Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Porównanie metod ponownego próbkowania dla skalowanego w dół zmniejszania DEM
Konferencja
POL-VIET 2019 : scientific-research cooperation between Poland and Vietnam : 08–10.07.2019, Krakow
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
In this paper, a comparison and evaluation of three resampling methods for gridded DEM is implemented. The evaluation was based on the results of bilinear resampling, bi-cubic and Kriging resampling methods for an experiment using both degraded and sampled datasets at 20 m and 60 m spatial resolutions. The evaluation of the algorithms was accomplished comprehensively with visual and quantitative assessments. The visual assessment process was based on direct comparison of the same topographic features in different downscaled images, scatterplots and profiles. The quantitative assessment was based on the most commonly used parameters for DEM accuracy assessment such as root mean square errors (RMSEs), linear regression parameters m and b, and correlation coefficient R. Both visual and quantitative assessment revealed greater accuracy of the Kriging over the other two conventional methods.
Słowa kluczowe
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
240--248
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 20 poz., tab., wykr., zdj.
Twórcy
autor
- Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, 18 Vien St, Duc Thang, Bac Tuliem, Hanoi
autor
- Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, 18 Vien St, Duc Thang, Bac Tuliem, Hanoi
autor
- Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, 18 Vien St, Duc Thang, Bac Tuliem, Hanoi
autor
- Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, 18 Vien St, Duc Thang, Bac Tuliem, Hanoi
autor
- Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, 18 Vien St, Duc Thang, Bac Tuliem, Hanoi
autor
- General Department of Remote Sensing, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment
Bibliografia
- 1. S. Saksena and V. Merwade, J. Hydrol. 530, 180 (2015).
- 2. Z. Zhao, G. Benoy, T. L. Chow, H. W. Rees, J. L. Daigle, and F. R. Meng, Water Resour. Manag. 24, 1363 (2010).
- 3. T. Bolstad, Paul V. & Stowe, ISPRS J. Photogrametric Eng. Remote Sens. 60, 1327 (1994).
- 4. K. S. Rawat, G. Krishna, A. Mishra, J. Singh, and S. V. Mishra, J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 6, (2018).
- 5. R. F. Vázquez and J. Feyen, J. Hydrol. 334, 73 (2007).
- 6. J. M. Schoorl, M. P. W. Sonneveld, and A. Veldkamp, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms (2000).
- 7. M. P. Smith, A. X. Zhu, J. E. Burt, and C. Stiles, Geoderma 137, 58 (2006).
- 8. W. L. Kuo, T. S. Steenhuis, C. E. McCulloch, C. L. Mohler, D. A. Weinstein, S. D. DeGloria, and D. P. Swaney, Water Resour. Res. 35, 3419 (1999).
- 9. Q. Guo, W. Li, H. Yu, and O. Alvarez, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 76, 701 (2013).
- 10. X. Liu, Prog. Phys. Geogr. (2008).
- 11. D. Kidner, M. Dorey, and D. Smith, in GeoComputation.Org (1999).
- 12. W. Shi, B. Wang, and Y. Tian, Math. Geosci. 46, 445 (2014).
- 13. C. H. Grohmann and S. S. Steiner, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 22, 895 (2008).
- 14. B. Dixon and J. Earls, Hydrol. Process. (2009).
- 15. L. E. Band and I. D. Moore, Hydrol. Process. 9, 401 (1995).
- 16. W. G. Rees, Int. J. Remote Sens. 21, 7 (2000).
- 17. U. Alganci, B. Besol, and E. Sertel, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information 7, (2018).
- 18. S. Kienzle, Trans. GIS 8, 83 (2003).
- 19. K. Whitehead and C. H. Hugenholtz, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 81, 787 (2015).
- 20. ASPRS, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 81, (2015).
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-e43f3bb3-fddd-447f-bf46-e719a84a390d