Application of DOI index to analysis of selected examples of resistivity imaging models in Quaternary sediments

• Autorzy: Glazer M , Mendecki M J , Mycka M

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/squa-2014-0011

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Interpretation of resistivity cross sections may be in many cases unreliable due to the presence of artifacts left by the inversion process. One way to avoid erroneous conclusions about geological structure is creation of Depth of Investigation (DOI) index maps, which describe durability of prepared model with respect to variable parameters of inversion. To assess the usefulness of this interpretation methodology in resistivity imaging method over quaternary sediments, it has been used to one synthetic data set and three investigation sites. Two of the study areas were placed in the Upper Silesian Industrial District region: Bytom–Karb, Chorzów–Chorzów Stary; and one in the Southern Pomeranian Lake District across Piława River Valley. Basing on the available geological information the results show high utility of DOI index in analysis of received resistivity models, on which areas poorly constrained by data has been designated.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

depth of investigation index (DOI); Electric Resistivity Tomography (ERT); resistivity model

• Wydawca: Institute of Geological Science Polish Academy of Science
• Czasopismo: Studia Quaternaria
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 31, Nr 2
• Strony: 109--114
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Glazer M

• Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia, Będzińska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec

autor

Mendecki M J

• Department of Applied Geology, Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia, Będzińska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec

autor

Mycka M

• Department of Applied Geology, Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia, Będzińska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec

Bibliografia

• 1. Caterina D., Beaujean J., Robert T.,Nguyen F.,2013, A comparison study of different image appraisal tools for electrical resistivity tomography. Near Surface Geophysics, 11, 639–657
• 2. Cudak J., Wantuch A. (2009) Chorzów [In:] Groundwater of Polish cities. Cities over 50 000 inhabitants (in Polish), ed. Z. Nowicki. Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny Warszawa. (Website accessed 26.04.2014) http://www.psh.gov.pl/plik/id,4743.pdf
• 3. Deceuster J., Etienne A., Tanguy R., Nguyen F., Kaufmann O., 2014, A modified DOI-based method to statistically estimate the depth of investigation of dc resistivity surveys, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 103, 172–185.
• 4. Dobracka E., Piotrowski A., 2002, Geological structure and morphology of sub-Quernary surface, Proc. 9th Conference “Pleistocene Stratigraphy of Poland”, 85–92, (in Polish).
• 5. Edwards L.S., 1977, A modified pseudosection for resistivity and inducted-polarization, Geophysics 42, 1020–1036. Hilbitch C., Marescot L., Hauck C., Loke M.H., Mausbacher R.,
• 6. 2009, Applicability of electrical resistivity tomography moni- toring to coarse blocky and icerich permafrost landforms, Per- mafrost and Periglacial Processes, 20, 269–284.
• 7. Idziak A.F., Wysowska-Świebodzińska A., 2008, Geophysical survey of post-glacial deposits, ActaGeodynamica et Geomaterialia., 5, No. 2 (150), p. 197–203.
• 8. Klimek K., Lewandowski J., 2002, Pilawa river valley. Proc. 9th Conference Pleistocene Stratigraphy of Poland, 161–166, (in Polisch).
• 9. Kowalczyk S., Zawrzykraj P., Mieszkowski R., 2014, Application of electrical resistivity tomography in assessing complex soil conditions, Geological Quarterly, 59 (2), (Website accessed 26.06.2014) http://www.gq.pgi.gov.pl/article/view/10390/pdf_1166
• 10. Lewandowski J., Heliasz Z., Chybiorz R., 2000, Explanations to de tail geological map of Poland, Lubowo sheet. Polish Geological Institute. Warsaw, (in Polish).
• 11. Loke M.H., 2014, Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging; surveys in: http://www.geoelectrical.com (Website accessed 26.04. 2014)
• 12. Loke M.H., Acworth I., Dahlin T., 2003, A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys, Exploration Geophysics 34, p. 182–187.
• 13. Marescot L., Loke M.H., Chapellier D., Delaloye R.,Lambiel C., Reynard E., 2003 Assesing reliability of 2D resistivity imaging in mountain permafrost studies using the depth of investigation index method, Near Surface Geophysics, 1(2), 57–67.
• 14. Oldenburg D. W., Jones F.H.M., 2007, Inversion for Applied Geophysics; Learning resources about geophysical inversion, University of British Columbia: Geophysical Inversion Facility, http://www.eos.ubc.ca/ubcgif/iag/index.htm (Website accessed 26.04.2014)
• 15. Oldenburg D.W., Li Y., Estimating depth of investigation in dc resistivity and IP surveys, Geophysics 64(2), 403–416.
• 16. Razowska-Jaworek L., Brodziński I., 2009, Bytom [In:] Ground- water of Polish cities. Cities over 50 000 inhabitants (in Polish), ed. Z. Nowicki. Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny Warszawa. (Website accessed 26.04.2014) http://www.psh.gov.pl/ plik/id,4742.pdf
• 17. RES2DINV manual, 2014, http://www.geoelectrical.com (Website accessed 26.04.2014)
• 18. Wyczółkowski J., 1597. The Detailed Geological Map of Poland, scale 1:50 000, sheet Zabrze, M34-62A, Geological Institute, Warsaw (in Polish)
• 19. Żogała B., Dubiel R., Lewandowski J., Zuberek W.M., G¹ska G., 2008, Application of resistivity imaging method for investigation of geologic structure of Pleistocene sediments, Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia., Vol. 5, No. 2 (150), p. 177–183.