The effect of carfentrazone-ethyl on soil microorganisms and soil enzymes activity

• Autorzy: Tomkiel M. , Baćmaga M. , Wyszkowska J. , Kucharski J. , Borowik A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/aep-2015-0025

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ karfentrazonu etylu na mikroorganizmy i aktywność enzymów glebowych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of carfentrazone-ethyl (CE) doses of 0.265, 5.280, 10.560, 21.180, 42.240 μg kg-1 soil DM on fungi, Acnomycetes, organotrophic bacteria, total oligotrophic bacteria and spore-forming oligotrophic bacteria, and on the activity of dehydrogenases, catalase, urease, alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase, arylsulfatase and β-glucosidase. Carfentrazone-ethyl had a stimulating effect on total oligotrophic bacteria and organotrophic bacteria, but it inhibited the growth of Azotobacter, fungi, spore-forming oligotrophic bacteria and Actinomycetes. The analyzed substance modified the structure of soil microbial communities, and it induced the most profound changes in fungi. The highest values of the colony development (CD) index and the eco-physiological (EP) index were observed in organotrophic bacteria. The optimal dose of carfentrazone-ethyl stimulated the activity of dehydrogenases, catalase, urease, alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase and β-glucosidase, but it had no effect on arylsulfatase. The highest doses of the analyzed substance inhibited the activity of dehydrogenases (reduction from 11.835 to 11.381 μmol TPF), urease (reduction from 0.545 to 0.500 mmol N-NH4) and arylosulfatase (reduction from 0.210 to 0.168 mmol PNP). Dehydrogenases were most resistant to CE, whereas acid phosphatase and arylsulfatase were least resistant to the analyzed compound.

PL

W pracy określono wpływ karfentrazonu etylu zaaplikowanego w dawkach 0,265, 5,280, 10,560, 21,180, 42,2 40 μg kg-1s.m. gleby na grzyby, promieniowce, bakterie organotroficzne, oligotroficzne ogółem i oligotroficzne przetrwalnikujące oraz aktywność dehydrogenaz, katalazy, ureazy, fosfatazy alkalicznej, fosfatazy kwaśnej, arylosulfatazy i β-glukozydazy. W wyniku badań stwierdzono stymulujące działanie karfentrazonu etylu na bakterie oligotroficzne ogółem i bakterie organotrofi czne, natomiast inhibicyjne na Azotobacter, grzyby, bakterie oligotroficzne przetrwalnikujące oraz promieniowce. Preparat ten zmieniał strukturę zespołu drobnoustrojów. Największe zmiany wywoływał u grzybów. Najwyższe wartości wskaźników rozwoju kolonii (CD) i ekofi zjologicznej różnorodności (EP) odnotowano u bakterii organotroficznych. Karfentrazon etylu w dawce optymalnej zwiększał aktywność dehydrogenaz katalazy, ureazy, fosfatazy alkalicznej, fosfatazy kwaśnej i β-glukozydazy, a nie oddziaływał na arylosulfatazę, natomiast najwyższe dawki zmniejszały aktywność dehydrogenaz (obniżenie z 11,835 do 11,381 μmol TPF), ureazy (obniżenie z 0,545 do 0,500 mmol N-NH4) i arylosulfatazy (obniżenie z 0,210 do 0,168 mmol PNP). Najbardziej opornymi enzymami na działanie KE okazały się dehydrogenazy, a najmniej fosfataza kwaśna i arylosulfataza.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

herbicides; carfentrazone ethyl; soil; microorganisms; enzymes; resistance

PL

herbicydy; karfentrazon etylu; gleba; mikroorganizmy; enzymy; odporność

• Wydawca: Institute of Environmental Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Archives of Environmental Protection
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 41, no. 3
• Strony: 3--10
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 42 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Tomkiel M.

• University of Warmia and Mazury, Poland Department of Microbiology

autor

Baćmaga M.

• University of Warmia and Mazury, Poland Department of Microbiology

autor

Wyszkowska J.

• University of Warmia and Mazury, Poland Department of Microbiology

autor

Kucharski J.

• University of Warmia and Mazury, Poland Department of Microbiology

autor

Borowik A.

