Methane and hydrogen production from potato wastes and wheat straw under dark fermentation

• Autorzy: Sołowski Gaweł , Konkol Izabela , Shalaby Marwa , Cenian Adam

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/cpe.2021.137335

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Batch dark fermentation of wheat straw and boiled potato wastes at volatile suspended solids (VSS) 5 g VSS/L are examined and compared. Investigations on dark fermentation of potatowastes and wheat straw were carried out at different pH and OFR (oxygen flow rate) values and inoculum pretreatment. The obtained hydrogen yield from waste potato was 70 mL/g VSS, while for hydrolysed wheat straw it amounted to 80 mL/g VSS. The optimum conditions for potato dark fermentation are acidic pH 6.0 and OFR 1.0 mL/h, while for the wheat straw, optimal conditions are pH 6.4 and OFR 4.6 mL/h. The comparison revealed a significant difference in hydrogen production due to the type of substrate, inoculum stressing and DF conditions applied.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

dark fermentation; hydrogen production; wheat straw; boiled potato wastes; microaeration; inoculum stressing

PL

ciemna fermentacja; produkcja wodoru; słoma pszenna; gotowane odpady ziemniaczane; mikronapowietrzanie

• Wydawca: Komitet Inżynierii Chemicznej i Procesowej Polskiej Akademii Nauk
• Czasopismo: Chemical and Process Engineering
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 42, nr 1
• Strony: 3--–13
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Sołowski Gaweł

• Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery Polish Academy of Sciences, Physical Aspects of Ecoenergy Department, 14 Fiszera St., 80-231 Gdańsk, Poland

autor

Konkol Izabela

• Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery Polish Academy of Sciences, Physical Aspects of Ecoenergy Department, 14 Fiszera St., 80-231 Gdańsk, Poland

autor

Shalaby Marwa

• National Research Center in Cairo, Department of Chemical Engineering and Pilot Plant, El Bijouth St., Dokki, Cairo, Egypt 12622

