PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Spatial planning for reducing the epidemic risk - the state of knowledge and practice from the perspective of the COVID-19 pandemic

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The ongoing public health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the link between community safety and health and the urban environment and has raised many challenges for cities that want to continue to provide a safe living environment. The Coronavirus pandemic has provoked many controversy and questions about its impact on urban forms. The goal of research was to document the status of knowledge and emerging research paths in the year following the COVID pandemic’s disclosure. The study includes a scoping review to determine the relationship between urban planning and the epidemic risk. Literature research showed that compact structures, because of their proximity to health centers, give higher epidemic safety. Accessibility to vital services prepares cities and their residents for unanticipated threats. The promotion of a dispersion strategy, with social distance regulations already in place, can lead to the rise of prejudice and xenophobia. Urban planners and architects should also pay more attention to urban geometry, building configuration, communication networks, or green spaces. In order to strengthen urban resilience, appropriate infrastructure, the implementation of new technologies, and the construction of urban systems and structures are essential.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
Rocznik
Strony
56--69
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 96 poz., rys.
Twórcy
  • Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Institute of Spatial Management, ul. Grunwaldzka 55, 50-357 Wrocław, Poland
  • Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Institute of Spatial Management, ul. Grunwaldzka 55, 50-357 Wrocław, Poland
Bibliografia
  • ACUTO M. 2020. Engaging with global urban governance in the midst of a crisis. Dialogues in Human Geography. Vol. 10(2) p. 221–224. DOI 10.1177/2043820620934232.
  • AHMADPOOR N., SHAHAB S. 2021. Realising the value of green space: A planners’ perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic. Town Planning Review. Vol 92(1) p. 49–56. DOI 10.3828/tpr.2020.37.
  • AKPINAR A., BARBOSA-LEIKER C., BROOKS K. 2016. Does green space matter? Exploring relationships between green space type and health indicators. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. Vol. 20 p. 407–418.
  • ALIROL E., GETAZ L., STOLL B., CHAPPUIS F., LOUTAN L. 2011. Urbanisation and infectious diseases in a globalised world. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. Vol. 11(2) p. 131–141. DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70223-1.
  • ALTER L. 2020. Urban design after the coronavirus [online]. Treehugger Voices. [Access 10.02.2021]. Available at: https://www.treehug-ger.com/urban-design/urban-design-after-coronavirus.html
  • BAILEY D., CLARK J., COLOMBELLI A., CORRADINI C., DE PROPRIS L., DERUDDER B., USAI S. 2020. Regions in a time of pandemic. Regional Studies. Vol. 54. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2020.1798611.
  • BALDWIN A.N. 2006. Sars and the built environment in Hong Kong. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineers. Vol. 159 p. 37–42.
  • BARBAROSSA L. 2020. The post pandemic city: Challenges and opportunities for a non-motorized urban environment. An overview of Italian cases. Sustainability (Switzerland). Vol. 12 (17), 7172. DOI 10.3390/su12177172.
  • BARKHORN E. 2020. Rules for using the sidewalk during the coronavirus [online]. The New York Times. [Access 16.03.2021]. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/05/opinion/coronavirus-walk-outside.html
  • BATTY M. 2020. The coronavirus crisis: What will the post-pandemic city look like? Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. Vol. 47(4) p. 547–552. DOI 10.1177/2399808320926912.
  • BAWACK R.E., KAMDJOUG J.R.K., WAMBA S.F., NOUTSA A.F. 2022. E-participation in developing countries: The case of the national social insurance fund in Cameroon. In: Research anthology on citizen engagement and activism for social change. Information Recources Management Association Hershey, PA, USA. IGI Global p. 826–847.
  • BELČÁKOVÁ I., ŚWIĄDER M., BARTYNA-ZIELIŃSKA M. 2019. The green infrastructure in cities as a tool for climate change adaptation and mitigation: Slovakian and Polish experiences. Atmosphere. Vol. 10, 552. DOI 10.3390/atmos10090552.
  • BERDEJO-ESPINOLA V., SUÁREZ-CASTRO A.F., AMANO T., FIELDING K.S., OH R.R.Y., FULLER R.A. 2021. Urban green space use during a time of stress: A case study during the Covid-19 pandemic in Brisbane, Australia. People and Nature. Vol. 3 p. 597–609. DOI 10.1002/pan3.10218.
