Seismic landslide hazard assessment of central seismic gap region of Himalaya for a Mw 8.5 scenario event

Nayek, Partha Sarathi; Gade, Maheshreddy

doi:10.1007/s11600-021-00572-y

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Seismic landslide hazard assessment of central seismic gap region of Himalaya for a Mw 8.5 scenario event

Autorzy

Nayek Partha Sarathi , Gade Maheshreddy

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.springer.com/journal/11600

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-021-00572-y

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

In this study, seismic landslide hazard analysis is performed for central seismic gap (CSG) region of Himalaya for a future scenario earthquake of magnitude (M_w) 8.5. Initially, PGA values are estimated by using stochastic fnite fault seismological model. Further, the PGA values along with slope displacement prediction equation are used to estimate the Newmark’s sliding displacement. Monte Carlo simulations are performed by considering uncertainties in the material properties. Finally, the hazard map in terms of the probability of slope displacement (D_N) value exceeding the threshold values of 5 cm is presented. The probability value varies between 0.1 and 1 and high probability in higher Himalayas highlights the possibility of huge number of co-seismic landslides in this region. The developed seismic landslide hazard map will help local authorities and planners with tools for assessing the seismic landslide risk associated with the use of land and taking necessary measures to minimize the damages.

Słowa kluczowe

central seismic gap scenario earthquake landslide hazard assessment Monte Carlo simulation Co-Seismic landslides CSG

centralna szczelina sejsmiczna scenariusz trzęsienia ziemi ocena zagrożenia osuwiskami symulacje Monte Carlo

Wydawca

Instytut Geofizyki PAN
Springer

Czasopismo

Acta Geophysica

Rocznik

2021

Tom

Vol. 69, no. 3

Strony

747--759

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 61 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Nayek Partha Sarathi

