Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Purpose: The issue of gender in analyzes concerning entrepreneurship is part of numerous items, most of which focus on showing the worse situation of women, often equated with discrimination. Qualitative analyzes are often directly linked to a clear predominance of men in the population of entrepreneurs. This study is of a theoretical-cognitive nature. By emphasizing the prevailing gender discrimination, structural inequalities, and lack of consensus within the scientific community, the article contributes to the ongoing discussion on women's entrepreneurship and the challenges they face. The quantitative nature of the study aims to determine the ratio of women to men engaged in entrepreneurial activities during the social, economic, and political changes that have taken place in Poland over the past three decades. The research problem was embedded in the conception of natural differences between the number of women and men as entrepreneurs wherein the criteria of sustainable development, with convergent entrepreneurial intentions of both sexes. Design/methodology/approach: The study is theoretical and cognitive in nature. The article uses statistical tools in benchmarking and regression to present a quantitative pattern of entrepreneurship in Poland. The quantitative analysis was preceded by a review of the literature. Findings: The obtained results indicate that the quantitative structure of the self-employed in terms of gender is quasi-constant. The dominance of men in the population of entrepreneurs does not change over time, and it remains in constant relative relation to the number of women entrepreneurs, regardless of changes in the external environment. Similar arrangements apply to entrepreneurs' decisions regarding liquidation, suspension, and resumption of economic activity. Research limitations/implications: The completed study has limitations related to the adopted time limit of the public reporting system. Research limitations are also present in quantitative terms that ignore the context. Practical implications: In practical terms, they constitute a considerable incentive to revise the formulated EU development strategies and the programs implemented as part of public policies that influence the Polish economy. he obtained results are part of the literature that undermines the effectiveness of interventionism, in this case related to the creation of preferences for women. Social implications: The gender issue in entrepreneurship is important. However, too often these issues are presented in public debate, where the arguments are belief, not science. The article is an important voice in current global discussions on inequality, including discrimination. Originality/value: The obtained results are supplemented by quantitative research on entrepreneurship, considering the gender of the entrepreneur. The applied research approach in the area of quantitative material and statistical tools is innovative.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
169--184
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 47 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
autor
- The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
autor
- The Pázmány Péter Catholic University, and Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungary
autor
- The Catholic University in Ružomberok, Slovakia
Bibliografia
- 1. Achtzehn, S., Treanor, L., Amess, K. (2023). Do enterprise education competitions have gendered outcomes amongst STEM early-career researchers? International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 026624262311582, https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426231158281
- 2. Afshan, G., Shahid, S., Tunio, M.N. (2021). Learning experiences of women entrepreneurs amidst COVID-19. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 13(2), pp. 162186, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-09-2020-0153.
- 3. Avnimelech, G., Rechter, E. (2023). How and Why Accelerators Enhance Female Entrepreneurship. Res. Policy, 52 (2), 104669, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022. 104669.
- 4. Ayatakshi-Endow, S., Steele, J. (2021). Striving for balance: women entrepreneurs in Brazil, their multiple gendered roles and Covid-19. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 13(2), 121-141, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-09-2020-0142.
- 5. Belitski, M., Guenther, C., Kritikos, A.S., Thurik, R. (2022). Economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on entrepreneurship and small businesses. Small Business Economics, 58, pp. 593-609, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00544-y.
- 6. Chhatoi, B.P. (2022). Resistance to swelling of strategic gender disparity: Support of microfinance. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 47(2/3), 376, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2022.10051569.
- 7. Clayton, P. (2023). Different outcomes for different founders? Local organizational sponsorship and entrepreneurial finance. Small Business Economics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00753-7.
- 8. Correa, V.S., da Brito, F.R.S., de Lima, R.M., Queiroz, M.M. (2022). Female Entrepreneurship in Emerging and Developing Countries: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 14(3), pp. 300-322, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-08-2021-0142.
- 9. Costa, J., Pita, M. (2020), Appraising entrepreneurship in Qatar under a gender perspective. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 12(3), pp. 233-251, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-10-2019-0146.
