Comment On Energy-Efficient Alternative for Different Types of Traditional Soil Binders

• Autorzy: Jangde Himanshu , Khan Farhan

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/sgem-2022-0029

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Due to urban sprawl, the demand for land has increased for the purpose of construction. It is unlikely that soil available at different construction sites will be suitable for designed structures. For improving the load-bearing capacity of the soil, different soil binders are used, which are present in distinct states. In this review, the authors have collected details about various binders, which are generally used in the soil stabilization, and their effect as a binding agent on the soil. In this article, the authors tried to review different traditional binders. After studying various research articles, the authors found that lime, ground-granulated blast slag (GGBS) polypropylene, polyurethane grouting, and asphalt mix are frequently used binders. However, the authors also gathered information about the negative environmental impact of these traditional soil binders, which led to the need for alternatives to these commonly used soil binders. To diminish this issue, different alternate hydraulic and non-hydraulic binders are discussed. The authors found alternatives to cement and lime with the alkali-activated material consisting of Na₂O and silica modulus and belite-calcium sulfoaluminate ferrite, which is also known as "Aether™." According to the research, both alternatives emit 20–30% less CO₂ into the environment and also improve the compressive strength of the soil. The various studies promotes bitumen modification. Incorporating 20-mesh crumb rubber and bio-oil into the bitumen reduces its viscosity and improves its fatigue value. When waste oil is mixed with asphalt, it revitalizes the bitumen, improves fatigue resistance, and increases compressive strength. The soil particles treated by Eko soil are held together by enzymes, which give them the same strength as cement. Apart from that, low-carbon binders such as basic oxygen furnace slag, bamboo fiber, enzyme-based soil treatment, zebu manure for stabilization, and lignin-contained biofuels and coproducts are discussed. Replacing these traditional binders helps with energy savings. All waste products are recycled, and energy is saved by not manufacturing traditional binders. Additionally, energy is saved, which is required to avoid the detrimental effects of these conventional binders, making them energy-efficient alternate binders. The authors also summarize the methods used, impacts, and changes that occur in soil properties after using substitutes in place of traditional binders. From the review, the authors determined that different binders have various properties in terms of chemical and physical compositions, and they show different variations in terms of strength when added to soil with low bearing capacity or poor stability.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

binder; soil stabilisation; biochar; BOFS; basic oxygen furnace slag; enzyme; Eko soil; lignin; zebu manure

• Wydawca: De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 45, nr 1
• Strony: 72--87
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 97 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Jangde Himanshu