  • BIRCH E., WACHTER S.M. (ed.) 2006. Rebuilding urban places after disaster: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 978-0812219807 pp. 375.
  • BOJOVIĆ M., RAJKOVIĆ I., PEROVIĆ S.K. 2022. Towards resilient residential buildings and neighborhoods in light of COVID-19 pandemic – the scenario of Podgorica, Montenegro. Sustainability. Vol. 14, 1302. DOI 10.3390/su14031302.
  • BOOTH A., SUTTON A., PAPAIOANNOU D. 2012. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review [online]. London. SAGE Publications. ISBN 9780857021359 pp. 288. [Access 16.03.2021]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235930866_Systematic_Approaches_to_a_Successful_Literature_Review
  • BOOTH W., SPOLAR C., ROLFE P. 2020. Vast coronavirus ‘field hospitals’ fill spaces that hosted wedding expos and dog shows [online]. The Washington Post. 31.03.2020. [Access 16.03.2021]. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/coronavirus-field-hospitals/2020/03/31/3a05ba28-6f0f-11ea-a156-0048b62cdb51_story.html
  • BOSCHETTO P. 2020. Covid-19 and simplification of urban planning tools. The residual plan. TeMA-Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment. Spec. iss. COVID-19 vs city-20 scenarios, insights, reasoning and research p. 9–16. DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/6845.
  • BRIZUELA N.G., GARCÍA-CHAN N., PULIDO H.G., CHOWELL G. 2020 Understanding the role of urban design in disease spreading. BioRxiv. DOI 10.1101/766667.
  • CARSON S., NANDA A., THANOS S., VALTONEN E., XU Y. 2020. Imagining a post-COVID-19 world of real estate. Town Planning Review. Vol. 92(3) p. 371–376. DOI 10.3828/tpr.2020.63.
  • CARTENÌ A., DI FRANCESCO L., MARTINO M. 2020. How mobility habits influenced the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the Italian case study. The Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 741, 140489. DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140489.
  • CAVES R.W. (ed.) 2004. Encyclopedia of the City. London. Routledge. ISBN 9780415252256 pp. 564.
  • CHIGBU U.E., ONYEBUEKE V.U. 2020. Viewpoint the COVID-19 pandemic in informal settlements: (re)considering urban planning interventions. Town Planning Review. DOI 10.3828/tpr.2020.74.
  • COMBS T., PARDO C.F. 2020. Streetplans, Epiandes, MobilityWorks, & Datasketch. The „Shifting Streets” Covid-19 mobility dataset [online]. [Access 16.03.2021]. Available at: http://pedbikeinfo.org/resources/resources_details.cfm?id=5235
  • CONNOLLY C., KEIL R., ALI S.H. 2021. Extended urbanisation and the spatialities of infectious disease: Demographic change, infrastructure and governance. Urban Studies. Vol. 58(2) p. 245–263. DOI 10.1177/0042098020910873.
  • COPPEL G., WÜSTEMANN H. 2017. The impact of urban green space on health in Berlin, Germany: Empirical findings and implications for urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning. Vol. 167 p. 410–148.
  • DASZAK P., CUNNINGHAM A., HYATT A. 2001. Anthropogenic environmental changeand the emergence of infectious diseases in wildlife. Acta Tropica. Vol. 78(2) p. 103–116. DOI 10. 1016/S0001-706X(00)00179-0.
  • DI NARDO K. 2019. The green revolution spreading across our rooftops [online]. The New York Times. [Access 16.03.2021]. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/09/realestate/the-green-roof-revolution.html
  • DUHL L., SANCHEZ A. 1999. Healthy cities and the city planning process: a background document on links between health and urban planning. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. [Access 10.02.2021]. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/han-dle/10665/108252.
  • EFE 2020. Milán le quitará al coche 35 km de carriles para dárselos a la bici y el peatón [Milan will take 35 km of lanes away from the car and give them to bicycles and pedestrian] [online]. El Periódico 21.04.2020. [Access 16.03.2021]. Available at: https://www.elperiodico.com/es/internacional/20200421/milan-le-quitara-al-coche-35-km-de-carriles-para-darselos-a-la-bici-y-el-peaton-7935410
  • ELLDÉR E. 2017. Does telework weaken urban structure – Travel relationships? Journal of Transport and Land Use. Vol. 10(1) p. 187–210. DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2015.762.
