PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Biochar and Biochar with N Fertilizer Impact on Soil Physical Properties in a Silty Loam Haplic Luvisol

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Recently, a lot of studies focused on the effects of biochar application to agricultural soils and its influence on the soil properties. However, only limited information is available on the simultaneous impact of N-fertilizer combined with biochar to soil physical propersies such as: soil moisture, soil temperature, bulk density and waterfilled pore space. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in the soil physical properties of a silty loam Haplic Luvisol affected by the biochar application and its combination with N fertilizer during the years 2014–2016 (Experimental site of SUA-Nitra, Dolná Malanta, Slovakia). The field experiment was carried out in 2014 with different biochar application doses (0, 10 and 20 t ha-1) and different rate of N fertilization (0, 1st and 2nd level of N fertilization). The results showed that the both biochar amendment and biochar with N fertilizer increased the soil moisture in the range of 1 to 15%, on average. The higher rate of biochar resulted in higher soil moisture in all treatments with biochar in the following order B0 (14.9) < B10 (15.1) < B20 (16.2) as well as in biochar in combination with N fertilization: B0N1 (14.6) < B10N1 (15.7) < B20N1 (16.2) as well as B0N2 (14.8) < B10N2 (15.8) < B20N2 (16.0) during the years of 2014–2016. A positive trend of water-filled pore space increase by the time in all studied treatments was observed. No significant changes in the average soil temperature were observed between the biochar and biochar with N fertilization treatments during the growing seasons of individual years. The higher rate of biochar resulted in lower soil bulk density in all treatments with biochar in combination with N fertilization in the following order: B0N1 (1.49) > B10N1 (1.47) > B20N1 (1.44) as well as B0N2 (1.51) > B10N2 (1.47) > B20N2 (1.39) during years the studied period (2014–2016).
Rocznik
Strony
31--38
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 36 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Biometeorology and Hydrology, Horticulture and Landscape Engineering Faculty, Slovak University of Agriculture, Hospodárska 7, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia
  • Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia
autor
  • Department of Biometeorology and Hydrology, Horticulture and Landscape Engineering Faculty, Slovak University of Agriculture, Hospodárska 7, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia
Bibliografia
  • 1. Agegnehu G., Bass A.M., Nelson P.N., Bird M. I. 2016. Benefits of biochar, compost and biochar–compost for soil quality, maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions in a tropical agricultural soil. Science of The Total Environment, 543, 295–306.
  • 2. Agegnehu G., Bird M.I., Nelson P.N., Bass A.M. 2015. The ameliorating effects of biochar and compost on soil quality and plant growth on a Ferralsol. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 53(1), 1–12.
  • 3. Barrow C. J. 2012. Biochar: potential for countering land degradation and for improving agriculture. Applied Geography, 34, 21–28.
  • 4. Campbell C.A., Biederbeck V.O., McConkey B.G., Curtin D., Zentner R.P. 1999. Soil qualityeffect of tillage and fallow frequency. Soil organic matter quality as influenced by tillage and fallow frequency in a silt loam in southwestern Saskatchewan. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31, 1–7.
  • 5. Case S. D. C., McNamara N. P., Reay D. S., Whitaker J. 2012. The effect of biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emissions from a sandy loam soil – the role of soil aeration. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 51, 125–134.
  • 6. Chen H., Cao C.F., Kong L.C., Zhang C.L., Li W., Qiao Y.Q., Du S.Z., Zhao Z. 2014. Study on wheat yield stability in Huaibei lime concretion black soil area basedon long-term fertilization experiment. Scientia Agricola, 47, 2580–2590.
  • 7. Chintala R., Owen R., Kumar S., Schumacher T.E., Malo D. 2014. Biochar impacts on denitrification under different soil water contents. World Congress of Soil Science, 6, 157–157.
  • 8. Edwards C.A., Lofty J.R. 1982. Nitrogenous fertilizers and earthworms populations in agricultural soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 147, 515–521.
  • 9. Faria W.M., Figueiredo C.C. de Coser T.R., Vale A.T., Schneider B.G. 2018. Is sewage sludge biochar capable of replacing inorganic fertilizers for corn production? Evidence from a two-year field experiment. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 64, 505–519.
  • 10. Figueiredo C., Lopes H., Coser T., Vale A., Busato J., Aguiar N., Novotny E., Canellas L. 2018. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on chemical and physical properties of biochar from sewage sludge. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 64, 881–889.
  • 11. Fulajtár E. 2006. Soil physical properties. SSCRI, Bratislava, (in Slovak).
  • 12. Gu Q.Z., Yang X.Y., Sun B.H., Ma L.J., Tong Y.A., Zhao B.Q., Zhang F.D. 2004. Effects of long-term fertilization on grain yield and quality of wheat. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 24, 76–79.
  • 13. Horák J. 2015. Testing biochar as a possible way to ameliorate slightly acidic soil at the research field located in the Danubian lowland. Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturae, 18, 20–24.
