Improving ANN based streamfow estimation models for the Upper Indus Basin using satellite derived snow cover area

Hassan, Muhammad; Hassan, Ishtiaq

doi:10.1007/s11600-020-00491-4

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Improving ANN based streamfow estimation models for the Upper Indus Basin using satellite derived snow cover area

Autorzy

Hassan Muhammad , Hassan Ishtiaq

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.springer.com/journal/11600

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-020-00491-4

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The mountainous catchments often witness contrasting regimes and the limited available meteorological network creates uncertainty in both the hydrological data and developed models. To overcome this problem, remotely sensed data could be used in addition to on-ground observations for hydrological forecasting. The fusion of these two types of data gives a better picture and helps to generate adequate hydrological forecasting models. The study aims at the improvement of ANN-based streamfow estimation models by using an integrated data-set containing, the satellite-derived snow cover area (SCA) with on-ground fow observations. For this purpose, SCA of three sub catchments of Upper Indus Basin, namely Gilgit, Astore and Bunji coupled with their respective gauge discharges is used as model inputs. The weekly stream-fow models are developed for infows at Besham Qila located just upstream of Tarbela dam. The data-set for modeling is prepared through normal izing all variables by scaling between 0 and 1. A mathematical tool, Gamma test is applied to fuse the inputs, and a best input combination is selected on the basis of minimum gamma value. A feed forward neural network trained via two layer Broyden Fletcher Goldfarb Shanno algorithm is used for model development. The models are evaluated on the basis of set of performance indicators, namely, Nash–Sutclife Efciency, Root Mean Square Error, Variance and BIAS. A comparative assessment has also been made using these indicators for models developed, through data-set containing gauge discharges, only and the data-set fused with satellite-derived SCA. In particular, the current study concluded that the efciency of ANN-based streamfow estimation models developed for mountainous catchments could be improved by integrating the SCA with the gauge discharges.

Słowa kluczowe

mountainous catchment Upper Indus Basin snow cover area streamflow artificial neural network ANN

zlewnia górska dorzecze Górnego Indusu obszar pokrywy śnieżnej spływ wodny sztuczna sieć neuronowa SSN

Wydawca

Instytut Geofizyki PAN
Springer

Czasopismo

Acta Geophysica

Rocznik

2020

Tom

Vol. 68, no. 6

Strony

1791--1801

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 65 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Hassan Muhammad

