Influence of Growth Regulators with Anti–Stress Activity on Productivity Parameters of Sinapis alba L.

• Autorzy: Butenko Sergey , Melnyk Andrii , Melnyk Tetiana , Jia Peipei , Kolosok Volodymyr

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/151780

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The research results of using growth regulators with anti-stress action which stimulated growth and development of plants, and provided them with resistance to adverse factors during the vegetation period, were presented. The use of plant growth regulators with anti–stress effect on Sinapis alba L. increased the plant resistance to adverse environmental influences, providing adaptation to changing environmental conditions, i.e. it has a stress–correcting effect throughout the whole vegetation period. The result of using drugs on mustard (Sinapis alba L.) was obtaining a significant and stable additional seed yield (0.57 t·ha^-1), i.e. an increase in yield by 38%. Over the years of research, the most effective were the applications of Fast Start and Biofoge growth regulators. The most effective processing terms were: during the vegetation period as well as combination of seed treatment and application during the vegetation period.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

individual productivity; variety; yield; ecological adaptability; stress-correcting action; vegetation period

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 23, nr 9
• Strony: 128--135
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Butenko Sergey

• Sumy National Agrarian University, H. Kondratieva St., 160, Sumy, 40021, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9925-3029

autor

Melnyk Andrii

• Sumy National Agrarian University, H. Kondratieva St., 160, Sumy, 40021, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7318-6262

autor

Melnyk Tetiana

• Sumy National Agrarian University, H. Kondratieva St., 160, Sumy, 40021, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3839-6018

autor

Jia Peipei

• School of Life Science and Technology, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Hualan, St., 90, 453003, Xinxiang, People’s Republic of China

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0454-6695

autor

Kolosok Volodymyr

• Sumy National Agrarian University, H. Kondratieva St., 160, Sumy, 40021, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5550-6058

