Next generation smart system: 4-layer modern organization and activity theory for a new paradigm perspective

• Autorzy: Prihatmanto Ary Setijad , Sukoco Agus , Budiyon Agus

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/acs.2024.149673

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This research article discusses a new paradigm in smart system development using the 4-layer framework and activity theory from the perspectives of ontology, epistemology, and axiology. The study aims to understand how this paradigm can influence the development of smart systems and provide insights into its theoretical and practical implications. The 4-layer modern system comprises instrumentation, information systems, business intelligence, and gamification, which are the core components of a smart system. Each layer plays a crucial role in data collection, information processing, business analysis, and gamification implementation at the top layer. The integration of these layers forms a solid foundation for the development of efficient and innovative smart systems. In addition, activity theory is utilized to analyze the interactions among users, technology, and the environment within the context of smart systems. From an ontology standpoint, this research views smart systems as complex socio-technical entities involving human, technological, and process aspects. In terms of epistemology, a multidisciplinary approach is employed to combine knowledge from areas such as computer science, information systems, and human-computer interaction. In the realm of axiology, this study recognizes the ethical values and social implications that must be considered in the development and implementation of smart systems. By integrating the new smart system paradigm using the 4-layer modern systems and activity theory, this research contributes to the understanding of the dynamics and development potential of smart systems. The results of this study can provide guidance for practitioners, researchers, and decision-makers in developing more effective, efficient, and user-oriented smart systems in various contexts.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

new paradigm; smart system; 4-layer modern system; activity theory; ontology; epistemology; axiology

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee of Automatic Control and Robotics
• Czasopismo: Archives of Control Sciences
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 34, No. 3
• Strony: 589--623
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 76 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Prihatmanto Ary Setijad

• Schoolof Electrical Engineering and Informationmatic, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9471-0227

autor

Sukoco Agus

• Schoolof Electrical Engineering and Informationmatic, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia

autor

Budiyon Agus

• Faculty of Information and Computing, Indonesia Center for Technology Empowerment (ICTE), Jakarta, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• [1] A. Baliyan, K.S. Kaswan, N. Kumar, K. Uperti and R. Kannan: Cyber Physical Systems Concepts and Applications. CRC Press, 2023.
• [2] A.I. Wuryandari, M. Febrianti, K. Alfathdyanto and M. Syahfirin: Dance recognition system of Sigeh Penguten traditional dance based on hidden Markov model. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 14(23), (2019), 8668-8675. DOI: 10.36478/jeasci.2019.8668.8675
• [3] A.K. Luhach and A. Elçi: Artificial intelligence paradigms for smart cyber-physical systems. Artificial Intelligence Paradigms for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems, (2020), 1-392. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-5101-1
• [4] A. Leontiev: Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1978.
• [5] A. Navarro: Fundamentals of transaction management in enterprise application architectures. IEEE Access, 10 (2022), 124305-124332, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3224759
• [6] A. Sajjad, W. Ahmad, S. Hussain, R.M. Mehmood and S. Member: Development of innovative operational flexibility measurement model for smart systems in Industry 4.0 paradigm. IEEE Access, 10 (2022), 6760-6774. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3139544
• [7] A. Sukoco: The next generation information of technology for biodiversty of conservation. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Engineering and Technology Development (ICETD 2017), Bandar Lampung University, Indonesia, (2017), 469-473.
• [8] A. Sukoco, A.I. Wuryandari, A.S. Prihatmanto, R. Wijaya and S.R. Henim: Wireless data collection for animal monitoring system using UAV. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 16(3), (2021), 126-129.
• [9] A. Sukoco, A.S. Prihatmanto, R. Wijaya, I. Sadad and R. Darmakusuma: SEMUT: Next generation public transportation architecture in the era IoT and Big Data. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 14(12), (2019), 4052-4059. DOI: 10.36478/jeasci.2019.4052.4059
• [10] B.A. Nardi: Context and Consciousness: Activity theory and Human-Computer Interaction. MIT Press, 1995.
• [11] B.J. Keegan, D. Dennehy and P. Naudé: Implementing artificial intelligence in traditional B2B marketing practices: An activity theory perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 26 (2022), 1025-1039. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-022-10294-1
• [12] B. Krogstie and J. Krogstie: Using activity theory and community of practice to understand knowledge management processes of international enterprises with high diversity, (1998), [on-line] https://folk.idi.ntnu.no/krogstie/publications/2002/ISCRAT02/draft.pdf
• [13] D. Mahayana: Filsafat Sains. ITB Press, 2022.
• [14] D. Monteiro, P.H.M. Maia, L.S. Rocha and N.C. Mendonça: Building orchestrated microservice systems using declarative business processes. Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 14(4), (2020), 243-268. DOI: 10.1007/s11761-020-00300-2
• [15] D.S. Santos, B.R.N. Oliveira R. Kazman, and E.Y. Nakagawa: Evaluation of systems-of-systems software architectures: State of the art and future perspectives. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(4), (2022), 1-35. DOI: 10.1145/3519020
• [16] E.A. Lee: Computing Foundations and Practice for Cyber-Physical Systems: A Preliminary Report. Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2007-72, University of California at Berkeley, 2007, [on-line] https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2007/EECS-2007-72.pdf
• [17] Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen and R-L. Punamaki: Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1999. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511812774
• [18] F. Burzlaff, N. Wilken, C. Bartelt and H. Stuckenschmidt: Semantic interoperability methods for smart service systems: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(6), (2022), 4052-4066. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2019.2922103
• [19] F.C. Delicato, A. Al-Anbuky and K.I-K. Wang: Editorial: Smart cyber-physical systems: toward pervasive intelligence systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 107 (2020), 1134-1139, DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2019.06.031
• [20] H. Hasan and A. Kazlauskas: Activity theory: Who is doing what, why and how. University of Wollongong, Research Online, 2014. [on-line] http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1405&context=buspapers
• [21] H. Shi, M. Yang and P. Jiang: Social production system: A three-layer smart framework for implementing autonomous human-machine collaborations in a shop floor. IEEE Access, 9 (2021), 26696-26711. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3050236
• [22] I. Abuhay: ISO 9001:2015 A Complete Guide to Quality Management System. Taylor & Francis Inc. 2017.
• [23] I. Schmidt, W. Morris, A. Thomas and L. Manning: Smart systems: The role of advanced technologies in improving business quality, performance and supply chain integration. Standards, 2(3), (2022), 276-293. DOI: 10.3390/standards2030020
• [24] Technical report. ISO/TR 10013: Guidelines for quality management system documentation. iTech Standard Preview, 2001. [on-line] https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/26978/eec14833346141359a8434c72132005a/ISO-TR-10013-2001.pdf
• [25] J. Coulet: Technological forecasting and social change the organization activity: A foresight approach of theoretical knowledge evolution in management science. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140 (2019), 160-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.009
• [26] J.M. Carroll: Human-computer interaction: Psychology as a science of design. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), (1997), 61-83. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.61
• [27] J.S. Lim: Quality Management in Engineering. A Scientific and Systematic Approach. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 2019. DOI: 10.1201/9780429281600
• [28] J. Patalas-Maliszewska and N. Schlueter: Model of a knowledge management for system integrator(s) of cyber-physical production systems (CPPS). Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. J. Trojanowska, O. Ciszak. J. Mendes Machado and I. Pavlenko (Eds.), Advances in Manufacturing II, 1 (2019), 92-103. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-18715-6
• [29] J. Von Newman: The Computer and the Brain. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958.
• [30] V. Wertsch: The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology. M.E. Sharpe, Inc., Armonk, New York, 1979.
• [31] J. Zhou, Y. Zhou, B. Wang and J. Zang: Human-cyber-physical systems (HCPSs) in the context of new-generation intelligent manufacturing. Engineering, 5(4), (2019), 624-636. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2019.07.015
• [32] K. Kim and P.R. Kumar: Cyber - physical systems: A perspective at the centennial. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100 (2012), 1287-1308. DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2189792
• [33] K. Kuutti: Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. B. Nardi (Ed.), Cambridge. MA: MIT Press, 1996.
• [34] L. Von Bertalanffy: The history and status of general systems theory. Academy of Management Journal, 15(4), (1972), 407-426. DOI: 10.5465/255139
• [35] L. Vygotsky: Thought and Language. Revised and expanded edition. MIT Press, 2012.
• [36] L. White, K. Burger and M. Yearworth: Understanding behavior in problem structuring methods interventions with activity theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(3), (2016), 983-1004. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.044
