Factors affecting the level of supply chain performance and its dimensions in the context of supply chain adaptability

Leończuk, Dorota

doi:10.17270/J.LOG.2021.584

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Factors affecting the level of supply chain performance and its dimensions in the context of supply chain adaptability

Autorzy

Leończuk Dorota

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17270/J.LOG.2021.584

Warianty tytułu

Czynniki wpływające na poziom wydajności łańcucha dostaw oraz jej wymiarów w kontekście adaptacyjności łańcucha dostaw

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Background: A vital determinant of supply chain performance is its adaptability. It is one of essential features that affect the results of the functioning of a supply chain. Many researchers indicate adaptability as a significant source of acquiring and maintaining a long-term competitive advantage, one of major factors that guarantee the success of a supply chain, or a major development megatrend of supply chains. The main objective of the article is to analyse the impact of such factors as industry and applied competitive strategy (cost leadership, differentiation, or focus) on the level of supply chain performance and results achieved by the supply chain with regard to the key aspects of performance in the context of adaptability. Methods: In the article the author analyses results of studies conducted with CATI method at a sample of 200 enterprises representing four industries: automotive, food, furniture as well as consumer electronics and household appliances, which are among most advanced sectors in the Polish economy (leaders of Polish export). The analysis of data gathered was carried out at a few stages. Firstly, a hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis was applied. The developed model was used for measuring and assessing the performance of supply chains and its dimensions by means of designating factor scores. The last stage involved studying the impact of such factors as type of industry or applied competitive strategy on the level of performance and its four dimensions: visibility, velocity, versatility, and responsiveness. At this stage the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used. Results: The results of the conducted studies provided evidence that the level of supply chain performance as well as its four dimensions is not affected by the type of industry, but vary in accordance to the applied competitive strategy. Conclusions: The model, developed and positively verified in terms of quality, may constitute a useful tool for management practitioners to measure and assesses the performance of specific supply chains, as well as make comparisons between them. Thanks to determining factors that affect the level of performance and its four dimensions, managers may as well consciously indicate directions in improving supply chains.

Wstęp: Ważną determinantą wydajności łańcucha dostaw jest jego adaptacyjność. Jest to jedna z istotnych cech, które przekładają się na wyniki funkcjonowania łańcucha dostaw. Adaptacyjność jest przez wielu badaczy wskazywana jako ważne źródło zdobycia i utrzymania długoterminowej przewagi konkurencyjnej, jeden z głównych czynników gwarantujących sukces łańcucha dostaw, czy też główny megatrend rozwojowy łańcuchów dostaw. Głównym celem artykułu jest zbadanie wpływu czynników, takich jak branża i stosowana strategia konkurencyjna na poziom wydajności łańcucha dostaw oraz wyniki osiągane przez łańcuch dostaw w ramach kluczowych aspektów wydajności z uwzględnieniem kontekstu adaptacyjności. Metody: W artykule przeanalizowano wyniki badań przeprowadzonych techniką CATI na próbie 200 przedsiębiorstw z czterech branż: spożywczej, RTV/AGD i elektroniki, motoryzacyjnej oraz meblarskiej. Analiza zgromadzonych danych została przeprowadzona w kilku etapach. W pierwszej kolejności wykonano hierarchiczną konfirmacyjną analizę czynnikową. Opracowany model wykorzystano do pomiaru i oceny wydajności łańcuchów dostaw oraz jej wymiarów, poprzez wyznaczenie ocen czynnikowych. W ostatnim etapie zbadano wpływ takich czynników jak przynależność do branży oraz stosowana strategia konkurencyjna na poziom wydajności oraz jej czterech wymiarów. W tym etapie wykorzystano nieparametryczny test Kruskala-Wallisa. Wyniki: Wyniki przeprowadzonych badań wykazały, że poziom wydajności łańcuchów dostaw, a także jej czterech wymiarów nie jest zależny od przynależności do branży, natomiast różni się w zależności od stosowanej strategii konkurencyjnej. Wnioski: Opracowany oraz pozytywnie zweryfikowany pod względem jakości model może stanowić narzędzie użyteczne dla praktyków zarządzania do pomiaru i oceny wydajności poszczególnych łańcuchów dostaw, a także dokonywania ich porównań. Dzięki wskazaniu czynników wpływających na poziom wydajności oraz jej czterech wymiarów menedżerowie mogą także w świadomy sposób wskazywać kierunki doskonalenia łańcuchów dostaw.