hassan.ce@must.edu.pk

Capital University of Science and Technology (CUST), Islamabad, Pakistan

autor

Hassan Ishtiaq

eishtiaq@cust.edu.pk

Capital University of Science and Technology (CUST), Islamabad, Pakistan

Bibliografia

1. Abrahart RJ, See L (2002) Multi-model data fusion for river flow forecasting: an evaluation of six alternative methods based on two contrasting catchments. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6(4):655–670
2. Afzal MT, Arslan M, Zafar S, Waqar MM (2014) Satellite derived snow cover status and trends in the Indus Basin. J Sp Technol 4:26–31
3. Ahmed F, Hassan M, Nisar H (2018) Developing nonlinear models for sediment load estimation in an irrigation canal. Acta Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0221-3
4. Andermann C (2011) Evaluation of precipitation data sets along the Himalayan front. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC003513
5. Archer DR, Fowler HJ (2004) Spatial and temporal variations in precipitation in the Upper Indus Basin, global teleconnections and hydrological implications. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 8:47–61
6. Arfan M, Lund J, Hassan D, Saleem M, Ahmad A et al (2019) Assessment of spatial and temporal flow variability of the Indus River. Resources 8:103
7. Ata M, Tekeli AE, Dönmez S, Fouli H (2016) Use of interactive multisensor snow and ice mapping system snow cover maps (IMS) and artificial neural networks for simulating river discharges in Eastern Turkey. Arab J Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2074-2
8. Azmi M, Araghinejad S, Kholghi M (2010) Multi model data fusion for hydrological forecasting using K-nearest neighbour method. Iran J Sci Technol 34:81–92
9. Bashir F, Rasul G (2003) Estimation of water discharge from gilgit basin using remote sensing. GIS Runoff Model Introd 6:97–113
10. Behrangi A, Khakbaz B, Chun T, Aghakouchak A, Hsu K (2011) Hydrologic evaluation of satellite precipitation products over a mid-size basin. J Hydrol 397:225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.043
11. Brownlee J (2018) Deep learning performance. Machine Learning Mastery
12. Broxton PD, Zeng X, Sulla-Menashe D, Troch PA (2014) A global land cover climatology using MODIS data. J Appl Meteorol Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0270.1
13. Brubaker KL, Pinker RT, Deviatova E et al (2005) Evaluation and comparison of MODIS and IMS snow-cover estimates for the continental united states using station data. J Hydrometeorol 6:1002–1017
14. Durrant PJ (2001) A non-linear data analysis and modeling tool with applications to flood prediction. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, Cardiff University, University of Wales, UK
15. Elshorbagy A, Corzo G, Srinivasulu S, Solomatine DP (2010) Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data driven modeling techniques in hydrology: Part 2. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:1943–1961. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1943-2010
16. Ercan MB, Asce M, Goodall JL, Asce AM (2013) Estimating watershed-scale precipitation by combining gauge- and radar-derived observations, pp 983–994. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000687
17. Forsythe N, Kilsby CG, Fowler HJ, Archer DR, Forsythe N, Kilsby CG, Fowler HJ, Archer DR (2011) Variability and potential change using MODIS satellite data products assessment of runoff sensitivity in the Upper Indus Basin to interannual climate variability and potential change using MODIS satellite data products. BioOne 32:16–29
18. Fowler HJ, Archer DR (2005) Hydro-climatological variability in the Upper Indus Basin and implications for water resources. Reg Hydrol Impacts Clim Change Impact Assess Decis Mak 295:131–138
19. Giustolisi O (2004) Sparse solution in training artificial neural networks. NeuroComputing 56C:284–304
20. Gökbulak F, Kamil Ş, Serengil Y (2015) Comparison of rainfall-runoff relationship modeling using different methods in a forested watershed. Water Resour Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1056-1
21. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. MIT Press, Cambridge
22. Hassan M, Shamim MA, Hashmi HN, Ashiq SZ, Ahmed I, Pasha GA, Naeem UA (2014) Predicting streamflows to a multipurpose reservoir using artificial neural networks and regression techniques. Earth Sci Inform. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-014-0161-7
23. Hassan M, Shamim MA, Sikandar A, Mehmood I, Ahmed I, Ashiq SZ, Khitab A (2015) Development of sediment load estimation models by using artificial neural networking techniques. Environ Monit Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4866-y
24. Hasson ul S, Böhner J, Lucarini V et al (2017) Prevailing climatic trends and runoff response from Hindukush–Karakoram–Himalaya, upper Indus Basin. Earth Syst Dyn 8:337–355. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-337-2017
25. Hasson S, Lucarini V, Khan, Petitta M, Bolch T, Gioli G (2014) Early 21st century snow cover state over the western river basins of the Indus River system. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4077-2014
26. Hayat H, Akbar TA, Tahir AA, Hassan QK, Dewan A, Irshad M (2019) Simulating current and future river-flows in the snowmelt-runo ff model and RCP scenarios. Water 11:1–19
27. Immerzeel WW, Droogers P, De Jong SM, Bierkens MFP et al (2009) Remote Sensing of Environment Large-scale monitoring of snow cover and runoff simulation in Himalayan river basins using remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 113:40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.08.010
28. Jamal K, Ahmad S, Li X, Rizwan M, Li H, Feng J (2018) Climate change and runoff contribution by hydrological zones of cryosphere catchment of Indus River, Pakistan. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-548
29. Jones AJ (2004) New tools in non-linear modelling and prediction. Comput Manage Sci 1(2):109–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-003-0006-1
30. Khan A, Naz BS, Bowling LC (2015) Separating snow, clean and debris covered ice in the Upper Indus Basin, Hindukush–Karakoram–Himalayas, using Landsat images between 1998 and 2002. J Hydrol 521:46–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.048
31. Kisi O, Sanikhani H (2015) Prediction of long-term monthly precipitation using several. Int J Climatol 35:4139–4150. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4273
32. Lang K, Waibel A, Hinton G (1990) A time-delay neural network architecture for isolated word recognition. Neural Netw 3:23–43
33. Le Cun Y, Denker J S, Solla S A (1990) Optimal brain damage. In: Touretzky DS (ed) Advances in neural information processing systems, vol 2, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, California, pp 598–605