  • 14. Horák J., Kondrlová, E., Igaz, D., Šimanský V., Felber R., Lukac M., Balashov E.V., Buchkina N.P., Rizhiya E.Y., Jankowski M. 2017. Biochar and biochar with N-fertilizer affect soil N2O emission in Haplic Luvisol. Biologia, 72(9), 995–1001.
  • 15. Hossain M.K., Strezov V., Yin Chan K., Nelson P.F. 2010. Agronomic properties of wastewater sludge biochar and bioavailability of metals in production of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Chemosphere, 78, 1167–1171.
  • 16. Igaz D., Šimanský V., Horák J., Kondrlová E., Domanová J., Rodný M., Buchkina N.P. 2018. Can a single dose of biochar affect selected soil physical and chemical characteristics? Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 66(4), 421–428.
  • 17. IUSS Working Group WRB. 2015. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, Rome.
  • 18. Jeffery S., Abalos D., Prodana M., Bastos A.C., van Groenigen J.W., Hungate B.A., Verheijen F. 2017. Biochar boosts tropical but not temperate crop yields. Environmental Research Letters, 12, 053001.
  • 19. Kinney T., Masiello C., Dugan B., Hockaday W., Dean M., Zygourakis K., Barnes R. 2012. Hydrologic properties of biochars produced at different temperatures. Biomass and Bioenergy, 41, 34–43.
  • 20. Kondrlová E., Horák J., Igaz D., Dobiašová D. 2017. The possibility of using digital images in assessment of plant canopy development and weed spread. Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturae, 20, 20–24.
  • 21. Kotorová D., Šoltýsová B. 2011. Physico-chemical properties of heavy soils. CVRV, Piešťany, (in Slovak).
  • 22. Leelamanie D.A.L. 2014. Initial water repellency affected organic matter depletion rates of manure amended soils in Sri Lanka. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 62, 309–315.
  • 23. Liang B., Lehmann J., Solomon D., Kinyangi J., Grossman J., O‘Neill B., Skjemstad J.O., Thies J., Luizao F.J., Petersen J., Neves E.G. 2006. Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 70, 1719–1730.
  • 24. Liyanage T.D.P., Leelamanie D.A.L. 2016. Influence of organic manure amendments on water repellency, water entry value, and water retention of soil samples from a tropical Ultisol. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 64,160–166.
  • 25. Méndez A., Terradillos M., Gascó G. 2013. Physicochemical and agronomic properties of biochar from sewage sludge pyrolysed at different temperatures. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 102, 124–130.
  • 26. Niu L.A., Hao J.M., Zhang B.Z., Niu X.S. 2011. Influences of Long-Term Fertilizer and Tillage Management on Soil Fertility of the North China Plain. Pedosphere, 21, 813–820.
  • 27. Paz-Ferreiro J., Gascó G., Gutiérrez B., Méndez A. 2012. Soil biochemical activities and the geometric mean of enzyme activities after application of sewage sludge and sewage sludge biochar to soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 48, 511–517.
  • 28. Schjonning P., Christensen B.T. 1994. Physical and chemical properties of a sandy loam receiving animal manure, mineral fertilizer or no fertilizer for 90 years. European Journal of Soil Science, 45, 257–268.
  • 29. Schnell R.W., Vietor D.M., Provin T.L., Munster C.L., Capareda S. 2012. Capacity of biochar application to maintain energy crop productivity: soil chemistry, sorghum growth, and runoff water quality effects. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, 1044–1051.
  • 30. Šimanský V., Polláková N., Chlpík J., Kolenčík M. 2018. Soil science. SUA, Nitra, (in Slovak).
  • 31. Šimanský V., Horák J., Igaz D., Balashov E.V., Jonczak J. 2018. Biochar and biochar with N fertilizer as a potential tool for improving soil sorption of nutrients. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 18(4), 1432–1440.
  • 32. Turski R., Flis-Bujak M. 1980. Transformations of humic substances in similarly utilized soils of different origin. Roczniki Gleboznawce, 31, 299–307.
  • 33. Vítková J., Kondrlová E., Rodný M., Šurda P., Horák J. 2017. Analysis of soil water content and crop yield after biochar application in field conditions. Plant Soil and Environment, 63, 569–573.
  • 34. Yang X.Y. 2011. Long-term-fertilization effects on soil organic carbon, physical properties, and wheat yield of a loess soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 174, 775–784.
  • 35. Zeytin S., Baran A. 2003. Influences of composted hazelnut husk on some physical properties of soils. Bioresource Technology, 88, 241–244.
  • 36. Zhang A.F., Cui L.Q., Pan G.X., Li L.Q., Hussain Q., Zhang X.H., Zheng J.W., Crowley D. 2010. Effect of biochar amendment on yield and methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a rice paddy from Tai Lake plain, China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 139, 469–475.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-ebf5190f-f03a-41cb-9f37-fa2116a17fec
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.