The Importance of Forest Patches in Supporting Steppe-Species: A Case Study from the Carpathian Basin

• Autorzy: Erdős L. , Tölgyesi C. , Körmöczi L. , Bátori Z.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.3161/15052249PJE2015.63.2.005

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Moderating effects of trees on the environment in their immediate proximity are considered an important force in structuring plant communities, especially in harsh environments. In the semi-arid regions of the middle Carpathian Basin, such facilitative influences are expected to become crucial for the survival of several plant species, given the current warming and drying tendencies. We used 20 × 20 m plots to analyze whether grassland species adapted to mesic conditions penetrate forest patches, where they are able to survive. Using transects and the moving split window analysis, we also investigated how far the positive effects of the forest patches extend into grasslands, and whether this enables the existence of a steppe community that cannot tolerate extreme dry conditions and unfavorable soils. We found that beside forest-related species, forest patches hosted large numbers of grassland-related species. Among them, plants of closed steppe grasslands were the most numerous, which usually cannot tolerate the harsh conditions of open sandy grasslands, and are often confined to areas with better water and soil conditions. Our results showed that there is a 5–8 m wide closed steppe zone around the forest patches. Some species that are not able to survive in open xeric sandy grasslands are restricted to this zone. Unfortunately, while considerable attention is paid to the research, protection and restoration of sandy grasslands, forest patches are usually neglected. Our results emphasize that the establishment of individual trees and groups of trees should be actively promoted, because they have considerable nature conservation benefits by supporing closed steppe species.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

forest-steppe landscape; spatial heterogeneity; grassland conservation; edge; moving split-window

PL

krajobraz leśno-stepowy; zróżnicowanie przestrzenne; ochrona; użytki zielone; krawędź

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 63, nr 2
• Strony: 213--222
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 56 poz., fot., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Erdős L.

• Department of Ecology, University of Szeged, H-6726 Szeged, Közép fasor 52, Hungary

autor

Tölgyesi C.

• Department of Ecology, University of Szeged, H-6726 Szeged, Közép fasor 52, Hungary

autor

Körmöczi L.

• Department of Ecology, University of Szeged, H-6726 Szeged, Közép fasor 52, Hungary

autor

Bátori Z.

• Department of Ecology, University of Szeged, H-6726 Szeged, Közép fasor 52, Hungary

