PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Development and validation of HPTLC-densitometric method for estimation of trigonelline in leaves of Abrus precatorius L. and its formulation

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
A new, simple and reproducible HPTLC-densitometric method has been established and validated for estimation of trigonelline in leaves of Abrus precatorius L. and its herbal formulation Chatak® using ICH guidelines. Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) as an alternative to convention techniques was also explored for the rapid extraction. The methanol extracts of leaves, its formulation, and standard solution of trigonelline were applied on silica gel F254 HPTLC plates and developed in twin chamber using mobile phase toluene-ethyl acetate-formic acid-methanol (2:3:1.8:3.8, v/v/v/v). The plates were scanned at 268 nm (λmax of trigonelline) using Camag TLC scanner 3 with CATS 4 software. A linear relationship was obtained between response (peak area) and amount of trigonelline in the range 40–200 ng spot−1; the correlation coefficient was 0.9957. ASE method has higher extraction efficiency in less time as compared to Soxhlet extraction. The HPTLC-densitometric method showed good linearity, recovery and high precision of compound. It is useful to analyze trigonelline in A. precatorius leaves and routine quality control of its marketed formulation.
Rocznik
Strony
511--518
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 10 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Agharkar Research Institute Botany, Plant Science Division G. G. Agarkar Road Pune 411 004 India
  • Agharkar Research Institute Botany, Plant Science Division G. G. Agarkar Road Pune 411 004 India
autor
  • Agharkar Research Institute Botany, Plant Science Division G. G. Agarkar Road Pune 411 004 India
Bibliografia
  • [1] The Wealth of India Raw Materials, Vol. 1: A, Publication and Information Directorate, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, 1985, pp. 18–20
  • [2] S. Sankaranarayanan, P. Bama, J. Ramachandran, P.T. Kalaichelvan, M. Deccaraman, M. Vijayalakshimi, R. Dhamotharan, B. Dananjeyan, and S. Sathya Bama, J. Med. Plants Res., 4, 1089–1101 (2010)
  • [3] Y.A. Ahirrao and D.A. Patil, Indian J. Nat. Prod. Resour., 1, 85–88 (2010)
  • [4] O.A. Georgewill and U.O. Georgewill, Eastern J. Med., 14, 23–25 (2009)
  • [5] J. Parekh and S.V. Chanda, Turk. J. Biol., 31, 53–58 (2007)
  • [6] C. Wambebe and S.L. Amosun, J. Ethnopharmacol., 11, 49–58 (1984)
  • [7] A.A. Adedapo, O.A. Omoloye, and O.G. Ohore, Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res., 74, 31–36 (2007)
  • [8] S. Ghosal and S.K. Dutta, Phytochemistry, 10, 195–198 (1971)
  • [9] C.L. Gopu, S.S. Gilda, A.R. Paradkar, and K.R. Mahadik, Acta Chromatogr., 20(4), 709–719 (2008)
  • [10] I.C.H. Guidelines on Analytical Method Validation, in: Proc. Int. Convention on Quality for the Pharmaceutical Industry, Toronto, 2002
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-eca9fd8f-ce63-48e6-9032-a3d6f815293e
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.