Analysis of factors influencing carbon footprint reduction in construction projects

• Autorzy: Kryzia Katarzyna , Radziejowska Aleksandra , Sobotka Anna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/ams.2024.150348

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article addresses the issue of reducing carbon footprint in construction production. It focuses on the sources and factors of greenhouse gas emissions responsible for climate change. The construction sector plays a significant role in generating carbon footprint, both in the manufacturing of construction products within supply chains and during the execution of construction work on-site. The identified factors that influence carbon footprint throughout the lifecycle of a construction project and the life of a building are examined and analysed using the DEMATEL method. The research aims to identify causal relationships among factors that contribute to minimising carbon footprint in construction projects. The factors with the highest causal impact are identified in each phase of the building’s lifecycle, including Building Information Modelling (BIM), appropriate selection of construction products, and regulatory and financial incentives. The results of the analysis can be utilised to support decision-making processes aimed at reducing harmful emissions during project realisation and building operation.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

carbon footprint; construction project; DEMATEL method; causal-effect analysis

PL

ślad węglowy; projekt budowlany; emisja gazów cieplarnianych

• Wydawca: Instytut Mechaniki Górotworu PAN
• Czasopismo: Archives of Mining Sciences
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 69, no. 2
• Strony: 327--347
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 48 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Kryzia Katarzyna

• AGH University of Krakow, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7693-107X

autor

Radziejowska Aleksandra

• AGH University of Krakow, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3190-7129

autor

Sobotka Anna

• AGH University of Krakow, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4477-8821