Słowa kluczowe

supply chain performance supply chain adaptability 3V formula hierarchical confirmatory factor analysys

dokonania łańcucha dostaw adaptacyjność formuła 3V hierarchiczna konfirmacyjna analiza czynnikowa

Wydawca

Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki

Czasopismo

LogForum

Rocznik

2021

Tom

Vol. 17, no. 2

Strony

253--269

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 70 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Leończuk Dorota

d.leonczuk@pb.edu.pl

Bialystok University of Technology, Faculty of Engineering Management, 45A, Wiejska Street, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0424-0226

Bibliografia

1. Ahimbisibwe A., Ssebulime R., Tumuhairwe R., Tusiime, W., 2016. Supply chain visibility, supply chain velocity, supply chain alignment and humanitarian supply chain relief agility. European Journal of Logistics, Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 4(2), 34-64.
2. Arif-Uz-Zaman K., Ahsan, A.M.M.N., 2014. Lean supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(5), 588-612, http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2013-0092
3. Barratt M., Oke A., 2007. Antecedents of supply chain visibility in retail supply chains: A resource-based theory perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1217-1233, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.003
4. Basu R., Wright J.N., 2008. Total supply chain management. Elsevier, United Kingdom.
5. Beamon B.M., 1999. Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(3), 275-292, http://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910249714
6. Bozarth C., Handfield R.B., 2007. Wprowadzenie do zarządzania operacjami i łańcuchem dostaw [Introduction to operations and supply chain management]. Helion, Gliwice.
7. Brewer P.C., Speh T.W., 2000. Using the balanced scorecard to measure supply chain performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), 75-93.
8. Brown T.A., 2015. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press, New York.
9. Caridi M., Moretto A., Perego A., Tumino A., 2014. The benefits of supply chain visibility: A value assessment model. International Journal of Production Economics, 151, 1-19, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.08.016
10. Carvalho H., Azevedo S.G., Cruz-Machado V., 2012. Agile and resilient approaches to supply chain management: Influence on performance and competitiveness. Logistics Research, 4(1), 49-62, http://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-012-0064-2
11. Chae B., 2009. Developing key performance indicators for supply chain: An industry perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(6), 422-428, http://doi.org/10.1108/13598540910995192
12. Chan F.T.S., 2003. Performance measurement in a supply chain. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21(7), 534-548, http://doi.org/10.1007/s001700300063
13. Chimhamhiwa D., van der Molen P., Mutanga O., Rugege D., 2009. Towards a framework for measuring end to end performance of land administration business process - a case study. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33(4), 293-301, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.04.001
14. Cho D.W., Lee Y.H., Ahn S.H., Hwang M.K., 2012. A framework for measuring the performance of service supply chain management. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(3), 801-818, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.014
15. Clark Ch., 2007. Getting back to basics: Top five tips for accelerating supply chain velocity. Supply & Demand Chain Executive, 8(4), 26.
16. Davidrajuh R, 2006. Structures for stepwise development of adaptive supply chains. Journal of Internet Commerce, 5(4), 55-72, http://doi.org/10.1300/J179v05n04_04
17. DiStefano Ch., Zhu M., Mîndrilă D., 2009. Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(20), 1-11.
18. Elking I., Paraskevas J-P., Grimm C., Corsi T., Steven A., 2017. Financial Dependence, Lean Inventory Strategy, and Firm Performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(2), 22-38, http://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12136
19. Elrod C., Murray S., Bande S., 2013. A review of performance metrics for supply chain management. Engineering Management Journal, 25(3), 39-50, http://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2013.11431981
20. Espinoza O.A., Bond B.H., Kline E., 2010. Quality measurement in the wood products supply chain. Forest Products Journal, 60(3), 249-257, http://doi.org/10.13073/0015-7473-60.3.249
21. Estampe D., 2014. Supply chain performance and evaluation models. ISTE, London.
22. Estampe D., Lamouri S., Paris J-L., BrahimDjelloul S., 2013. A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models. International Journal of Production Economics, 142(2), 247-258, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.024