- 10. Crane, S.R. (2022). Entrepreneurship and economic growth: does gender matter? International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-04-2021-0056.
- 11. Cucculelli, M., Peruzzi, V. (2020). Post-crisis firm survival, business model changes, and learning: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Small Business Economics, 54(2), pp. 459-474, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0044-2.
- 12. Elliott, C., Mantler, J., Huggins, J. (2021). Exploring the gendered entrepreneurial identity gap: implications for entrepreneurship education. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), pp. 50-74, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-04-2020-0048.
- 13. Endris, E., Kassegn, A. (2022). The role of micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) to the sustainable development of sub-Saharan Africa and its challenges: a systematic review of evidence from Ethiopia. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(20), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-022-00221-8.
- 14. Fernández-Guadano, J., Martín-López, S. (2023). Gender Differences in Social Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Spain. Women's Studies International Forum, 96, 102663, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102663.
- 15. Fuentes, M., Díaz, C., Ruiz, M., Bojica, A.M., Ruiz, J.M. (2019). Mujeres emprendedoras en Espana: tendencias y retos. In: I. Pena-Legazkue, M. Guerrero, J.L. González-Pernía, J. Montero (eds.), Informe GEM Espana, pp. 117-132.
- 16. Gupta, P., Chauhan, S., Paul, J., Jaiswal, M.P. (2020). Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 113, pp. 209-229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.032.
- 17. Halilem, N., De Silva, M., Amara, N. (2022). Fairly Assessing Unfairness: An Exploration of Gender Disparities in Informal Entrepreneurship amongst Academics in Business Schools. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121295, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121295.
- 18. Henry, C., Lewis, K.V. (2023). The Art of Dramatic Construction: Enhancing the Context Dimension in Women’s Entrepreneurship Research. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113440, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113440
- 19. Iaroslav, P., Khmarska, I., Tkachenko, T., Koptieva, H., Komandrovska, V. (2021). The Importance of Small and Medium Enterprises in the Economic Development of Eastern Europe. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 17, pp. 898-910, https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2021.17.84.
- 20. Jegorow, D., Przyłuska-Schmitt, J. (2022). Liquidation of Micro-Enterprises as a Seasonal Phenomenon: Evidence from Poland. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 19, pp. 1421-1429, https://10.37394/23207.2022.19.128.
- 21. Jegorow, D., Pazdzior, M., Marzec, P., Bednarz, K. (2021). The Establishment of New Businesses as a Seasonal Phenomenon: A Polish Example. European Research Studies Journal, 0(4B), pp. 120-137, https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2636.
- 22. Kassicieh, S.K., Kirchhoff, B.A., Walsh, S.T., McWhorter, P. (2002). The role of small firms in the transfer of disruptive technologies. Technovation, 22(11), pp. 667-674, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00064-5.
- 23. Katila, R., Chen, E.L., Piezunka, H. (2012). All the right moves: how entrepreneurial firms compete effectively. Strateg. Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(2), pp. 116-132, https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1130.
- 24. Kogut, C.S., Mejri, K. (2022). Female Entrepreneurship in Emerging Markets: Challenges of Running a Business in Turbulent Contexts and Times. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), pp. 95-116, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-03-2021-0052.
- 25. Kumar, S., Das, S. (2019). An Extended Model of Theory of Planned Behaviour: Entrepreneurial Intention, Regional Institutional Infrastructure and Perceived Gender Discrimination in India. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 11(3), pp. 369-391, https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-09-2018-0089.
- 26. Li, Y. (2011). Emotions and new venture judgment in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(2), pp. 277-298, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9145-4.
- 27. Liguori, E.W., Pittz, T.G. (2020). Strategies for small business: Surviving and thriving in the era of COVID-19. Journal of the International Council for Small Business, 1(2), pp. 106-110, https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015.2020.1779538.
- 28. Llados-Masllorens, J., Ruiz-Dotras, E. (2022). Are women's entrepreneurial intentions and motivations influenced by financial skills? International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), pp. 69-94, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-01-2021-0017.