• Rungta College of Engineering and Technology, Bhilai, India

autor

Khan Farhan

• Rungta College of Engineering and Technology, Bhilai, India

Bibliografia

• [1] Chang, I., et al., Review on biopolymer-based soil treatment (BPST) technology in geotechnical engineering practices. Transportation Geotechnics, 2020. 24. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100385
• [2] S. Control et al., “EC-5 EC-5,” no. November, pp.1–8, 2009.
• [3] Starry, T.E.K.a.D.W., Modern Soil Stabilization Techniques. 2007
• [4] army, u., Military Soils Engineering, D.o.t. Army, Editor. 4 June 1997: Washington, DC.
• [5] Soil Binders, s.w. services, Editor. 2008.
• [6] Afrin, H., A Review on Different Types Soil Stabilization Techniques. International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Technology, 2017. 3(2). DOI: 10.11648/j.ijtet.20170302.12
• [7] Xu, D.-M., et al., Chemical stabilization remediation for heavy metals in contaminated soils on the latest decade: Available stabilizing materials and associated evaluation methods–A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021. 321. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128730
• [8] Imbabi, M.S., C. Carrigan, and S. McKenna, Trends and developments in green cement and concrete technology. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 2012. 1(2): p. 194–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2013.05.001
• [9] Aspin J. An improvement in the modes of producing an artificial stone. In: Patent ed., 5022:1824, UK, 1824.
• [10] Toma, I.-O., et al., Strength and elastic properties of mortars with various percentages of environmentally sustainable mineral binder. Construction and Building Materials, 2013. 43: p. 348–361. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.061
• [11] Harnisch, N.M.J., A blueprint for a climate friendly cement industry. 2012
• [12] Xu, J.-H., et al., CO2 emissions reduction potential in China's cement industry compared to IEA's Cement Technology Roadmap up to 2050. Applied Energy, 2014. 130: p. 592–602. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.004
• [13] Gartner, E.M. and D.E. Macphee, A physico-chemical basis for novel cementitious binders. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011. 41(7): p. 736–749. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.006
• [14] Bell, F.G., Lime stabilization of clay minerals and soils. Engineering Geology 42 (1996) 1996: p. 223–237
• [15] Dash, S.K. and M. Hussain, Lime Stabilization of Soils: Reappraisal. 2012. 24(6): p. 707–714. DOI: doi:10.1061/(ASCE) MT.1943-5533.0000431
• [16] Thyagaraj, T. and S. Zodinsanga, Laboratory Investigations of In Situ Stabilization of an Expansive Soil by Lime Precipitation Technique. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2015. 27(7). DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001184
• [17] Hopkins, T.L.B.a.T.C., Stabilization of Subgrade Soil using Hydrated Lime Product. 1997
• [18] Consoli, N.C., et al., Control factors for the long term compressive strength of lime treated sandy clay soil. Transportation Geotechnics, 2014. 1(3): p. 129–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.07.005
• [19] Ola, S.A., The potentials of lime stabilization of lateritic soils. Engineering Geology, 1977. 11(4): p. 305–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(77)90036-9
• [20] Zhao, H., et al., Reexamination of Lime Stabilization Mechanisms of Expansive Clay. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2015. 27(1). DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001040
• [21] Amadi, A.A. and A. Okeiyi, Use of quick and hydrated lime in stabilization of lateritic soil: comparative analysis of laboratory data. International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 2017. 8(1). DOI: 10.1186/s40703-017-0041-3
• [22] source: https://www.pulpandpaper-technology.com/products/ankur-minerals/quick-lime-powder.
• [23] Alzubaidi, R. and S.H. Lafta, Effect of Strain Rate on the Strength Characteristics of Soil–Lime Mixture. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2013. 31(4): p. 1317–1327. DOI: 10.1007/s10706-013-9653-3
• [24] Cherian, C. and D.N. Arnepalli, A Critical Appraisal of the Role of Clay Mineralogy in Lime Stabilization. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2015. 1(1). DOI: 10.1007/s40891-015-0009-3
• [25] Di Sante, M., et al., Influence of delayed compaction on the compressibility and hydraulic conductivity of soil–lime mixtures. Engineering Geology, 2015. 185: p. 131–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.12.005
• [26] Mohanty, S., et al., Strength and durability of flyash, GGBS and cement clinker stabilized dispersive soil. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2021. 191: p. 103358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103358
• [27] S, K.S.K. and N.N. Patil, Evaluation of strength, durability characteristics of Flyash, GGBFS and alccofine based Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.290
• [28] source: https://sodimate-inc.com/hydrated-lime/.
• [29] TOMMY C. HOPKINS, T.L.B.a.D.Q.H., MODIFICATION OF IDGHWAY SOIL SUBGRADES. 1995
