Selected management concepts supporting self-organizing teams

• Autorzy: Perlak Jakub

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2019.136.36

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this paper is to present several selected management concepts that support self-organizing teams. The chosen concepts are agile project management, teal organization, holacracy and sociocracy, and the paper places emphasis on the organizational factors in each of presented concept. Four groups of organizational factors were extracted: culture, structure, management and processes. The value of this paper is that it is a comparison of the extracted groups in the selected concepts. The outcome of this work was the discovery that the organizational culture in each of the concepts was very similar, yet, the structure supporting self-organizing teams may vary in effect, starting from the project, to the whole organization. Still, the management and processes appeared to be very similar in the teal organization, holacracy and sociocracy. Moreover, agile project management was more similar to traditional organizations. The paper emphasizes the need for further research, in particular, in companies which have adopted the presented concepts.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

self-organizing teams; agile project management; holacracy; sociocracy; teal organization

PL

zespoły samoorganizujące się; zwinne zarządzanie projektami; holakracja; socjokracja; organizacja turkusowa

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: z. 136
• Strony: 471--481
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 15 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Perlak Jakub

• AGH w Krakowie

Bibliografia

• 1. Bernstein, E., Bunch, J., Canner, N., and Lee, M. (2016). THE BIG IDEA Beyond the Holacracy HYPE. Harvard Business Review, 94(7-8), 38-49.
• 2. Blikle, A. (2017). Doktryna Jakości. Rzecz O Turkusowej Samoorganizacji. Gliwice: Helion.
• 3. Dingsøyr, Torgeir, Sridhar Nerur, Venugopal Balijepally, and Nils Brede Moe (2012). A Decade of Agile Methodologies: Towards Explaining Agile Software Development. The Journal of Systems and Software, 85(6), 1213-21.
• 4. Guzzo, R.A., and Dickson, M.W. (1996). TEAMS IN ORGANIZATIONS: Recent Research on Performance and Effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 307-38.
• 5. Highsmith, J., and Fowler, M. (2001). The Agile Manifesto. Software Development Magazine, 9(8), 29-30.
• 6. Hoda, Rashina, and Latha, K. Murugesan (2016). Multi-Level Agile Project Management Challenges: A Self-Organizing Team Perspective. The Journal of Systems and Software, 117 (July), 245-57.
• 7. Hoda, Rashina, Noble, J., and Marshall, S. (2010). Organizing Self-Organizing Teams. https://doi.org/10.1145/1806799.1806843.
• 8. Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing Organizations: A Guide to Creating Organizations Inspired by the next Stage in Human Consciousness. Nelson Parker.
• 9. Langfred, C.W. (2000). The Paradox of Self-management: Individual and Group Autonomy in Work Groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 563.
• 10. Moe, Nils, Brede, Torgeir, Dingsøyr, and Tore, Dybå (2008). Understanding Self-Organizing Teams in Agile Software Development. Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference, ASWEC. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2008.4483195.
• 11. Robertson, B.J. (2007). Organization at the Leading Edge: Introducing Holacracy TM. Integral Leadership Review, 7(3), 1-13.
• 12. Romme, G. (1995). The Sociocratic Model of Organizing, 4(4), 209.
• 13. Serrador, P., and Pinto, J.K. (2015). Does Agile Work? - A Quantitative Analysis of Agile Project Success. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1040-51.
• 14. Sheffield, J., and Lemétayer, J. (2013). Factors Associated with the Software Development Agility of Successful Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(3), 459-72.
• 15. Zidane, Y.J.-T., Hussein, B.A., Gudmundsson, J.Ø., and Ekambaram, A. (2016). Categorization of Organizational Factors and Their Impact on Project Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226(July), 162-69.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).