Behavioural strategy. Adaptability context

Piórkowska, K.

doi:10.1515/manment-2015-0038

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Behavioural strategy. Adaptability context

Autorzy

Piórkowska K.

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.management-poland.com/

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/manment-2015-0038

Warianty tytułu

Strategia behawioralna. Kontekst adaptacyjności

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The paper is embedded in the following fields: strategic management in terms of behavioural strategy concept, adaptability construct, and micro-foundations realm as well as organizational theory and psychology. Moreover, the paper concerns to some extent a multi-level approach in strategic management involving individual, team, and organizational level. The aim of the paper is to contribute to extend, on one hand, the ascertainment set in the field of behavioural strategy as behavioural strategy encompasses a mindboggling diversity of topics and methods and its conceptual unity has been hard to achieve (Powell, Lovallo, Fox 2011, p. 1371), and on the other hand, to order mixed approaches to adaptability, especially to gain insights on micro-level adapting processes (individual adaptability and adaptive performance) in terms of the multi-level approach. The method that has been used is literature studies and the interference is mostly deductive. The structure of the manuscript is four-fold. The first part involves the considerations in the field of adaptability and adaptive performance at the individual level. The issues of adaptability and adaptive performance at the team level have been presented in the second part. The third part encompasses the organizational adaptability assertions. Finally, the conclusion, limitations of the considerations highlighted as well as the future research directions have been emphasized. The overarching key finding is that the behavioural strategy concept may constitute the boundary spanner in exploring and explaining adaptability phenomenon at different levels of analysis.

Treść artykułu została zakorzeniona w następujących obszarach wiedzy: zarządzanie strategiczne (z perspektywy strategii behawioralnej, konstruktu adaptacyjności i mikro-fundamentów w zarządzaniu strategicznym), teoria organizacji oraz psychologia. W pewnym stopniu opracowanie plasuje się również w obszarze badań zjawisk na wielu poziomach analizy (poziom jednostki, zespołu i organizacji). Celem opracowania, z jednej strony, jest wzbogacenie wiedzy i ustaleń dotyczących zjawiska strategii behawioralnej, gdyż ze względu na różnorodność sposobów analizy wciąż nie wypracowano koncepcyjnego konsensusu (Powell, Lovallo, Fox 2011, p. 1371), a z drugiej strony, uporządkowanie rozproszonych podejść do konstruktu adaptacyjności zwłaszcza z perspektywy mikro (adaptycyjność jednostki) determinujacej pozostałe perspektywy rozważań (zespołu i organizacji). Zastosowano metodę ekstensywnego przeglądu literatury, a wnioskowanie ma charakter dedukcyjny. W pierwszej części opracowania omówiono adaptacyjność z punktu widzenia jednostki. Druga część odnosi się do rozważań nad adaptacyjnością na poziomie zespołu. W trzeciej części przedstawiono adaptacyjność z perspektywy organizacji. Ostatecznie, sformułowano wnioski końcowe, zidentyfikowano ograniczenia opracowania oraz zaproponowano dalsze kierunki badań. Kluczową konkluzję przedstawionych rozważań stanowi przypuszczenie, iż konstrukt “strategia behawioralna” zespala poziomy analizy dotyczące rozważań w obszarze adaptacyjności.

Słowa kluczowe

strategic management behavioural strategy adaptability adaptive performance microfoundations

zarządzanie strategiczne strategia behawioralna adaptacyjność wyniki adaptacyjne

Wydawca

University of Zielona Góra, Faculty of Economics and Management

Czasopismo

Management

Rocznik

2016

Tom

Vol. 20, no. 1

Strony

256--276

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 72 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Piórkowska K.