• [30] Ullah, S., et al., Adsorption behavior of mercury over hydrated lime: Experimental investigation and adsorption process characteristic study. Chemosphere, 2021. 271: p. 129504. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129504
• [31] Deng, X., et al., Effect of hydrated lime on structures and properties of decorative rendering mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 2020. 256. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119485
• [32] Das, A.K. and D. Singh, Evaluation of fatigue performance of asphalt mastics composed of nano hydrated lime filler. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. 269. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121322
• [33] Yilmaz, I. and B. Civelekoglu, Gypsum: An additive for stabilization of swelling clay soils. Applied Clay Science, 2009. 44(1): p. 166–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2009.01.020
• [34] Divya Krishnan, K., et al., Study on Behaviour of Soil with Phosphogypsum as Stabiliser. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2016. 9(23). DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i23/95980
• [35] Liu, Y., G.Z. Li, and C.W. Du, Research on the Effects of Calcination Temperature on the Physical Properties of Titanium Gypsum. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014. 711: p. 189–192. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.711.189
• [36] Survey, U.S.G., Miniral Commodities Summaries 2013. 2013.
• [37] A. Mohammadi, M.D., Aff.M.ASCE, I. Shooshpasha and S. Asadollahi, Mechanical Properties of Sandy Soil Stabilized with Modified Sulfur. 2014. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001059.
• [38] B. CZARNECK, J.E.G., Effect of Different Admixtures on the Durability of Sulphur Concrete Made with Different Aggregates. Engineering Geology, 28 (1990) 105–118, 1989
• [39] Alan, H.V., Sulfur Concrete Goes Global. Concrete International. 20(1)
• [40] Grugel, R.N. and H. Toutanji, Sulfur “concrete” for lunar applications – Sublimation concerns. Advances in Space Research, 2008. 41(1): p. 103–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2007.08.018
• [41] Vlahovic, M.M., et al., Durability of sulfur concrete in various aggressive environments. Construction and Building Materials, 2011. 25(10): p. 3926–3934. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.024
• [42] Enayaty-Ahangar, T. and S. Motahari, Fiber Reinforcement of DCPD-Modified Sulfur Mortar. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2014. 26(1): p. 1–5. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000778
• [43] ABRAHAM, H., ASPHALTS AND ALLIED SUBSTANCES. 4 ed. 198.
• [44] Raymond, M. and W.L. Leffler, Oil and Gas Production in Nontechnical Language. 2006: PennWell Corporation.
• [45] Valentin, J., et al., A comprehensive study on adhesion between modified bituminous binders and mineral aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. 305. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124686
• [46] source: https://www.asphalt.com.au/why-asphalt/bitumen-vs-asphalt/.
• [47] Shen, W., et al., Quantifying CO2 emissions from China's cement industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015. 50: p. 1004–1012. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.031
• [48] Rolfe, A., et al., Technical and environmental study of calcium carbonate looping versus oxy-fuel options for low CO2 emission cement plants. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018. 75: p. 85–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.05.020
• [49] Cao, Z., et al., Toward a better practice for estimating the CO2 emission factors of cement production: An experience from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016. 139: p. 527–539. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.070
• [50] Schuhmacher, M., J.L. Domingo, and J. Garreta, Pollutants emitted by a cement plant: health risks for the population living in the neighborhood. Environ Res, 2004. 95(2): p. 198–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2003.08.011
• [51] Prisciandaro, M., G. Mazziotti, and F. Veglió, Effect of burning supplementary waste fuels on the pollutant emissions by cement plants: a statistical analysis of process data. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2003. 39(2): p. 161–184. DOI: 10.1016/s0921-3449(02)00170-2
• [52] Puppala, A.J., Advances in ground modification with chemical additives: From theory to practice. Transportation Geotechnics, 2016. 9: p. 123–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.08.004
• [53] Bailey, H.K., ASPHALT REJUVENATION. 2009.
• [54] G. S. Li, G.W.a.E.M.G., Formation and hydration of low-CO2 cements based on belite, calcium sulfoaluminate and calcium aluminoferrite. 2007
• [55] Alvarez-Ayuso, E., et al., Environmental, physical and structural characterisation of geopolymer matrixes synthesised from coal (co-)combustion fly ashes. J Hazard Mater, 2008. 154(1–3): p. 175–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.008
• [56] Burduhos Nergis, D.D., et al., Geopolymers and Their Uses: Review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018. 374. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/374/1/012019