34. Lee G, Kim D, Kwon H, Choi E (2019) Estimation of maximum daily fresh snow accumulation using an artificial neural network model. Adv Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2709351
35. Liu X, Chen B (2000) Climatic warming in the Tibetan Plateau during recent decades. Int J Climatol 1742:1729–1742
36. Lutz AF, Immerzeel WW, Kraaijenbrink PDA, Shrestha AB, Bierkens MFP (2016) Climate change impacts on the Upper Indus hydrology: sources, shifts and extremes. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165630
37. Minsky M, Papert S (1969) Perceptrons. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
38. Mishra B, Tripathi NK, Babel MS (2014) An artificial neural network-based snow cover predictive modeling in the higher Himalayas An Artificial Neural Network-Based Snow Cover Predictive Modeling in the Higher Himalayas. J Mt Sci 11:825–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-2985-5
39. Mukhopadhyay B, Dutta A (2010) A stream water availability model of Upper Indus Basin based on a topologic model and global climatic datasets. Water Resour Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9666-0
40. Naeem UA, Hashmi HN, Shamim MA, Ejaz N (2012) Flow variation in astore river under assumed glaciated extents due to climate change. Pak J Eng Appl Sci 11:73–81
41. Naeem U, Mughal H-U-R, Ghumman AR, Shamim MA (2014) Ranking sensitive calibrating parameters of UBC watershed model ranking sensitive calibrating parameters of UBC watershed model. KSCE J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0515-6
42. Nagarajan K, Krekeler C, Member S, Slatton KC, Member S, Graham WD (2010) A scalable approach to fusing spatiotemporal data to estimate streamflow via a bayesian network. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48:3720–3732
43. Piotrowski AP, Napiorkowski JJ (2013) A comparison of methods to avoid overfitting in neural networks training in the case of catchment runoff modelling. J Hydrol 476:97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.019
44. Prasad AK, Yang KS, Kafatos M (2009) Melting of major Glaciers in the western Himalayas: evidence of climatic changes from long term MSU derived tropospheric temperature trend (1979–2008). Annales Geophysicae 27:4505–4519
45. Quiroga VM, Mano A, Kure S, Udo K (2013) Snow glacier melt estimation in tropical Andean glaciers using artificial neural networks. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1265-2013
46. Rastner P, Prinz R, Notarnicola C, Nicholson L, Sailer R, Schwaizer G, Paul F (2019) On the automated mapping of snow cover on glaciers and calculation of snow line altitudes from multi-temporal landsat data. Remote Sens 12:1–24
47. Razavi T, Coulibaly P (2016) Improving streamflow estimation in ungauged basins using multi-modelling approach. Hydrol Sci J. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1154558
48. Remesan R, Shamim MA, Han D (2008) Model data selection using gamma test for daily solar radiation estimation. Hydrol Process 2274:2267–2274. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp
49. Remesan R, Ali M, Han D, Mathew J (2009) Runoff prediction using an integrated hybrid modelling scheme. J Hydrol 372:48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.034
50. Sakai A, Nuimura T, Fujita K, Takenaka S, Nagai H, Lamsal D (2015) Climate regime of Asian glaciers revealed by GAMDAM glacier inventory. Cryosph. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-865-2015
51. See L, Abrahart RJ (2001) Multi-model data fusion for hydrological forecasting. Comput Geosci 27:987–994
52. Shamim MA, Hassan M, Ahmad S, Zeeshan M (2016) A comparison of artificial neural networks (ANN) and local linear regression (LLR) techniques for predicting monthly reservoir levels. KSCE J Civ Eng 20:971–977
53. Sönmez I, Emre AT, Erdi E (2014) Snow cover trend analysis using Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System data over Turkey. Int J Climatol 2361:2349–2361. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3843
54. Srinivasulu S, Jain A (2006) A comparative analysis of training methods for artificial neural network rainfall: runoff models. Appl Soft Comput 6:295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2005.02.002
55. Stefánsson A, Končar N, Jones AJ (1997) A note on the Gamma test. Neural Comput Appl 5(3):131–133
56. Sun L, Anderson MC, Gao F, Hain C, Alfieri JG, Sharifi A, Mccarty GW, Yang Y, Yang Y, Kustas WP, Mckee L (2017) Investigating water use over the Choptank River Watershed using a multi-satellite data fusion approach. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020700
57. Tahir AA, Adamowski JF, Chevallier P, Haq AU, Terzago S (2016) Comparative assessment of spatiotemporal snow cover changes and hydrological behavior of the Gilgit, Astore and Hunza River basins (Hindukush–Karakoram–Himalaya region. Meteorol Atmos Phys, Pakistan). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-016-0440-6
58. Tekeli AE, Sönmez I, Erdi E (2016) Snow-covered area determination based on satellite-derived probabilistic snow cover maps. Arab J Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2149-0
59. Tikhonov AN (1963) Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 151:501–504
60. Uysal G, Arda A (2016) Streamflow forecasting using different neural network models with satellite data for a snow dominated region in Turkey. Procedia Eng 154:1185–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.526
61. Uysal G, Ünal A (2018) Monthly streamflow estimation using wavelet-artificial neural network model: a case study on Çamlıdere dam basin, Turkey. Procedia Comput Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.234
62. Van Dijk AIJM (2011) Model-data fusion: using observations to understand and reduce uncertainty in hydrological models. 19th international congress on modelling and simulation, Perth, Australia, 12–16 December 2011. http://mssanz.org.au/modsim2011/index.htm
63. Wang W, Xiang Y, Gao Y, Lu A, Yao T (2014) Rapid expansion of glacial lakes caused by climate and glacier retreat in the Central Himalayas. Hydrol Process. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10199
64. Yilmaz AG, Imteaz MA, Jenkins G (2011) Catchment flow estimation using Artificial Neural Networks in the mountainous Euphrates Basin. J Hydrol 410:134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.09.031
65. Zhu X, Wu X (2004) Class noise versus attribute noise : a quantitative study of their impacts. Artif intell Rev 22:177–210

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-eb5d561f-2477-482b-bb35-89bbaba709f8