Effects of intergraded farming on herbal and bird species diversity in Czech agricultural landscapes

• Autorzy: Štefanova M. , Šálek M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Negative impacts from application of fertilizers and pesticides in agriculture have been observed since the mid-20th century, when their use rapidly increased. This led to decrease in the number of species connected to the agricultural landscape. So-called integrated farming practices are currently being introduced that aim to mitigate negative impacts on the environment and to stabilize the numbers of wild flora and fauna. A number of studies have examined the positive influence of integrate and organic farming as modern agricultural practices in a European perspective. The positive impact of these practices is particularly evident in plants and invertebrates studied in Italy, Austria, Germany and the UK, for example. There is little such data from Central and Eastern Europe, however, even as the region has specific environmental conditions due especially to the more moderate impact of agriculture there during the second half of the 20th century. In this study, we compared the numbers of herbal and bird species on crop fields and meadows managed with conventional versus integrated systems in Southern and Central Bohemia, the Czech Republic. Our analysis included also the effects of land parcel size, position within these parcels and presence of other habitat elements (ditch, tree, field roads, dunghill, field margins – boundaries, bushes, fallow area) in the vicinity of study plots. We found that herbal communities were significantly more species-rich on lands with integrated farming and similar results were obtained in the case of birds, except there was a non-significant effect of integrated farming on bird species richness in meadows. In addition, the species richness of plants decreased as land parcel size increased. In conclusion, herbal and bird communities were shown to benefit more distinctively from integrated farming in Central Europe, where this effect is not considered unambiguous due to the higher overall habitat heterogeneity and historically lower burdening of farmland with pesticides and fertilizers. The results support the idea that it makes sense even here to introduce integrated forms of agricultural practice.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

agricultural intensification; biodiversity; bird communities; conventional agriculture; integrated farming; plant communities

PL

intensyfikacja rolnictwa; bioróżnorodność; ptaki; rolnictwo konwencjonalne; rolnictwo zintegrowane; zbiorowiska roślinne

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 62, nr 1
• Strony: 147--162
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 60 poz., il.

Twórcy

autor

Štefanova M.

• Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, CZ-165 21, Czech Republic

autor

Šálek M.

• Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, CZ-165 21, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• 1. Anonym 2012 – http://www.czso.cz/cz/cr_1989_ts/0901.pdf. Cited 15. 12. 2012.
• 2. Andreska J. 1990 – Změny složení avifauny polní krajiny v důsledku změn vegetace v letech 1948–1988 [Changes in the composition of avifauna of field landscapes as a result of vegetation changes during the years 1948– 1988] (In: Ptáci v kulturní krajině – Sborník přednášek z II. jihočeské ornitologické konference konané ve dnech 25. a 26. února 1989 v Českých Budějovicích [Birds in cultural landscape – A collection of papers from the 2nd South Bohemian Ornithological Conference held 25–26 February 1989 in České Budějovice]), díl 1, pp. 1–6 (in Czech).
• 3. Aviron S., Kindlmann P., Burel F. 2007 – Conservation of butterfly populations in dynamic landscapes: The role of farming practices and landscape mosaic – Ecol. Model. 205: 135–145.
• 4. Báldi A., Batáry P., Erdös S. 2005 – Effects of grazing intensity on bird assemblages and populations of Hungarian grasslands – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 108: 251–263.
• 5. Báldi A., Faragó S. 2007 – Long-term changes of farmland game populations in a post-socialist country (Hungary) – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 118: 307–311.
• 6. Batár y P., Báldi A. 2004 – Evidence of an edge effect on avian nest success – Conserv. Biol. 18: 389–400.
• 7. Batáry P., Matthiesen T., Tscharntke T. 2010 – Landscape-moderated importance of hedges in conserving farmland bird diversity of organic vs. conventional croplands and grasslands – Conserv. Biol. 143: 2020–2027.
• 8. Belfrage K., Björklund J., Salomonsson L. 2005 – The effects of farm size and organic farming on diversity of birds, pollinators and plants in a Swedish landscape – Ambio, 34: 582–588.
• 9. Bengtsson J., Ahnström J., Weibull A. 2005 – The effects of organic farming on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis – J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 261–269.
• 10. Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D., Hill D.A. 1992 – Bird Census Techniques – Academic Press, London.
• 11. Chamberlain D.E., Wilson J.D., Fuller R.J., Bunce R.G.H., Duckworth J.C., Shrubb M. 2000 – Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales – J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 771–788.
• 12. Culek M. (ed.) 1996 – Biogeografické členění České republiky [Biogeographical division of the Czech Republic] – Enigma, Praha (in Czech).
• 13. Darnhofer I., Lindenthal T., Bartel-Kratochvil R., Zollitsch W. 2010 – Conventionalisation of organic farming practices: from structural criteria towards an assessment based on organic principles. A review – Agron. Sustain. Dev. 30: 67–81.
• 14. Donald P.F., Green R.E., Heath M.F. 2001 – Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe´s farmland bird populations – Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 268: 25–29.
• 15. Dutton A., Edwards-Jones G., Strachan R., Macdonald D.W. 2008 – Ecological and social challenges to biodiversity conservation on farmland: reconnecting habitats on a landscape scale – Mamm. Rev. 38: 205–219.
• 16. Eurostat 2012 – http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database. Cited 21. 3. 2012.
• 17. Fischera C., Flohre A., Clement, Lars W., Batáry P., Weiserr, Wolfgang W., Tschrantke T., Theis C. 2011 – Mixed effects of landscape strukture and farming practice on bird diversity – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 141: 119–125.
• 18. Flohre A., Rudnick M., Traser G., Tscharntke T., Eggers T. 2011 – Does soil biota benefit from organic farming in complex vs. simple landscapes? – Agric. Ecosyst. Envi¬ron. 141: 210–214.
• 19. Freemark K.E. 1995 – Assessing effects of agriculture on terrestrial wildlife: developing a hierarchial approach for the US EPA – Landscape Urban Plann. 31: 99–115.
• 20. Freemark K.E., Kirk D.A. 2001 – Birds on organic and conventional farms in Ontario: partitioning effects of habitat and practices on species composition and abundance – Conserv. Biol. 101: 37–350.
