Approaches to industrial risk assessment coupled with catastrophic natural phenomena

• Autorzy: Milazzo M. F.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this contribution is to focus attention on a new emerging risk known in the literature as Na-Tech risk (Natural-Technological risk). Na-Tech are technological accidents triggered by natural events, these are of particular interest for high risk industries. The magnitude of such an event is much broader than that related to a technological accident and its management is much more complex. Adequate preparedness, proper emergency planning and effective response are crucial for the prevention and mitigation of the consequences of Na-Techs This contribution gives a general overview of the methodologies, that are currently being developed, in order to integrate these types of scenarios into the conventional quantitative risk analysis for chemical and process industry.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Na-Tech risk; quantitative risk assessment; industrial facilities; natural hazards; chemical process; industrial process

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Bezpieczeństwa i Niezawodności
• Czasopismo: Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 4, No. 2
• Strony: 229--240
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 42 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Milazzo M. F.

• University of Messina, Messina, Italy

Bibliografia

• [1] Antonioni, G., Bonvicini, S., Spadoni, G. & Cozzani, V. (2009). Development of a general framework for the risk assessment of Natech accidents. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 94, 1442-1450.
• [2] Balluz, L., Moll, D., Diaz Martinez, M.G., Merida Colindres, J.E. & Malilay, J. (2001). Environmental pesticide exposure in Honduras following Hurricane Mitch. Bull. World Health Organ., 79, 288-295.
• [3] Baxter, P.J., Bernstein, R.S., Falk, H., French, J. & Ing, R. (1982). Medical aspects of volcanic disasters: an outline of the hazards and emergency response measures. Disasters, 6, 268 -276.
• [4] Christou, M. D. & Porter, S. (1999). Guidance on Land Use Planning as Required by Council Directive 96/82/EC (Seveso II). European Commission, Report EUR 18695 EN.
• [5] Cruz, A.M. & Krausmann, E. (2009). Hazardousmaterials releases from offshore oil and gas facilities and emergency response following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. J. Loss Prev. Proc. Ind., 22, 59-65.
• [6] Cruz, A.M., Steinberg L J & Luna, R. (2001). Identifying Hurricane-Induced Hazardous Materials Releases in an Oil Refinery. Natural Hazards Review. Nat. Haz. Rev., 2, 4, 203-210.
• [7] Cruz, A.M., Steinberg, L.J., Vetere Arellano, A.L., Nordvik, J.P. & Pisano, F. (2004). State of the Art in Natech Risk Management (NATECH: Natural Hazard Triggering a Technological Disaster). European Commission Report EUR 21292 EN.
• [8] European Commission, 1982. Council Directive 82/501/EEC of 24 June 1982 on the majoraccident hazards of certain industrial activities.
• [9] European Commission, 1996. Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances.
• [10] European Commission, 2003. Council Directive2003/105/EC of 16 December 2003 amending Council Directive 96/82/EC on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances.
• [11] European Commission, 2012. Council Directive 2012/18/EU of 4 July 2012 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directive 96/82/EC.
• [12] Girgin, S. (2011). The natech events during the 17 August 1999 Kocaeli earthquake:aftermath and lessons learned. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1129-1140.
• [13] Hartmann, J., Okada, N. & Levy, J.K. (2004). Integrated disaster risk management strategy to prevent exposure to hazardous substances due to inundation triggered releases: a concept for Japan. J. Nat. Disaster Sci., 26, 2, 87-93.
• [14] HAZUS (1997). Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology. National Institute of Building Sciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
• [15] http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/
• [16] INPO (2011). Special Report on the Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. Report INPO 11-005.
• [17] Krausmann, E., Cozzani, V., Salzano, E. & Renni, E. (2011). Industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards: an emerging risk issue. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 921-929.
• [18] Krausmann, E., Cruz, A.M. & Affeltranger, B. (2010). The impact of the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake on industrial facilities. J. Loss Prev. Proc. Ind., 23, 242-248.