- 29. Mandel, H., Rotman, A. (2021). Revealing the Concealed Effect of Top Earnings on the Gender Gap in the Economic Value of Higher Education in the United States, 1980-2017. Demography, 58(2), pp. 551-570, https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-9009367.
- 30. Mandel, H., Rotman, A. (2022). The Stalled Gender Revolution and the Rise of Top Earnings in the United States, 1980 to 2017. Sociological Science, 9, pp. 136-158, https://doi.org/10.15195/v9.a6.
- 31. Meyer, N., Schachtebeck, C., Nieuwenhuizen, C. (2022). Motivation and Intention of Small Business Entrepreneurs: A Gender Perspective. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 32(4), pp. 1-15, https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.40316.
- 32. Morgan, J., Sisak, D. (2016). Aspiring to succeed: A model of entrepreneurship and fear of failure. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(1), pp. 1-21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.09.0024.
- 33. Nasar, A., Akram, M., Safdar, M.R., Akbar, M.S. (2021). A qualitative assessment of entrepreneurship amidst COVID-19 pandemic in Pakistan. Asia Pacific Management Review, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.08.001.
- 34. Parnell, D., Widdop, P., Bond, A., Wilson, R. (2020). COVID-19, networks and sport. Managing Sport and Leisure, pp. 1-7, https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2020.1750100.
- 35. Ratten, V. (2020). Coronavirus (covid-19) and entrepreneurship: Changing life and work landscape. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 32(5), pp. 503-516, https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1790167.
- 36. Sarwar, A., Ahsan, Q., Rafiq, N. (2021). Female Entrepreneurial Intentions in Pakistan: A Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 553963, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.553963.
- 37. Say, J.B. (1960). Traktat o ekonomii politycznej. Warszawa: PWN.
- 38. Setyaningrum, R.P., Norisanti, N., Fahlevi, M., Aljuaid, M., Grabowska, S. (2023). Women and Entrepreneurship for Economic Growth in Indonesia. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 975709, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.975709.
- 39. Shane, S., Venkataraman, S. (2002). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), pp. 217-226, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611.
- 40. Si, S., Ahlstrom, D., Wei, J., Cullen, J. (2020). Business, entrepreneurship and innovation toward poverty reduction. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 32(1-2), pp. 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2019.1640485.
- 41. Siivonen, P.T., Komulainen, K., Kasanen, K., Kupiainen, P. (2022). Aged and gendered master narratives on entrepreneurship in Finnish higher education. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), pp. 26-43, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-01-2021-0010.
- 42. Sitaridis, I., Kitsios, F. (2017). Entrepreneurial Intentions of Information Technology Students: The Theory of Planned Behaviour, the Role of Gender and Education. Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 10(3), 316, https://doi.org/10.1504/JIBED.2017.085508.
- 43. Smith, B.R., McMullen, J.S., Cardon M.S. (2021). Toward a theological turn in entrepreneurship: How religion could enable transformative research in our field. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(5), 106139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106139.
- 44. Stephens, S., Cunningham, I., Kabir, Y. (2021). Female entrepreneurs in a time of crisis: evidence from Ireland. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 13(2), pp. 106-120, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-09-2020-0135.
- 45. Sutter, C., Bruton, G.D., Chen, J. (2019). Entrepreneurship as a solution to extreme poverty: a review and future research directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(1), pp. 197-214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.06.003.
- 46. Szczepankiewicz, J. (2006). Czy przedsiębiorczość ma płeć? Przedsiębiorczość - Edukacja, 2, pp. 216-219, https://doi.org/10.24917/20833296.2.22.
- 47. Welsh, D.H.B., Llanos-Contreras, O., Alonso-Dos-Santos, M., Kaciak, E. (2023). How Much Do Network Support and Managerial Skills Affect Women’s Entrepreneurial Success? The Overlooked Role of Country Economic Development. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 33(3-4), pp. 287-308, https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2021. 1872939.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-e83df92e-158d-4cf4-8514-1bff6837c965