Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Cybersecurity is still considered a purely technological challenge; however, despite all technological progress, this challenge remains unsolved – as emphasized by many high-impact attacks against public administration and industry worldwide. We postulate that the mere focus on technology fogs the bigger picture, since people generate, operate, and interact with all technological systems, thus making them socio-technical systems. Hence, in this commentary we argue for a change of perspective towards a holistic, interdisciplinary view on our technological infrastructure. By example of the European power grid – inarguably a critical infrastructure not only for daily life but also for the continuity of our polity – we show that through interpretation as a socio-technical system, systematic and interdisciplinary studies would allow to reveal how its (cyber)security is not only a technological matter. An interdisciplinary approach combining STEM disciplines and Social Sciences would additionally advance the understanding of stakeholders and their goals and mindsets as well as the manifold dependencies between technology and human actors. While interdisciplinary endeavours appear to be generally supported by funding agencies, reviewers, universities, and researchers, they rarely occur in practice. We discuss why this is the case and present ideas on how to facilitate more interdisciplinary research.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
1--6
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 17 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- University of Vienna, SBA Research, Austria
autor
- University of Vienna, SBA Research, Austria
autor
- University of Vienna, SBA Research, Austria
Bibliografia
- 1. Austrian Power Grid (APG). (2022, Aug. 25). Trockenheit reduziert Stromproduktion aus Wasserkraft um 31 Prozent. [Online]. Available: https://www.apg.at/news-presse/austrian-power-grid-apg-trockenheitreduziert-stromproduktion-aus-wasserkraft-um-31-prozent/. [Accessed: Oct. 27, 2022].
- 2. S. Sijelmassi. (2022, Sep. 8). Face au réchauffement climatique, l’avenir de l’énergie nucléaire est-il menacé?,TV5 Monde. [Online]. Available: https://information.tv5monde.com/info/face-au-rechauffement-climatique-lavenir-de-l-energie-nucleaire-est-il-menace-466906. [Accessed: Oct. 27, 2022].
- 3. BBC. (2022, Sep. 29). Nord Stream 1: How Russia is cutting gas supplies to Europe. [Online]. Available:https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60131520. [Accessed: Oct. 27, 2022].
- 4. European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E). (2022, Mar. 16). ContinentalEurope successful synchronisation with Ukraine and Moldova power systems. [Online]. Available: https://www.entsoe.eu/news/2022/03/16/continental-europe-successful-synchronisation-with-ukraine-and-moldovapower-systems/. [Accessed: Oct. 27, 2022].
- 5. European Climate Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency. (2021, June 18). Baltic SynchronisationProject: Works are on track. [Online]. Available: https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/balticsynchronisation-project-works-are-track-2021-06-18_en. [Accessed: Oct. 27, 2022].
- 6. A. Dabrowski, J. Ullrich, E. R. Weippl, “Grid Shock: Coordinated Load-Changing Attacks on Power Grids: TheNon-Smart Power Grid is Vulnerable to Cyber Attacks as Well,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ComputerSecurity Applications Conference, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2017, pp. 303–314, doi: 10.1145/3134600.3134639.
- 7. UCTE. (2007). Final Report - System Disturbance on 4 November 2006, Union for the Co-ordination of Transmission of Electricity. [Online]. Available: https://eepublicdownloads.entsoe.eu/clean-documents/pre2015/publications/ce/otherreports/Final-Report-20070130.pdf. [Accessed: Oct. 27, 2022].
- 8. T. Petermann, H. Bradke, A. Lüllmann, M. Poetzsch, U. Riehm, Eds., Was bei einem Blackout geschieht:Folgen eines langandauernden und großflächigen Stromausfalls. Berlin: Edition sigma, 2013.
- 9. T. Hughes, “The evolution of large technological systems,” in The Social construction of technologicalsystems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1987, pp. 51–82.
- 10. T. P. Hughes, “The seamless web: Technology, science, etcetera, etcetera,” Social Studies of Science, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 281–292, 1986, doi: 10.1177/0306312786016002004.
- 11. C. Perrow, Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.
- 12. D. Vaughan, The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
- 13. KIRAS Sicherheitsforschung, Sicherheitsklammer. [Online]. Available: https://www.kiras.at/. [Accessed: Oct. 27, 2022].
- 14. FWF Programmes, Emerging Fields. [Online]. Available: https://www.fwf.ac.at/en/research-funding/fwfprogrammes/emerging-fields. [Accessed: Oct. 27, 2022].
- 15. WWTF, Digital Humanism 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.wwtf.at/funding/programmes/ict/index.php?lang=EN#ICT20. [Accessed: Oct. 27, 2022].
- 16. Dighum, Vienna Manifesto on Digital Humanism. [Online]. Available: https://dighum.ec.tuwien.ac.at/dighum-manifesto/. [Accessed: Oct. 27, 2022].
- 17. A. Barry, G. Born, Eds., Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences. London, New York: Routledge, 2013.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-e2460d54-2176-48e8-9d03-04019d28c5f5