  • ELTARABILY S., ELGHEZANWY D. 2020. Post-pandemic cities – The impact of COVID-19 on cities and urban design. Architecture Research. Vol. 10(3) p. 75–84. DOI 10.5923/j.arch.20201003.02.
  • FRANCIS L.F., JENSEN M. 2017. Benefits of green roofs: A systematic review of the evidence for three ecosystem services. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. Vol. 28 p. 167–176. DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.015.
  • FREEMAN S., EYKELBOSH A. 2020. COVID-19 and outdoor safety: Considerations for use of outdoor recreational spaces. National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health [online]. [Access 20.03.2021]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340721289_COVID-19_and_outdoor_safety_Considerations_for_use_of_outdoor_recreational_spaces_Prepared_by
  • FURMANKIEWICZ M., JANC K., KACZMAREK I., SOLECKA I. 2021. Are rural stakeholder needs compliant with the targets of the Europe 2020 Strategy? Text mining analysis of Local Action Group strategies from two Polish regions. In: Proceedings of the international scientific conference Hradec Economic Days 2021. Vol. 11. Eds. J. Maci, P. Maresova, K. Firlej, I. Soukal. University of Hradec Kralove, 25–26.03.2021 p. 195–206. DOI 10.36689/uhk/hed/2021-01-019.
  • GENG D.C., INNES J., WU W., WANG G. 2021. Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: A global analysis. Journal of Forestry Research. Vol. 32(2) p. 553–567. DOI 10.1007/s11676-020-01249-w.
  • GILES-CORTI B., VERNEZ-MOUDON A., REIS R., TURRELL G., DANNENBERG A.L., BADLAND H., ..., OWEN N. 2016. City planning and population health: A global challenge. Lancet. Vol. 388, 10062 p. 2912–2924. DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30066-6.
  • GOUVEIA N., KANAI C. 2020. Pandemics, cities and public health. Ambiente e Sociedade. Vol. 23 p. 1–12. DOI 10.1590/1809-4422asoc20200120vu2020l3id.
  • GRANT M.J., BOOTH A. 2009. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libralies Journal. Vol. 26(2) p. 91–108. DOI 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
  • HAMIDI S., SABOURI S., EWING R. 2020. Does density aggravate the COVID-19 pandemic?: Early findings and lessons for planners. Journal of the American. Planning Association. Vol. 86(4) p. 495–509. DOI 10.1080/01944363.2020.1777891.
  • HAWKINS A.J. 2020. There’s no better time for cities to take space away from cars [online]. The Verge. [Access 30.03.2021]. Available: https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/23/21191325/cities-car-free-coronavirus-protected-bike-lanes-air-quality-social-distancing
  • Healthy Streets 2021. Healthy streets qualitative assessment [online]. [Access 30.03.2021]. Available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6048ed6105c2155a63b0c831/t/605dcb1ed4-f9a710a238b0f0/1616759584928/Qualitative+Street+Assessment.pdf
  • HONEY-ROSÉS J. 2020. Public spaces and health in post-pandemic cities [online]. [Access 16.03.2021]. Available at: https://www.isglobal.org/en/healthisglobal/-/custom-blog-portlet/los-espacios-publicos-y-la-salud-en-la-ciudad-pospandemia/8000927/12302
  • HONEY-ROSES J., ANGUELOVSKI I., CHIREH V.K., DAHER C., VAN DEN BOSCH C.K., LITT J.S., ..., NIEUWENHUIJSEN M.J. 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on public space: A review of the emerging questions. Cities Health. Vol. 5 p. S263–S279. DOI 10.1080/23748834.2020.1780074.
  • HONG J., MCARTHURM D., RATURI V. 2020. Did safe cycling infrastructure still matter during a COVID-19 lockdown? Sustainability (Switzerland). Vol. 12, 8672. DOI 10.3390/su12208672.