• [57] Al Makhadmeh, W.a. and A. Soliman, Effect of activator nature on property development of alkali-activated slag binders. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 2020. 10(4): p. 240–256. DOI: 10.1080/21650373.2020.1833256
• [58] Diaz Caselles, L., et al., Stabilization of soils containing sulfates by using alternative hydraulic binders. Applied Geochemistry, 2020. 113. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.104494
• [59] Du, Y.-J., et al., New phosphate-based binder for stabilization of soils contaminated with heavy metals: Leaching, strength and microstructure characterization. Journal of Environmental Management, 2014. 146: p. 179–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.035
• [60] Jin, F., F. Wang, and A. Al-Tabbaa, Three-year performance of in-situ solidified/stabilised soil using novel MgO-bearing binders. Chemosphere, 2016. 144: p. 681–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.09.046
• [61] Wang, D., H. Wang, and X. Wang, Compressibility and strength behavior of marine soils solidified with MgO—A green and low carbon binder. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2016. 35(6): p. 878–886. DOI: 10.1080/1064119x.2016.1258095
• [62] Feng, Y.-S., et al., Performance of two novel binders to stabilize field soil with zinc and chloride: Mechanical properties, leachability and mechanisms assessment. Construction and Building Materials, 2018. 189: p. 1191–1199. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.072
• [63] Zheng, W., et al., A review on compatibility between crumb rubber and asphalt binder. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. 297. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123820
• [64] Chen, Y., et al., Evaluation of crumb rubber modification and short-term aging on the rutting performance of bioasphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 2018. 193: p. 467–473. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.192
• [65] Lei, Y., et al., Evaluation of the effect of bio-oil on the high-temperature performance of rubber modified asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 2018. 191: p. 692–701. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.064
• [66] Wan Azahar, W.N.A., et al., The Potential of Waste Cooking Oil as Bio-Asphalt for Alternative Binder – an Overview. Jurnal Teknologi, 2016. 78(4). DOI: 10.11113/jt.v78.8007
• [67] Junaid, M., et al., Moisture susceptibility and fatigue performance of asphalt binder modified by bone glue and coal fly ash. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. 308: p. 125135. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125135
• [68] Huang, J., et al., A state-of-the-art review of polymers used in soil stabilization. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. 305. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124685
• [69] Hosseinpour, Z., et al., Synthesis of a biopolymer via a novel strain of Pantoea as a soil stabilizer. Transportation Geotechnics, 2021. 26. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100425
• [70] Chang, I. and G.-C. Cho, Strengthening of Korean residual soil with β-1,3/1,6-glucan biopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, 2012. 30: p. 30–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.030
• [71] Saleh, S., et al., Improving the strength of weak soil using polyurethane grouts: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 2019. 202: p. 738–752. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.048
• [72] Correia, A.A.S., P.J. Venda Oliveira, and D.G. Custódio, Effect of polypropylene fibres on the compressive and tensile strength of a soft soil, artificially stabilised with binders. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2015. 43(2): p. 97–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.11.008
• [73] Almajed, A., et al., Enzyme-Induced Carbonate Precipitation (EICP)-Based methods for ecofriendly stabilization of different types of natural sands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020. 274. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122627
• [74] Kushwaha, S.S., et al., Stabilization of Red mud using Eko soil enzyme for highway embankment. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2018. 5(9): p. 20500–20512. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.427
• [75] Feng, Y.S., et al., Geoenvironmental properties of industrially contaminated site soil solidified/stabilized with a sustainable by-product-based binder. Sci Total Environ, 2021. 765: p. 142778. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142778
• [76] Brahmachary, T.K. and M. Rokonuzzaman, Investigation of random inclusion of bamboo fiber on ordinary soil and its effect CBR value. International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 2018. 9(1). DOI: 10.1186/s40703-018-0079-x
• [77] Lv, S., et al., Experimental investigation on the performance of bone glue and crumb rubber compound modified asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. 305. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124734
