Worldwide and route-specific coverage of electronic navigational charts

• Autorzy: Vanem E. , Eide M. S. , Skjong R. , Gravir G. , Lepsoe A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper presents the results from a recent study on the coverage of Electronic Navigational Charts (ENC). Global traffic datahas been evaluated in relation to the coverage of ENC and eleven specific ship routes, representative for global merchant shipping, have been analyzed in further detail. Overall, the ENC coverage was found to be extensive, with 82 – 94% coverage for SOLAS ships, and 28 – 100% coverage along selected routes. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated how the coverage of ENCs could be taken into account when assessing the effect of ECDIS for safer ship navigation and associated cost effectiveness.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Electronic Navigational Charts (ENC); ECDIS; Global Coverage of ENC; shipping; marine navigation; ships routes; SOLAS Convention; Net Cost of Averting a Fatality (NCAF)

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: Vol. 1, no. 2
• Strony: 163--169
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 10 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Vanem E.

• DNV Research & Innovation, Det Norske Veritas, Hovik, Norway

autor

Eide M. S.

• DNV Research & Innovation, Det Norske Veritas, Hovik, Norway

autor

Skjong R.

• DNV Research & Innovation, Det Norske Veritas, Hovik, Norway

autor

Gravir G.

• DNV Energy Region Nordic and Eurasia, Det Norske Veritas, Hovik, Norway

autor

Lepsoe A.

• DNV Maritime Technology and Production Centre, Det Norske Veritas, Hovik, Norway

Bibliografia

• 1. Denmark and Norway (2006). "FSA Study on ECDIS/ENCs", Submitted by Denmark and Norway, MSC 81/24/5, IMO.
• 2. Endresen, Ø, Sørgård, E, Sundet, JK, Dalsøren, SB, Isaksen, ISA, Berglen, TF and Gravir, G (2003). "Emission from international sea transportation and environmental impact", Journal of Geophysical Re-search, Vol 108, 4560.
• 3. IMO (1995). "Performance standards for electronic chart display and information systems (ECDIS)", IMO resolution A.817(19).
• 4. IMO (2002). “Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process”. MSC/Circ.1023 -MEPC/Circ.392, IMO.
• 5. Norway (2000). “Formal Safety Assessment – Decision parameters including risk acceptance criteria”, Submitted by Norway, MSC 72/16, IMO.
• 6. Norway (2005). "FSA – Large Passenger Ships - Navigational Safety", Submitted by Norway, NAV 51/10, IMO.
• 7. Spouge, JR (2002). "A Simple Model of the Costs of Ship Accidents Rev 1", DNV Job No C383184/5.
• 8. Vanem, E, Antão, P, Castillo, F and Skjong, R (2007a). "Formal Safety Assessment of LNG Tankers", Proc 10th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures, PRADS 2007.
• 9. Vanem, E, Endresen, Ø and Skjong, R (2007b). "CATS – CostEffectiveness in Designing for Oil Spill Prevention", Proc 10th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures, PRADS 2007.
• 10. Vanem, E, Gravir, G and Eide, MS (2007c). "Effect of ENC Coverage on ECDIS Risk Reduction", DNV Report no. 2007-0304, Det Norske Veritas. http://research.dnv.com /skj/FSA-ENC/ENC.pdf