  • JAMSHIDI S., BANIASAD M., NIYOGI D. 2020. Global to USA county scale analysis of weather, urban density, mobility, homestay, and mask use on COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Vol. 17(21), 7847. DOI 10.3390/ijerph17217847.
  • JAYAWEERA M., PERERA H., GUNAWARDANA B., MANATUNGE J. 2020. Transmission of COVID-19 virus by droplets and aerosols: A critical review on the unresolved dichotomy. Environmental Research. Vol. 188, 109819. DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109819.
  • KANG M., KIM J., LEE K.O., LEE S., PARK I.K., PARK J., SEO I. 2020. COVID-19 impact on city and region: What’s next after lockdown? International Journal of Urban Sciences. Vol. 24(3) p. 297–315. DOI 10.1080/12265934.2020.1803107.
  • KAZAK J.K., SZEWRAŃSKI S., PILAWKA T., TOKARCZYK-DOROCIAK K., JANIAK K., ŚWIĄDER M. 2021. Changes in water demand patterns in a European city due to restrictions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Desalination Water Treatment. Vol. 222 p. 1–15. DOI 10.5004/dwt.2021.27242.
  • KELLERT S., CALABRESE E. 2015. The practice of biophilic design [online]. London. Terrapin Bright LLC pp. 25. [Access 16.03.2021]. Available at: https://earthwise.education/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/principles-of-biophilic-design.pdf
  • KELLY J.F. 2012. Social cities [online]. Melbourne. Grattan Institute. [Access 17.03.2021]. Available at: https://grattan.edu.au/report/social-cities/
  • KIMMELMAN M. 2020. Can city life survive coronavirus? [online]. The New York Times 2020 March 17. [Access 20.03.2021]. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/world/europe/corona-virus-city-life.html
  • KLEINSCHROTH F., KOWARIK I. 2020. COVID-19 crisis demonstrates the urgent need for urban greenspaces. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. Vol. 18(6) p. 318–319. DOI 10.1002/fee.2230.
  • KUBICKI P. 2020. Odporność miast musi być oparta na wspólnocie [online]. W: Pomorskie miasta wobec pandemii i wyzwań klimatycznych [Cities' resilience must be community-based. In: Pomeranian cities and climate challenges]. Pomorski Kongres Obywatelski. [Access 10.03.2021]. Available at: https://www.kongresobywatelski.pl/pomorski-thinkletter/wszystkie-teksty/od-pornosc-miast-musi-byc-oparta-na-wspolnocie-2/
  • LIANG C., WANG J., MA Z., TANG S., WANG B., WU Y. 2021. Study on the correlation between community construction planning factors and the spatial distribution of COVID-19 Outbreak: Case study of main urban area of Wuhan. Current Urban Studies. Vol. 9(3) p. 502–531. DOI 10.4236/cus.2021.93031.
  • LYDON M., GARCIA A. 2015. Tactical urbanism: Short-term action for long-term change [online]. Washington DC. Island Press. [Access 15.03.2021]. Available at: https://link.springer.com/book/10.5822/978-1-61091-567-0
  • MCCUNN L.J. 2020. The importance of nature to city living during the COVID-19 pandemic: Considerations and goals from environmental psychology. Cities Health. Vol. 5, sup1 p. S223-S226. DOI 10.1080/23748834.2020.1795385.
  • MIR V. 2020. Post-pandemic city: Historical context for new urban design. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences. Spec. iss. p. 94–108. DOI 10.24193/tras.SI2020.6.
  • MUNN Z., PETERS M.D.J., STERN C., TUFANARU C., MCARTHUR A., AROMATARIS E. 2018. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology. Vol. 18(1), 143. DOI 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
  • NATCO 2021. The urban street design guide [online]. National Association of City Transportation Officials. [Access 10.03.2021]. Available at: https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/
  • NEIDERUD C.J. 2015. How urbanization affects the epidemiology of emerging infectious diseases. Infection Ecology & Epidemiology. Vol. 5(1), 27060. DOI 10.3402/iee.v5.27060.
  • NIEUWENHUIJSEN M.J. 2020. Urban and transport planning pathways to carbon neutral, liveable and healthy cities; A review of the current evidence. Environment International. Vol. 140(6448), 105661. DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105661.