Wroclaw University of Economics, Department of Strategy and Management Methods

Bibliografia

1. Allworth E., Hesketh B. (1999), Construct-oriented biodata: Capturing changerelated and contextually relevant future performance, „International Journal of Selection and Assessment”, Vol. 7, pp. 97-111.
2. Bandura A. (1989), Human agency in social cognitive theory, „American Psychologist”, Vol. 44, pp. 1175-1184.
3. Barreto I. (2010), Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future, „Journal of Management”, Vol. 36, pp. 256–280.
4. Barrick M., Mount M., Strauss J. (1993), Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting, „Journal of Applied Psychology”, Vol. 78, pp. 715–722.
5. Bateman T.S., Crant J.M. (1993), The proactive component of organizational behaviour, “Journal of Organizational Behavior”, Vol. 14 (2), pp. 103-118.
6. Bell B., Kozlowski S. (2008), Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability, „Journal of Applied Psychology”, Vol. 93 (2), pp. 296-316.
7. Bordia P., Hobman E., Jones E., Gallois C., Callan,V.J. (2004), Uncertainty during organizational change: Types, consequences, and management strategies, „Journal of Business and Psychology”, Vol. 18, pp. 507–532.
8. Burgelman R.A. (1991), Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research, “Organizational Science”, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 239-262.
9. Burke C.S., Stagl K.C., Salas E., Pierce L., Kendall D. (2006), Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model, “The Journal of Applied Psychology”, Vol. 91 (6), pp. 1189–207.
10. Burtscher M.J., Wacker J., Grote G., Manser T. (2010), Managing Nonroutine Events in Anesthesia: The Role of Adaptive Coordination. Human Factors, “The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society”, Vol. 52 (2), pp. 282–294.
11. Cannon-Bowers J., Salas E., Converse S. (1993), Shared mental models in expert team decision making, [in:] N.J. Castellan, Jr. (ed.), Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 221–246), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillside, NJ.
12. Cannon-Bowers J.A., Salas E. (2001), Reflections on shared cognition, „Journal of Organizational Behavior”, Vol. 22 (2), pp. 195–202.
13. Carley K.M., Svoboda D.M. (1996), Modeling Organizational Adaptation as a Simulated Annealing Process, „Sociological Methods & Research”, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 138-168.
14. Chan D. (2000), Understanding adaptation to changes in the work environment: Integrating individual difference and learning perspectives, „Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management”, Vol. 18, pp. 1-42.
15. Chen G., Thomas B., Wallace J.C. (2005), A multilevel examination of the relationships among training outcomes, mediating regulatory processes, and adaptive performance, “The Journal of Applied Psychology”, Vol. 90 (5), pp. 827–41.
16. Cullen K.L., Edwards B.D., Casper W.C., Gue K.R. (2014), Employees’ Adaptability and Percpetions of Change-Related Uncertainty: Implications for Perceived Organizational Support, Job Satisfaction, Performance, „Journal of Business and Psychology”, Vol. 29, pp. 269-280.
17. Eisenhardt K.M., Martin J.A. (2000), Dynamic capabilities: What are they?, „Strategic Management Journal”, Vol. 21, pp. 1105-1121.
18. Fine S.A., Cronshaw S.F. (1999), Functional job analysis: A foundation for human resources management, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ.
19. Funder D. C. (2006), Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors, „Journal of Research in Personality”, Vol. 40, pp. 21-34.
20. Griffin M.A., Neal A., Parker S.K. (2007), The new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts, „Academy of Management Journal”, Vol. 50, pp. 327–347.
21. Griffin B., Hesketh B. (2005), Are Conscientious Workers Adaptable?, “Australian Journal of Management”, Vol. 30(2), pp. 245-259.
22. Griffi n M.A., Parker S.K., Mason C. (2010), Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: A longitudinal study, “Journal of Applied Psychology”, Vol. 95, pp. 174–182.
23. Hamtiaux A., Houssemand C. (2012), Adaptability, Cognitive Flexibility, Personal Need for Structure, and Rigidity, „Psychology Research”, Vol. 2, No. 10, pp. 563-585.
24. Han T.Y., Williams K.J. (2008), Multilevel Investigation of Adaptive Performance: Individual- and Team-Level Relationships, Group & Organization Management”, Vol. 33, pp. 657–684.