• 21. Fuller R.J., Gregory R.D., Gibbons D.W., Marchant J.H., Wilson J.D., Baillie S.R., Carter N. 1995 – Population declines and range contraction among lowland farmland birds in Britain – Conserv. Biol. 9: 1425–1441.
• 22. Geiger F., Bengtsson J., Berendse F., Weisser W.W., Emmerson M., Morales M.B., Ceryngier P., Liira J., Tscharntke T., Winqvist C., Eggers S., Bommarco R., Pärt T., Bretagnolle V., Plantegenest M., Clement L.W., Dennis C., Palmer C., Ońate J.J., Guerrero I., Hawro V., Aavik T., Thies C., Flohre A., Hänke S., Fischer C., Goedhart P.W., Inchausti P. 2010 – Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland – Basic Appl. Ecol. 11: 97–105.
• 23. Genghini M., Gellini S., Gustin M. 2006 – Organic and integrated agriculture: the effects on bird communities in orchard farms in northern Italy – Biodivers. Conserv. 15: 3077–3094.
• 24. Grzebisz W., Diatta J., Hardter R., Cyna K. 2010 – Fertilizer consumption patterns in central european countries – effect on actual field development trends in 1986–2005 years – A comparative study of the Czech Republic and Poland – J. Central European Agricult. 11: 73–82.
• 25. Hald A.B. 1999 – Weed vegetation (wild flora) of long established organic versus conventional fields in Denmark – Ann. Appl. Biol. 134: 307–314.
• 26. Hole D.G., Perkins A.J., Wilson J.D., Alexander I.H., Grice P.V., Švand A.D. 2005 – Does organic farming benefit biodiversity? – Biol. Conserv. 122: 113–130.
• 27. Hyvönen T. 2007 – Can conversion to organic farming restore the species composition of arable weed communities? – Biol. Conserv. 137: 328–390.
• 28. Janda J., Řepa P. 1986 – Metody kvantitativního výzkumu v ornitologii [Quantitative research methods in ornithology] – Okresní vlastivědné muzeum J.A. Komenského, Moravské ornitologické sdružení v Přerově, Krajské středisko státní památkové péče a ochrany přírody (Ostrava), Praha, 157 pp. (in Czech).
• 29. Kędziora A., Kujawa K., Gołdyn H., Karg J., Bernacki Z., Kujawa A., Bałazy S., Oleszczuk M., Rybacki M., Arczyńska-Chudy E., Tkaczuk C., Łęcki R., Szyszkiewicz-Golis M., Pińskwar P., Sobczyk D., Andrusiak J. 2012 – Impact of land-use and climate on biodiversity in an agricultural landscape (In: Biodiversity enrichment in a diverse world, Ed: G.A. Lameed) – In. Tech. Publisher, pp. 281–336.
• 30. Klabzuba J. 1995 – Agrometeorologické hodnocení roků ve středočeské oblasti [Agrometeorological evaluation of years in the Central Bohemian region] – ČZU, Praha (in Czech).
• 31. Kleijn D., Baquero R.A., Clough Y., Díaz M., De Esteban J., Fernández F., Gabriel D., Herzog F., Holzschuh A., Jöhl R., Knop E., Kruess A., Marshall E.J.P., Stefan-Dewenter I., Tscharntke T., Verhulst J., West T.M., Yela J.L. 2006 – Mixed biodiversity benefits of agro-environment schemes in five European countries – Ecol. Lett. 9: 243–254.
• 32. Kragten S., Trimbos K.B., de Snoo G.R. 2008 – Breeding Skylarks (Alauda arvensis) on organic and conventional arable farms in The Netherlands – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 126: 16–167.
• 33. Kubát K., Hrouda L., Chrtek J., Kaplan Z., Kirschner J., Stěpánek J. (eds) 2002 – Klíč ke květeně České republiky [Field guide to the flowers of the Czech Republic] – Academia, Praha (in Czech).
• 34. Lampkin N. 1990 – Organic farming – Farming Press, Ipswich.
• 35. Levin G. 2007 – Relationships between Danish organic farming and landscape composition – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 120: 330–344.
• 36. Marshall E.J.P., Brown V.K., Boatman N.D., Lutman P.J.W., Squire G.R., Ward L.K. 2003 – The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields – Weed Res. 43: 77–89.
• 37. Macdonald, D.W., Smith, H.E. 1991 – New perspectives on agro-ecology: Between theory and practice in the agricultural ecosystem – Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
• 38. Mikulka J. 1999 – Plevelné rostliny polí, luk a zahrad [Weedy plants of fields, meadows and gardens] – Redakce čas. Farmář – Zemědělské listy, Praha (in Czech).
• 39. Nag y G. 1998 – Ecological conditions, field potential and grassland management in Hungary, in: Nagy G., Pet K. (Eds.) – Ecological aspects of grassland management, grassland science in Europe, vol. 3 – European Grassland Federa¬tion, Zürich, pp. 1–13.
