Research on preventive maintenance strategy of Coating Machine based on dynamic failure rate

• Autorzy: Gu Dongwei , Nie Ruihua , Han Wenbo , Chen Guang , Jia Ligang

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17531/ein.2023.1.20

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this paper, a dynamic preventive maintenance strategy is proposed for the problem of high maintenance cost rate due to excessive maintenance caused by unreasonable maintenance threshold setting when complex electromechanical equipment maintenance strategy is formulated. Increasing failure rate factor and decreasing service age factor are introduced to describe the evolution rules of failure rate during the maintenance of the coating machine, and the BP-LSTM (BP-Long Short Term Memory Network, BP-LSTM) model is combined to predict the failure rate of the coating machine. A Dynamic preventive maintenance Model (DM) that relies on dynamic failure rate thresholds to classify the three preventive maintenance modes of minor, medium and major repairs is constructed. A dynamic preventive maintenance strategy optimization process based on Genetic-Particle Swarm Optimization (GPSO) algorithm with the lowest cost rate per unit time in service phase is built to solve the difficult problem of dynamic failure rate threshold finding. Based on the historical operating data of the coating machine, a case study of the dynamic preventive maintenance strategy of the coating machine was conducted to verify the effectiveness of the model and the developed maintenance strategy proposed in this paper. The results show that the maintenance strategy developed in this paper can ensure better economy and applicability.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

dynamic preventive maintenance model; DM; BP-LSTM; dynamic failure rate threshold; preventive maintenance strategy; Genetic-Particle Swarm Optimization; GPSO

• Wydawca: Polskie Naukowo-Techniczne Towarzystwo Eksploatacyjne
• Czasopismo: Eksploatacja i Niezawodność
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 25, no. 1
• Strony: atr. no. 20
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Gu Dongwei

• School of Mechatronic Engineering, Changchun University of technology, Changchun, China

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6179-9106

autor

Nie Ruihua

• School of Mechatronic Engineering, Changchun University of technology, Changchun, China

autor

Han Wenbo

• School of Mechatronic Engineering, Changchun University of technology, Changchun, China

autor

Chen Guang

• School of Mechatronic Engineering, Changchun University of technology, Changchun, China

autor

Jia Ligang

• School of Mechatronic Engineering, Changchun University of technology, Changchun, China