23. Fischer C., 2013. Trust and communication in European agri-food chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(2), 208-218, http://doi.org/10.1108/13598541311318836
24. Folan P., Browne J., 2005. A review of performance measurement: towards performance management. Computers in Industry, 56(7), 663-680, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2005.03.001
25. Ganga G.M.D., Carpinetti L.C.R., 2011. A fuzzy logic approach to supply chain performance management. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(1), 177-187, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.06.011
26. Golrizgashti S., 2014. Supply chain value creation methodology under BSC approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 10(67), 1-15, http://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-014-0067-5
27. Gopal P.R.C., Thakkar J., 2012. A review on supply chain performance measures and metrics: 2000-2011. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(5), 518-547, http://doi.org/10.1108/17410401211232957
28. Guilford J. P., 1954. Psychometric methods. McGraw-Hill, New York.
29. Gunasekaran A.,Kobu B., 2007. Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: a review of recent literature (1995-2004) for research and applications. International Journal of Production Research, 45(12), 2819 2840, http://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600806513
30. Hines T., 2013. Supply chain strategies: Demand driven and customer focused. Routledge New York.
31. Holcomb M.C., Ponomarov S.Y., Manrodt K.B., 2011. The relationship of supply chain visibility to firm performance. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 12(2), 32-45, http://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2011.11517258
32. Hooper D., Coughlan J., Mullen M., 2008. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
33. Ivanov D., Sokolov B., 2010. Adaptive supply chain management. Springer, London.
34. Ivanov D., Sokolov B., Kaeschel J., 2010. A multi-structural framework for adaptive supply chain planning and operations control with structure dynamics considerations. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(2), 409-420, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.002
35. Iyer A., Seshadri S., Vasher R., 2009. Toyota supply chain management: A Strategic approach to Toyota's renowned system. McGraw-Hill Education, USA.
36. Johansson S., Melin J., 2008. Supply chain visibility. The value of information. A benchmark study of the Swedish industry. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
37. Jűttner U.,Maklan S., 2011. Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: An empirical study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 246-259, http://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111139062
38. Kalakota R., Robinson M., Gundepudi P., 2003. Mobile applications for adaptive supply chain: A landscape analysis, in: E-P. Lim & K. Siau (Eds), Advances in mobile commerce technologies. Idea Group Inc, Hershey, USA, http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-052-3.ch013
39. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into action. Harvard Business Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
40. Kohlberger R., Gerschberger M., Engelhardt-Nowitzki C., 2011. Variety in supply networks - definitions and influencing parameters, in: C.H. Fang (Ed.). Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Logistics and SCM systems, 07-09.03.2011, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
41. Kot S., Onyusheva I., Grondys K., 2018. Supply chain management in SMEs: evidence from Poland and Kazakhstan. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 10(3), 23-36.
42. Lee H.L., 2004. The triple - A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 102-112.
43. Leończuk D., Ryciuk U., Szymczak M., Nazarko J., 2019. Measuring performance of adaptive supply chains, in: A. Kawa, A. Maryniak (Eds), SMART Supply Network, EcoProduction (Environmental Issues in Logistics and Manufacturing). Springer, Cham, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91668- 2_5
44. Lin L-Ch., Li T-S., 2010. An integrated framework for supply chain performance measurement using Six-Sigma metrics. Software Quality Journal, 18(3), 387-406, http://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-010-9099-2
45. MacCallum R. C., Widaman K. F., Zhang S., Hong S., 1999. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84-99, http://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.4.1.84
46. Min S., Roath A.S., Daugherty P.J., Genchev S.E. Chen H., Arndt A.D., Richey R.G., 2005. Supply chain collaboration: what's happening? The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16(2), 237-256, http://doi.org/10.1108/09574090510634539
47. Momeni E., Tavana M., Mirzagoltabar H., Mirhedayatiane S.M., 2014. A new fuzzy network slacks-based DEA model for evaluating performance of supply chains with reverse logistics. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 27(2), 793-804, http://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-131037
