Agro-Environmental Evaluation of Irrigation Water from Different Sources, Together with Drainage and Escape Water of Rice Irrigation Systems, According to its Impact on Maize (Zea mays L.)

• Autorzy: Lykhovyd Pavlo , Dementiieva Olha , Lavrenko Sergiy , Lavrenko Nataliia

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/94916

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The water supply deficit requires agro-environmental rationale for the use of alternative water sources to feed agricultural crops, viz.: industrial wastes, municipal drains, farm animal waste, drainage and escape water of rice irrigation systems. We analyzed the quality of irrigation water from different sources, with regard to the content of cations, anions, water-soluble salts, power of hydrogen (рН), sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), etc. in it. In the course of the greenhouse trial, we diagnosed its impact on the indicator crop (maize) (Zea mays L.) with its herbage crop stage of 10 leaves, supplied with water of varying quality. We proved the viability of improved drainage and escape water from rice irrigation systems in irrigated agriculture, owing to which maize herbage was diminished, on average, by 5.82%. We verified the negative impact of irrigation water, which contains the effluent disposals of metallurgical production, on croppers – it had contributed to diminishing the watered maize herb, on average, by 39.27%. A correlation analysis of the test data proved the closely interrelated feedback between the maize herbage amount and the content of cations, anions and water-soluble salts in irrigation water (coefficient of correlation r varied between 0.88 and 0.98). The worked-out linear regressive model for maize herbage, based on the content of water-soluble salts in irrigation water, together with SAR index (Y=2342.71–1.82×x₁+366.78×x₂), affirmed the validity of the pattern, discovered by means of the correlation analysis.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

maize; irrigation water quality; regression model; drainage water; escape water; rice irrigation systems; effluent disposals; metallurgical production

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 20, nr 2
• Strony: 1--7
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 28 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Lykhovyd Pavlo

• Institute of Irrigated Agriculture of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Naddniprianske, 73483, Kherson, Ukraine

autor

Dementiieva Olha

• Kherson State Agricultural University, Stritenska Street 23, 73006, Kherson, Ukraine

autor

Lavrenko Sergiy

• Kherson State Agricultural University, Stritenska Street 23, 73006, Kherson, Ukraine

autor

Lavrenko Nataliia

• Kherson State Agricultural University, Stritenska Street 23, 73006, Kherson, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• 1. Andriolo J.L., da Luz G.L., Witter M.H., Godori R.S., Barros G.T. and Bortolotto O.C. 2005. Growth and yield of lettuce plants under salinity. Hortic Braz. 23:931–934.
• 2. APHA. 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 19th Ed. American Public Health Association, Washington DC.
• 3. Ayers R.S. and Westcott D.W. 1985. Water quality for agriculture, FAO irrigation and drainage paper 29. Rev. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
• 4. Banjaw D.T., Megersa H.G. and Lemma D.T. 2017. Effect of water quality and deficit irrigation on tomatoes yield and quality: a review. Adv Crop Sci Tech. 5:295.
• 5. Cui Y.L., Li Y.H. and Mao Z. 1998. The crop-water production function with the influence of reference evapotranspiration taken into account. J Hydraul Eng. 3:48–56.
• 6. Feizi M., Hajabbasi M.A. and Mostafazadehfard B. 2010. Saline irrigation water management strategies for better yield of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in an arid region. Aust J Crop Sci. 4:408–414.
• 7. Kelly W.P. 1963. Use of saline irrigation water. Soil Sci. 95(4):355–391.
• 8. Khan M.A. and Shaukat S.S. 2008. Economic benefits from irrigation of maize with treated effluent of waste stabilization ponds. Pak J Bot. 40:1091–1098.
• 9. Kim H., Jeong H., Jeon J. and Bae S. 2016. Effects of irrigation with saline water on crop growth and yield in greenhouse cultivation. Water. 8:127.
• 10. Leogrande R., Vitti C., Lopedota O., Ventrella D. and Montemurro F. 2016. Effects of irrigation volume and saline water on maize yield and soil in Southern Italy. Irrig Drain. 65:243–253.
• 11. Letey J. and Dinar A. 1986. Simulated crop-water production functions for several crops when irrigated with saline waters. Hilgardia. 54:1–32.
• 12. Letey J., Dinar A. and Knapp K.C. 1985. Crop-water production function model for saline irrigation waters. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 49:1005–1009.
• 13. Lykhovyd P.V., Kozlenko Ye.V. (2018). Assessment and forecast of water quality in the River Ingulets irrigation system. Ukr J Ecol. 8(1):350–355.
• 14. Childs S.W. and Hanks R.J. 1975. Model of soil salinity effects on crop growth. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 39:617–622.
• 15. Li Y.H. 2001. Research and practice of water-saving irrigation for rice in China. Proc. of the international workshop on water saving irrigation for rice, 1–9.
• 16. Liu X., Til F., Chen S., Shao L., Sun H. and Zhang X. 2016. Effects of saline irrigation on soil salt accumulation and grain yield in the winter wheatsummer maize double cropping system in the low plain of North China. J Integr Agric. 15:2886–2898.
• 17. Lu G.A. 2000. Impact of water saving irrigation on uptake efficiency of phosphorus nutrient by rice. Irrig Drain. 19:16–20.
• 18. Alghobar M.A. and Suresha S. 2016. Effect of wastewater irrigation on growth and yield of rice crop and uptake and accumulation of nutrient and heavy metals in soil. Appl Ecol Environ Sci. 4:53–60.
• 19. Mok H.F., Dassanayake K.B., Hepworth G. and Hamilton A.J. 2014. Field comparison and crop production modelling of sweet corn and silage maize (Zea mays L.) with treated urban wastewater and freshwater. Irrig Sci. 32:351–368.
• 20. Oron G., DeMalach Y., Gillerman L., David I. and Rao V.P. 1999. Improved saline-water use under subsurface drip irrigation. Agric Water Manag. 39:19–33.
• 21. Ould Ahmed B.A., Yamamoto T. and Inoue M. 2007. Response of drip irrigated sorghum varieties growing in dune sand to salinity levels in irrigation water. J Appl Sci. 7:1061–1066.
• 22. Rameshwaran P., Tepe A., Yazar A. and Ragab R. 2015. The effect of saline irrigation water on the yield of pepper: experimental and modelling study. Irrig Drain. 64:41–49.
• 23. Rengasamy P. 2010. Soil processes affecting crop production in salt-affected soils. Funct Plant Biol. 37:613–620.
• 24. Tarjuelo J.M., De-Juan J.A., Moreno M.A. and Ortega J.F. 2010. Review. Water resources deficit and water engineering. Span J Agric Res. 8:102–121.
• 25. Wan S., Y. Kang, D. Wang and Liu S.P. 2010. Effect of saline water on cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) yield and water use under drip irrigation in North China. Agric Water Manag. 98:105–113.
• Wan S., Kang Y., Wang D., Liu S.P. and Feng L.P. 2007. Effect of drip irrigation with saline water on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) yield and water use in semi-humid area. Agric Water Manag. 90:63–74.
• 26. Wang X., Yang J., Liu G., Yao R. and Yu S. 2015. Impact of irrigation volume and water salinity on winter wheat productivity and soil salinity distribution. Agric Water Manag. 149:44–54.
• 27. Wilcox L.V. 1955. Classification and use of irrigation water. In: Circular No. 969. US Department of Agriculture, Washington.

Uwagi

Błędna numeracja w bibliografii.

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).