Evaluation of the architecture of an orphanage for orphaned children in the context of the reform of residential institutions (deinstitutionalisation concept)

• Autorzy: Babych Olha

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.37705/TechTrans/e2023012

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

On the basis of the analysis of more than a hundred projects that have beencompleted over the past four decades, the process of the transformation of thearchitecture of orphanages in the context of the deinstitutionalisation strategywas analysed. The analysis was based on a specially developed method ofcomparing environmental and peculiarities of fostering. The main goal of thismethod was to establish a connection between the effective methods of raisingchildren and architectural form. In accordance with the structure of the plan,three types of orphanage have been identified – single, branched and dispersed.As a result of the analysis, three factors were identified that contribute to thepreservation of outdated methods of organising the architectural space of analternative care institution for children. A number of design solutions have beenidentified that have significant potential for strengthening deinstitutionalized,child-centred educational practices that correspond to the best interests of the child.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

orphanage; architecture; variety; deinstitutionalisation; evaluation

PL

sierociniec; architektura; odmiana; deinstytucjonalizacja; ocena

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej im. Tadeusza Kościuszki
• Czasopismo: Technical Transactions
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 120, iss. 1
• Strony: art. no. e2023012
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 10 poz. , il.

Twórcy

autor

Babych Olha

• Department of Architectural Projects, Institute of Architecture and Design of Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2377-5891

Bibliografia

• 1. Al-sheikh, N. (2016). Rehabilitation center for street children. Retrieved from: https://www.behance.net/gallery/40615689/rehabilitation-center-for street-children (access: 10.06.2023).
• 2. Barber, J., Delfabbro, P., Gilbertson, R. (2004). Children in Foster Care. Book, 240. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203462775
• 3. CEBRA. ArchDaily (2014). Children’s Home. Retrieved from: https://www.archdaily.com/570664/children-s-home-cebra (access: 27.04.2023).
• 4. Day, B. (2020). The Opening of Pasadena’s Only International Boarding School is Pushed Back, Again. Retrieved from: https://www.pasadenanow.com/weekendr/the-opening-of-pasadenas-only-international-boardingschool-is-pushed-back-again/ (access: 10.06.2023).
• 5. Estudio Gustavo Utrado (2010). Buildingcentre. Watch Wood Work #05 – Children Village, Brazil. Retrieved from: https://www.buildingcentre.co.uk/whats_on/events/wood-work-05-with-gustavo-utrabo (access: 10.06.2023).
• 6. Holloway, J. (2013). 28 containers transform orphanage in South Africa. Retrieved from: https://newatlas.com/shipping-container-orphanage/26227/ (date of access: 10.06. 2023).
• 7. Najwyższa Izba Kontroli (2023). Za dużo domów dziecka, za mało rodzin zastępczych. Retrieved from: https://www.nik.gov.pl/aktualnosci/deinstytucjonalizacji-pieczy-zastepczej.html (access: 10.07.2023).
• 8. Purcell Collegiate School (2020). Virtual Tour. Retrieved from: https://purcellcollegiate.ca/virtual-tour (access: 10.03.2023).
• 9. Rosenfeld, A.A., Pilowsky, D.J., Fine, P., Thorpe, M., Fein, E., Simms, M.D., Halfon, N., Irwin, M., Alfaro, J., Saletsky, R. and Nickman, S. (1997). Foster Care: An Update. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(4), 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199704000-00006
• 10. The AKDN (1991). SOS Children’s Village. Retrieved from: https://the.akdn/en/how-we-work/our-agencies/aga-khan-trust-culture/akaa/sos-childrens village (access: 27.04.2023).

Uwagi

Section "Architecture and Urban Planning"