Bibliografia

• 1. Ambrózy P., Kozma F. 1990 — [Climate of the Dorozsma-Majsa sand region] (In: [Cadaster of the Basic Landscape Units of Hungary I] Ed: S. Marosi, S. Somogyi) — MTA Földrajztudományi Kutató Int ézet, Budapest, pp. 84 –85 (in Hungarian).
• 2. Barczi A., Penksza K., Czinkota I., Néráth M. 1997 — A study of connection between certain phytoecological indicators and soil characteristics in the case of the Tihany peninsula — Acta Bot. Hung. 40:1 –14.
• 3. Bartha D. 1999 — [Tree and shrub species of Hungary] — Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest, 302 pp. (in Hungarian).
• 4. Bartha S., Campetella G., Kertész M., Hahn I., Kroel-Dulay Gy., Rédei T., Kun A., Virágh K., Fekete G., Kovács-Láng E. 2011 — Beta diversity and community differentiation in dry perennial sand grasslands — Ann. Bot. 1:9 –18.
• 5. Bartha S., Campetella G., Ruprecht E., Kun A., Házi J., Horvth A., Virágh K., Molnár Zs. 2008 — Will interannual variability in sand grassland communities increase with climate change? — Community Ecol. 9: 13–21.
• 6. Bartholy J., Pongr ácz R., Gelybó Gy. 2007 — Regional climate change expected in Hungary for 2071-2100 — Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 5: 1–17.
• 7. Belsky A.J., Mwonga S.M., Amundson R.G., Duxbury J.M., Ali A.R. 1993— Comparative effects of isolated trees on their undercanopy environments in high- and low-rainfall savannas — J. Appl. Ecol. 30: 143–155.
• 8. Bertness M.D., Callaway R. 1994 — Positive interactions in communities— Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 191 –193.
• 9. Biró M., Révész A., Molnár Zs., Horváth F., Czúcz B. 2008 — Regional habitat pattern of the Danube- Tisza Interfluve in Hungary II — Acta Bot. Hung. 50: 19 –60.
• 10. Bodrogközy Gy. 1957 — Die Vegetation der Weisspappel- Haine in dem Reservat Emlékerdő bei Szeged- Ásotthalom — Acta Biol. Szeged. 3: 127–140.
• 11. Bodrogközy Gy. 1982 — Hydroecology of the vegetation of sandy forest-steppe character in the Emlékerdő at Ásotthalom — Acta Biol. Szeged.28: 13 –39.
• 12. Borhidi A. 1993 — Characteristics of the climate of the Danube-Tisza Mid-region (In: The flora of the Kiskuns ág National Park I, Eds: J. Szujkó-Lacza, D. Kováts) — Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, pp. 9–20.
• 13. Borhidi A. 1995 — Social behaviour types, the naturalness and relative ecological indicator values of the higher plants in the Hungarian Flora —Acta Bot. Hung. 39: 97 –181.
• 14. Borhidi A., Kevey B., Lendvai G. 2012 — Plant communities of Hungary —Akad émiai Kiadó, Budapest, 544 pp.
• 15. Bölöni J., Molnár Zs., Kun A. 2011 — [Habitat types of Hungary] — MTA ÖBKI, V ácr át ót, 439 pp. (in Hungarian).
• 16. Bronstein J.L. 2009 — The evolution of facilitation and mutualism — J. Ecol. 97: 1160 –1170.
• 17. Brooker R.W., Callaghan T.V. 1998 — The balance between positive and negative plant interactions and its relationship to environmental gradients: a model — Oikos, 81: 196 –207.
• 18. Brooker R.W., Maestre F.T., Callaway R.M., Lortie C.L., Cavieres L.A., Kunstler G., Liancourt P., Tielbörger K., Travis J.M.J., Anthelme F., Armas C., Coll L., Corcket E., Delzon S., Forey E., Kikvidze Z., Olofsson J., Pugnaire F., Quiroz C.L., Saccone P., Schiffers K., Seifan M., Touzard B., Michalet R. 2008 — Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future — J. Ecol. 96: 18 –34.
• 19. Bruno J.F., Stachowicz J.J., Bertness M.D. 2003 — Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory — Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 119–125.
• 20. Callaway R.M., Walker L.R. 1997 — Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities — Ecology, 78:1958 –1965.
• 21. Choesin D., Boerner R.E.J. 2002 — Vegetetation boundary detection: A comparison of two approaches applied to field data — Plant Ecol. 158: 85–96.
• 22. Chytrý M., Tichý L., Holt J., Botta-Dukát Z. 2002. — Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures — J. Veg. Sci. 13: 79–90.
• 23. De Jong T.J., Klinkhamer P.G.L. 1988 — Seedling establishment of the biennials Cirsium vulgare and Cynoglossum officinale in a sand-dune area: the importance of water for differential survival and growth — J. Ecol. 76:393 –402.
• 24. Diekmann M. 2003 — Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology: a review — Basic Appl. Ecol. 4: 493 –506.
• 25. Erdős L., Bátori Z., Tölgyesi Cs., Körmöczi L. 2014a — The moving split window (MSW) analysis in vegetation science: an overview — Appl. Ecol. Env. Res. 12: 787 –805.
• 26. Erdős L., Gallé R., Körmöczi L., Bátori Z. 2013 — Species composition and diversity of natural forest edges: edge responses and local edge species — Community Ecol. 14: 48 –58.
• 27. Erdős L., Tölgyesi Cs., Cseh V., Tolnay D., Cserhalmi D., Körmöczi L., Gellény K., Bátori Z. — Vegetation history, recent dynamics and future prospects of a Hungarian sandy forest-steppe reserve: forest-grassland relations, tree species composition and size-class distribution — Community Ecol. (in press).
• 28. Erdős L., Tölgyesi Cs., Horzse M., Tolnay D., Hurton Á., Schulcz N., Körmöczi L., Lengyel A., Bátori Z. 2014c — Habitat complexity of the Pannonian forest-steppe zone and its nature conservation implications —Ecol. Complex. 17: 107 – 118.