School of Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh 175005, India

autor

Gade Maheshreddy

maheshreddy@iitmandi.ac.in

School of Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh 175005, India

Bibliografia

1. Ambraseys NN, Menu JM (1988) Earthquake-induced ground displacements. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 16(7):985–1006
2. Benito MB, Navarro M, Vidal F, Gaspar-Escribano J, García-Rodríguez MJ, Martínez-Solares JM (2010) A new seismic hazard assessment in the region of Andalusia (Southern Spain). Bull Earthq Eng 8(4):739–766
3. Bilham R (2019) Himalayan earthquakes: a review of historical seismicity and early 21st century slip potential. Geol Soc Lond Spec Pub 483(1):423–482
4. Bilham R, Gaur VK (2000) Geodetic contributions to the study of seismotectonic in India. Curr Sci Bangalore 79(9):1259–1269
5. Bilham R, Gaur VK, Molnar P (2001) Himalayan seismic hazard. Science 293:1442–1444
6. Blanford WT, Medlicott HB (1879) A manual of the geology of India. Nature 20(504):191
7. Boore DM (2009) Comparing stochastic point-source and finite-source ground-motion simulations: SMSIM and EXSIM. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(6):3202–3216
8. Boore DM, Joyner WB (1997) Site amplifications for generic rock sites. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87(2):327–341
9. Bray JD, Travasarou T (2007) Simplified procedure for estimating earthquake-induced deviatoric slope displacements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 1334:381–392
10. Bray JD, Augello AJ, Leonards GA, Repetto PC, Byrne RJ (1995) Seismic stability procedures for solid-waste landfills. J Ggeotech Eng 121(2):139–151
11. Chopra S, Kumar V, Suthar A, Kumar P (2012) Modeling of strong ground motions for 1991 Uttarkashi, 1999 Chamoli earthquakes, and a hypothetical great earthquake in Garhwal-Kumaun Himalaya. Nat Hazards 64(2):1141–1159
12. Dèzes P (1999) Tectonic and metamorphic evolution of the central Himalayan domain in southeast Zanskar (Kashmir, India) (Doctoral dissertation, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des sciences)
13. Dhanya J, Raghukanth STG (2020a) A non-stationary random field model for earthquake slip. J Seismol, pp 1–19
14. Dhanya J, Raghukanth STG (2020b) Neural network-based hybrid ground motion prediction equations for Western Himalayas and North-Eastern India. Acta Geophys, pp 1–22
15. Dhanya J, Gade M, Raghukanth STG (2017) Ground motion estimation during 25th April 2015 Nepal earthquake. Acta Geod Geoph 52(1):69–93
16. Dimri S, Lakhera RC, Sati S (2007) Fuzzy-based method for landslide hazard assessment in active seismic zone of Himalaya. Landslides 4(2):101
17. Du G, Zhang Y, Yang Z, Iqbal J, Tong B, Guo C (2017) Estimation of seismic landslide Hazard in the eastern Himalayan Syntaxis region of Tibetan plateau. Acta Geologica Sinica-English Edition 91(2):658–668
18. Finn WL (1990) Analysis of post-liquefaction deformations in soil structures, H. Bolton Seed. In: Memorial symposium proceedings. BiTech Publishers, Ltd., Vancouver, vol 2, pp 291–311
19. Gade M, Raghukanth STG (2017) Simulation of strong ground motion for a MW 85 hypothetical earthquake in central seismic gap region, Himalaya. Bull Earthq Eng 15(10):4039–4065
20. Gade M, Nayek PS, Dhanya J (2020) A New Neural Network based Prediction Model for Newmark’s Sliding Displacements. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01923-7
21. Ghosh A, Sarkar S, Kanungo DP, Jain SK, Kumar D, Kalura AS, Kumar S (2009) Slope instability and risk assessment of an unstable slope at Agrakhal, Uttarakhand. In: Proceedings of the India geotechnical conference, Guntur, India, pp 783–786
22. Hsieh SY, Lee CT (2011) Empirical estimation of the Newmark displacement from the Arias intensity and critical acceleration. Eng Geol 122(1):34–42
23. Jibson RW (1993) Predicting earthquake-induced landslide displacements using Newmark’s sliding block analysis. Transp Res Rec 1411:9–17
24. Jibson RW (2007) Regression models for estimating coseismic landslide displacement. Eng Geol 91(2–4):209–218
25. Kumar D, Khattri KN, Teotia SS, Rai SS (1999) Modelling of accelerograms of two Himalayan earthquakes using a novel semi-empirical method and estimation of accelerogram for a hypothetical great earthquake in the Himalaya. Curr Sci, pp 819–830
26. Lee KL (1974) Seismic permanent deformations in earth dams. University of California, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Mechanics and Structures Department, pp 1–33
27. Legg M, Slosson J, Eguchi R (1982) Seismic hazard for lifelines vulnerability analyses. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on microzonation, Seattle, Washington
28. Liu J, Shi J, Wang T, Wu S (2018) Seismic landslide hazard assessment in the Tianshui area, China, based on scenario earthquakes. Bull Eng Geol Env 77(3):1263–1272
29. Ma S, Xu C (2019) Assessment of co-seismic landslide hazard using the Newmark model and statistical analyses: a case study of the 2013 Lushan, China, Mw 66 earthquake. Nat Hazards 96(1):389–412
30. Martha TR, Roy P, Mazumdar R, Govindharaj KB, Kumar KV (2017) Spatial characteristics of landslides triggered by the 2015 Mw 7.8 (Gorkha) and Mw 7.3 (Dolakha) earthquakes in Nepal. Landslides 14(2):697–704
31. Mathur LP (1953) Assam earthquake of 15th August 1950–a short note on factual observations. a compilation of papers on the Assam earthquake of August, 15(1950), 56–60