25. Hannan M.T., Freeman J. (1977), The Population Ecology of Organizations, „American Journal of Sociology”, Vol. 82, pp. 929–964.
26. Harvey O.J. (1966), Ends, means, and adaptability, [in:] O.J. Harvey (ed.), Experience, Structure & Adaptability, Springer, New York, pp. 3-12.
27. Herr E.L. (1993), Contexts and influences on the need for personal flexibility for the 21st Century, „Canadian Journal of Counseling”, Vol. 27, pp. 148-164.
28. Hirschfeld R.R., Thomas C. H., Bernerth J.B. (2011), Consequences of autonomous and team-oriented forms of dispositional proactivity for demonstrating advancement potential, „Journal of Vocational Behavior”, Vol. 78, pp. 237-247.
29. Kohler J.M., Munz D.C., Grawitch M.J. (2006), Test of a Dynamic Stress Model for Organisational Change: Do Males and Females Require Different Models?, „Applied Psychology: An International Review”, Vol. 55 (2), pp. 168-191.
30. Latack J.C., Havlovic S.J. (1992), Coping with job stress: A conceptual evaluation framework for coping measures, „Journal of Organizational Behavior”, Vol. 13, pp. 479–508.
31. Lau C., Woodman R. C. (1995), Understanding organizational change: A schematic perspective, “Academy of Management Journal”, Vol. 38, pp. 537–554.
32. LePine J.A., Colquitt J.A., Erez A. (2000), Adaptability to changing task contexts: effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience, “Personnel Psychology”, Vol. 53, pp. 563–593.
33. LePine J.A. (2003), Team adaptation and post change performance: Effects of team composition in terms of member’s cognitive ability and personality, „Journal of Applied Psychology”, Vol. 88 (1), pp. 27–39.
34. LePine J.A. (2005), Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: effects of goal difficulty and team composition in terms of cognitive ability and goal orientation, „The Journal of Applied Psychology”, Vol. 90 (6), pp. 1153–1167.
35. Levy M., Powell Ph. (2005), Strategies for growth in SMEs: The role of information and information systems, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
36. Lin Z., Hui Ch. (1997), Adapting to the Changing Environment: A Theoretical Comparison of Decision Making Proficiency of Lean and Mass Organization Systems, „Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory”, Vol. 3 (2), pp. 113-142.
37. Martin M.M., Rubin R.B. (1995), A new measure of cognitive flexibility, „Psychological Reports”, Vol. 76, pp. 623-626.
38. Meresko R., Rubin M., Shontz F.C., Morrow W.R. (1954), Rigidity of attitudes regarding personal habits and its ideological correlates, „Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology”, Vol. 49, pp. 89-91.
39. Metselaar E.E. (1997), Assessing the adaptive attitudes; construction and validation of the DINAMO, VU, Amsterdam.
40. Nagel O. (1908), The evolution of the senses, “Psychological Bulletin”, Vol. 5(2), pp. 349-350
41. Ocasio W. (1997), Towards an attention-based view of the firm, „Strategic Management Journal”, Vol. 18, pp. 187–206.
42. Ocasio W., Joseph J. (2005), An attention-based theory of strategy formulation: Linking micro- and macroperspectives in strategy processes, „Advances in Strategic Management”, Vol. 22, pp. 39–61.
43. O’Connell D.J., McNeely E., Hall D.T. (2008), Unpacking personal adaptability at work, „Journal of Leadership, Organizational Studies”, Vol. 14, pp. 248-259.
44. O’Leary V.E. (1998), Strength in the Face of Adversity: Individual and Social Thriving, “Journal of Social Issues”, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 425-446.
45. Oreg S., Vakola M., Armenakis A. (2011), Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review of quantitative studies, “The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science”, Vol. 47, pp. 461–524.
46. Parent J.D. (2006), Individual Adaptation to the Changing Workplace: Causes, Consequences and Outcomes, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
47. Parker S.K., Collins C.G. (2010), Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors, “Journal of Management”, Vol. 36 (3), pp. 632-662.
48. Piórkowska K. (2014), Behavioral strategies as micro-foundations in strategic management, “Global Business & Economics Anthology”, Vol. 2, December, pp. 356-361.
49. Piórkowska K. (2016), Behavioural strategy. The context of mindfulness, “Przegląd Organizacji”, No. 4, pp. 60-67.
