Collective creativity in management science

• Autorzy: Ciachorowski Damian , Lis Anna Maria

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/emj-2022-0027

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper aims to establish the current state of knowledge on collective creativity in management science based on a systematic literature review. A systematic review was performed based on the three-step SPL procedure proposed by Tranfield et al. (2003). Two databases (Scopus and Web of Science) were searched electronically until March 2022. Literature analysis and content analysis were performed based on the secondary data. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria following the systematic literature review procedure. The conducted descriptive and thematic analysis allowed establishing the state of knowledge in the analysed area and identifying the main thematic areas along with the future research directions. The research was the first to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) on collective creativity in management science. The main contribution of this paper is its exclusive focus on analysing existing research in the collective creativity field, limited to management science. SLR allowed determining that research in the analysed area was still at a fairly early stage. Although the existing literature sheds some light on collective creativity, studies investigating the aspects of teamwork focused on problem-solving are required.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

collective creativity; creativity; teamwork; innovation

PL

twórczość zbiorowa; twórczość; praca zbiorowa; innowacje

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej
• Czasopismo: Engineering Management in Production and Services
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 14, no. 3
• Strony: 68--81
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 28 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Ciachorowski Damian

• Gdańsk University of Technology, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5226-9015

autor

Lis Anna Maria

• Gdańsk University of Technology, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1527-7796

Bibliografia

• Arkko-Saukkonen A., Krastina A., & Lynch M. (2021). The power of collective creativity. Journal of Finnish Universities of Applied Science, 1.
• Astola, M., Bombaerts, G., Spahn, A., & Royakkers, L. (2021). Can creativity be a collective virtue? Insights for the ethics of innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04833-0
• Bai, X., & Li, J. (2020). The best configuration of collaborative knowledge innovation management from the perspective of artificial intelligence. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1-13. doi: 10.1080/14778238.2020.1834886
• Bissola, R., & Imperatori, B. (2011). Organizing individual and collective creativity: Flying in the face of creativity clichés. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(2), 77-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00597.x
• Bradford, M., & Leberman, S. (2019). BeWeDo: A dynamic approach to leadership development for co-creation. Leadership, 15(1), 58-80. doi: 10.1177/1742715017721090
• Brown, B., & Anthony, S. D. (2011). How P&G tripled its innovation success rate. Harvard Business Review, 89(6), 64-72.
• Černevičiūtė, J., & Strazdas, R. (2018). Teamwork management in Creative industries: factors influencing productivity. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(2), 503-516. doi: 10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(3)
• Chanal, V., & Caron-Fasan, M. L. (2010). The difficulties involved in developing business models open to innovation communities: the case of a crowdsourcing platform. M@ n@ gement, 13(4), 318-340. doi: 10.3917/mana.134.0318
• Chiu, C. Y. C., Owens, B. P., & Tesluk, P. E. (2016). Initiating and utilizing shared leadership in teams: The role of leader humility, team proactive personality, and team performance capability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(12), 1705. Doi: 10.1037/apl0000159
• Cirella, S. (2016). Organizational variables for developing collective creativity in business: A case from an Italian fashion design company. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(3), 331-343. doi: 10.1111/caim.12189
• Cirella, S. (2021). Managing collective creativity: Organizational variables to support creative teamwork. European Management Review, 18(4), 404-417. doi: 10.1111/emre.12475
• Cirella, S., Guerci, M., & Shani, A. B. (2012). A process model of collaborative management research: The study of collective creativity in the luxury industry. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 25(3), 281- 300. doi: 10.1007/s11213-011-9220-x
• Ehlen, C., van der Klink, M., Stoffers, J., & Boshuizen, H. (2017). The co-creation-wheel: A four-dimensional model of collaborative, interorganisational innovation. European Journal of Training and Development, 41(7), 628-646. doi: 10.1108/EJTD-03-2017-0027
• Godwin, A. (2016, October). Visualizing systematic literature reviews to identify new areas of research. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757690
• Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484-500. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0200
• Hatch, M. J. (2002). Essai: Doing time in organization theory. Organization Studies, 23(6), 869-875. doi: 10.1177/0170840602236008
• Hurley, E., Trischler, J., & Dietrich, T. (2018). Exploring the application of co-design to transformative service research. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(6), 715-727. doi: 10.1108/JSM-09-2017-0321
• Kraus, K., Kraus, N., & Shtepa, O. (2021). Synergetic effects of network interconnections in the conditions of virtual reality. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 17(3), 149-188. doi: 10.7341/20211735
• Lee, H. H. M., & van Dolen, W. (2015). Creative partici pation: Collective sentiment in online co-creation communities. Information & Management, 52(8), 951-964. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2015.07.002
• Martins, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2011). Creativity in virtual work: Effects of demographic differences. Small Group Research, 42(5), 536-561. doi: 10.1177/1046496410397382
• Musick, P. L. (1976). Primitive percepts and collective creativity. Art Psychotherapy, 3, 43-50. doi: 10.1016/0090-9092(76)90016-8
• Palomino, M., Dávila, A., & Melendez, K. (2018). Methodologies, methods, techniques and tools used on SLR elaboration: a mapping study. In International Conference on Software Process Improvement (pp. 14-30). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-01171-0_2
• Parjanen, S., Hennala, L., & Konsti-Laakso, S. (2012). Brokerage functions in a virtual idea generation platform: Possibilities for collective creativity? Innovation, 14(3), 363-374. doi: 10.5172/impp.2012.14.3.363
• Stankiewicz, J. S., & Moczulska, M. (2015). The involvement of employees in knowledge management in the light of the research results. Oeconomia Copernicana, 6(2), 37-51. doi: 10.12775/OeC.2015.011
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375
• Vogelgsang, L. (2020). Transition rather than balance: Organizing constraints for collective creativity in pharmaceutical development. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(3), 413-423. doi: 10.1111/caim.12391
• Yao, J., Liu, X., & He, W. (2021). The curvilinear relationship between team informational faultlines and creativity: moderating role of team humble leadership. Management Decision, 59(12), 2793-2808. doi: 10.1108/MD-12-2019-1698
• Yuan, Y., Humphrey, S. E., & van Knippenberg, D. (2022). From individual creativity to team creativity: A meta‐analytic test of task moderators. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. doi: 10.1111/joop.12380

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).