PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Organizational climate, organizational support and citizenship behavior in the army

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Klimat organizacyjny, wsparcie organizacyjne a zachowania obywatelskie w Siłach Zbrojnych
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The main aim of this study is to determine how citizenship behaviors may be shaped in the Armed Forces. The presented study is by far the first that thoroughly examines connections between all aspects of organizational climate (OC), perceived organizational support (POS), and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) in the Polish Army. Research hypotheses were examined using data collected from a sample of 139 military officers from the Polish Land Forces. Results showed that some of the OC parameters and POS, especially those coming from other soldiers were positively connected with OCB. Implications of OCBs and practical management are discussed, and directions for future research are suggested.
PL
Głównym celem przedstawionego badania jest prezentacja kształtowania się zachowań obywatelskich w Siłach Zbrojnych. Prezentowane badanie jest zdecydowanie pierwszym, które dogłębnie analizuje powiązania między wszystkimi aspektami klimatu organizacyjnego, postrzeganym wsparciem organizacyjnym a organizacyjnymi zachowaniami obywatelskimi w Siłach Zbrojnych RP. Hipotezy badawcze testowano na podstawie danych zebranych na próbie 139 żołnierzy Wojsk Lądowych RP. Wyniki pokazały, że wybrane parametry klimatu organizacyjnego i wsparcia organizacyjnego, zwłaszcza te pochodzące od innych żołnierzy, były pozytywnie powiązane z organizacyjnymi zachowaniami obywatelskimi. Omówiono implikacje organizacyjnych zachowań obywatelskich, praktyki dowodzenia, a także zaproponowano przyszłe kierunki badań.
Twórcy
  • Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk, Poland
autor
  • Department of Business, Strategy and Political Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Notodden, Norway
  • Department of Psychology, Bjørknes University College, Oslo, Norway
autor
  • Faculty of Management, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Board of University Development and Symbiosis School of Sports Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Management Domain, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, India
Bibliografia
  • 1. Organ DW. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1988.
  • 2. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Paine JB, Bachrach DG. Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. Journal of Management. 2000;26:513-63.
  • 3. Bergeron DM, Shipp AJ, Rosen B, Furst SA. Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: The cost of being a good citizen. Journal of Management. 2013;39:958-84.
  • 4. Williams LJ, Anderson SE. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behavior. Journal of Management. 1991;17(3):601-17.
  • 5. Piotrowski A, Pękała P. Responsibility and conscientiousness of soldiers. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższa Szkoła Oficerska Wojsk Lądowych im. gen. Tadeusza Kościuszki. Journal of Science of the gen. Tadeusz Kosciuszko Military Academy of Land Forces. 2016;48;4(182):62-73, DOI: 10.5604/17318157.1226135.
  • 6. Blatt R. Organizational Citizenship Behavior of Temporary Knowledge Employees. Organization Studies. 2008;29;6:849-66.
  • 7. Guillaume P, Sullivan SE, Wolff H, Forret M. Are there major differences in the attitudes and service quality of standard and seasonal employees? An empirical examination and implications for practice. Human Resource Management. 2019;58:45-56.
  • 8. Jain AK, Giga SI, Cooper CL. Perceived organizational support as a moderator in the relationship between organizational stressors and organizational citizenship behaviors. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 2013;21:313-34.
  • 9. Chen CC, Chiu S-F. The mediating role of job involvement in the relationship between job characteristics and organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology. 2009;149:474-94.
  • 10. Saboe KN, Taing MU, Way JD, Johnson RE. Examining the unique mediators that underlie the effects of different dimensions of transformational leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 2015;22:175-86.
  • 11. Frombrun C, Shanley M. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal. 1990;33:233-58.
  • 12. Ozer M, Chang Ch-H, Schaubroeck JM. Contextual moderators of the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviours and challenge and hindrance stress. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2014;87:557-78.
  • 13. Bolino MC, Turnley WH, Gilstrap JB, Suazo MM. Citizenship under pressure: What’s a “good soldier” to do? Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2010;31:835-55.
