PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Influence of Neonicotinoids on Selected Characteristics of the Earthworm Dendrobaena Veneta (Rosa) in Laboratory Conditions

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In the laboratory experiment, the effect of neonicotinoid Nuprid 200SC at the dose recommended by the manufacturer on the dynamics of population of earthworms Dendrobaena veneta was assessed. The studies were conducted on mature D. veneta specimens, in 4 replications of beddings (control, insecticide) in the climatic chamber. Condition of the population was checked five times, using a method of manual segregation of beddings. Insecticide limited the increase in number and biomass of D. veneta population (both the whole population, mature specimens and immature earthworms), but also restricted its reproduction (it decreased the number of cocoons laid by earthworms (p<0.05)).
Rocznik
Strony
217--224
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 30 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Department of Natural Theories of Agriculture and Environmental Education, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, 35-601 Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 1A str., Poland
  • Department of Natural Theories of Agriculture and Environmental Education, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, 35-601 Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 1A str., Poland
  • Department of Natural Theories of Agriculture and Environmental Education, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, 35-601 Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 1A str., Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Alves P.R.L., Cardoso E.J.B.N., Martines A.M., Sousa J.P., Pasini A. 2013. Earthworm ecotoxicological assessments of pesticides used to treat seeds under tropical condition. Chemosphere, 90(11), 2674–2682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.046
  • 2. Basley K., Goulson D. 2017. Effects of chronic exposure to clothianidin on the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. PeerJ, April 11, https://doi:org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.046
  • 3. Bonmatin J.M., Giorio C., Girolami V., Goulson D., Kreutzweiser D., Krupke C., Liess M., Long E., Marzaro M., Mitchell E., Noome D., Simon-Delso N., Tapparo A. 2014. Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(1), 35–67. https://doi:org/10.1007/s11356–014–3332–7.
  • 4. Botías C., David A., Hill E.M., Goulson D. 2016. Contamination of wild plants near neonicotinoid seedtreated crops, and implications for non-target insects. Science of the Total Environment, 566–567, 269–278. https://doi:org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.065.
  • 5. Chen Ch., Wang Y., Zhao X., Wang Q., Qian Y. 2014. Comparative and combined acute toxicity of butachlor, imidacloprid and chlorpyrifos on earthworm, Eisenia fetida. Chemosphere, 100, 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.023.
  • 6. Dittbrenner N., Schmitt H., Capowicz Y., Triebskorn R. 2011. Sensitivity of Eisenia fetida in comparison to Aporrectodea caliginosa and Lumbricus terrestris after imidacloprid exposure. Body mass change and histopathology. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 11(6), 1000–1010. https://doi:org/:10.1007/s11368–011–0397–5.
  • 7. Eng M., Stutchbury B.J., Morrissey C.A. 2017. Imidacloprid and chlopyrifos impair migratory ability in a seed-eating songbird. Scientific Reports, 7,151–176. https://doi:org/:10.1038/s41598–017–15446-x.
  • 8. Garczyńska M., Pączka G., Mazur-Pączka A., Kostecka J. 2018. Earthworms in short–term contact with a low dose of neonicotinoid Actara 25WG. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 19(3), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/86254.
  • 9. Gomez-Eyles J.L., Svendsen C., Lister L., Martin H., Hodson M.E., Spurgeon D. 2009. Mea suring and modelling mixture toxicity of imidacloprid and thiacloprid on Caenorhabditis elegans and Eisenia fetida. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 72, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.07.006.
  • 10. Hladik M.L., Anson R., Main A.R.M., Goulson D. 2018. Environmental risks and challenges associated with neonicotinoid insecticides. Environmental Science and Technology, 52, 3329–3335. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06388.
  • 11. Johnston A.S.A., Hodson M.E., Thorbek P., Alvarez T., Sibly R.M. 2014. An energy budżet agent-based model of earthworm populations and its applications to study the effects of pesticides. Ecological Modelling, 280, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.09.012.
  • 12. Kostecka J. 2000. Investigation into vermicomposting of organic wastes. Scient Paper of Agricultular University of Cracow, 268, pp. 88 (in Polish).
  • 13. Lukkari T., Aatsinki M., Vaisanen A., Haimi J. 2005. Toxicity of copper and zinc assessed with three different earthworm tests. Applied Soil Ecology, 30, 133–146. https://doi.org/l0.1016/j.apsoil.2005.02.001.