48. Neely A., Gregory M., Platts K., 1995. Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80-116, http://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083622
49. Nielsen N.P.H., Holmström, J., 1995. Design for speed: A supply chain perspective on design for manufacturability. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 8(3), 223-228, http://doi.org/10.1016/0951-5240(95)00016-M
50. Nutt B., 2004. Infrastructure resources: Forging alignments between supply and demand. Facilities, 22(13/14), 335-343, http://doi.org/10.1108/02632770410563031
51. O'Rourke N., Hatcher L., 2013. A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modelling. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.
52. Olugu E.U., Wong K.Y., 2009. Supply chain performance evaluation: Trends and challenges. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2(1), 202-211, http://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2009.202.211
53. Piotrowicz W., Cuthbertson R., 2015. Performance measurement and metrics in supply chains: An exploratory study. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(8), 1-26, http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2014-0064
54. Porter M.E., 1985. Competitive advantage. The Free Press, New York.
55. Qrunfleh S., Tarafdar M., 2014. Supply chain information systems strategy: Impacts on supply chain performance and firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 340-350, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.09.018
56. Ross T.J., Holcomb M.C., Fugate B.S., 2004. Connectivity. Enabling visibility in the adaptive supply chain. http://web.utk.edu/~mholcomb/Report2004.pdf, Accessed December 14, 2018.
57. Ruhi U., Turel O., 2005. Driving visibility, velocity and versatility: The role of mobile technologies in supply chain management. Journal of Internet Commerce, 4(3), 95- 117, http://doi.org/10.1300/J179v04n03_06
58. Ryciuk U., 2016. Zaufanie międzyorganizacyjne w łańcuchach dostaw w budownictwie [Inter-organizational trust in construction supply chains]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
59. Schmidt Ch.G., Foerstl K., Schaltenbrand B., 2017. The Supply Chain Position Paradox: Green Practices and Firm Performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(1), 3-25, http://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12113
60. Scholten K., Schilder S., 2015. The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 471-484, http://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2014-0386
61. Shaw S., Grant D.B., Mangan J., 2010. Developing environmental supply chain performance measures. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 17(3), 320-339, http://doi.org/10.1108/14635771011049326
62. Swaminathan J.M., Tayur S.R., 2003. Models for supply chains in e-business. Management Science, 49(10), 1387-1406, http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1387.17309
63. Szymczak M., 2015a. Elastyczność, wrażliwość i odporność jako cechy adaptacyjnych łańcuchów dostaw [Flexibility, Responsibility and Resiliency as Features of Adaptive Supply Chains]. Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 3(6), 39-54.
64. Szymczak M., 2015b. Ewolucja łańcuchów dostaw [The Evolution of Supply Chains]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, Poznań.
65. Tarasewicz R., 2014. Jak mierzyć efektywność łańcuchów dostaw? [How to measure the performance of supply chains?]. Szkoła Główna Handlowa - Oficyna Wydawnicza, Warszawa.
66. Tsironis L.K., Matthopoulos P.P., 2015. Towards the identification of important strategic priorities of the supply chain network. Business Process Management Journal, 21(6), 1279-1298, http://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2014-0120
67. Uluman M., Doğan C.D., 2016. Comparison of factor score computation methods in factor analysis. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 10(18), 143-151.
68. Whitten G.D., Green K.W., Zelbst P.J., 2012. Triple - A supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(1), 28-48, http://doi.org/10.1108/01443571211195727
69. Ying J., Li-jun Z., 2011. The quantitative research on the index system of supply chain performance measurement based on SCOR, in: J. Jiang (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2011 International conference on informatics, cybernetics, and computer engineering (ICCE2011) November 19-20, 2011. Melbourne, Australia. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, 112, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
70. Zailani S., Jeyaraman K., Vengadasan G., Premkumar R, 2012. Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: A survey. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 330-340, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.008

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-eb7265d3-46cd-41c9-b9e7-905685832498