• University of Warmia and Mazury, Poland Department of Microbiology

Bibliografia

• [1] Acosta-Martínez, V., Cruz, L., Sotomayor-Ramírez, D. & Pérez- -Alegría, L. (2007). Enzyme activities as affected by soil properties and land use in a tropical watershed, Applied Soil Ecology, 35, pp. 35-45.
• [2] Alef, K. & Nannipieri, P. (Eds) (1998). Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry, Academic Press. Harcourt Brace & Company, Publishers, London 1998.
• [3] Araujo, A.S.F., Monteiro, R.T.R. & Abarkeli, R.B. (2003). Effect of glyphosate on the microbial activity of two Brazilian soils, Chemosphere, 52, pp. 799-804.
• [4] Baćmaga, M., Boros, E., Kucharski, J. & Wyszkowska, J. (2012). Enzymatic activity in soil contaminated with the Aurora 40 WG herbicide, Environment Protection Engineering, 38, 1, pp. 91-102.
• [5] Barchańska, H., Czaplicka, M. & Giemza, A. (2013). Simultaneous determination of selected insecticides and atrazine in soil by MAE-GC-ECD, Archives of Environmental Protection, 39, 1, pp. 27-40.
• [6] Bunt, J.S. & Rovira, A.D. (1955). Microbiological studies of some subantarctic soil, Journal of Soil Science, 6, pp. 119-128.
• [7] Crouzet, O., Batisson, I., Besse-Hoggan, P., Bonnemoy, F., Bardot, C., Poly, F., Bohatier, J. & Mallet, C. (2010). Response of soil microbial communities to the herbicide mesotrione: A dose-effect microcosm approach, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42, pp. 193-202.
• [8] Cycoń, M. & Piotrowska-Seget, Z. (2009). Changes in bacterial diversity and community structure following pesticides addition to soil estimated by cultivation technique, Ecotoxicology, 18, pp. 632-642.
• [9] De Leij, F.A.A.M., Whips, J.M. & Lynch, J.M. (1993). The use of colony development for the characterization of bacterial communities in soil and on roots, Microbial Ecology, 27, pp. 81-97.
• [10] Fenglerowa, W. (1965). Simple method for counting Azotobacter in soil samples, Acta Microbiologica Polonica, 14, 2, pp. 203-206.
• [11] García, N.A.T., Iribarne, C., Palma, F. & Lluch, C. (2007). Inhibition of the catalase activity from Phaseolus vulgaris and Medicago sativa by sodium chloride, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 45, pp. 535-541.
• [12] Glomski, L.A.M., Poovey, A.G. & Getsinger, K.D. (2006). Effect of carfentrazone-ethyl on three aquatic macrophytes, Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 44, pp. 67-69.
• [13] Han, L., Xu, Y., Dong, M. & Qian, Ch. (2007). Dissipation and residues of carfentrazone-ethyl in wheat and soil, Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 79, pp. 445-447.
• [14] Knight, T.R. & Dick, P.R. (2004). Differentiating microbial and stabilized β-glucosidase activity relative to soil quality, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36, pp. 2089-2096.
• [15] Koschnick, T.J., Haller, W.T. & Chen, A.W. (2004). Carfentrazone- -ethyl pond dissipation and efficacy on floating plants, Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 42, pp. 103-108.
• [16] Kucharski, J., Baćmaga, M. & Wyszkowska, J. (2009). Effect of herbicides on the course of ammonifi cation in soil, Journal of Elementology, 14, 3, pp. 477-487.
• [17] Kucharski, J. & Wyszkowska, J. (2008). Biological properties of soil contaminated with the herbicide Apyros 75 WG, Journal of Elementology, 13, pp. 357-371.
• [18] Łozowicka, B. & Kaczyński, P. (2011). Pesticide residues in apples (2005-2010), Archives of Environmental Protection, 37, 3, pp. 43-54.
• [19] Martin, J. (1950). Use of acid rose Bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi, Soil Science, pp. 215-233.
• [20] Martinez, C.O., Silva, C. M.M.S., Fay, E.F., Maia, A.H.N., Abakerli, R.B. & Durrant, L.R. (2008). Degradation of the herbicide sulfentrazone in a Brazilian Typic Haploudox soil, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40, pp. 879-886.
• [21] Milošević, N.A. & Govedarica, M.M. (2002). Effect of herbicides on microbiological properties of soil, Proceedings for Natural Sciences, 102, pp. 5-21.
