertisements. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management, 161.
100. Young, M.M., Bullock, J.B., Lecy, J.D. (2019). Artificial Discretion as a Tool of Governance: A Framework for Understanding the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Public Administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(4), 301313. https://doi.org/10.1093/PPMGOV/GVZ014

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-ee1872ea-fd04-463a-83a2-0a89498b5ea2