autor

Cenian Adam

• Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery Polish Academy of Sciences, Physical Aspects of Ecoenergy Department, 14 Fiszera St., 80-231 Gdańsk, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Achinas S., Li Y., Achinas V., Euverink G.J.W., 2019. Biogas potential from the anaerobic digestion of potato peels: Process performance and kinetics evaluation. Energies, 12, 2311. DOI: 10.3390/en12122311.
• 2. Aly S.S., Imai T., Hassouna M.S., Kim Nguyen D.M., Higuchi T., Kanno A., Yamamoto K., Akada R., Sekine M., 2018. Identification of factors that accelerate hydrogen production by Clostridium butyricum RAK25832 using casamino acids as a nitrogen source. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 43, 5300–5313. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.171.
• 3. Bartacek J., Zabranska J., Lens P.N.L., 2007. Developments and constraints in fermentative hydrogen production. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin., 1, 201–214. DOI: 10.1002/bbb.17.
• 4. Bundhoo Z.M.A., 2019. Potential of bio-hydrogen production from dark fermentation of crop residues: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 44, 17346–17362. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.098.
• 5. Chaganti S.R., Kim D.H., Lalman J.A., 2012. Dark fermentative hydrogen production by mixed anaerobic cultures: Effect of inoculum treatment methods on hydrogen yield. Renewable Energy, 48, 117–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene. 2012.04.015.
• 6. Chi C.H., Chen K.W., Huang J.J., Chuang Y.C., Wu M.H., 1995. Gas composition in Clostridium septicum gas gangrene. J. Formos. Med. Assoc., 94, 757–759.
• 7. De Cicco A., Jeanty J.-C., 2017. The EU potato sector – statistics on production, prices and trade – Statistics Explained. Statistic Explained. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=The_EU_potato_sector_-_statistics_on_production,_prices_and_trade.
• 8. Dessě P., Lakaniemi A.M., Lens P.N.L., 2017. Biohydrogen production from xylose by fresh and digested activated sludge at 37, 55 and 70 °C. Water Res., 115, 120–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.063.
• 9. Gallipoli A., Braguglia C.M., Gianico A., Montecchio D., Pagliaccia P., 2020. Kitchen waste valorization through a mild-temperature pretreatment to enhance biogas production and fermentability: Kinetics study in mesophilic and thermophilic regimen. J. Environ. Sci., 89, 167–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2019.10.016.
• 10. Garcia-Bernet D., Steyer J.-P., Bernet N., 2017. Traitement anaerobie des effluents industriels liquides Traitement anaerobie des effluents industriels liquides. Techniques de l’Ingenieur, Ref : J3943 v2.
• 11. Garcia Depraect O., Muńoz R., van Lier J.B., Rene E.R., Diaz-Cruces V.F., Leon Becerril E., 2020. Three-stage process for tequila vinasse valorization through sequential lactate, biohydrogen and methane production. Bioresour. Technol., 307, 123160. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123160.
• 12. HanW., Ye M., Zhu A.J., Zhao H.T., Li Y.F., 2015. Batch dark fermentation from enzymatic hydrolyzed food waste for hydrogen production. Bioresour. Technol., 191, 24–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.120.
• 13. Hawkes F.R., Hussy I., Kyazze G., Dinsdale R., Hawkes D.L., 2007. Continuous dark fermentative hydrogen production by mesophilic microflora: Principles and progress. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32, 172–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.08.014.
• 14. Hernandez C., Alamilla-Ortiz Z.L., Escalante A.E.,Navarro-Diaz M., Carrillo-Reyes J., Moreno-Andrade I.,Valdez-Vazquez I., 2019. Heat-shock treatment applied to inocula for H2 production decreases microbial diversities, interspecific interactions and performance using cellulose as substrate. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 44, 13126–13134. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.124.
• 15. Kumar G., Bakonyi P., Periyasamy S., Kim S.H.,NemestothyN., Belafi-Bako K., 2015. Lignocellulose biohydrogen:
• 16. Practical challenges and recent progress. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 44, 728–737. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.042.
• 17. Laurinavichene T.V., Belokopytov B.F., Laurinavichius K.S., Tekucheva D.N., Seibert M., Tsygankov A.A., 2010.
• 18. Towards the integration of dark- and photo-fermentative waste treatment. 3. Potato as substrate for sequential dark fermentation and light-driven H2 production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 35, 8536–8543. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.063.
• 19. Leszczyński, W., 2000. Jakość ziemniaka konsumpcyjnego. Żywność, Nauka, Technologia, Jakość, Supl., 4(25), 5–27.
• 20. Li Y., Zhang Q., Deng L., Liu Z., Jiang H., Wang F., 2018. Biohydrogen production from fermentation of cotton stalk hydrolysate by Klebsiella sp. WL1316 newly isolated from wild carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) of the Tarim River basin. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 102, 4231–4242. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-018-8882-z.
• 21. Moriarty K., 2013. Feasibility study of anaerobic digestion of foodwaste in St. Bernard, Louisiana.Astudy prepared in partnership with the Environmental Protection Agency for the RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative: Siting renewable energy on potentially contaminated land and mine sites. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Technical Report, NREL/TP-7A30-57082. DOI: 10.2172/1067946.
• 22. Nasirian N., Almassi M., Minaei S.,Widmann R., 2011. Development of a method for biohydrogen production from wheat straw by dark fermentation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36, 411–420. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.073.
• 23. Paillet F., Maron, A., Moscovi, R., Steyer J.P., Tapia-Venegas E., Bernet N., Trably E., 2019. Improvement of biohydrogen production from glycerol in micro-oxidative environment. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 44, 17802–17812. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.082.
• 24. Patel A.K., Debroy A., Sharma S., Saini R., Mathur A., Gupta R., Tuli D.K., 2015. Biohydrogen production from a novel alkalophilic isolate Clostridium sp. IODB-O3. Bioresour. Technol., 175, 291–297. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech. 2014.10.110.
• 25. Sekoai P.T., Ayeni A.O., Daramola M.O., 2019. Parametric optimization of biohydrogen production from potato waste and scale-up study using immobilized anaerobic mixed sludge.Waste Biomass Valorization, 10, 1177–1189. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-017-0136-2.
• 26. Si B.C., Li J.M., Zhu Z.B., Zhang Y.H., Lu J.W., Shen R.X., Zhang C., 2016. Continuous production of biohythane from hydrothermal liquefied cornstalk biomass via twostage highrate anaerobic reactors. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 9, 254. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0666-z.
• 27. Słupek E., Kucharska K., G˛ebicki J., 2019. Alternative methods for dark fermentation course analysis. SN Appl. Sci., 1, 469. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-0488-2.
• 28. Sołowski G., Konkol I., Cenian A., 2019a. Perspectives of hydrogen production from corn wastes in Poland by means of dark fermentation. Ecol. Chem. Eng. S, 26, 255–263. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2019-0031.
• 29. Sołowski G., Konkol, I., Hrycak B., Czylkowski D., 2019b. Hydrogen and methane production under conditions of anaerobic digestion of key-lime and cabbage wastes. Agritech, 39(3), 243–250. DOI: 10.22146/agritech.35848.
• 30. Sołowski G., Konkol I., Cenian A., 2020a. Production of hydrogen and methane from lignocellulose waste by fermentation. A review of chemical pretreatment for enhancing the efficiency of the digestion process. J. Cleaner Prod., 267, 121721. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121721. Sołowski G.,Konkol I., Cenian A., 2020b. Methane and hydrogen production from cottonwaste by dark fermentation under anaerobic and micro-aerobic conditions. Biomass Bioenergy, 138, 105576. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2020. 105576.
• 31. Woodward J., Orr M., Cordray K., Greenbaum E., 2000. Enzymatic production of biohydrogen. Nature, 405, 1014–1015. DOI: 10.1038/35016633.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).