  • NIEUWENHUIJSEN M.J., KHREIS H. 2019. Integrating human health into the Urban Development and Transport Planning Agenda: A summary and final conclusions. In: Integrating human health into urban and transport planning. A framework. Eds. M.J. Nieuwenhuijsen, H. Khreis. Springer p. 707–718. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9.
  • NOWAK M., BLASZKE M. 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic and the directions of changes in the Polish spatial management system. Organization & Management Scientific Quarterly Organizacja i Zarządzanie: Kwartalnik Naukowy. Vol. 4 p. 89–98.
  • NULL S., SMITH H. 2020. COVID-19 could affect cities for years. Here are 4 ways they’re coping now [online]. Washington. WRI. [Access 15.03.2021]. Available at: https://www.wri.org/blog/2020/03/covid-19-could-affect-cities-years-here-are-4-ways-theyre-coping-now
  • OECD 2020. OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). The territorial impact of COVID-19: Managing the crisis across levels of government [online]. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development pp. 94. [Access 16.03.2021]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/the-territorial-impact-of-covid-19-managing-the-crisis-across-level-sof-government-d3e314e1/
  • PHILLIPS D.R. 1993. Urbanization and human health. Parasitology. Vol. 106. Suppl. p. 93–107. DOI 10.1017/s0031182000086145.
  • POLKO A. 2012. Public space development in the context of urban and regional resilience. Journal of Economics & Management. Vol. 10 p. 47–58.
  • ROBERTS D. 2020. How to make a city livable during lockdown [online]. Vox. [Access 18.03.2021]. Available at: https://www.vox.com/cities-and-urbanism/2020/4/13/21218759/coronavirus-cities-lockdown-covid-19-brent-toderian
  • ROMANELLI M., METALLO C., AGRIFOGLIO R., FERRARA M. 2019. Cities designing the future. In: The social issue in contemporary society: Relations between companies, public administrations and people. Eds. A. Stachowicz-Stanusch, L. Mercurio. Charlotte, NC, USA. Information Age Publishing p. 137–153.
  • RONCHI S., ARCIDIACONO A., POGLIANI L. 2020. Integrating green infrastructure into spatial planning regulations to improve the performance of urban ecosystems. Insights from an Italian case study. Sustainable Cities and Society. Vol. 53, 101907. DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101907.
  • RUEDA S. 2019. Superblocks for the design of new cities and renovation of existing ones: Barcelona’s Case. In: Integrating human health into urban and transport planning. Eds. M. Nieuwenhuijsen, H. Khreis. Springer p. 135–153 DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9.
  • SAGAN I. 2021. Polityka miejska w warunkach kryzysu. Rozdział 3. W: Polityka przestrzenna w czasie kryzysu [Urban policy under crisis conditions. In: Spatial policy in times of crisis]. Ed. M. Nowak. Warszawa. Wydaw. Nauk. Scholar p. 53–72.
  • SALLIS J.F., PRATT M. 2020. Multiple benefits of physical activity during the Coronavirus pandemic. Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde. Vol. 25, e0112 p. 1–5. DOI 10.12820/rbafs.25e0112.
  • SANYÉ-MENGUAL E., ANGUELOVSKI I., OLIVER-SOLÀ J., MONTERO J.I., RIERADEVALL J. 2016. Resolving differing stakeholder perceptions of urban rooftop farming in Mediterranean cities: Promoting food production as a driver for innovative forms of urban agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values. Vol. 33 p. 101–120. DOI 10.1007/s10460-015-9594-y.
  • SAS A. 2020. Mobility changes due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak in Poland 2020 [online]. [Access 09.03.2021]. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1110080/poland-mobility-changes-due-to-covid-19/
  • SEAMAN P.J., JONES R., ELLAWAY A. 2010. It’s not just about the park, it’s about integration too: Why people choose to use or not use urban greenspaces. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. Vol. 7, 78. DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-7-78.
  • SENNETT R., SENDRA P. 2020. Designing disorder: Experiments and disruptions in the city. London. Verso Books. ISBN 978-1788737807 pp. 160.
