General assumptions for project management in Industry 4.0

• Autorzy: Gajdzik Bożena , Kopeć Grzegorz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2022.157.8

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: Authors of the paper develop the main assumptions for project management in the Industry 4.0, and present them in the short form as basic knowledge, useful for managing smart manufacturing (SM) projects in companies. Design/methodology/approach: the process of preparing SM (smart manufacturing) projects and their implementation, in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, have been changed, due to the importance of the issue of linking more and more intelligent machines, IT-computer programs and monitored processes into integrated technological systems of key importance for the construction of cyber-physical production systems (CPS). The paper applies a conceptual analysis of possible areas of change in project management (PM) when enterprises build the smart manufacturing (SM). Findings/conclusions: companies building the smart environment must adapt their organization of project management to the new requirements and opportunities of Industry 4.0 (I 4.0) technologies. Research limitations: the narrow scope of knowledge about the ongoing changesin SM project management is due to the short period of experience (the Industry 4.0 concept has been implemented since 2011), therefore the authors have only presented the framework of changes in organization of project management. Practical implications: the authors' intention was to initiate a practical discussion about the changes in project management in the ongoing industrial revolution. Originality/value: Since 2011, when the government of the Federal Republic of Germany recognized the concept of "Industrie 4.0" as the key strategy of innovative development, Industry 4.0 has become an important discussed topic among practitioners and researchers. The fourth industrial revolution is expected to result in a leap in the efficiency of companies operating in the intelligent technological environment. Key technologies or pillars of Industry 4.0 are implemented in manufacturing enterprises to build the smart manufacturing processes. Enterprises develop new projects and make investments in order to create Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPS).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Industry 4.0; project management; integrated technology; IT system; digitalization; smart manufacturing

PL

Przemysł 4.0; zarządzanie projektem; zintegrowana technologia; system informatyczny; digitalizacja; inteligentna produkcja

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: z. 157
• Strony: 133--144
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Gajdzik Bożena

• Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0408-1691

autor

Kopeć Grzegorz

• Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1293-4797

Bibliografia

• 1. Aghemo, C., Blaso, L., Pellegrino, A. (2014). Building automation and control systems: a case study to evaluate the energy and environmental performances of a lighting control system in offices. Automation in Construction, 43, 10-22.
• 2. Amaya Erro-Garces (2021). Industry 4.0: defining the research agenda. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(5), pp. 1858-1882, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0444.
• 3. ARC White Paper March 2020. Smart manufacturing continuous improvement maturity model. (Prepared By) Valentijn de Leeuw, Vice President, and Shin Kai, Director of Research.
• 4. Arczewski, P., Salwin, M. (2021). Scrum jako przykład koncepcji iteracyjnej wykorzystywanej w tworzeniu produktów i usług oraz zarządzania projektami. In: R. Konsala (ed.), Inżynieria Zarządzania. Cyfryzacja produkcji. Aktualności badawcze, 3 (pp. 369-377). Warszawa: PWE.
• 5. Asproni, G. (2006).Wstęp do Scrum. Software Developer’s Journal, 6.
• 6. Biały, W., Gajdzik, B., Jimeno, C.L., Romanyshyn, L. (2019). Engineer 4.0 in a metallurgical enterprise. In: W. Biały (ed.), Multidisciplinary aspects of production engineering. Monograph. Engineering and technology, pt. 1 (pp. 172-182). Warszawa: Publisher Sciendo, DOI 10.2478/mape-2019-0017.
• 7. Brandenburg, H. (1999). Zarządzanie projektami. Gliwice: Politechnika Śląska, p. 46.
• 8. Bryde, D. (2008). Perceptions of the Impact of Project Sponsorship Practices on Project Success. Int. J. Proj. Manag., 26, 800-809.
• 9. Cakmakci, M. (2019). Interaction in Project Management Approach Within Industry 4.0. Proceedings of the Advances in Manufacturing, II. Cham, Switzerland: Springer,176-189.
• 10. Cerezo-Narváez, A., Otero-Mateo, M., Pastor, A. (2017). Development of Professional Competences for Industry 4.0 Project Management. Proceedings of the 7th IESM Conference. Saarbrücken, Germany, 11-13 October 2017.
• 11. Fortune, J., White, D., Jugdev, K., Walker, D. (2011). Looking Again at Current Practice in Project Management. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 4, 553-572.
• 12. Gajdzik, B. (2021). Operator maszyn i urządzeń w Przemyśle 4.0 – wprowadzenie do tematu. Gospodarka Materiałowa i Logistyka, 73(5), 2-7, DOI 10.33226/1231-2037.2021.5.1.
• 13. Gajdzik, B., Grabowska, S., Saniuk, S. (2021). A Theoretical Framework for Industry 4.0 and its Implementation with Selected Practical Schedules. Energies, vol. 14, iss. 4, 1-24, DOI: 10.3390/en14040940.
• 14. Gajdzik, B., Grabowska, S., Wyciślik, A. (2019). Poglądowe ujęcie kierunków zmian w rozwoju Przemysłu 4.0. Polish Technical Review, 1/1.
• 15. Gajdzik, B., Grabowska, S., Saniuk, S., Wieczorek, T. (2020). Sustainable Development and Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Analysis Identifying Key Scientific Problems of the Sustainable Industry 4.0. Energies, vol. 13, iss. 16, 1-27, DOI:10.3390/en13164254.
• 16. Greengard, S. (2015). The Internet of Things. Cambridge-London: MIT Press.
• 17. Grendys, A. (2021). Sztuczna inteligencja przemysłu, www.przemyslprzyszlosci.gov.pl, 20.04.2022.
• 18. Hofmann, E., Rüsch, M. (2017). Industry 4.0 and the Current Status as Well as Future Prospects on Logistics. Comput. Ind. 89, 23-34.
• 19. Kagermann, H., Lukas, W., Wahlster, W. (2011). Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. industriellen Revolution. VDI nachrichten, 13.
• 20. Kerzner, H. (1989). Project management: a system approach to planning, scheduling and control. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhod.
• 21. Keys, J. Difference Between Engineering Management & Project Management, https://study.com/academy/popular/difference-between-engineering-management-project-management.html, 22.04.2022.
• 22. Komus, A., Kuberg, M., Atinc, C., Franner, L., Friedrich, F., Lang, T. et. al. (2015). Quelle, Studie Status Quo Agile 2014. Koblenz: Koblenz University of Applied Sciences, BPM Labor.
• 23. Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.G., Feld, T., Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industrie 4.0: Bedarfssog und Technologiedruck als Treiber der vierten industriellen Revolution. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 56(4), p. 2.
• 24. López-Robles, J.R., Otegi-Olaso, J.R., Porto Gómez, I., Cobo, M.J. (2019). 30 Years of Intelligence Models in Management and Business: A Bibliometric Review. Int. J. Inf. Manag., 48, 22-38.
• 25. Marousek, R., Novotny, P. (2016). Project Management for Increasing Logistics Productivity in Direction of Industry 4.0. Clc 2015: Carpathian Logistics Congress – Conference Proceedings, 80-85.
• 26. Monostori, L., Kádár, B., Bauernhansl, T., Kondoh, S., Kumara, S., Reinhart, G., Sauer, O., Schuh, G., Sihn, W., Ueda, K. (2016). Cyber-Physical Systems in Manufacturing. Cirp Ann., 65, 621-641.
• 27. Romero, D., Noran, O., Stahre, J., Bernus, P., Fast-Berglund, Å. (2015). Towards a human 17 centred reference architecture for next generation balanced automation systems: human 18 automation symbiosis. Adv. Prod. Manag. Syst., 460, 556-566.
• 28. Spałek, S. (2012). The Role of Project Management Office in The Multi-Project Environment. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 12(2), 172-188.
• 29. Spałek, S. (2017). Zarządzanie projektami w erze przemysłu 4.0. Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsiębiorstwa, 9(812), 106-112.
• 30. Sutherland, J., Schwaber, K. (2011). The SCRUM papers: Nut, bolts, and origins of an agile process. Paris: Scrum Inc.
• 31. Turner, J.R. (2009). The Handbook of Project-Based Management: Leading Strategic Change in Organizations. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, ISBN 978-0-07-154974-5.
• 32. Vrchota, J., Řehoř, P., Maříková, M., Pech, M. (2021). Critical Success Factors of the Project Management in Relation to Industry 4.0 for Sustainability of Projects. Sustainability, 13, 281, https:// doi.org/10.3390/su13010281.
• 33. White Paper SMKL Smart Manufacturing Kaizen Level. Approach to Smart Manufacturing (2000). Tokyo: IAF, Mitsubishi Electric Company, Shinbashi, Minato-ku, 4/1, p. 6.
• 34. Wybraniak-Kujawa, M., Salwin, M. (2021). Zwinne zarządzanie projektami za pomocą ram postępowania Scrum – wybrane zagadnienia. In: R. Konsala (ed.), Inżynieria Zarządzania. Cyfryzacja produkcji. Aktualności badawcze, 3 (pp. 423-430). Warszawa: PWE.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).