  • 14. Mörtl M., Kereki O., Darvas B., Klatyik Sz., Vehovszky A., Györi J., Szekacs A. 2016. Study on soli mobility of two neonicotinoid insecticides. Journal of Chemistry. ID 4546584: 9 http:/dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4546584.
  • 15. OECD 2004. Test 222: Earthworm Reproduction Test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei), OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264070325-en.
  • 16. Olvera-Velona A., Capowiez Y., Mascle O., OrtizHernandez L., Benoit P. 2008. Assessment of the toxicity of ethyl-parathion to earthworms (Aporrectodea caliginosa) using behavioural, physiological and biochemical markers. Applied Soil Ecology, 40(3), 476–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.07.002.
  • 17. Pelosi C., Bertrand M., Capowiez Y., Boizard H., Roger-Estrade J. 2009. Earthworm collection from agricultural fields: comparisons of selected expellants in presence/absence of hand-sorting. European Journal of Soil Biology, 45, 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.09.013.
  • 18. Podolak-Machowska A. 2016. Reactions earthworms (Lumbricidae) to stress on the population and cell level. PhD thesis. Faculty of Biology of Agriculture. University of Rzeszow. http://repozytorium.ur.edu.pl/handle/item/2295.
  • 19. Raymann K., Motta E.V.S., Girard C., Raddington I.M., Dinser J.A., Morgan N.A. 2018. Imidacloprid decreases honey bee survival rates but does not affect the gut microbiome. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 84(13). https://doi.org/10.1128/ AEM.00545–18.
  • 20. Renaud M., Akeju T., Natal-da-Luz T., Leston S., Rosa J., Ramos F., Jose Paulo Sousa J., Azevedo-Pereira H. M.V.S. 2018. Effects of the neonicotinoids acetamiprid and thiacloprid in their commercial formulations on soil fauna. Chemosphere, 194, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.102.
  • 21. Stanisz A. 2006. An affordable statistic course using Statistica PL on examples of medicine (in Polish). StatSoft Polska Sp. z o.o. Cracow, pp. 532.
  • 22. Suchail S., Debrauwer L.; Belzunces L.P. 2004. Metabolism of imidacloprid in Apis mellifera. Pest Manage Sci., 60(3), 291−296. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.772.
  • 23. Suzhen QI., Donghui W., Lizhen Zh., Miaomiao T., Chengju W., Xiaofeng X., Liming W. 2018. Effects of a novel neonicotinoid insecticide cycloxaprid on earthworm, Eisenia fetida. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(14), 14138–14147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356–018–1624-z.
  • 24. Uhl P., Bucher R., Schafer R.S., Entling M.H 2015. Sublethal effects of imidacloprid on interactions in a tritrophic system on non target species. Chemosphere, 132, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.027.
  • 25. Wang K., Pang S., Mu X., Qi S., Li D., Cui F., Wang C. 2015a. Biological response of earthworm, Eisenia fetida, to five neonicotinoid insecticides. Chemosphere, 132, 120–126. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.002.
  • 26. Wang K., Suzhen Qi., Xiyan M., Tingling Ch., Yang Y., Danden W., Dongzhai Li., Wunam Ch., Chengju W. 2015b. Evaluation of te toxicity, Ache activity and DNA damage cause by imidachloprid of earthworms, Eisenia fetida. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination Toxicology, 95, 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00128–015–1629-y.
  • 27. Wood T.J., Goulson D. 2017. The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 17285–17325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356–017–9240-x.
  • 28. Zang Y., Zhong Y., Luo Y., Kong Z.M. 2000. Genotoxicity of two novel pesticides for the earthworm, Eisenia fetida. Environmental Pollution, 108(2), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269–7491(99)00191–8.
  • 29. Zhang J., Xiong K., Chen A., Li T. 2017. Toxicity a novel neonicotinoid insecticide paichongding to earthworm Eisenia fetida. Soil Sediment and Contamination, 26(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1080. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2017.1276153
  • 30. Zhang Q., Zhang B., Wang C. 2014. Ecotoxicological effects on the earthworm Eisenia fetida following exposure to soil contaminated with imidacloprid. Environmental Science Pollution Research International 21(21), 12345–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356–014–3178-z.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-ea355578-1831-4dea-a2f3-26cc01366b2c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.