32. Middlemiss CS (1910) The Kangra earthquake of 4th April 1905. Mem. Geol. Surv. India, vol 38
33. Miles SB, Keefer DK, Nyerges TL (2000) A case study in GIS-based environmental model validation using earthquake-induced landslide hazard, paper presented at 4th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Science. Int. Spatial Accuracy Res. Assoc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
34. Motazedian D, Atkinson GM (2005) Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(3):995–1010
35. Newmark NM (1965) Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique 15(2):139–160
36. Oldham RD (1899) Report of the great earthquake of 12th June 1897. Office of the Geological survey
37. Pradhan SP, Vishal V, Singh TN (2018) Finite element modelling of landslide prone slopes around Rudraprayag and Agastyamuni in Uttarakhand Himalayan terrain. Nat Hazards 94(1):181–200
38. Raghukanth STG, Kavitha B (2014) Ground motion relations for active regions in India. Pure Appl Geophys 171(9):2241–2275
39. Raghukanth STG, Kumari KL, Somala SN (2013) Regional level ground motion simulation for a hypothetical great earthquake in the Garwhal Himalaya. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 4(3):202–225
40. Refice A, Capolongo D (2002) Probabilistic modeling of uncertainties in earthquake-induced landslide hazard assessment. Comput Geosci 28(6):735–749
41. Roback K, Clark MK, West AJ, Zekkos D, Li G, Gallen SF, Godt JW (2018) The size, distribution, and mobility of landslides caused by the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal. Geomorphol 301:121–138
42. Rodríguez-Peces MJ, García J, Azanon JM, Jabaloy A (2011) Regional hazard assessment of earthquake-triggered slope instabilities considering site effects and seismic scenarios in Lorca Basin (Spain). Environ Eng Geosci 17(2):183–196
43. Rodríguez-Peces MJ, García-Mayordomo J, Azañón JM, Jabaloy A (2014) GIS application for regional assessment of seismically induced slope failures in the Sierra Nevada Range, South Spain, along the Padul Fault. Environ Eearth Sci 72(7):2423–2435
44. Romeo R (2000) Seismically induced landslide displacements: a predictive model. Eng Geol 58(3–4):337–351
45. Sah N, Kumar M, Upadhyay R, Dutt S (2018) Hill slope instability of Nainital City, Kumaun Lesser Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. J Rrock Mech Geotech Eng 10(2):280–289
46. Satyabala SP (2002) The historical earthquakes of India. In: International geophysics) Academic Press, vol 81
47. Saygili G, Rathje EM (2008) Empirical predictive models for earthquake-induced sliding displacements of slopes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(6):790–803
48. Saygili G, Rathje EM (2009) Probabilistically based seismic landslide hazard maps: an application in Southern California. Eng Geol 109(3–4):183–194
49. Seed HB, Lee KL, Idriss IM, Makdisi FI (1975) The slides in the San Fernando dams during the earthquake of February 9, 1971. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 101(ASCE# 11449 Proceeding)
50. Sharma M, Sharma S, Kumar M, Singh SK (2019) Analysis of Slope Stability of road cut Slopes of Srinagar, Uttarakhand, India. Int J Appl Eng Res 14(3):609–615
51. Siddique T, Pradhan SP, Vishal V, Mondal MEA, Singh TN (2017) Stability assessment of Himalayan road cut slopes along National Highway 58, India. Environ Earth Sci 76(22):759
52. Singh SK, Garcia D, Pacheco JF, Valenzuela R, Bansal BK, Dattatrayam RS (2004) Q of the Indian Shield. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(4):1564–1570
53. Singh R, Umrao RK, Singh TN (2014) Stability evaluation of road-cut slopes in the Lesser Himalaya of Uttarakhand, India: conventional and numerical approaches. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73(3):845–857
54. Singh SK, Srinagesh D, Srinivas D, Arroyo D, Pérez-Campos X, Chadha RK (2017) Strong Ground Motion in the Indo-Gangetic Plains during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal, Earthquake Sequence and Its Prediction during Future Earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(3):1293–1306
55. Terzaghi K (1950) Mechanism of landslides. Paige, Chairman, Geological Society of America, Application of geology to engineering practice (Berkey volume), p 83
56. Thingbaijam KKS, Martin Mai P, Goda K (2017) New empirical earthquake source-scaling laws. Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(5):2225–2246
57. Umrao RK, Singh R, Ahmad M, Singh TN (2011) Stability analysis of cut slopes using continuous slope mass rating and kinematic analysis in Rudraprayag district, Uttarakhand. Geomaterials, 2011
58. Vose D (1996) Quantitative risk analysis: a guide to Monte Carlo simulation modelling. John Wiley & Sons
59. Wieczorek GF, Wilson RC, Harp EL (1985) Map showing slope stability during earthquakes in San Mateo County, California (No. 1257-E)
60. Wyss M (2006) The Kashmir M7. 6 shock of 8 October 2005 calibrates estimates of losses in future Himalayan earthquakes. In Proceedings of the third international ISCRAM conference
61. Yegian MK, Marciano EA, Ghahraman VG (1991) Earthquake-induced permanent deformations: probabilistic approach. J Geotech Eng 117(1):35–50

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-eb03c84f-b1ba-4040-8d9e-d1fca9ba5c40