• [78] Rizvi, H.R., M.J. Khattak, and A.A. Gallo, Rheological and mechanistic characteristics of Bone Glue modified asphalt binders. Construction and Building Materials, 2015. 88: p. 64–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.023
• [79] Ramiandrisoa Antsa Lalaina, R., Andrianary Philipe, Rakotoarivonizaka Ignace, Study Of The Soil Stabilization Mechanism By Natural Stabilizers – Case Sweet Potato - Banana - Zebu Manure. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT), 2021. 25: p. 304–320
• [80] Do, T.M., et al., Development of a new cementless binder for marine dredged soil stabilization: Strength behavior, hydraulic resistance capacity, microstructural analysis, and environmental impact. Construction and Building Materials, 2018. 186: p. 263–275. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.130
• [81] Yuan, Q., et al., Supercritical CO2 coupled with mechanical force to enhance carbonation of fly ash and heavy metal solidification. Fuel, 2022. 315: p. 123154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123154
• [82] Mohd Nasir, N.H., et al., Development of composite material from Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate and fly ash: Four decades progress review. Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2022. 5: p. 100280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2022.100280
• [83] Fu, H., et al., Preparation, characterization and properties study of a superhydrophobic ceramic membrane based on fly ash. Ceramics International, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.014
• [84] Ma, S., et al., Influence of alkali-resistant glass fiber on seismic performance of precast ceramsite concrete sandwich wall panels. Structures, 2022. 38: p. 94–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.081
• [85] Rajesh, D., et al., Mechanical characterization of glass fiber and glass fiber reinforced with aluminium particulated polymer composite. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.202
• [86] Patil, S., T.H. Patel, and E. Yashodha, The effect of rice husk ash, silica fume, and quarry dust on glass fibre reinforced concrete's strength properties. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.458
• [87] Yan, R., et al., Damage evolution behavior of cold plasma treated glass fiber/vinyl ester resin composites under bending load by acoustic emission. Composites Communications, 2022. 30: p. 101075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2022.101075
• [88] Ghadir, P., et al., Shear strength and life cycle assessment of volcanic ash-based geopolymer and cement stabilized soil: A comparative study. Transportation Geotechnics, 2021. 31. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100639
• [89] Liu, L.-K., et al., Hydrothermal-processed volcanic ash-based geopolymers for immobilization of sodium salt wastes containing Cs. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2021. 158: p. 108251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108251
• [90] Nana, A., et al., Mechanical strength and microstructure of metakaolin/volcanic ash-based geopolymer composites reinforced with reactive silica from rice husk ash (RHA). Materialia, 2021. 16: p. 101083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101083
• [91] Aziz, A., et al., Effect of acidic volcanic perlite rock on physio-mechanical properties and microstructure of natural pozzolan based geopolymers. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2021. 15: p. e00712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00712
• [92] Gobinath, R., et al., Studies on strength characteristics of black cotton soil by using novel SiO2 combination as a stabilizing agent. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020. 27: p. 657–663. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.597
• [93] Naeem, I., et al., Prospective usage of magnesium potassium phosphate cement combined with Bougainvillea alba derived biochar to reduce Pb bioavailability in soil and its uptake by Spinacia oleracea L. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2021. 208: p. 111723. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111723
• [94] Yang, B., et al., Assessment of soils stabilized with lignin-based byproducts. Transportation Geotechnics, 2018. 17: p. 122–132. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.10.005
• [95] Zhao, D., Reactive MgO-modified slag-based binders for cemented paste backfill and potential heavy-metal leaching behavior. Construction and Building Materials, 2021. 298: p. 123894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123894
• [96] Wang, Z., et al., Hydration properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag binders modified by MgO with different reactivity. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021. 44: p. 103252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103252
• [97] Shah, V. and A. Scott, Use of kaolinite clays in development of a low carbon MgO-clay binder system. Cement and Concrete Research, 2021. 144: p. 106422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106422

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).