PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Organizational culture as prerequisite of proactive safety and security management in critical infrastructure systems including hazardous plants and ports

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This article addresses selected aspects of organizational culture to be considered in the context of knowledge based proactive safety and security management of plants, ports and systems of critical infrastructure. It has been often emphasized in the domain literature that business effectiveness of such plants and their resilience against hazards and threats to avoid major accidents depends substantially on human and organizational factors. It becomes obvious that appropriate shaping of these factors is crucial and should be considered in life cycle. Some terms have been also introduced such as safety culture and security culture. Current research topic in this domain includes an interface between safety and security. The article discusses these issues in the context of knowledge based proactive safety and security management being a new challenge, especially in cases of hazardous plants, ports and other complex systems of critical infrastructure. Nevertheless a crucial role plays the human-operator undertaking safety-related decisions during potential abnormal situations and accidents. Below some issues concerning requirements for the alarm system design in context of human factors are outlined and discussed.
Rocznik
Strony
133--146
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys.
Twórcy
  • Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland
  • Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland
Bibliografia
  • [1] Berg, H. P. (2011). Safety Culture. Summer Safety & Reliability Seminars, SSARS 2011, Educational & Training Course, Gdańsk–Sopot.
  • [2] Berg, H. P. (2013). Considerations on Applying the Risk-Informed Decision Making Process to Security Issues. Summer Safety & Reliability Seminars. SSARS 2013, Educational & Training Course, Gdańsk–Sopot.
  • [3] Carey, M. (2001). Proposed Framework for Addressing Human Factors in IEC 61508. Prepared by Amey VECTRA Ltd. for Health and Safety Executive (HSE), U.K. Contract Research Report 373.
  • [4] CCPS (2008). Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures. New York: Center for Chemical Process Safety. Wiley-Interscience, A John Wiley & Sons.
  • [5] DNV (2014). ISRS for the health of your business. DNV GL - Business Assurance. Ravello, Katy.
  • [6] DOE-HDBK (2002). Behavior Based Safety Process, vol. 1: Summary of Behavior Based Safety. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.
  • [7] Gertman, I. D. & Blackman, H. S. (1994). Human Reliability and Safety Analysis Data Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York.
  • [8] Goslin, Ch. (2008). Maritime and port security. Duos Technologies, Inc., Jacksonville.
  • [9] Howe, J. (2001). A Union Critique of BehaviorBased Safety. International Union, UAW Health and Safety Department, Detroit.
  • [10] Howsley, R. (2011). An Integrated Approach to Nuclear Safety and Nuclear Security. World Institute for Nuclear Security (WINS), Vienna.
  • [11] IAEA INSAG-24 (2010). The Interface Between Safety and Security at Nuclear Power Plants. A report by the International Nuclear Safety Group. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
  • [12] IAEA INSAG-25 (2011). A Framework for an Integrated Risk Informed Decision Making Process. A report by the International Nuclear Safety Group. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
  • [13] IAEA (2011). Nuclear Security Series No 17: Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities. Technical Guidance / Reference Manual. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
  • [14] IAEA (2015). Development and implementation of a process based management system. Nuclear Energy Series Report NG-T-1.3. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
  • [15] IEC 61508 (2010). Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems. Parts 1–7. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission.
  • [16] IEC 61511 (2014). Functional safety: Safety Instrumented Systems for the process industry sector. Parts 1–3. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission.
  • [17] ISO 31000 (2009). Risk management - Principles and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
  • [18] Kosmowski, K. T. (Ed.) (2007). Functional Safety Management in Critical Systems. Gdansk University of Technology. Publishing House Of Gdansk University.
  • [19] Kosmowski, K. T. (2013). Functional safety and reliability analysis methodology for hazardous industrial plants. Gdańsk University of Technology Publishers.
  • [20] Kosmowski, K. T. & Śliwiński, M. (2015). Knowledge-based functional safety and security management in hazardous industrial plants with emphasis on human factors. In: Advanced Systems for Automation and Diagnostics, PWNT, Gdańsk.
  • [21] Kosmowski, K. T., Śliwiński, M. & Piesik, E. (2015). Integrated safety and security analysis of hazardous plants and systems of critical infrastructure. Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association. 6, 2, 31-45.
  • [22] LOPA (2001). Layer of Protection Analysis, Simplified Process Risk Assessment. Center for Chemical Process Safety. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York.
  • [23] Lu, T. et al. (2015). Towards a Framework for Assuring Cyber Physical System Security. International Journal of Security and Its Applications. 9, 3, 25-40.
  • [24] Mahan, R. E. et al. (2011). Secure Data Transfer Guidance for Industrial Control and SCADA Systems. PNNL-20776, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland.
  • [25] Needle, D. (2004). Business in Context: An Introduction to Business and Its Environment. South Western Educational Publishing, Mason.
  • [26] NRC (2015). Managing the Safety / Security Interface. Regulatory Guide 5.74. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
  • [27] Rasmussen, J. & Svedung, I. (2000). Proactive Risk Management in a Dynamic Society. Swedish Rescue Services Agency, Karlstad.
  • [28] Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. Cambridge University Press.
  • [29] UN (2006). Maritime security: elements of an analytical framework for compliance measurement and risk assessment. United Nations, New York and Geneva.
Uwagi
Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-ea9eaf21-ff4a-4784-9174-8b5413be9783
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.