The Antagonistic Activity of Actinomycetes of Streptomyces Genus in Relation to Trichoderma Koningii

• Autorzy: Breza-Boruta B. , Paluszak Z.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/61197

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the study was to estimate the effect of actinomycetes of genus Streptomyces on the growth of the antagonistic fungus Trichoderma koningii. 150 strains of Streptomyces spp. isolated from two potato cropping systems were used to the tests. Analyses were conducted experimentally in vitro on PDA medium with pH 6 and 7. The results obtained clearly indicate the inhibitory effect of actinomycetes on the fungus T. koningii. Of the tested population of actinomycetes only two strains did not inhibit the growth of the tested fungus. The strains from the rhizosphere of potato cultivated under the ecological system were predominant in the group of actinomycetes with a very strong effect. pH value appeared to be a crucial factor influencing the inhibition zone. High antagonistic activity in relation to the useful fungus T. koningii noted with numerous strains of Streptomyces spp. is unfavorable in respect of biological control.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

antagonism; Streptomyces; Trichoderma koningii; soil; antifungal activity

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 17, nr 1
• Strony: 106--113
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 28 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Breza-Boruta B.

• Department of Microbiology and Food Technology, University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, Bernardyńska 6, 85-029 Bydgoszcz, Poland

autor

Paluszak Z.

• Department of Microbiology and Food Technology, University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, Bernardyńska 6, 85-029 Bydgoszcz, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Al-Askar A.A., Abdul Khair W.M., Rashad Y. 2011. In vitro antifungal activity of Streptomyces spororaveus RDS28 against some phytopathogenic fungi Afr. J. Agric. Res., 6(12), 2835–2842.
• 2. Bressan W., Figueiredo J.E. 2008. Efficacy and doseresponse relationship in biocontrol of Fusarium disease in maize by Streptomyces spp.. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 120, 311−316.
• 3. Breza-Boruta B. 2013. Występowanie drobnoustrojów pektynolitycznych w glebie w systemie ekologicznym i konwencjonalnym. Polish Journal of Agronomy 15, 32–37.
• 4. Breza-Boruta B., Sadowski S. Paluszak. Z. 2004. Effect of Actinomycetes of Streptomyces genus isolated potato cultivation on the pathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathol. Pol., 31, 33–43.
• 5. Compant S., Duffy B., Nowak J., Clément C., Barka E.A. 2005. Use of growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action and future prospect. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71(9), 4951–4959.
• 6. Crawford D.L., Lynch J.M. Whipps J.M., Ousley M.A. 1993. Isolation and characterization of actinomycete antagonists of a fungal root pathogen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 59, 3899–3905.
• 7. Dharmaraj S. 2010. Marine Streptomyces as a novel source of bioactive substances. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 26, 2123–2139.
• 8. Domsch K.H., Gams W., Anderson T.H. 1980. Compendium of soil fungi. Academic Press, London, England.
• 9. Evangelista-Martínez Z. 2014. Isolation and characterization of soil Streptomyces species as potential biological control agents against fungal plant pathogens. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 30(5), 1639–1647.
• 10. Felice L., Jordan N.R., Dill-MackyR., Sheaffer C.C., Aldrich-Wolfe L., Huerd S.C., Kinkel L.L. 2014. Soil Streptomyces communities in a prairie establishment reflect interactions between soil edaphic characteristics and plant host. Plant and Soil, 386 (1-2), 89–98.
• 11. Gajera H.P., Bambharolia R.P., Patel S.V., Khatrani T.J., Goalkiya B.A. 2012. Antagonism of Trichoderma spp. against Macrophomina phaseolina: evaluation of coiling and cell wall degrading enzymatic activities. J. Plant Pathol. Microb., 3, 149–156.
• 12. Goodfellow M., Kämpfer P., Busse H.J.,Trujillo M.E., Suzuki K., Ludwig W., Whitman W.B. 2012 Bergey’s Manual of Syst matic Bacteriology. 2nd Ed.,Vol. 5: The Actinobacteria. Part B., Springer Verlag, New York, 1455–1804.
• 13. Howell C.R. 2003. Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: the history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Dis., 87, 4–1.
• 14. Kamal R., Sharma A.K. 2014. Control of Fusarium wilt using biological agent Streptomyces sp.CPP-53 isolated from compost with plant growth promoting effect on tomato under greenhouse condition. J. Microbiol. Antimicrob., 6 (6), 97–103.
• 15. Kumar N., Singh R.K., Mishra S.K, Singh A.K., Pachouri U.C. 2010. Isolation and screening of soil Actinomycetes as a source of antibiotics active against bacteria. Int. J. Microbiol. Res., 2, 12–16.
• 16. Lee J.Y., Hwang B.K. 2002. Diversity of antifungal actinomycetes in various vegetative soils of Korea. Can J Microbiol. 48(5), 407–417.
• 17. Mandic L., Djukić D., Beatovic I., Jovovic Z., Pesakovic M., Stevovic V. 2011. Effect of different fertilizers on the microbial activity and productivity of soil under potato cultivation. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 10(36), 6954–6960.
• 18. Marcinowska K., Bis H., 1997. Występowanie promieniowców antybiotycznych w środowiskach glebowych intensywnych zmianowań specjalistycznych. W: Drobnoustroje w środowisku występo-wanie, aktywność i znaczenie. AR Kraków, 417–425.
• 19. Oskay M. 2009. Antifungal and antibacterial compounds from Streptomyces strains. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 8, 3007–3017.
• 20. Pięta D., Patkowska E. 2003. Antagonistic bacteria and fungi limiting potato infection by soil-borne pathogenic fungi. J. Plant Prot. Res., 43(2), 97–104.
• 21. Prapagdee B., Kuekulvong C., Mongkolsuk S. 2008. Antifungal potential of extracellular metabolites produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus against phytopathogenic fungi. Int. J. Biol. Sci., 4(5), 330–337.
• 22. Reddy B.N., Saritha1 K.V., Hindumathi A. 2014. In vitro Screening for antagonistic potential of seven species of Trichoderma against different plant pathogenic fungi. Res. J. Biology 2, 29–36.
• 23. Schrey S.D., Tarkka M.T. 2008. Friends and foes: streptomycetes as modulators of plant disease and symbiosis. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 94, 11–19.
• 24. Sharma D., Mayilraj S., Manhas R.K. 2014. Streptomyces amritsarensis sp. nov., exhibiting broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 4(5), 943–949.
• 25. Singh A., Shahid M., Srivastava M., Pandey S., Sharma A., Kumar V. 2014. Optimal physical parameters for growth of Trichoderma species at varying pH, temperature and agitation. Virology and Mycology, 3(1), 127–134.
• 26. Solecka J., Ziemska J., Rajnisz A., Laskowska A., Guśpiel A. 2013. Promieniowce – występowanie i wytwarzanie związków biologicznie czynnych. Post. Mikrobiol., 52 (1), 83–91.
• 27. Świerczyńska I., Korbas M., Horoszkiewicz-Janka J., Danielewicz J. 2011. Antagonistyczne oddziaływanie Trichoderma viride na patogeny z rodzaju Fusarium w obecności biopreparatów. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Engng., 56(4) 157–160.
• 28. Williams S.T., Davies F.L. 1965. Use of antibiotics for selective isolation and enumeration of Actinomycetes in soil. J. Gen. Microbiol., 38, 251–261.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.