• 29. Erdős L., Zalatnai M., Bátori Z., Körmöczi L. 2014b — Transitions between community complexes: a case study analysing gradients through mountain ridges in South Hungary — Acta Bot. Croat. 73: 63 –77.
• 30. Frost W.E., McDougald N.K. 1989 — Tree canopy effects on herbaceous production of annual rangeland during drought — J. Range Manage. 42:281 –283.
• 31. Gaskó B. 2009 — [On the conservation of the natural and near-natural habitats in Csongr ád county] — Stud. Nat. 5: 5 –486 (in Hungarian, English summary).
• 32. Halassy M. 2001 — Possible role of the seed bank in the restoration of open sand grassland in old fields — Community Ecol. 2: 101–108.
• 33. Holmgren M., Scheffer M., Huston M.A. 1997 — The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities — Ecology, 78: 1966–1975.
• 34. Horváth A., Szemán L., Bartha S., Virágh K., Bölöni J., Fülöp Gy., Rév Sz. 2009 — [Possibilities of restoration of natural or seminatural grasslands] — Gyepgazdálkodási Közlem. 6: 19 –27 (in Hungarian, English summary).
• 35. Kertész A., Mika J. 1999 — Aridification, climate change is South-eastern Europe — Phys. Chem. Earth Pt. A. 24: 913 –920.
• 36. Kopecky F. 1978 — [Common aspen and silver poplar] (In: [Poplar and willow plantations] Ed: B. Keresztesi) — Mezőgazdas ági Kiadó,Budapest, pp. 30 –33 (in Hungarian).
• 37. Kovács-Láng E., Kröel-Dulay Gy., Kertész M., Fekete G., Bartha S., Mika J., Dobi-Wantuch I., Rédei T., Rajkai K., Hahn I. 2000 — Changes in the composition of sand grasslands along a climatic gradient in Hungary and implications for climate change — Phytocoenologia, 30: 385–407.
• 38. Magyari E.K., Chapman J.C., Passnore D.G., Allen J.R.M., Huntley J.P., Huntley B. 2010 — Holocene persistence of wooded steppe in the Great Hungarian Plain — J. Biogeogr. 37: 915 –935.
• 39. Margóczi K., Fehér M., Hrtyan M., Gradzikiewicz M. 2009 — [Evaluation of old-fields and ecological restoration of grasslands in the Great Hungarian Plain] — Term észetvédelmi Közlem. 15: 182 –192 (in Hungarian, English summary).
• 40. Margóczi K., Körmöczi L., Kincsek I. 1997 — Regeneration of sand grasslands: case studies in two different scales — ANP Füzetek 1: 233–239.
• 41. Mittelbach G.G. 2012 — Community ecology — Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 400 pp.
• 42. Molnár Zs. 1998 — Interpreting present vegetation features by landscape historical data: an example from a woodland-grassland mosaic landscape (Nagykőrös Wood, Kiskunság, Hungary) (In: The ecological history of European forests, Eds: K.J. Kirby, C. Watkins) — CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 241 –263.
• 43. Molnár Zs. 2009 [The Holocene history of the vegetation types of the central part of the Great Hungarian Plain: a paleoecological review from a vegetation scientist's poin of view] - Kanitzia, 16: 93-118 (in Hungarian, English summary).
• 44. Molnár Zs., Fekete G., Biró M., Kun A. 2008 — [Land-use history of the sandy steppes of the Danube-Tisza Interfluve] (In: [Soil-plantclimate interactions] Eds: Gy. Kröel-Dulay, T. Kalapos, A. Mojzes) — MTA ÖBKI, Vácrátót, pp. 39 –56 (in Hungarian).
• 45. Pálfai I. 2011 — [Extreme droughts ont he Hungarian Plain between 1931 and 2010] (In: [Environmental changes and the Hungarian plain], Ed: J. Rakonczai) — Nagyalföld Alapítvány, Békéscsaba, pp. 87 –96. (in Hungarian).
• 46. Rédei K. 2010 — [Forest plantations] — Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadé,Debrecen, 88 pp. (in Hungarian).
• 47. Ries L., Fletcher R.J., Battin J., Sisk T.D. 2004 — Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 35: 491 –522.
• 48. Soó R. 1980 — [Reference book of the Hungarian flora and vegetation VI] — Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 556 pp. (in Hungarian).
• 49. Szalai J. 2011 — [Changes in water table depth int he Hungarian Plain](In: [Environmental changes and the Hungarian Plain] Ed: J. Rakonczai) — Nagyalföld Alapítvány, Békéscsaba, pp. 97–110 (in Hungarian).
• 50. Tewksbury J.J., Lloyd J.D. 2001 — Positive interactions under nurse-plants: Spatial scale, stress gradients and benefactor size — Oecologia, 127: 425–434.
• 51. Tichý L. 2002 — JUICE, software for vegetation classification — J. Veg. Sci. 13: 451–453.
• 52. Tichý L., Chytrý M. 2006 — Statistical determination of diagnostic species for site groups of unequal size — J. Veg. Sci. 17: 809–818.
• 53. van Andel J. 2005 — Species interactions structuring plant communities(In: Vegetation ecology, Ed: E. van der Maarel) — Blackwell, Malden, pp.238–264.
• 54. Webster R., Wong I.F.T. 1969 — A numerical procedure for testing soil boundaries interpreted from air photographs — Photogrammetria, 24:59–72.
• 55. Zólyomi B. 2007 — [Natural vegetation of Hungary] (In: [Pannon encyclopedia: Flora and vegetation of Hungary] Ed: M. Járai-Komlódi) —Urbis, Budapest, pp. 156–157 (in Hungarian).
• 56. Zsákovics G., Kovács F., Kiss A., Pócsik E. 2007 — Risk analysis of the aridification endangered sand-ridge area in the Danube-Tisza Interfluve —Acta Climatol. Chorol. Univ. Szeged. 40–41: 169–178.