Developing a Hybrid Method of Analytical Hierarchy Process and Additive Ratio Assessment for Ranking Suppliers: A Case Study of an Indonesian Concrete Manufacturing Company

• Autorzy: Ristono Agus , Wahyuningsih Tri , Madyno Putro Gunawan

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/mper.2024.153110

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Indonesia is developing its infrastructure to remain competitive in the global market, focusing on projects such as the construction of toll roads and bridges, which require large volumes of precast concrete products. Accordingly, it is important to focus on the quality of suppliers so that the products meet the requirements of companies and consumers. This case study aimed to develop a proposed model for ranking suppliers, employing the Additive Ratio Assessment and Analytical Hierarchy Process. Furthermore, it examined the practical application of the proposed model in an Indonesian concrete manufacturing company. The Delphi method was employed to enhance decision-making in criteria selection, considering that it determines the reliability of the supplier ranking. The study demonstrated that the proposed method yielded a practical solution and was not sensitive to parameter changes. Sensitivity analysis can help decision-makers evaluate the resilience of the process by determining the effect of change in the primary criteria on supplier ranking. Therefore, establishing a straightforward methodology enables managers in the concrete industry to identify the most suitable supplier. Additionally, this approach assists managers in categorizing intricate decision-making challenges into straightforward methodologies. The study provides managers in the Indonesian concrete industry with a thorough understanding of the variables that must be assessed when selecting suppliers.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

additive ratio assessment; ARAS; analytical hierarchical process; AHP; delphi; criteria selection; supplier ranking

• Wydawca: Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences ; Polish Association for Production Management
• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 15, No. 4
• Strony: 1--12
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 48 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Ristono Agus

• University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran, Industrial Engineering Yogyakarta, Babarsari 02, 55281, Indonesia

autor

Wahyuningsih Tri

• Management Department (University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

autor

Madyno Putro Gunawan

• Industrial Engineering (University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