• [37] M.B. Schrettenbrunner: Artificial-intelligence-driven management. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(2), (2020), 15-19. DOI: 10.1109/EMR.2020.2990933
• [38] M. Cole and Y. Engeström: A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. psychological and educational considerations. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1993, 1-46.
• [39] M.C. Rozendaal, B. Boon and V. Kaptelinin: Objects with intent: Designing everyday things as collaborative partners. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 26(4), (2019), 1-33. DOI: 10.1145/3325277
• [40] M. Jaccard: The Objective is Quality: An Introduction to Performance and Sustainability Management Systems. EPFL Press, 2013.
• [41] M-H. Huang and R.T. Rust: A framework for collaborative artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of Retailing, 98(2), (2022), 209-223. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2021.03.001
• [42] M. Poursoltan, N. Pinède, M.K. Traore and B. Vallespir: A new descriptive, theoretical framework for cyber-physical and human systems. IFAC PapersOnLine, 54(1), (2021), 918-923. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.109
• [43] M. Romero, W. Guédria, H. Panetto and B. Barafort: Towards a characterisation of smart systems: A systematic literature review. Computers in Industry, 120 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103224
• [44] N. Syam and A. Sharma: Waiting for a sales renaissance in the fourth industrial revolution: Machine learning and artificial intelligence in sales research and practice. Industrial Marketing Management, 69 (2017), 135-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.12.019
• [45] P. Dourish: Where the Action Is. The Foundation of Embodied Interaction. A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, 2001.
• [46] P. Marwede: Embedded System Design: Embedded System Foundation of Cyber-Physical System, and the Internet of Things. Springer, 2018.
• [47] R. Alur: Principles of Cyber-Physical Systems. MIT Press, 2015.
• [48] R. Kamanga, P.M. Alexander and F. Kanobe: Activity theory used as an analytical lens for business research. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 17(4), (2019), 212-228. DOI: 10.34190/JBRM.17.4.002
• [49] R. Kurweil: The Singularity is Near when Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking Penguin, 2005.
• [50] R. Tricker: Quality ManagementT Systems. A Practical Guide to Standards Implementation. Routledge, 2021.
• [51] R. Wijaya, A.S. Prihatmanto, A. Sukoco, M. Syahfirin and M. Shusanti: Biodiversity conservation monitoring systemimage detection using tensorflow. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 15(6), (2020), 824-828.
• [52] R. Wijaya, A. Sukoco, R. Rin Nurmalasari and A. Setijadi Prihatmanto: HIV transmission using agent based model simulation. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 15(7), (2020), 1652-1658.
• [53] R. Wijaya, R. Siswanto, A. Setijadi Prihatmanto, F.S. Suwita, R. Darmakusuma, H.A. Rosyid, A. Satriawan and A. Sukoco: Utilization magnetic field and radio frequency identification for moving block signalling system prototype to increase line track capacity. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 15(5), (2020), 613-619.
• [54] S. Bødker: Through the interface: An activity-theoretical perspective on human-computer interaction. PhD thesis, Aarhus University, Computer Science Department, 1987.
• [55] S. Bødker: When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. Proceedings of the Nordic Conference on Human Computer Interaction, (2006). DOI: 10.1145/1182475.1182476
• [56] S. Jung, O.O. Buruk and J. Hamari: Altered states of consciousness in Human-Computer Interaction: A review. Proceedings of the Nordic Conference on Human Computer Interaction, (2022). DOI: 10.1145/3546155.3546667
• [57] S.K. Card, T.P. Morgan and A. Newell: The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. CRC Press, 1983. DOI: 10.1201/9780203736166
• [58] T.H. Davenport, A. Guha, D. Grewal and T. Bressgott: How artificial intelligence will change the future of bullion production. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48 (2020), 24-42. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0
• [59] T. Clemmensen: Human Work Interaction Design for Socio-Technical Theory and Action. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2021.
• [60] T. Clemmensen: Whatever happened to the psychology of human-computer interaction? A biography of the life of a psychological framework within a HCI journal. Information Technology and People, 19(2), (2006), 121-151. DOI: 10.1108/09593840610673793
• [61] T. Clemmensen, V. Kaptelinin and B. Nardi: Making HCI theory work: an analysis of the use of activity theory in HCI research. Behaviour and Information Technology, 35(8), (2016), 608-627. DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2016.1175507
• [62] Inernational Standard ISO 9001:2015. Quality management systems - Requirements. International Standard, 2015.
• [63] T.R. Schactzki: Social practises: A Witggensteinina Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge University Press, 2003. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511527470
• [64] T. Winograd and F. Flores: Undertanding Computers and Cognition. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc, 1996.
• [65] V. Kaptelinin and B. Nardi: Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. MIT Press, 2007.
• [66] V. Lenarduzzi, F. Lomio, N. Saarimäki and D. Taibi: Does migrating a monolithic system to microservices decrease the technical debt? Journal of Systems and Software, 169 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110710
• [67] V. Kaptelinin, B. Nardi, S. Bødker, J. Carroll, J. Hollan, E. Hutchins and T. Winograd: Post-cognitivist HCI: Second-wave theories. Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Lauderdale, USA, (2003), 692-693. DOI: 10.1145/765891.765933
• [68] V. Uren and J.S. Edwards: Technology readiness and the organizational journey towards AI adoption: An empirical study. International Journal of Information Management, 68 (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102588
• [69] V. Varadarajan, P. Kommers and V. Piuri: Preface of special issue on advanced techniques and emerging trends in smart cyber-physical systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 135(C), (2022), 299-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2022.05.011
• [70] W. Chu and R. Wever: Behaviours, practices, activities, doings: Making them sustainable through design. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, London, UK, (2022). DOI: 10.35199/epde.2022.97
• [71] W.K.G. Assunção, T.E. Colanzi, L. Carvalho, A. Garcia, J. Alves Pereira, M.J. de Lima and C. Lucena: Analysis of a many-objective optimization approach for identifying microservices from legacy systems. Empirical Software Engineering, 27(2), (2022). DOI: 10.1007/s10664-021-10049-7
• [72] Y. Engeström: Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), (2010), 133-156. DOI: 10.1080/13639080020028747
• [73] Y. Engeström: Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit, 1987.
• [74] Y.K. Dwivedi et al.: Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57 (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
• [75] Y. Rogers: HCI Theory Classical, Modern, and Contemporary. Part of the book series: Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, Springer, 2012.
• [76] Y. Sun, C. Xu, G. Li, W. Xu, J. Kong, D. Jiang, B. Tao and D. Chen: Intelligent human computer interaction based on non redundant EMG signal. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59(3), (2020), 1149-1157. DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.015

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025)