  • 14. Bolino MC. Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? The Academy of Management Review. 1999;24:82-98.
  • 15. Donia MBL, Johns G, Raja U. Good soldier or good actor? Supervisor accuracy in distinguishing between selfless and self-serving OCB motives. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2015;6:1-10.
  • 16. Bommer WH, Miles EW, Grover SL. Does one good turn deserve another? Coworker influences on employee citizenship. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2003;24:181-96.
  • 17. Jafari KZ, Azizi SM, Malek HM. Organizational Citizenship Behavior as an Unavoidable Necessity for increasing the Effectiveness of Organizations. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business. 2013;4:827-50.
  • 18. Runhaar P, Konermann J, Sanders K. Teachers’ organizational citizenship behaviour: Considering the roles of their work engagement, autonomy and leader–member exchange. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2013;30:99-108.
  • 19. Markose B, Jayachandran S. The Impact of Organizational Citizenship Behaviours on Goal Orientation and Performance of Salespeople. International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation. 2009;2:16-27.
  • 20. Reynolds CA, Shoss MK, Jundt DK. In the eye of the beholder: A multi-stakeholder perspective of organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behaviors. Human Resource Management Review. 2015;25:80-93.
  • 21. Gaudet M-C, Tremblay M, Doucet O. Exploring the black box of the contingent reward leadership – performance relationship: The role of perceived justice and emotional exhaustion. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2014;23:897-914.
  • 22. Podsakoff NP, Blume BD, Whiting SW, Podsakoff PM. Individual and Organizational-Level Consequences of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2009;94:122-41.
  • 23. Chin T. Harmony and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2015;26:1110-29.
  • 24. Felfe J, Heinitz K. The impact of consensus and agreement of leadership perceptions on commitment, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, and customer satisfaction. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2010;19:279-303.
  • 25. Gurbuz S. Some possible antecedents of military personnel organizational citizenship behavior. Military Psychology. 2009;21:200-15.
  • 26. Turnipseed DL. Are good soldiers good? Exploring the link between organization citizenship behavior and personal ethics. Journal of Business Research. 2002;55:1-15.
  • 27. Keppie L. The making of the Roman army: from republic to empire. Totowa, N.J.: Barnes & Noble; 1984.
  • 28. Klastorin T. Project Management: Tools and Trade-offs. 3rd Ed. New York: Wiley; 2003.
  • 29. Podsakoff NP, Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Maynes TD, Spoelma TM. Consequences of unit-level organizational citizenship behaviors: A review and recommendations for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2014:35:87-119.
  • 30. Hsiung HH, Lin CW, Lin CS. Nourishing or suppressing? The contradictory influences of perception of organizational politics on organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2012;85:258-76.
  • 31. Lambert EG, Hogan NL, Griffin ML. Being the good soldier: Organizational citizenship behavior and commitment among correctional staff. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2008;35:56-68.
  • 32. Leboeuf JNG. Institutional-occupational value orientations and a multidimensional view of commitment among Army officers. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering. 1995;55:5591.
  • 33. Deluga RJ. The relation between trust in the supervisor and subordinate organizational citizenship behavior. Military Psychology. 1995;7:1-16.
  • 34. Turnipseed D. Good soldiers and their syndrome: Organizational citizenship behavior and the work environment. North American Journal of Psychology. 2000;2:281-302.
  • 35. Zellars KL, Tepper BJ, Duffy MK. Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002;87:1068-76.
  • 36. Tepper BJ, Taylor EC. Relationships among supervisors’ and subordinates’ procedural justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors. Academy of Management Journal. 2003;46:97-105.
  • 37. Tiedemann KF. Integrity in military service: A leadership impact study. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering. 2005;65:5384.
  • 38. Ehrhart MG, Bliese PD, Thomas JL. Unit-level OCB and unit effectiveness: Examining the incremental effect of helping behavior. Human Performance. 2006;19:159-73.
  • 39. Jordan MH, Schraeder M, Feild HS, Armenakis AA. Organizational citizenship behavior, job attitudes, and psychological contract. Military Psychology. 2007;19:259-71.
