Peer paired ranking: assessing and training 21st century graduates

• Autorzy: Miralles C. , Perello-Marin M. R. , Canós-Darós L. , Vidal-Carreras P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Słowa kluczowe

EN

paired ranking; assessing; training

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Łódzka
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: z. 67
• Strony: 119--124
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Miralles C.

• ROGLE - Dep. Organización de Empresas Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (Spain)

autor

Perello-Marin M. R.

• Dep. Organización de Empresas Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (Spain)

autor

Canós-Darós L.

• ROGLE - Dep. Organización de Empresas Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (Spain)

autor

Vidal-Carreras P.

• ROGLE - Dep. Organización de Empresas Universitat Politecnica de Yalencia (Spain)

Bibliografia

• [1] EHEA, Bologna-process European Higher Education Area. History, 2014.
• [2] Reinalda B. and Publishers B.B.: The Bologna Process - Harmonizing Europe 's Higher Education, 2005.
• [3] ICE, Proyecto de competencias transversales UPV. Rubricas, 2015.
• [4] Grao J., Carot J.M., Mora J.G., Ochoa C, Perez P.J., Uriarte C. and Vila L.E.: Aportación de la universidad y de la experiencia laboral al desarrollo de competencias en la juventud egresada, Investig. Econ. la Educ, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 563-576, 2011.
• [5] Anderson R.S.: Why talk about different ways to grade? The shift from traditional assessment to alternative assessment, New Dir. Teach. Learn., Vol. 74, pp. 5-16, 1998.
• [6] Christoforou A.P. and Yigit A.S.: Improving teaching and learning in engineering education through a continuous assessment process, Eur. J. Eng. Educ., Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 105-116, 2008.
• [7] Reiter H.I., Eva K.W., Hatala R.M. and Norman G.R.: Self and peer assessment in tutorials: application of a relative-ranking model, Acad. Med., Vol. 77, No. 11, pp. 1134-1139, 2002.
• [8] Nicol D.J. and Macfarlane-Dick D.: Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Stud. High. Educ., Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 199-218, 2006.
• [9] Higgins M. and Grant F.: Formative Assessment: Balancing Educational Effectiveness and Resource Efficiency, Education, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 4-24, 2010.
• [10] Vickerman P.: Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: an attempt to deepen learning?, Assess. Eval. High. Educ., Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 221-230, 2009.
• [11] Ohland M.W., Loughry M.L., Woehr D.J., Bullard L.G., Felder RM., Finelli C.J., Layton R.A., Pomeranz H.R. and Schmucker D.G.: The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self- and Peer Evaluation, Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ., Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 609-631,2012.
• [12] Sluijsmans D., Dochy F. and Moerkerke G.: Creating a learning environment by using self, peer-and co-assessment, Learn. Environ. Res., pp. 293-319, 1998.
• [13] Tu Y. and Lu M.: Peer-and-Self Assessment to Reveal the Ranking of Each Individual's Contribution to a Group Project, J. Inf. Syst. Educ., Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 197-205, 2005.
• [14] Lai C.-L. and Hwang G.-J.: An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students' art design performance using handheld devices, Comput. Educ., Vol. 85, pp. 149-159, 2015.
• [15] Fürnkranz J. and Hüllermeier E. (Eds.): Preference Learning. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.
• [16] Kadziński M., Słowiński R. and Greco S.: Multiple criteria ranking and choice with all compatible minimal cover sets of decision rules, Knowledge-Based Syst., Vol. 89, pp. 569-583,2015.
• [17] Adler N., Friedman L. and Sinuany-Stern Z.: Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context, Eur. J. Oper. Res., Vol. 140, No. 2, pp. 249-265, Jul. 2002.
• [18] Hüllermeier E. and Fürnkranz J.: Ranking by Pairwise Comparison: A Note on Risk Minimization, Fuzzy Syst. 2004. Proceedings. 2004 IEEE Int. Conf., Vol. 1, pp. 97-102, 2004.
• [19] Tavana M., Di Caprio D. and Santos-Arteaga F.J.: An ordinal ranking criterion for the subjective evaluation of alternatives and exchange reliability, Inf. Sci. (Ny), Vol. 317, pp. 295-314, 2015.
• [20] Tran N.M.: Pairwise ranking: Choice of method can produce arbitrarily different rank order, Linear Algebra Appl., Vol. 438, No. 3, pp. 1012-1024, 2013.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).