Bibliografia

• Ali, M.R., Nipu, S.M.A., & Khan, S.A. (2023). A decision support system for classifying supplier selection criteria using machine learning and random forest approach. Decision Analytics Journal, 7, 100238. DOI: 10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100238
• Atlı, H.F. (2024). Turkish Journal of Agriculture – Food Science and Technology Sustainable Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy AHP (AHP-F) and Fuzzy ARAS ( ARAS-F ) Techniques for Fertilizer Supply in the Agricultural Supply Chain. Turkish Journal of Agriculture – Food Science and Technology, 12 (8), 1269–1280.
• Bag, S., Sabbir Rahman, M., Choi, T.M., Srivastava, G., Kilbourn, P., & Pisa, N. (2023). How COVID-19 pandemic has shaped buyer-supplier relationships in engineering companies with ethical perception considerations: A multi-methodological study. Journal of Business Research, 158 (June 2022), 113598. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113598
• Brady, S. R. (2015). Utilizing and Adapting the Delphi Method for Use in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14, 1–9. DOI: 10.1177/1609406915621381
• Büyüközkan, G., & Göçer, F. (2018). An extension of ARAS methodology under Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy environment for Digital Supply Chain. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 69, 634–654. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.040
• Cafiso, S., Di Graziano, A., & Pappalardo, G. (2013). Using the Delphi method to evaluate opinions of public transport managers on bus safety. Safety Science, 57, 254–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.03.001
• Costello, J.W., & Osborne, A.B. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10 (7), 1–9.
• Deretarla, Ö., Erdebilli, B., & Gündoğan, M. (2023). An integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Complex Proportional Assessment for vendor selection in supply chain management. Decision Analytics Journal, 6 (October 2022), 100155. DOI: 10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100155
• Dožić, S., Babić, D., Kalić, M., & Živojinović, S. (2023). An AHP approach to airport choice by freight forwarder. Sustainable Futures, 5 (June 2022), In-press. DOI: 10.1016/j.sftr.2023.100106
• Dožić, S., & Kalić, M. (2015). Comparison of two MCDM methodologies in aircraft type selection problem. Transportation Research Procedia, 10 (July), 910–919. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.044
• Drumm, S., Bradley, C., & Moriarty, F. (2022). ‘More of an art than a science’? The development, design and mechanics of the Delphi Technique. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 18, 2230–2236. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.027
• Fu, Y.K. (2019). An integrated approach to catering supplier selection using AHP-ARAS-MCGP methodology. Journal of Air Transport Management, 75 (January), 164–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.01.011
• Gaskin, C.J., & Happell, B. (2014). On exploratory factor analysis: A review of recent evidence, an assessment of current practice, and recommendations for future use. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51, 511–521. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.005
• Gupta, S., Soni, U., & Kumar, G. (2019). Green supplier selection using multi-criterion decision making under fuzzy environment: A case study in automotive industry. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 136 (140), 663–680. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.038
• Huda, M.H., Rustina, Y., Waluyanti, F.T., Dennis, C.L., & Kuo, S.Y. (2024). Psychometric evaluation of the Indonesian version of paternal breastfeeding self-efficacy scale- short form: A confirmatory factor analysis. Midwifery, 139 (September). DOI: 10.1016/ j.midw.2024.104182
• Hue, T.T., & Oanh, N.K. (2023). Antecedents of green brand equity: Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 403 (September 2022), 136895. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136895
• Karabasevic, D., Paunkovic, J., & Stanujkic, D. (2016). Ranking of companies according to the indicators of corporate social responsibility based on SWARA and ARAS methods. Serbian Journal of Management, 11, 43–53. DOI: 10.5937/sjm11-7877
• Koskey, K.L.K., May, T.A., Fan, Y. “Kate,” Bright, D., Stone, G., Matney, G., & Bostic, J.D. (2023). Flip it: An exploratory (versus explanatory) sequential mixed methods design using Delphi and differential item functioning to evaluate item bias. Methods in Psychology, 8 (2023), 100117. DOI: 10.1016/j.metip.2023.100117
• Liao, C.N., Fu,Y.K., & Wu, L.C. (2016). Integrated FAHP, ARAS-F and MSGP methods for green supplier evaluation and selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22, 651–669. DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2015.1072750
• Liu, Q. (2022). Identifying and correcting the defects of the Saaty analytic hierarchy/network process: A comparative study of the Saaty analytic hierarchy/network process and the Markov chain-based analytic network process. Operations Research Perspectives, 9 (July). DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2022.100244
• Luu, S., & ElBassiouny, A. (2020). Factor analysis in personality research. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, Measurement and Assessment, 109–111. DOI: 10.1002/9781119547167.ch88
• Mavi, R.K. (2015). Green supplier selection: A fuzzy AHP and fuzzy ARAS approach. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 22, 165–188. DOI: 10.1504/IJSOM.2015.071528
• Mokhtar, S., & Yasin, R.M. (2018). Design of Teaching Influences the Training Transfer Amongst TVET’s Instructors: Fuzzy Delphi Technique. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8 (6), 1083–1097. DOI: 10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i6/4303
• Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24, 9–18. DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
• Mustapha, R., Hussin, Z., & Siraj, S. (2017). Analisis faktor penyebab ketidakjujuran akademik dalam kalangan mahasiswa: Aplikasi teknik fuzzy delphi. Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 5, 1–18.
• Özdağoğlu, A., Yilmaz, K., & Çirkin, E. (2019). An Integration of HF-AHP and ARAS Techniques in Supplier Selection: A Case Study in Waste Water Treatment Facility. Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Dergisi, 33, 477–497. DOI: 10.24988/deuiibf.2018332744
• Ristono, A. (2019). New Method of Criteria Weighting for Supplier Selection. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 87, 349–369. DOI: 10.18551/rjoas.2019-03.42
• Ristono, A., Pratikto, -, Santoso, P.B., & Tama, I.P. (2018a). A literature review of criteria selection in supplier. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11, 680–696. DOI: 10.3926/jiem.2203
• Ristono, A., Pratikto, -, Santoso, P.B., & Tama, I.P. (2018b). Modified AHP to select new suppliers in the Indonesian steel pipe industry. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 13 (12), 3894–3907.
• Ristono, A., Wahyuningsih, T., & Ibrahim, M.T. (2021). The application of Factor Analysis (FA) in evaluating suppliers selection criteria in PT. Wijaya Karya Beton Tbk Indonesia and ranking suppliers using Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solutions (TOPSIS). RSF Conference Series: Engineering and Technology, 1, 324–334. DOI: 10.31098/cset.v1i1.392
• Ristono, A., Wahyuningsih, T., & Junianto, E. (2020a). Proposed Method for Supplier Selection. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 13 (November), 376–394. DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v13i1.1955
• Ristono, A., Wahyuningsih, T., & Munandar, A. (2020b). A New Method In The AHP-Weighting Of Criteria For Supplier Selection. Proceeding on Engineering and Science Series (ESS), 1, 81–89.
• Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2011). The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects – Introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78 (9), 1487–1490. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore. 2011.09.002
• Saaty, T.L. (1994). How to make a decision: Analytical Hierarchy Process. Interface, 24 (6), 19–43.
• Saaty, T.L. (2008). Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process. Revista de La Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales – Serie A: Matematicas, 102, 251–318. DOI: 10.1007/BF03191825
• Saaty, T.L., & Ozdemir, M.S. (2003). Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38 (3–4), 233–244. DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7177(03)90083-5
• Scheeringa, M.S. (2024). Is factor analysis useful for revising diagnostic criteria for PTSD? A systematic review of five issues ten years after DSM-5. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 176 (May), 98–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.05.057
• Secundo, G., Magarielli, D., Esposito, E., & Passiante, G. (2017). Supporting decision-making in service supplier selection using a hybrid fuzzy extended AHP approach: A case study. Business Process Management Journal, 23, 196–222. DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-01-2016-0013
• Tamošaitiene, J., Zavadskas, E.K., Šileikaite, I., & Turskis, Z. (2017). A Novel Hybrid MCDM Approach for Complicated Supply Chain Management Problems in Construction. Procedia Engineering, 172, 1137– 1145. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.168
• Tanwar, R., & Agarwal, P.K. (2024). Analysis of the determinants of service quality in the multimodal public transport system of Bhopal city using structural equation modelling (SEM) and factor analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 256 (May). DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124931
• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
• Wahyuningsih, T., Ristono, A., & Muhsin, A. (2022). The application of factor analysis (FA) in evaluating supplier selection criteria in PT. Wijaya Karya Beton Tbk and ranking suppliers using integration of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and adaptive ratio assessment (ARAS). Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 4 (6), 11–17. DOI: 10.47577/technium.v4i6.6814
• Watkins, M.W. (2018). Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44, 219–246. DOI: 10.1177/0095798418771807
• Yaakob, M.F.M., Nawi, A., Yusof, M.R., Fauzee, M.S.O., Awang, H., Khun-Inkeeree, H., Pozin, M.A.A., & Habibi, A. (2020). A quest for experts’ Consensus on the Geo-education module using Fuzzy Delphi analysis. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8 (7), 3189–3203. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080748
• Yadav, V., & Sharma, M.K. (2016). Journal of Modelling in Management. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11, 326–354. DOI: 10.1108/JM2-06-2014-0052
• Yusoff, A.F.M., Hashim, A., Muhamad, N., & Hamat, W.N.W. (2021). Application of Fuzzy Delphi Technique Towards Designing and Developing the Elements for the e-PBM PI-Poli Module. Asian Journal of University Education, 17, 1–13.
• Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., & Vilutiene, T. (2010). Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 10, 123–141. DOI: 10.1016/s1644-9665(12)60141-1
• Zavadskas, E.K., Vainiūnas, P., Turskis, Z., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2012). Multiple criteria decision support system for assessment of projects managers in construction. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 11, 501–520. DOI: 10.1142/S0219622012400135