Bibliografia

• [1] ISO 14067:2018, Greenhouse gases — Carbon footprint of products — Requirements and guidelines for quantification(2018).
• [2] Global CCS 2021, „Global status report for buildings and construction”, (2021). https://globalabc.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/GABC_Buildings-GSR-2021_BOOK.pdf [Accessed: 2023-04-15].
• [3] P. Wiśniewski, Ślad węglowy będą liczyć architekci. Obowiązek dla każdego budynku od 2030; Mutatorplus, (2022).https://www.muratorplus.pl/biznes/wiesci-z-rynku/slad-weglowy-co-to-aa-o8Wc-8de3-nRo7.html#obliczaniesladu-weglowego-obowiazkowe [Accessed: 2023-04-15].
• [4] PLGBC 2021, Polish Green Building Council, Estimating the carbon footprint of buildings. Whole life carbonroadmap for Poland 2050, https://plgbc.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/estimating-the-carbon-footprint-ofbuildings.pdf [Accessed: 2023-04-15].
• [5] PN-EN 15978:2012, Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of environmental performance of buildings– Calculation method (2012).
• [6] PN-EN 15643:2021-11, Sustainability of construction works – Framework for assessment of buildings and civilengineering works (2021).
• [7] J . Steinmann, M. Röck, T. Lutzkendorf, K. Allacker, X. Le Den, Whole life carbon models for the EU27 to bringdown embodied carbon emissions from new buildings: Review of existing national legislative measures. (2022).Retrieved from https://ramboll.com.
• [8] ARP 2023, Agencja Rozwoju Przemysłu S.A. Oddział w Katowicach, Ślad węglowy (2023).
• [9] W .K. Biswas, Carbon footprint and embodied energy consumption assessment of building construction works inWestern Australia. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 3, 179-186 (2014).DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.11.004.
• [10] D .Z. Li, H.X. Chen, E.C.M. Hui, J.B. Zhang, Q.M.Li, A methodology for estimating the life-cycle carbon efficiencyof a residential building. Build. Environ. 59, 448-455 (2013).DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.012.
• [11] S.S. Ramachanderan, V.K. Venkiteswaran, Y.T. Chuen, Carbon (CO2) Footprint Reduction Analysis for Buildingsthrough Green Rating Tools in Malaysia. Energy Procedia 105, 3648-3655 (2017).DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.841.
• [12] S.Y.C. Yim, S.T. Ng, M.U. Hossain, J.M.W. Wong, Comprehensive Evaluation of Carbon Emissions for the Developmentof High-Rise Residential Building. Buildings 8, 11, 147 (2018).DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8110147.
• [13] Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; UNITED NATIONS; 1998.https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf [Accessed: 2023-04-15].
• [14] J. Zarczuk, B. Klepacki, Pojęcie, znaczenie i pomiar śladu węgloweg(carbon footprint), The term, importance andmeasurement of the carbon footprint. Economics and Organization of Logistics 6 (1), 85-95 (2021).DOI : https://doi.org/10.22630/eiol.2021.6.1.8.
• [15] J. Śleszyński, Footprinting, czyli mierzenie śladu pozostawionego w środowisku. Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne1 (79), 57-67 (2016).
• [16] W . Huang, F. Li, S.-H. Cui, F. Li, L. Huang, J.-Y. Lin, Carbon Footprint and Carbon Emission Reduction of UrbanBuildings: A Case in Xiamen City, China. Procedia Eng. 198, 1007-1017 (2017).DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.146.
• [17] Tažiková, Z. Struková, Reducing the carbon footprint by selecting building material. International MultidisciplinaryScientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management. SGEM 20 (4.2), 227-234,(2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEM2020V/4.2/S06.28.
• [18] EUR-Lex 2019, European Commission. Communication: The European Green Deal, COM (2019) 640 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640 [Accessed: 2023-04-15].
• [19] EUR-Lex 2020, Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The EuropeanEconomic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions; A Renovation Wave for Europe – greeningour buildings, creating jobs, improving lives COM/2020/662 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0662 [Accessed: 2023-04-15].
• [20] EUR-Lex 2022, Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The European Council,The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions REPowerEUPlan COM/2022/230 final https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2022%3A230%3AFIN[Accessed: 2023-04-15].
• [21] R. Geryło, A. Garbacz, Zrównoważony rozwój budownictwa w świetle wyzwań klimatycznych, Materiały Budowlane9, 15-18 (2022).
• [22] A. Wyciślok, P. Wyciślok, W kierunku budynku przyjaznego środowisku – propozycje zmniejszenia śladuwęglowego w budynkach wysokościowych. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Technicznej w Katowicach 14,23-36 (2022).
• [23] M. Fedorczak-Cisak, A. Leśniak, P. Markiewicz-Zahorski, A.P. Węglarz, Jastrzębski: Wpływ rozwiązańmateriałowych przegród zewnętrznych na emisję CO2 na przykładzie budynku w standardzie nZEB. MateriałyBudowlane 1, 46-49 (2022).
• [24] K. Zima, A. Przesmycka, Koncepcja zintegrowanej analizy kosztów i generowanego śladu węglowego w cyklużycia budynku. Przegląd Budowlany 92, 10, 42-48 (2021).