  • 40.Topa G, Morales JF, Moriano JA. Psychological contract breach and social identity: Their influences on Spanish soldiers’ job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviour. Estudios de Psicología. 2009;30:303-15.
  • 41. Annen H, Goldammer P, Szvircsev TT. Longitudinal effects of OCB on cadre selection and pursuing a career as militia cadre in the Swiss Armed Forces. Military Psychology. 2015;27:9-21.
  • 42. Hung YC, Tsai TY. Ethical work climate and organizational citizenship behavior in the Taiwanese military. Military Psychology. 2016;28:34-49.
  • 43. Vitell SJ, Singhapakdi A. The role of ethics institutionalization in influencing organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and esprit de corps. Journal of Business Ethics. 2008;81:343-53.
  • 44. Rodrigues C. Fayol’s 14 principles of management then and now: a framework for managing today’s organizations effectively. Management Decisions. 2001;39(10):880-9.
  • 45. Motowidlo SJ, Borman WC. Relationships between military morale, motivation, satisfaction, and unit effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1978;63:47-52.
  • 46. Britt TW, Dickinson JM. Morale during military operations: A positive psychology approach. In: Britt TW, Castro CA, Adler AB (eds.). Military life: The psychology of serving in peace and combat. Vol. 1: Military performance. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International; 2006, p. 157-84.
  • 47. Britt TW, Adler AB, Bliese PD, Moore D. Morale as a moderator of the combat exposure-PTSD symptom relationship. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2013;26:94-101.
  • 48. Wimbush JC, Shepard JM. Toward an understanding of ethical climate: Its relationship to ethical behavior and supervisory influence. Journal of Business Ethics. 1994;13:637-47.
  • 49. Reichers AE, Schneider B. Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs. In: Schneider B (ed.). Organizational Climate and Culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1990, p. 5-39.
  • 50. Deninson DR. What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review. 1994;7:619-54.
  • 51. Armstrong M, Taylor S. Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. New York: KoganPage; 2014.
  • 52. Viitala R, Tanskanen J, Santti R. The connection between organizational climate and well-being at work. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 2015;23:606-20.
  • 53. Fu W, Deshpande SP. The impact of caring climate, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment on job performance of employees in a China’s insurance company. Journal of Business Ethics. 2014;124:339-49.
  • 54. Ghosh K. Benevolent leadership in not-for-profit organizations: Welfare orientation measures, ethical climate and organizational citizenship behaviour. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 2015;36:592-611.
  • 55. Suresh S, Venkatammal P. Antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology. 2010;36:276-86.
  • 56. Turnipseed PH, Turnipseed DL. Testing the proposed linkage between organizational citizenship behaviours and an innovative organizational climate. Creativity and Innovation Management. 2013;22:209-16.
  • 57. Shore LM, Shore TH. Perceived organizational support and organizational justice. In: Cropanzano RS, Kacmar KM (eds.). Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace. Westport, CT: Quorum; 1995, p. 149-64.
  • 58. George JM, Reed TF, Ballard KA, Colin J, Fielding J. Contact with AIDS patients as a source of work-related distress: Effects of organizational and social support. Academy of Management Journal. 1993;36:157-71.
  • 59. Johnson JV, Hall EM. Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. American Journal of Public Health. 1988;78:1336-42.
  • 60. Ahmed I, Nawaz MM. Antecedents and outcomes of perceived organizational support: A literature survey approach. Journal of Management Development. 2015;34:867-80.
  • 61. Singh AK, Singh AP, Kumar S, Gupta VK. Role of perceived organizational support in the relationship between role overload and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology. 2015;41:77-85.
  • 62. Luthans F. The need for and meaning of positive organization behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2002;23:695-706.
  • 63. Zaborowski M, Dunn DH. Poland: A New Power in Transatlantic Security. London: Routledge; 2003.
  • 64. Czarnota-Bojarska J. Zachowania obywatelskie w organizacji – próba konstrukcji narzędzia pomiaru. In: Czarnota-Bojarska J, Zinserling I (eds.). W kręgu psychologii społecznej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego; 2011, p. 145-57.
