The European Union’s cohesion policy in the face of new challenges

• Autorzy: Lewandowski Krzysztof

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2019.139.21

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Cohesion policy is one of the most important policy areas of the European Union in the current programming period. Its main objective is to reduce regional disparities throughout the Union. Since its inception, it has evolved as a result of successive enlargements, changes in the economic and political situation in Europe and political preferences. These changes are visible in the current programming period and are also inevitable in the next phase. The aim of the article is to present the changes that will take place in the European Union Cohesion policy in the future programming period and to identify the most important challenges that this policy will have to face. The article presents a brief description of the current programming period, as well as the countries that are payers and net beneficiaries of this policy. The next part presents proposals for the new policy - the most important objectives, principles, as well as the amount of funds for individual Member States. The third part includes the identification of the most important future challenges for the cohesion policy: the exit of Great Britain from the European Union, climate change, security and migration issues, as well as potential enlargement of the Community to the Western Balkans countries.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

European Union; cohesion policy; regional policy

PL

Unia Europejska; polityka spójności; polityka regionalna

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: z. 139
• Strony: 267--277
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 18 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Lewandowski Krzysztof

• University of Lodz

Bibliografia

• 1. Busch, B. (2018). Die Finanzierung der EU nach 2020. Zeit für Reformen. Köln: Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft.
• 2. Busch, B. (2018). Kohäsionspolitik in der Europäischen Union. Bestandsaufnahme und Neuorientierung. Köln: Institut der deutschenWirtschaft.
• 3. Busch, B. (2004). EU-Kohäsionspolitik. IW-Analysen, 8. Köln.
• 4. Donati, N. (2019). The EU cohesion policy under the next MFF: winners and losers across Europe`s twin peripheries. Retrieved from: http://www.euvisions.eu/eu-cohesion-policy-2021-2027-mff-winners-losers-europe-peripheries/.
• 5. Dörr, J. (2016). Die europäische Kohäsionspolitik auf dem Weg zu einer "informellen Wirtschaftspolitik". Ordo, 67, 193-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2016-0109.
• 6. European Commission (2017). Joint Report from the negotiators of the European Union and the United Kingdom Government on progress during phase 1 of negotiations under Article 50 TEU on the United Kingdom’s orderly withdrawal from the European Union. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/joint_report.pdf, 8 December 2017.
• 7. European Commission (2018). EU budget: Regional Development and Cohesion Policy beyond 2020. Retrieved from: https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-3885_en.htm.
• 8. European Commission (2018). EU's long-term budget proposal. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/poland/news/180502_budzet_pl, 25.July 2019.
• 9. European Commission (2019). Serbia 2019 Report, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions, 2019 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy. Brussels: European Commission.
• 10. European Parliament (2018). 2021-2027 Multiannual financial framework and new own resources. Analysis of Commission`s proposal. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service.
• 11. Eurostat (2019). Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tec00114&plugin=, 30 July 2019.
• 12. Greta, M. (2013). Euroregiony polskie w procesie integracji europejskiej oraz w przezwyciężaniu peryferyjności i dysproporcji regionalnych. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
• 13. Grochowska, R., Kosior, K. (2016). Negocjacje budżetowe Unii Europejskiej w cieniu zasady juste retour. Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej, 4(349).
• 14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018). Global Warming of 1.5⁰ C. Geneva: IPCC Special Report.
• 15. Komisja Europejska (2017). Sprawozdanie Komisji dla Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady, Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno-Społecznego i Komitetu Regionów "Mój region, moja Europa, nasza przyszłość”: siódme sprawozdanie w sprawie spójności gospodarczej, społeczne j i terytorialnej. Bruksela: Komisja Europejska.
• 16. Komisja Europejska (2014). Wprowadzenie do unijnej polityki spójności na lata 2014-2020. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informatbasic/basic_2014_pl.pdf.
• 17. Sapir, A. et al. (2003). An Agenda for a Growing Europe. Making the EU System Deliver. Report of an Independent High-Level Study Group established on the initiative of the President of the European Commission. Brussels: European Commission.
• 18. Szlachta, J. (2012). Strategia Europa 2020 a europejska polityka spójności po 2013 roku. Prace i Materiały Instytutu Rozwoju Gospodarczego SGH, 88.