Bibliografia

• 1. Aafif Y, A Chelbi, L Mifdal, S Dellagi, I Majdouline. Optimal preventive maintenance strategies for a wind turbine gearbox. Energy Reports 2022; 8:803-814, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.084.
• 2. Afsar B, D Aydin, A Ugur, S Korukoglu. Self-Adaptive and Adaptive Parameter Control in Improved Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm. Informatica 2017; 28(3):415-438, https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2017.136.
• 3. Al Hanbali A, H Saleh, N Ullah. Two-threshold control limit policy in condition-based maintenance. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2022; 38(4):2170-2187, https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3069.
• 4. Alvarez C, M Lopez-Campos, R Stegmaier, F Mancilla-David, R Schurch, A Angulo. A Condition-Based Maintenance Model Including Resource Constraints on the Number of Inspections. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 2020; 69(3):1165-1176, https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TR.2019.2955558.
• 5. Bai SY, ZJ Cheng, B Guo. Maintenance Optimization Model with Sequential Inspection Based on Real-Time Reliability Evaluation for Long-Term Storage Systems. Processes 2019; 7(8), https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7080481.
• 6. Bautista L, IT Castro, L Landesa. Condition-based maintenance for a system subject to multiple degradation processes with stochastic arrival intensity. European Journal of Operational Research 2022; 302(2):560-574, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.01.004.
• 7. Castro IT, RJI Basten, GJ Van Houtum. Maintenance cost evaluation for heterogeneous complex systems under continuous monitoring. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2020; 200, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106745.
• 8. Chen W, XB Li, QC Ji, XP Pei, ZF Wang, F He. A dynamic and combined maintenance strategy for photovoltaic power plants considering the dependencies and availability of components. Electrical Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-022-01576-7.
• 9. de Jonge B, PA Scarf. A review on maintenance optimization. European Journal of Operational Research 2020; 285(3):805-824, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.09.047.
• 10. Devarapalli R, B Bhattacharyya. A hybrid modified grey wolf optimization-sine cosine algorithm-based power system stabilizer parameter tuning in a multimachine power system. Optimal Control Applications & Methods 2020; 41(4):1143-1159, https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.2591.
• 11. Gad AG. Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Its Applications: A Systematic Review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 2022; 29(5):2531-2561, https:// 10.1007/s11831-021-09694-4.
• 12. Garg, H. A hybrid PSO-GA algorithm for constrained optimization problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2016; 274:292-305, https://doi.org/12:10.1016/j.amc.2015.11.001.
• 13. Gong Q, L Yang, YH Li, B Xue. Dynamic Preventive Maintenance Optimization of Subway Vehicle Traction System Considering Stages. Applied Sciences-Basel 2022; 12(17), https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178617.
• 14. Kitayama S, K Yamazaki, M Arakawa. Adaptive range particle swarm optimization. Optimization and Engineering 2009; 10(4):575-597, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-009-9081-7.
• 15. Knypinski L. Performance analysis of selected metaheuristic optimization algorithms applied in the solution of an unconstrained task. Compel-the International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering 2022; 41(5):1271-1284, https:// 10.1108/compel-07-2021-0254.
• 16. Li S, XF Chi, BZ Yu. An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for the reliability-redundancy allocation problem with global reliability. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2022; 225, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108604.
• 17. Ma CY, W Wang, ZQ Cai, JB Zhao. Maintenance optimization of reconfigurable systems based on multi-objective Birnbaum importance. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O-Journal of Risk and Reliability 2022; 236(2):277-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X20901983
• 18. Malik MAK. Reliable preventive maintenance policy. AIIE Transactions 1979; 11(3):221-228, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X20901983.
• 19. Marini F, B Walczak. Particle swarm optimization (PSO). A tutorial. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2015; 149:153-165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.08.020.
• 20. Maruyama T, H Igarashi. Effective robust optimization based on genetic algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2008; 44(6):990-993, https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2007.916696.
• 21. Massaoudi M, H Abu-Rub, SS Refaat, I Chihi, FS Oueslati. Deep Learning in Smart Grid Technology: A Review of Recent Advancements and Future Prospects. IEEE Access 2021; 9:54558-54578, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3071269.
• 22. Mlynarski S, R Pilch, M Smolnik, J Szybka, G Wiazania. A MODEL OF AN ADAPTIVE STRATEGY OF PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE OF COMPLEX TECHNICAL OBJECTS. Eksploatacja I Niezawodnosc-Maintenance and Reliability 2020; 22(1):35-41, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2020.1.5.
• 23. Mohammed A, A Ghaithan, M Al-Saleh, K Al-Ofi. Reliability-Based Preventive Maintenance Strategy of Truck Unloading Systems. Applied Sciences-Basel 2020; 10(19), https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196957.
• 24. Nakagawa T. Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance policies. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 1988;37(3):295-298. https://doi.org/10.1109/24.3758
• 25. Nazarizadeh F, A Alemtabriz, M Zandieh, A Raad. An analytical model for reliability assessment of the rail system considering dependent failures (case study of Iranian railway). Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2022; 227, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108725.
• 26. O'Neil R, C Diallo, A Khatab, E Aghezzaf. A hybrid column-generation and genetic algorithm approach for solving large-scale multimission selective maintenance problems in serial K-out-of-n:G systems. International Journal of Production Research 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/ 10.1080/00207543.2022.2077670.
• 27. Okwuobi S, F Ishola, O Ajayi, E Salawu, A Aworinde, O Olatunji, SA Akinlabi. A Reliability-Centered Maintenance Study for an Individual Section-Forming Machine. Machines 2018; 6(4), https://doi.org/10.3390/machines6040050.
• 28. Park M, H Pham. Condition-based maintenance for a degradation-shock dependence system under warranty. International Journal of Production Research 2022; https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2099319.
• 29. Patil SS, AK Bewoor, R Kumar, MH Ahmadi, M Sharifpur, S PraveenKumar. Development of Optimized Maintenance Program for a Steam Boiler System Using Reliability-Centered Maintenance Approach. Sustainability 2022; 14(16), https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610073.
• 30. Rodriguez MLR, S Kubler, A de Giorgio, M Cordy, J Robert, Y Le Traon. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning based Predictive Maintenance on parallel machines. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 2022; 78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102406.
• 31. Safaei F, E Chatelet, J Ahmadi. Optimal age replacement policy for parallel and series systems with dependent components. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2020; 197, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106798.
• 32. Sedighizadeh D, E Masehian, M Sedighizadeh, H Akbaripour. GEPSO: A new generalized particle swarm optimization algorithm. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 2021; 179:194-212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2020.08.013.
• 33. Toksari, M.D. A heuristic approach to find the global optimum of function. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2007; 209(2):160-166. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cam.2006.10.074.
• 34. Wu ZY, B Guo, Axita, X Tian, LJ Zhang. A Dynamic Condition-Based Maintenance Model Using Inverse Gaussian Process. IEEE Access 2020; 8:104-117, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2958137.
• 35. Xin JY, M Akiyama, DM Frangopol, MY Zhang. Multi-objective optimisation of in-service asphalt pavement maintenance schedule considering system reliability estimated via LSTM neural networks. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 2022; 18(7):1002-1019, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2022.2038641.
• 36. Yang ST, LN Luo, BH Tan. Research on Sports Performance Prediction Based on BP Neural Network. Mobile Information Systems 2021; 2021, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5578871.
• 37. Yang XZ, YH He, D Zhou, X Zheng. Mission reliability-centered maintenance approach based on quality stochastic flow network for multistate manufacturing systems. Eksploatacja I Niezawodnosc-Maintenance and Reliability 2022; 24(3):455-467, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2022.3.7.
• 38. Yousefi N, S Tsianikas, DW Coit. Dynamic maintenance model for a repairable multi-component system using deep reinforcement learning. Quality Engineering 2022; 34(1):16-35, https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2021.1977950.
• 39. Zhang L, XH Chen, A Khatab, YJ An. Optimizing imperfect preventive maintenance in multi-component repairable systems under s-dependent competing risks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2022; 219, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108177.
• 40. Zhang N, FQ Qi, CJ Zhang, HM Zhou. Joint optimization of condition-based maintenance policy and buffer capacity for a two-unit series system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2022; 219, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108232.