• [25] J . Kneifel, Life-cycle carbon and cost analysis of energy efficiency measures in new commercial buildings. Energyand Buildings 42, 3, 333-340 (2010).
• [26] S. Mahdi Hosseinian, M. Faghani, Assessing the effect of structural parameters and building site in achievinglow carbon building materialization using a life-cycle assessment approach. Journal of Building Engineering 44,December 202 (2021).
• [27] K. Zima, Integrated analysis of costs and amount of greenhouse gases emissions during the building lifecycle.Archives of Civil Engineering 67, 2, 413-423 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2021.137176.
• [28] P. Łasut, J. Kulczycka, Metody i programy obliczające ślad węglowy. Zeszyty Naukowe Instytutu GospodarkiSurowcami Mineralnymi i Energią PAN 87, 137-147 (2014).
• [29] T. Burdzik, Przestrzeń jako składnik tożsamości w świecie globalizacji. Kultura-Historia-Globalizacja 11, 13-27(2012).
• [30] D . Wieczorek, K. Zima, Analysis of the selection of materials for road construction taking into account the carbonfootprint and construction costs. Archives of Civil Engineering 68 (3), 199-219 (2022).DOI : https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2022.141881.
• [31] T .C. Kuo,, The construction of a collaborative framework in support of low carbon product design. Robotics andComputer-Integrated Manufacturing 29, 4, 174-183 (2013).
• [32] Z. Karaczun, A. Kassenberg, P. Siwicki, Oszacowanie śladu węglowego rozbudowy drogi wodnej na środkowymodcinku rzeki Odry (od Brzegu Dolnego do ujścia Nysy Łużyckiej). Projekt współfinansowany ze środkówEuropejskiego Funduszu Społecznego w ramach Programu Operacyjnego Wiedza Edukacja Rozwój 2014-2020,Nr projektu: POWR.02.16.00-00-0070/17-00, Warszawa, marzec 2019, (2019).http://praworzeki.eko-unia.org.pl/imgturysta/files/ekspertyzy/E20.pdf, [Accessed: 2023-03-03].
• [33] Z . Yeo, R. Ng, B. Song, Technique for quantification of embodied carbon footprint of construction projects usingprobabilistic emission factor estimators. Journal of Cleaner Production, Journal of Cleaner Production 119,135-151 (2016).
• [34] S.H. Teh, T. Wiedmann, J. Schinabeck, S. Moore, Replacement Scenarios for Construction Materials Based onEconomy-wide Hybrid LCA. Procedia Engineering 180, 179-189 (2017).
• [35] K. Ranjetha, U. Johnson Alengaram, Ahmed Mahmoud Alnahhal, S. Karthick, W.J. Wan Zurina, K.J. Rao, Towardssustainable construction through the application of low carbon footprint products. Materials Today: Proceedings52, 3, 873-881 (2022).
• [36] L . Huang, G. Krigsvoll, F. Johansen, Y. Liu, X. Zhang, Carbon emission of global construction sector. Renew.Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 1906-1916 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.001.
• [37] E. Heffernan, W. Pan, X. Liang, P. De Wilde, Zero carbon homes: Perceptions from the UK construction industry.Energy Policy 79, 23-36 (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.005.
• [38] J . Zuo, B. Read, S. Pullen, Q. Shi, Achieving carbon neutrality in commercial building developments – Perceptionsof the construction industry. Habitat Int. 36, 278-286 (2012).DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.10.010.
• [39] J . Li, M. Colombier, Managing carbon emissions in China through building energy efficiency. J. Environ. Manag.90, 2436-2447 (2009). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.015.
• [40] T . Jafary Nasab, S.M. Monavari, S.A. Jozi, H. Majedi, Assessment of carbon footprint in the construction phaseof high-rise constructions in Tehran. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17, 3153-3164 (2020).DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02557-3.
• [41] S.Y.C. Yim, S.T. Ng, M.U. Hossain, J.M.W. Wong, Comprehensive Evaluation of Carbon Emissions for the Developmentof High-Rise Residential Building. Buildings 8, 8, 147 (2018).DOI : https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8110147.
• [42] M. Dytczak, G. Ginda, B. Gotowała, Application potential of dematel method and its extensions for analysis ofdecision problems in civil engineering. Environmental Engineering 235-240 (2011).
• [43] S.L. Si., X.Y. You, H.C. Liu, P. Zhang, DEMATEL Technique: A Systematic Review of the State-of-the-ArtLiterature on Methodologies and Applications. In Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2018 (2018). HindawiLimited. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3696457.
• [44] J .I. Shieh, H.H. Wu, K.K. Huang, A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital servicequality. Knowledge-Based Systems 23 (3), 277-282 (2010).DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.01.013.
• [45] K. Kijewska, W. Torbacki, S. Iwan, Application of AHP and DEMATEL Methods in Choosing and Analysing theMeasures for the Distribution of Goods in Szczecin Region. Sustainability 10, 7, 1-26 (2018).
• [46] Sobotka, K. Linczowski, A. Radziejowska, Substitution of Building Components in Historic Buildings. Sustainability13, 16, 1-13 (2021).
• [47] Gabus, E. Fontela, World Problems, An invitation to Further Thought Within Framework of DEMATEL. Geneva,Switzerland (1972).
• [48] T .L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Decision Making in Complex Environments. Int. J. Services Sciences1, 1, 83-98 (2008).

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025)