Development of a new hexagonal honeycomb steel damper

• Autorzy: Javanmardi Ahad , Ghaedi Khaled , Ibrahim Zainah , Huang Fuyun , Xu Pu

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s43452-020-00063-9

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper presents a new metallic damper called hexagonal honeycomb steel damper (HHSD) for damage mitigation in structures subjected to earthquake excitations. The HHSD is composed of steel plates having several hexagonal and welded to the top and bottom anchor plates. The damper takes the advantages of hexagonal honeycomb geometry and steel material capability to dissipate seismic energy. The quasi-static cyclic test was performed experimentally and numerically on a series of specimens to evaluate the robustness of the HHSD. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of HHSD was carried out and verified with the experimental results. The results showed that the HHSD has low yield displacement, stable hysteretic behavior, a good range of ductility and high-energy dissipation capability. Additionally, the constitutive formulas of the damper are also derived based on the obtained results. Furthermore, it is found to have lightweight and inexpensive with ease of implementation as a potential alternative for new structures or seismic retrofitting of the existing structures.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

metallic yielding dampers; structural vibration control; hysteretic dampers; passive control; earthquake engineering

PL

tłumik; inżynieria sejsmiczna; drgania

• Wydawca: Springer ; Wrocław University of Science and Technology
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 20, no. 2
• Strony: 490--508
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 43 poz., fot., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Javanmardi Ahad

• Present Address: College of Civil Engineering, Key Laboratory of Fujian Province, Fuzhou University, University Town, 2 Xueyuan Road, Fuzhou 350108, China
• Civil Engineering Department, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

autor

Ghaedi Khaled

• Civil Engineering Department, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

autor

Ibrahim Zainah

• Civil Engineering Department, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

autor

Huang Fuyun

• Present Address: College of Civil Engineering, Key Laboratory of Fujian Province, Fuzhou University, University Town, 2 Xueyuan Road, Fuzhou 350108, China

autor

Xu Pu

• Present Address: College of Civil Engineering, Key Laboratory of Fujian Province, Fuzhou University, University Town, 2 Xueyuan Road, Fuzhou 350108, China