  • SHENKER J. 2020. Cities after coronavirus: How Covid-19 could radically alter urban life [online]. The Guardian, 26 March 2020. [Access 16.03.2021]. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/26/life-after-coronavirus-pandemic-change-world
  • SLATER S.J., CHRISTIANA R.W., GUSTAT J. 2020. Peer reviewed: Recommendations for keeping parks and green space accessible for mental and physical health during COVID-19 and other pandemics. Preventing Chronic Disease. Vol. 17, E59 p. 1–5. DOI 10.5888/pcd17.200204.
  • SOLECKA I., RINNE T., CARACCIOLO MARTINS R., KYTTA M., ALBERT C. 2022. Important places in landscape – investigating the determinants of perceived landscape value in the suburban area of Wrocław, Poland. Landscape and Urban Planning. Vol. 218, 104289. DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104289.
  • SONG X., CAO M., ZHAI K., GAO X., WU M., YANG T. 2021. The effects of spatial planning, well-being, and behavioural changes during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. Vol. 3, 686706. DOI 10.3389/frsc.2021.686706.
  • SPYRA M., LA ROSA D., ZASADA I., SYLLA M., SHKARUBA A. 2020. Governance of ecosystem services trade-offs in peri-urban landscapes. Land Use Policy. Vol. 95, 104617. DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104617.
  • STIER A.J., BERMAN M.G., BETTENCOURT L.M.A. 2020. COVID-19 attack rate increases with city size. medRxiv. DOI 10.1101/2020.03.22.20041004.
  • Street Plans 2020. COVID19 Livable Streets Response Strategies dataset [online]. [Access 16.03.2021]. Available at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/2/d/1tjam1v0NLUWkYedIa4dVOL49pyWI-PIyGwRB0DOnm3Ls/edit#gid=0
  • VAN ECK N.J., WALTMAN L. 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. Vol. 84(2) p. 523–538.
  • VAN HOOF J., BENNETTS H., HANSEN A., KAZAK J.K., SOEBARTO V. 2019. The living environment and thermal behaviours of older South Australians: A multi-focus group study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Vol. 16(6), 935. DOI 10.3390/ijerph16060935.
  • VAN HOOF J., MARSTON H.R., KAZAK J.K., BUFFEL T. 2021. Ten questions concerning age-friendly cities and communities and the built environment. Building and Environment. Vol. 199, 107922 p. 1–26. DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107922.
  • VENTER Z.S., BARTON D.N., GUNDERSEN V., FIGARI H., NOWELL M. 2020. Urban nature in a time of crisis: recreational use of green space increases during the COVID-19 outbreak in Oslo, Norway. Environmental Research Letter. Vol. 15(10), 104075. DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abb396.
  • WALKER P. 2017. How cycling can save the world. New York, NY, USA. Tarcher Perigee. ISBN 978-0143111771 pp. 288.
  • WANG G., LI H., YANG Y., JOMBACH S., TIAN G. 2019. “City in the park,” greenway network concept of high-density cities: Adaptation of Singapore park connector network in Chinese cities. In: Proceedings of the Fábos Conference on Landscape and Greenway Planning. Vol. 6(1), 13. DOI 10.7275/th5k-5d16.
  • WANG Q., SU M. 2020 A preliminary assessment of the impact of COVID-19 on environment – A case study of China. Science of Total Environment. Vol. 728, 138915. DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138915.
  • WHO 2010. Hidden cities: unmasking and overcoming health inequities in urban settings [online]. Kobe, Japan. World Health Organizaiton. ISBN 978-92-4-154803-8 pp. 126. [Access 06.03.2021]. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241548038
  • YU I.T., LI Y., WONG T.W., TAM W., CHAN A.T., LEE J.H.W., LEUNG D.Y. C., HO T. 2004. Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. New England Journal of Medicine. Vol. 350(17) p. 1731–1739. DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa032867.
  • ZAFIRA M., SALAS J. 2020. A room, a bar and a classroom: how the coronavirus is spread through the air [online]. El País 29.10.2020. [Access 16.03.2021]. Avalilable at: https://english.elpais.com/society/2020-10-28/a-room-a-bar-and-a-class-how-the-coronavirus-is-spread-through-the-air.html
  • ZAMBRANO-MONSERRATE M.A., RUANO M.A., SANCHEZ-ALCALDE L. 2020 Indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 728, 138813. DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138813.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-e4ada3ff-694f-4419-8699-e514d4a6e251
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.