Characterization of liquid waste streams from shale gas development

• Autorzy: Ziemkiewicz P. F.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Hydraulic fracturing has been practiced for over thirty years to improve effective porosity and stimulate oil and gas production. In the Appalachian Basin it has been used with horizontal drilling since 2008 to extract methane and natural gas liquids from source rock such as the Marcellus Formation. Hydraulic fracturing generates large volumes of waste water known as flowback: about 3,800 m3/well. Literature regarding the chemical composition of this waste stream is limited. This study examined injected hydraulic fracturing fluid from two wells and flow- back from four hydraulically fractured wells. Wells were sampled at various times during the flowback cycle and in sections of the basin known to produce either wet or dry gas, the former producing higher volumes of natural gas liquids. Concentrations were compared to available literature values and to drinking water standards as a basis for determining which parameters might compromise nearby, domestic wells in the event of an accidental release. Measured parameters included three classes: organic, inorganic ions and radioactive isotopes. Concentrations of all three classes of contaminants tended to increase during the flowback cycle. Organic contaminants including BTEX were substantially higher in the wet gas well. Radioactive isotopes, particularly alpha, beta, radium 226 and radium 228 increased during flowback. All contaminants were found in much higher concentrations in flowback water than in injected hydraulic fracturing fluids suggesting that the bulk of contaminants originate in the Marcellus formation rather than in the injected hydraulic fracturing fluids. Primary and secondary drinking water standards for all classes of contaminants were generally exceeded in flowback water. In addition to summarizing the chemical composition of flowback water, the presentation recommends practices for controlling the risk of environmental exposure.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

liquid waste; shale gas

• Wydawca: AGH University of Science and Technology Press
• Czasopismo: AGH Drilling, Oil, Gas
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 30, no. 1
• Strony: 297--310
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 16 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Ziemkiewicz P. F.

• West Virginia Water Research Institute West Virginia University

Bibliografia

• [1] Sampling and Analysis of Water Streams Associated with the Development of Marcellus Shale Gas Final Report; Thomas Hayes, Gas Technology Institute; for Marcellus Shale Coalition; December 2009.
• [2] America's New Energy Future: The Unconventional Oil and Gas Revolution and the U.S. Economy Volume 1: National Economic Contributions; An IHS Report; October 2012.
• [3] Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer; Ground Water Protection Council and ALL Consulting; Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy DE-FG26-04NT15455; April 2009.
• [4] Natural Gas Plays in the Marcellus Shale: Challenges and Potential Opportunities; David Kargbo, Ron Wilhelm and David Campbell; USEPA; Environmental Science & Technology; Volume 44; Number 2010.
• [5] Water Management Technologies Used by Marcellus Shale Gas Producers Final Report; John Veil, Argonne National Laboratory; Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy FWP-49462; July 2010.
• [6] Hydraulic Fracturing Considerations for Natural Gas Wells of the Marcellus Shale; Daniel Arthur, Brian Bohm and Mark Layne, ALL Consulting; The Ground Water Protection Council 2008 Annual Forum; 2008.
• [7] Data Confirm Safety of Well Fracturing; Kevin Fisher, The American Oil & Gas Reporter, www.aogr,com; July 2010.
• [8] Chemicals Used in Hydraulic Fracturing; for U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy & Commerce Minority Staff; April 2011.
• [9] 'Environmentally Friendly' No Longer an Oxymoron to Oil and Gas; Tayvis Dunnahoe, Hydraulic Fracturing; www.EPmag.com; August 2012.
• [10] Marcellus Shale Water Management Challenges in Pennsylvania; A.W. Gaudlip and L.O. Paugh, SPE, Range Resources Appalachia LLC, and T.D. Hayes, Gas Technology Institute, Society of Petroleum Engineers; SPE 119898; 2008 SPE Shale Gas Production Conference; November 2008.
• [11] Radiological Survey Report: Marcellus Shale Drilling Cuttings; CoPhysics Corporation; April 2010.
• [12] Marcellus Shale Potential Public Health Concerns Correspondence and Supplemental Reports: Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement on the Oil & Gas Regulatory Program - Well Permit Issuance for Horizontal Drilling and High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing to Develop the Marcellus Shale and other Low-Permeability Gas Reservoirs; State of New York Department of Health; July 2009.
• [13] Incidental TENORM: A Guidance for State Solid Waste Managers; Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials; April 2011.
• [14] Naturally-Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM); www.world-nuclear.org, August 2011.
• [15] Radiation Sources in Natural Gas Well Activities; Gayle Nicoll, Occupational Health & Safety Online; http://ohsonline.com/articles/.
• [16] Evaluating the Environmental Implications of Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale Gas Reservoirs; J. Daniel Arthur, Brian Bohm, Bobbi Jo Coughlin and Mark Layne, ALL Consulting; 2008