• [19] Landucci, G., Antonioni, G., Tugnoli, A. & Cozzani, V. (2012). Release of hazardous substances in flood events: Damage model for atmospheric storage tanks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 106, 200-216.
• [20] Lees, F.P. (1996). Loss prevention in the process industry (2nd edition). Oxford, ButterworthHeinemann.
• [21] Lindell, M.K. & Perry, R.W. (1996). Identifying and managing con joint threats: earthquakeinduced hazardous materials releases in the US. J. Hazard. Mater., 50, 31-46.
• [22] Lindell, M.K.& Perry, R.W. (1997). Hazardous materials releases in the Northridge earthquake: implications for seismic risk assessment. Risk Anal., 17, 2, 147-156, 1997.
• [23] MARSH (2012). The 100 largest losses. Report.
• [24] Milazzo, M.F. & Aven, T. (2012). An extended risk assessment approach for chemical plants applied to a study related to pipe ruptures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 99, 183-192.
• [25] Milazzo, M.F., Ancione, G., Lister, D.G., Salzano, E., Basco, A., & Maschio, G. (2012). Analysis of the effects due to fallout of ash from Mt. Etna on industrial installations. Chem. Eng. Trans., 26, 123-128.
• [26] Milazzo, M.F., Ancione, G., Salzano, E., Lister, D.G. & Maschio, G. (2012). Potential damage to filtration systems due to volcanic ash fallout. Proc. 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012, 7, 5379-5387.
• [27] Milazzo, M.F., Lisi, R., Ancione, G., Lister, D.G. & Maschio, G. (2012). Vulnerability maps for industrial facilities in areas with the potential volcanic ash fallout. Proc. 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012, 7, 5388-5397.
• [28] Milazzo, M.F., Ancione, G., Basco, A., Lister, D.G., Salzano, E. & Maschio, G. (2013). Potential loading damage to industrial storage tanks due to volcanic ash fallout. Nat. Hazards, 66, 2, 939-953.
• [29] Mitchison, N. & Porter, S. (1998). Guidelines on a Major Accident Prevention Policy and Safety Management System as Required by Council Directive 96/82/EC (Seveso II). European Commission Report EUR 18123 EN.
• [30] Necci, A., Antonioni, G., Cozzani, V., Borghetti, A. & Nucci, C.A. (2012). Risk assessment of accidents induced by lightning strike on storage tanks. Proc. 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012, 7, 5369-5378.
• [31] Papadakis, G.A. & Amendola, A. (1997). Guidance on the Preparation of a Safety Report to Meet the Requirements of Council Directive 96/82/EC (SEVESO II). European Commission, Report EUR 17690 EN.
• [32] Rasà, R., Tripodo, A, Casella, S. & Szilagyi, M.L. (2007). Contributi alla valutazione della pericolosità e rischio vulcanico nell'area etnea ed alla mitigazione dei danni attesi. Carta Tematica di Rischio Vulcanico della Regione Sicilia - Regione Sicilia Palermo. In Italian.
• [33] Salzano, E., Iervolino, I. & Fabbrocino, G. (2003). Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis. J. Loss Prev. Proc. Ind., 16, 403-409.
• [34] Scandone, R., Arganese, G. & Galdi, F. (1993). The evaluation of volcanic risk in the Vesuvian area. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 58, 263-271.
• [35] Schmidt, C.W. (2000). Lessons from the flood: will Floyd change livestock farming? Environ. Health Perspect., 108, A74-A77.
• [36] Showalter, P.S. & Myers, M.F. (1994). Natural Disasters in the United States as Release Agents of Oil, Chemicals, or Radiological Materials Between 1980-9: Analysis and Recommendations. Risk Anal., 14, 2, 169-181.
• [37] Solomos, S., Pinto, A. & Dimova, S. (2008). A Review of the Seismic Hazard Zonation in National Building Codes in the context of Eurocode 8. European Commission Report EUR 23563 EN.
• [38] Steinberg, L.J. & Cruz, A.M. (2004). When natural and technological disasters collide: lessons from the Turkey earthquake of August 17, 1999. Nat. Haz. Rev., 5, 3, 121-130.
• [39] Uijt de Haag, P.A.M. & Ale, B.J.M. (1999). Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment (Purple Book). CPR 18E, Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, The Hague, The Netherlands.
• [40] Vìlchez, J.A., Montiel, H., Casal, J. & Arnaldos, J. (2001). Analytical expressions for the calculation of damage percentage using the probit methodology. J. Loss Prev. Proc. Ind., 14, 193-197.
• [41] Woo, G., (1999). The Mathematics of Natural Catastrophes. Imperial College Press.
• [42] Young, S., Balluz, L. & Malilay, J. (2004). Natural and technologic hazardous material release during and after natural disaster: a review. Sci. Tot. Env., 322, 3-20.