• [22] Milošević, N.A, Govedarica, M.M. & Cvijanović, G. (2004). Microorganisms as indicators of herbicide effect on biological activity of soil, Acta Herbologica, 13, 1, pp. 243-250.
• [23] Öhlinger, R. (1996). Dehydrogenase activity with the substrate TTC in: Methods in Soil Biology, Schinner, F., Öhlinger, R., Kandler, E. & Margesin, R. (Eds.) Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996.
• [24] Onta, H. & Hattori, T. (1983). Oligotrophic bacteria on organic debris and plant roots in paddy fi eld, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1, pp. 1-8.
• [25] Orwin, K.H., Wardle, D.A. & Greenfi eld, G. (2006). Context- -dependent changes in the resistance and resilience of soil microbes to an experimental disturbance for three primary plant chronosequences, Oikos, 112, pp. 196-208.
• [26] Orwin, K.H. & Wardle, D.A. (2004). New indices for quantifying the resistance and resilience of soil biota to exogenous disturbance, Biology and Biochemistry, 36, pp. 1907-1912.
• [27] Parkinson, D., Gray, F.R.G. & Williams, S.T. (1971). Methods for studying the ecology of soil micro-organism, Blackweel Scientific Publication Oxford and Edinburgh, IBP Handbook 1971.
• [28] Pešaković, M., Milenković, S., Dukić, D., Mandić, L., Glišić, I. & Luković, J. (2011). Soil microbial activity as influenced by integrated and conventional production systems, Archives of Environmental Protection, 37, 3, pp. 79-85.
• [29] FMC Corporation (2010) Safety Data Sheet for Aurora 40 WG.
• [30] Saha, S., Dutta, D., Karmakar, R. & Prasad, R.D. (2012). Structure- -toxicity relationship of chloroacetanilide herbicides: Relative impact on soil microorganisms, Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 34, pp. 307-314.
• [31] Sarathachandra, S.U., Burch, G. & Cox, N.R. (1997). Growth patterns of bacterial communities in the rhizoplane and rhizosphere of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), In long-term pasture, Applied Soil Ecology 6, pp. 293-299.
• [32] Sebiomo, A., Ogundero, W.V. & Bankloe, S.A. (2011). Effect of four herbicides on microbial population, soil organic matter and dehydrogenase activity, African Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 5, pp. 770-778.
• [33] Shing, P. & Ghoshal, N. (2010). Variation in total biological productivity and soil microbial biomass in rained agroecosystems: Impact of application of herbicide and soil amendments, Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 137, pp. 241-250.
• [34] Singh, R.K. & Kumar, S. (2008). Nitrate reductase, arginine deaminase, urease and dehydrogenase activities in natural soil (Bridges with forest) and in cotton soil after acetamiprid treatments, Chemosphere, 71, pp. 412-418.
• [35] Statsoft. Inc. (2012). Statistica, Data Analysis Software system.
• [36] Sukul, P. (2006). Enzymatic activities and microbial biomass in soil as influence by metalaxyl residues, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38, pp. 320-326.
• [37] Trasar-Cepeda, C., Camiña, F., Leirós, M.C. & Gil-Sotres, F. (1999). An improved to measure catalase activity in soils, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31, pp. 483-485.
• [38] Truu, M., Truu, J. & Ivask, M. (2008). Soil microbiological and biochemical properties for assessing the effect of agricultural management practices in Estonian cultivated soils, European Journal of Soil Biology, 44, pp. 231-237.
• [39] World Reference Base for Soil Resources (2006). A framework for international classification, correlation and communication, World Soils Resources Rapport, 103, FAO, Rome.
• [40] Wyszkowska, J. (2002). Effect of soil contamination with Trefl an 480 EC on biochemical properties of soil, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 11, 1, pp. 71-77.
• [41] Wyszkowska, J. & Kucharski, J. (2004). Biochemical and physicochemical properties of soil contaminated with herbicide Triflurotox 250 EC, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 13, 2, pp. 223-231.
• [42] Yao, X., Min, H., Lii, Z. & Yuan, H. (2006). Influence of acetamiprid on soil enzymatic activities and respiration, European Journal of Soil Biology, 42, pp. 120-126.