50. Ployhart R.E., Bliese P.D. (2006), Individual ADAPTability (IADAPT) theory: Conceptualizing the antecedents, consequences, and measurement of individual differences in adaptability, [in:] S. Burke, L. Pierce, E. Salas (eds.), Understanding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments, Elsevier Science, St. Louis, MO, pp. 3–39.
51. Powell T.C., Lovallo D., Fox C.R. (2011), Behavioral strategy, “Strategic Management Journal”, Vol. 32, pp. 1369-1386.
52. Pulakos E.D., Arad S., Donovan M.A., Plamondon K.E. (2000), Adaptability in the workplace: development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance, “Journal of Applied Psychology”, Vol. 85 (4), pp. 612-624.
53. Pulakos E.D., Schmitt N., Dorsey D., Arad S., Borman W., Hedge J. (2002), Predicting Adaptive Performance: Further Tests of a Model of Adaptability, „Human Performance”, Vol. 15 (4), pp. 299-323.
54. Rafferty A., Griffi n M. (2006), Perceptions of organizational change: A stress and coping perspective, „Journal of Applied Psychology”, Vol. 91, pp. 1154-1162.
55. Savickas M.L., Porfeli E.J. (2012), Career adapt-abilities scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries, „Journal of Vocational Behavior”, Vol. 80, pp. 661-673.
56. Scott W.A. (1966), Flexibility, rigidity, and adaptation: Toward clarification of concepts, [in:] O.J. Harvey (ed.), Experience, Structure & Adaptability, Springer, pp. 369-400.
57. Shoss M.K., Witt L.A., Vera D. (2012), When does adaptive performance lead to higher task performance?, “Journal of Organizational Behavior”, Vol. 33, pp. 910-924.
58. Snow A.J. (1925), Individual adaptability to occupation and profession, [in:] A.J. Snow (ed.), Psychology in business relations, A W Shaw Co., New York, pp. 465-484
59. Stachowski A.A., Kaplan S.A., Waller M.J. (2009), The benefits of flexible team interaction during crises, „Journal of Applied Psychology”, Vol. 94 (6), pp. 1536–1543.
60. Steinmetz J.P., Loarer E., Houssemand C. (2011), Rigidity of attitudes and behaviors: A study on the validity of the concept, “Individual Differences Research”, Vol. 9, pp. 84-106.
61. Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997), Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, „Strategic Management Journal”, Vol. 18, pp. 509-533.
62. Thorndike E.L. (1903), The influence of special forms of training upon more general abilities, [in:] E.L. Thorndike (ed.), Educational Psychology (pp. 80-93), Lemcke & Buechner, New York.
63. Van den Heuvel M., Demerouti E., Schreurs B.H.J., Bakker A.B., Schaufeli W.B. (2009), Does meaning-making help during organizational change? Development and validation of a new scale, „Career Development International”, Vol. 14, pp. 508–533.
64. Van den Heuvel M., Demerouti E., Bakker A.B., Schaufeli W.B. (2013), Adapting to change: The value of change information and meaning-making, „Journal of Vocational Behavior”, Vol. 83, pp. 11-21.
65. Vaughn III E.D. (2011), A Longitudinal Examination of Individual Adaptability as an Antecedent of Training and Transfer Outcomes, A PhD dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
66. Vaughn E.D., Tucker J.S., Pleban R.J. (2011), Individual adaptability incrementally predicts performance in a dynamic training environment, Poster presented at the 26th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
67. Venkatraman N. (1989), The concept of fi t in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence, „Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 14, pp. 423–444.
68. Wang M., Zhan Y., Mccune E., Truxillo D. (2011), Understanding newcomers’ adaptability and work-related outcomes: Testing the mediating roles of perceived P–E fit variables, “Personnel Psychology”, Vol. 64, pp. 163-189.
69. Weick K.E. (1987), Organizational Culture and High Reliability, “California Management Review”, Vol. 29 (2), pp. 112–127.
70. Wick C.W. (1995), From Ideas to Action: Creating a Learning Organization, “Human Resource Management”, Vol. 34 (2), pp. 299–311.
71. Zaccaro S.J., Gilbert J.A., Thor K.K., Mumford M.D. (1991), Leadership and social intelligence: Linking social perceptiveness and behavioral flexibility to leader effectiveness, „Leadership Quarterly”, Vol. 2, pp. 317-342.
72. Zajac S., Gregory M.E., Bedwell W.L., Kramer W.S., Salas E. (2014), The cognitive underpinnings of adaptive team performance in ill-defined task situations: A closer look at team cognition, „Organizational Psychology Review”, Vol. 4 (1), pp. 49-73.

Uwagi

Opracowane ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-e518ff3b-42cc-4ac6-93e6-55647857aaf9