Bibliografia

• [1] Ghaedi K, Ibrahim Z. Earthquake prediction. In: Zouaghi T, editor. Earthquakes-tectonics, hazard risk mitigation. Rijeka: InTech; 2017. p. 205–227. https ://doi.org/10.5772/65511.
• [2] Ghaedi K, Ibrahim Z, Jameel M, Javanmardi A, Khatibi H. Seismic response analysis of fully base isolated adjacent buildings with segregated foundations. Adv Civ Eng (2018). https ://www.hinda wi.com/journ als/ace/aip/45179 40/.
• [3] Javanmardi A, Ibrahim Z, Ghaedi K, Khan NB, Ghadim HB. Seismic isolation retrofitting solution for an existing steel cable-stayed bridge. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:1–22. https ://doi.org/10.1371/journ al.pone.02004 82.
• [4] Skinner RI, Kelly JM, Heine AJ. Hysteretic dampers for earthquake-resistant structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1974;3:287–96. https ://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.42900 30307 .
• [5] Ghaedi K, Ibrahim Z, Adeli H, Javanmardi A. Invited Review: Recent developments in vibration control of building and bridge structures. J Vibroeng. 2017;19:3564–80. https ://doi. org/10.21595 /jve.2017.18900.
• [6] Javanmardi A, Ibrahim Z, Ghaedi K, Benisihadim H, Hanif MU. State-of-the-art review of metallic dampers: testing, development and implementation. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2019. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1183 1-019-09329 -9.
• [7] Kelly JM, Skinner RI, Heine AJ. Mechanisms of energy absorption in special devices for use in earthquake resistant structures. Bull N Zeal Natl Soc Earthq Eng. 1972;5:63–88.
• [8] Nakashima M, Iwai S, Iwata M, Takeuchi T, Konomi S, Akazawa T, Saburi K. Energy dissipation behaviour of shear panels made of low yield steel. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1994;23:1299–313. https ://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.42902 31203 .
• [9] Li H, Li G. Experimental study of structure with “dual function” metallic dampers. Eng Struct. 2007;29:1917–28. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.engst ruct.2006.10.007.
• [10] Deng K, Pan P, Li W, Xue Y. Development of a buckling restrained shear panel damper. J Constr Steel Res. 2015;106:311–21. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.01.004.
• [11] Hsu HL, Halim H. Improving seismic performance of framed structures with steel curved dampers. Eng Struct. 2017;130:99–111. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.engst ruct.2016.09.063.
• [12] Bergman DM. Evaluation of cyclic testing of steel-plate devices for added damping and stiffness. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan; 1987.
• [13] Tsai K-C, Chen H-W, Hong C-P, Su Y-F. Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction. Earthq Spectra. 1993;9:505–28. https ://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585727.
• [14] Takeda Y, Kimura Y, Yoshioka K, Furuya N, Takemoto Y. An experimental study on braces encased in steel tube and mortal. In: Annual Meeting Architecture Institute Japan, 1976. p. 1041–2.
• [15] Wada A, Saeki E, Takeuch T, Watanabe A. Development of unbonded brace. In Column, A Nippon Steel Publications 115 (1989).
• [16] Black C, Makris N, Aiken ID. Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces. J Struct Eng. 2004;130:880–94. https ://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(880).
• [17] Black C, Makris N, Aiken ID. Component testing, stability analysis and characterization of buckling-restrained unbonded braces, PEER Report 2002/08, Pacific earthquake engineering research center. University of california at berkeley 2002.
• [18] Zhao J, Wu B, Ou J. A novel type of angle steel bucklingrestrained brace: Cyclic behavior and failure mechanism. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2011;40:1083–102. https ://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.
• [19] Hao X-Y, Li H-N, Li G, Makino T. Experimental investigation of steel structure with innovative H-type steel unbuckling braces. Struct Des Tall Spec Build. 2014;24:421–39. https ://doi.org/10.1002/tal.
• [20] Dongbin Z, Xin N, Peng P, Mengzi W, Kailai D, Yabin C. Experimental study and finite element analysis of a buckling-restrained brace consisting of three steel tubes with slotted holes in the middle tube. J Constr Steel Res. 2016;124:1–11. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.05.003.
• [21] Chan RWK, Albermani F. Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation. Eng Struct. 2008;30:1058–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engst ruct.2007.07.005.
• [22] Maleki S, Bagheri S. Pipe damper, Part I: experimental and analytical study. J Constr Steel Res. 2010;66:1088–95. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.03.010.
• [23] Maleki S, Mahjoubi S. Dual-pipe damper. J Constr Steel Res. 2013;85:81–91. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.03.004.
• [24] Javanmardi A, Ibrahim Z, Ghaedi K, Khatibi H. Numerical analysis of vertical pipe damper. In: 39th IABSE symposium engineering future, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 2017. p. 2974–80.
• [25] Ghaedi K, Ibrahim Z, A Javanmardi, Rupakhety R. Experimental study of a new bar damper device for vibration control of structures subjected to earthquake loads. J Earthq Eng. 2018;1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1515796
• [26] Ghaedi K, Ibrahim Z, Javanmardi A. A new metallic bar damper device for seismic energy dissipation of civil structures. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2018;431:122009. https ://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/431/12/12200 9.
• [27] Aghlara R, Tahir MM, Bin Adnan A. Experimental study of Pipe-fuse damper for passive energy dissipation in structures. J Constr Steel Res. 2018;148:351–60. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.06.004.
• [28] Aghlara R, Tahir MM. A passive metallic damper with replaceable steel bar components for earthquake protection of structures. Eng Struct. 2018;159:185–97. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.049.
• [29] Tagawa H, Yamanishi T, Takaki A, Chan RWK. Cyclic behavior of seesaw energy dissipation system with steel slit dampers. J Constr Steel Res. 2016;117:24–34. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.09.014.
• [30] Yamazaki S, Usami T, Nonaka T. Developing a new hysteretic type seismic damper (BRRP) for steel bridges. Eng Struct. 2016;124:286–301. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.033.
• [31] Javanmardi A. Seismic behavior investigation of a cable-stayed bridge with hybrid passive control system. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya; 2019.
• [32] Oh S-H, Kim Y-J, Ryu H-S. Seismic performance of steel structures with slit dampers. Eng Struct. 2009;31:1997–2008. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.engst ruct.2009.03.003.
• [33] Javanmardi A, Ghaedi K, Ibrahim Z, Muthu KU. Seismic pounding mitigation of an existing cable-stayed bridge using metallic dampers. In: IABSE conference-engineering development world, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, 2018. p. 617–23.
• [34] Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular solids: structure and properties. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
• [35] Lan L-H, Fu M-H. Nonlinear Constitutive relations of cellular materials. AIAA J. 2009;47:264–70.
• [36] Gibson LJ, Ashby MF, Schajer GS, Robertson CI. The mechanics of two-dimensional cellular materials. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 1982;38:25–422.
• [37] Javanmardi A. Non-linear test of precast subframe subjected to cyclic lateral loadings. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; 2014.
• [38] ASTM-E8, Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials, 2015. https ://doi.org/10.1520/E0008.
• [39] Federal Emergency Management Agency. Interim protocols for determining seismic performance characteristics of structural and nonstructural components. Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
• [40] Chopra AK. Dynamics of structure, theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 4th ed. London: Pearson; 2014.
• [41] Vasdravellis G, Karavasilis TL, Uy B, Asce M. Design rules, experimental evaluation, and fracture models for high-strength and stainless-steel hourglass shape energy dissipation devices. J Struct Eng. 2012. https ://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.00010 14.
• [42] Chan RWK, Albermani F, Kitipornchai S. Experimental study of perforated yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation. J Constr Steel Res. 2013;91:14–25. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.08.013.
• [43] Abaqus Inc., Abaqus theory manual, Version 6.14., Abaqus Inc. 2014.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021)