• 40. Newton I. 2004 – The recent declines of farmland bird populations in Britain: an appraisal of causal factors and conservation actions – Auk, 146: 579 –600.
• 41. Piha M., Tiainen J., Holopainen J., Vepsalainen V. 2007 – Effects of land-use and landscape characteristics on avian diversity and abundance in boreal agricultural landscape with organic and conventional farms – Biol. Conserv. 140: 50–61.
• 42. Potts G.R. 1997 – Cereal farming, pesticides, predation and conservation – Collins, London.
• 43. R Development Core Team 2010 – R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org/. Cited 10. 6. 2012.
• 44. Reif J., Voříšek P., Šťastný K., Bejček V. 2006 – Trendy početnosti ptáků v České republice v letech 1982 – 2005 [Trends in the abundance of birds in the Czech Republic during the years 1982–2005] – Sylvia, 42: 22–37 (in Czech).
• 45. Reif J. 2007 – První ptačí poslové jara stále ubývají [The first birds of spring continue to decline] – ČSO. http://www.birdlife.cz/index.php?ID=1523. Cited 25. 1. 2007.
• 46. Reif J., Voříšek P., Šťastný K., Bejček V., Petr J. 2008 – Agricultural intensification and farmland birds: new insights from a central European country – Ibis, 150: 596–605.
• 47. Smith G.H., Dänhardt J., Lindström A., Rundlöf M. 2010 – Consequences of organic farming and landscape heterogeneity for species richness and abundance of farmland birds – Oecologia, 162: 1071–1079.
• 48. Stoate C., Báldi A., Beja P., Boatman N.D., Herzon I., van Doorn A., de Snoo G.R., Rakosy L., Ramwell C. 2009 – Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe – A review – J. Environ. Manage. 91: 22–46.
• 49. Šnobl J., Pulkrábek J. (eds). 1999 – Základy rostlinné produkce [The bases of plant production] – ČZU, Praha, 153 pp. (in Czech).
• 50. Štefanová M., Šálek M. 2012 – Početnost ptáků zemědělské krajiny v podmínkách šetrného a konvenčního hospodaření [Abundance of birds of agricultural landscapes under conditions of integrated and conventional farming] – Sylvia, 48: 25–37 (in Czech).
• 51. Šťastný K., Bejček V., Hudec K. 2006 – Atlas hnízdního rozšíření ptáků v České republice 2001–2003 [Atlas of the nesting distribution of birds in the Czech Republic 2001–2003] – H&H, Jinočany, 463 pp. (in Czech).
• 52. Tilman D., Fargione J., Wolff B., D´Antonio C., Dobson A., Howart R., Schindler D., Schlesinger W.H., Simberloff D., Swackhamer D. 2001 – Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change – Science, 292: 281–284.
• 53. Tuomisto, H.L., Hodge, I.D., Riordan, P., Macdonald, D.W. 2012 – Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts? A meta-analysis of European research – J. Environ. Manage. 112: 309–320.
• 54. van Elzakker B. 1991 – Alternativní zemědělství v Československu – MZe ČR, Praha, 42 pp. (translation of the English original).
• 55. Verhulst J., Báldi A., Kleijn D. 2004 – The relation between land-use intensity and species-richness and abundance of birds in Hungary – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 104: 465–473.
• 56. Vickery J., Carter N., Fuller R.J. 2002 – The potential value of manager cereal field margins as foraging habitats for farmland birds in the UK – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 89: 41–52.
• 57. Voříšek P., Klvaňová A., Brinke T., Cepák J., Flousek J., Hora J., Reif J., Šťastný K., Vermouzek Z. 2009 – Stav ptactva České Republiky 2009 [State of birds Czech Republic 2009] – Sylvia, 45: 1–38 (in Czech).
• 58. Wilson J.D., Švand J. Browne S.J., King J.R. 1997: Territory distribution and breeding success of Skylarks (Alauda arvensis) on organic and intensive farmland in southern England – J. Appl. Ecol. 34: 1462–1478.
• 59. Wilson J.D., Morris A.J., Arroyo B.E., Clark S.C., Bradbury R.B. 1999 – A review of the abundance and diversity of invertebrate and plant foods of granivorous birds in northern Europe in relation to agricultural change – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 75: 13–30.
• 60. Woese K.D., Lange C., Bogl K.W. 1997 – A comparasion of organically and conventionally grown foods – results of review of the relevant literature – J. Sci. Food Agric. 74: 281–293.