  • 65. Paluchowski WJ. Organizational climate and its measurement. Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. 1998;2035:161-70.
  • 66. Cieślak R, Widerszal-Bazyl M. Psychospołeczne warunki pracy. Podręcznik do kwestionariusza. Warszawa: Centralny Instytut Ochrony Pracy; 2000.
  • 67. Gully SM, Incalcaterra KA, Joshi A, Beaubien JM. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002;87(5):819-32.
  • 68. Moritz SE, Feltz DL, Fahrbach KR, Mack DE. The relation of SelfEfficacy Measures to Sport Performance: A Meta-Analytic review. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2000;71(3):280-94.
  • 69. Multon KD, Brown SD, Lent RW. Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1991;38:30-8.
  • 70. Sadri G, Robertson IT. Self-efficacy and Work-related Behaviour: A Review and Meta-analysis. Applied Psychology. 1993;42(2):139-52.
  • 71. Stajkovic AD, Luthans F. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 1998;124(2):240-61.
  • 72. Sørlie HO, Hetland J, Dysvik A, Fosse T, Martinsen ØL. Person-Organization Fit in a military selection context. Military Psychology. 2020;32(2):237-46.
  • 73. Tabarsa GA, Esmaeili GMR, Esmaeili GHR. Effective factors on organizational citizenship behaviour in a military hospital. Journal of Military Medicine. 2010;12(2):93-9.
  • 74. Livi S, Theodorou A, Rullo M, Cinque L, Alessandri G. The rocky road to prosocial behavior at work: The role of positivity and organizational socialization in preventing interpersonal strain. PloS ONE. 2018;13(3):e0193508.
  • 75. Bowles SV, Bartone PT, Ross D, Berman M et al. Well-Being in the Military. In: Bowles SV, Bartone PT (eds.). Handbook of Military Psychology: Clinical and Organizational Practice. Washington D.C., USA: Springer; 2017, p. 213-38.
  • 76. Rawat S. Self Awareness and Attitude Training for High Performance in the Military. In: MacIntyre A, Charbonneau D, Lindsay D (eds.). Human factors in Military Performance. Kingston: Canadian Defence Academy Press; 2018, p. 241-58.
  • 77. Rawat S. Enhancing Officer Cadet Intellect in Military Training Institutions – An Organizational Approach. In: Rawat S (ed.). Cadet Diary – Psychology of Warrior Ethos and Leadership Development. Jaipur, India: Rawat Publications; 2018, p. 140-7.
  • 78. Rawat S. Cognitive and Volitional Perspectives in Enhancing Human Factors In Military Performance. In: MacIntyre A, Charbonneau D, Lindsay D (eds.). Human factors in Military Performance. Kingston: Canadian Defence Academy Press; 2018, p. 299-314.
  • 79. Rawat S. Communicative Behavior as Transformative Power of Military Leadership. In: Watola D, MacIntyre A (eds.). From Knowing to Doing: International Perspectives on Leadership Effectiveness. Kingaton: Canadian Defence Academy Press; 2018, p. 23-32.
  • 80. Boe O. Officer Development at the Norwegian Military Academy. In: Rawat S (ed.). Cadet Diary – Psychology of Warrior Ethos and Leadership Development. Jaipur, India: Rawat Publications; 2018, p. 167-84.
  • 81. Bolino MC, Hsiung H-H, Harvey J, LePine JA. ‘Well, I’m tired of tryin’!’ Organizational citizenship behavior and citizenship fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2015;100:56-74.
  • 82. Burrell L, Adams GA, Durand DB, Castro CA. The Impact of military lifestyle demands on well-being, Army, and family outcomes. Armed Forces & Society. 2006;33:43-58.
  • 83. Karam C. Good organizational soldiers: Conflict-related stress predicts citizenship behavior. International Journal of Conflict Management. 2011;22:300-19.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-ea4841c2-0b79-4365-8c1d-f876ba1f98e6
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.