Bibliografia

• 1. Bani-Saeedi A. 2001. Examination of different amount of nitrogen and density on growth, quantity and quality characters in canola, in Khozestan climate condition. Thesis of MSc, Dezfool University, Dezfool, 187. (in Persian)
• 2. Burton W.A., Pymer S.J., Salisbury P.A., Kirk J.T.O., Oram R.N. 1999. Performance of Australian canola quality Brassica juncea breeding lines. In: Wratten, N., P.A. Salisbury, (Eds.), 10th International Rapeseed Congress, 113–115.
• 3. Dospekhov B.A. 1985. Methods of field experience. Kolos, Moscow, 351. (in Russian)
• 4. Hryhoriv Y., Butenko A., Nechyporenko V., Lyshenko M., Ustik T., Zubko V., Makarenko N., Mushtai V. 2021. Economic efficiency of Camelina sativa growing with nutrition optimization under conditions of Precarpathians of Ukraine. Agraarteadus, 32(2), 232–238. DOI: 10.15159/jas.21.33
• 5. Karbivska U., Masyk I., Butenko A., Onychko V., Onychko T., Kriuchko L., Rozhko V., Karpenko O., Kozak M. 2022a. Nutrient Balance of Sod–Podzolic Soil Depending on the Productivity of Meadow Agrophytocenosis and Fertilization. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 23(2), 70–77. DOI: 10.12912/27197050/144957
• 6. Karbivska U., Asanishvili N., Butenko A., Rozhko V., Karpenko O., Sykalo О., Chernega T., Masyk I., Chyrva A., Kustovska A. 2022b. Changes in Agrochemical Parameters of Sod-Podzolic Soil Depending on the Productivity of Cereal Grasses of Different Ripeness and Methods of Tillage in the Carpathian Region. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 23(1), 55–63. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/143863
• 7. Keivanrad S., Delkhosh B., Hossein A., Rad S., Zandi P. 2012. The Effect of Different Rates of Nitrogen and Plant Density on Qualitative and Quantitative traits of Indian mustard. Advances in Environmental Biology, 6, 145–152.
• 8. Kernasyuk Y. 2015. Export trend – niche crops. Agribusiness today, 4, 23–25. (in Ukrainian)
• 9. Kozina T.V. 2013. Improving individual elements of varietal technology of growing white mustard in the Western Forest-Steppe: author’s ref. dis. for science. degree of Cand. s.-g. Science: 06.01.09. Kamianets-Podilskyi, 20. (in Ukrainian)
• 10. Kurmi K. 2002. Influence of sowing date on the performance of rapeseed and mustard varieties under rainfed situation of Southern Assam. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 19(2), 197–198. DOI: 10.31018/jans.v9i2.1292
• 11. Kvitko M., Getman N., Butenko A., Demydas G., Moisiienko V., Stotska S., Burko L., Onychko V. 2021. Factors of increasing alfalfa yield capacity under conditions of the Forest–steppe. Agraarteadus. Journal of Agricultural Science, 1(32), 59–66. DOI: 10.15159/jas.21.10
• 12. Melnyk A.V., Zherdetska S.V. 2015. Status and prospects of mustard cultivation in the world and in Ukraine. Bulletin of Sumy NAU, 3, 166−169. (in Ukrainian)
• 13. Melnyk A.V., Zherdetska S.V. 2017. Influence of doses of mineral fertilizers on the yield of spring blue mustard in the north-eastern forest-steppe of Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of the National University of Bioresources and Nature Management of Ukraine. Kyiv, 269, 177–185. (in Ukrainian)
• 14. Mishchenko Y., Kovalenko I., Butenko A., Danko Y., Trotsenko V., Masyk I., Zakharchenko E., Hotvianska A., Kyrsanova G., Datsko O. 2022a. Post-Harvest Siderates and Soil Hardness. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 23(3), 54–63. DOI: 10.12912/27197050/147148
• 15. Mishchenko Y., Kovalenko I., Butenko A., Danko Y., Trotsenko V., Masyk I., Radchenko M., Hlupak Z., Stavytskyi A. 2022b. Microbiological Activity of Soil Under the Influence of Post–Harvest Siderates. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 23(4), 122-127. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/146612
• 16. Mohylyanska N.A. 2014. Current state and prospects of oilseeds processing. Cereals and animal feed, 1(53), 22–25. (in Ukrainian)
• 17. Moiseeva M. 2020. World oil market. Proposal: The main journal on agribusiness. https://propozitsiya.com/ua/svitoviy-rinok-oliynih (in Ukrainian)
• 18. Oksimets O.L. 2007. Productivity of white mustard depending on technological methods of cultivation in the Forest-Steppe: author’s ref. dis. for science. degree of Cand. s.-g. Science: special. 06.01.09. “Crop production”. Kyiv, 18. (in Ukrainian)
• 19. Piri I., Rahimi A., Tavassoli A., Rastegaripour F., Babaeian M. 2012. Effect of sulphur fertilizer on sulphur uptake and forage yield of Brassica juncea in condition of different regimes of irrigation. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7, 958–963.
• 20. Proposition. 2017. Ukraine is in the TOP-3 countries of mustard producers in the world. https://propozitsiya.com/ua/ukrayina-vhodyt-u-top-3-krayin-vyrobnykiv-girchycisvitu (in Ukrainian)
• 21. Rieznik S., Havva D., Butenko A., Novosad K. 2021. Biological activity of chernozems typical of different farming practices. Agraarteadus, 32(2), 307–313. DOI: 10.15159/jas.21.34
• 22. Rika Y.A. 2019. Effect on Growth and Yield of Mustard (Brassica juncea) to Addition of Coal Bottom Ash and Organic Matter Journal Agrosainstek: Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Pertanian, 2(1), 40-43. DOI: 10.33019/agrosainstek.v2i1.17
• 23. Saiko V.F. 2005. Recommendations for growing spring rape and white mustard: scientific and methodological publication. Kyiv, Kolobig, 36. (in Ukrainian)
• 24. Saiko V.F., Kaminskyi V.F., Vyshnivskyi P.S., Hudenko L.V., Korniichuk M.S., Buslaieva N.H., Shliakhturov D.S. 2011. Fetures of studying cruciferous oilseeds. Kyiv, 76. (in Ukrainian)
• 25. Saleem M., Cheema M.A., Malik M.A. 2001. Agroeconomic assessment of canola planted under different levels of nitrogen and row spacing. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 3, 27–30.
• 26. Sharma D.K., Kumar A. 1990. Effect of nitrogen on yield, uptake, recovery and nitrogen use efficiency of mustard under different irrigation scheduling. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 38, 229–232.
• 27. Shuvar I.A., Boyko I.E., Lis N.M., Vereshchinsky R.A. 2009. White mustard and its effective use in the biologization of agriculture. Lviv: LNAU, 69. (in Ukrainian)
• 28. Volkodav V.V. 2000. Methods of state varietal testing of agricultural crops State Commission of Ukraine for Testing and Protection of Plant Varieties. Kyiv, 2000. (in Ukrainian)
• 29. Voloshin P. 2017. Ukrainian oil products meet international standards National Industrial Portal. http://uprom.info/news/agro/ukrayinska-oliyna-produktsiya-vidpovidayemizhnarodnim-standartam/ (in Ukrainian)
• 30. Vovchenko Y.V. 2009. Features of growth and development of mustard species depending on weather conditions of the growing season. Bulletin of Kharkiv National Agrarian University, 4, 65–73. (in Ukrainian)
• 31. Zangani E., Kashani A., Fathi G.H., Mesgarbashi M. 2006. Effect and efficiency of nitrogen levels on quantitative and qualitative yield and yield components of two cultivars of rapeseed in Ahvaz region. Iranian J. Agric. Sci., 37, 39–45. (in Persian)
• 32. Zhernova N.P. 2011. Improvement of techniques of technology of white mustard cultivation in the conditions of the southern steppe of Ukraine: author’s ref. dis. for science. degree of Cand. s.-g. Science: 06.01.09. Kherson, 16. (in Ukrainian)
• 33. Zhuikov O.G. 2015. Agrobiological substantiation of the complex of technological methods of growing mustard species in the southern steppe of Ukraine: author’s ref. dis. for science. degree of Dr. s.-g. Science: 06.01.09. Kherson, 40. (in Ukrainian)