PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The concept of well integrity in gas production activities

Autorzy
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Koncepcja integralności odwiertów przy produkcji gazu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Shale gas production in the US, predominantly from the Marcellus shale, has been accused of methane emissions and contaminating drinking water under the suspicion that this is caused by hydraulic fracturing in combination with leaking wells. Misunderstandings of the risks of shale gas production are widespread and are causing communication problems. This paper discusses recent preliminary results from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) draft study, which is revealing fact-based issues: EPA did not find evidence that these mechanisms have led to widespread, systemic impacts on drinking water resources in the United States, which contrasts many broad-brushed statements in media and public. The complex geological situation and extraction history of oil, gas and water in the Marcellus area in Pennsylvania is a good case for learnings and demonstrating the need for proper analysis and taking the right actions to avoid problems. State-of-the-art technology and regulations of proper well integrity are available, and their application will provide a sound basis for shale gas extraction.
Rocznik
Strony
205--213
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 17 poz., rys.
Twórcy
  • Upstream - Energy - Consulting, Germany; Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Technische Universität Clausthal, Adolph-Roemer-Strasse 2A, D-38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
Bibliografia
  • [1] Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_truth_effect.
  • [2] EIA 2015: Marcellus Region Drilling Productivity Report July 2015, U.S. Energy Information Administration. http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/pdf/marcellus.pdf.
  • [3] EPA 2015: External Review Draft. EPA/600/R-15/047a, June 2015. http://www.epa.gov/hfstudy.
  • [4] Osborn SG, Vengosh A, Warner NR, Jackson RB. Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proc National Acad Sci. 2011:108;8172-8176. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1100682108.
  • [5] Molofsky LJ, Connor JA, Farhat SK, Wylie AS, Wager T. Methane in Pennsylvania water wells unrelated to Marcellus shale fracturing. Oil Gas J. 2011:54-67. http://www.ogj.com/1/vol-109/issue-49/exploration-development/methane-in-pennsylvania-water-full.html.
  • [6] Sueker JK, Clark BL, Cramer GH. Isotopic Forensic Techniques for Methane Source Discrimination. Stray Gas Incidence & Response Forum, Cleveland, Ohio. July 23-25, 2012. www.ipec.utulsa.edu/conf2011/sueker-27.pdf.
  • [7] Darrah TH, Vengosh A, Jackson RB, Warner NR, Poreda RJ. Noble gases identify the mechanisms of fugitive gas contamination in drinking-water wells overlying the Marcellus and Barnett Shales. Proc National Acad Sci. 2014. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1322107111.
  • [8] Reichetseder P. Clean Unconventional Gas Production: Myth or Reality? The Role of Well Integrity and Methane Emissions, Swiss Bulletin for Applied Geology of SASEG/VSP and SFIG, 2014: 19(2);39-52. http://www.saseg.ch/cms/images/pdf/Publikationen/Medien/SwissBulletin_2-2014-lr.pdf.
  • [9] Ingraffea AR, Wells MT, Santoro RL, Shonkoff SBC. Assessment and risk analysis of casing and cement impairment in oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania, 2000-2012. Proc National Acad Sci. 2014:111(30);10955-10960. http://www.pnas.org/content/111/30/10955.full.pdf.
  • [10] Reichetseder P. Comment on SHIP News “New Numbers on well integrity failures”, 30.10.2014. http://www.shale-gas-information-platform.org/areas/news/detail/article/comment-by-professor-reichetseder-on-ship-news-new-numbers-on-well-integrity-failures.html.
  • [11] Emmert A. Oil and Natural Gas Industry Standards for Hydraulic Fracturing and Unconventional Wells. IEA Golden Rules for Gas Workshop, Washington: American Petroleum Institute, March 2012.
  • [12] API 2009: API Guidance Document HF1: Hydraulic Fracturing Operations - Well Construction and Integrity Guidelines. 1st edition. Washington: American Petroleum Institute; 2009. www.shalegas.energy.gov/resources/HF1.pdf.
  • [13] API 2010: API Standard 65-Part 2, Isolating Potential Flow Zones During Well Construction. 2nd edition. Washington: American Petroleum Institute; 2010. http://www.shalegas.energy.gov/resources/65-2_e2.pdf.
  • [14] Cuadrilla 2014: Well Integrity - Cuadrilla Land Based Wells. http://www.cuadrillaresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/DrillingPage-Well-Integrity-Document.pdf.
  • [15] NORSOK 2013: Well Integrity in drilling and well operations. Norsok Standard D-010, Rev. 4, June 2013, http://www.standard.no/en/webshop/Search/?search=Norsok+D-010+Rev.+4#.
  • [16] Oil&Gas UK 2012: Well Integrity Guidelines. Issue 1, July 2012. Oil and Gas UK 2012b, OP069, Available for purchase online, http://www.oilandgasuk.co.uk/cmsfiles/modules/publications/pdfs/OP069.pdf.
  • [17] UKOOG 2013: UK Onshore Shale Gas Well Guidelines, Exploration and appraisal phase. Issue 1 February 2013, UKOOG United Kingdom Onshore Operators Group. http://www.ukoog.org.uk/images/ukoog/pdfs/ShaleGasWellGuidelines.pdf.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-e39077b2-05e5-454c-b7c5-f901ebdc96ce
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.