New developments in scholarship: lessons for the information professional

• Autorzy: Kotlay T.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Nowe rozwiązania w nauce: wnioski dla informacji profesjonalnej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

New media (web 2.0 tools) have been applauded as new and effective means of discovering and sharing scientific (scholarly) knowledge. The reality, nonetheless, does not show any revolution in this field. On the other hand we cannot deny that researchers do use new media, though they are likely to accept new methods if they improve research and do not threaten its reputation. They welcome new media practices if they do not make them to deviate from their existing priorities and principles. Not surprisingly new media is often used to support the informal conversations between esearchers, while there is no evidence that it would function as an alternative way of formally publishing research findings. Information professionals, especially academic librarians have to keep an eye on these developments, including issues of big data, data citation and open access without losing sight of the main mission of the library, as professionalism means that we are neither masters nor slaves of technology.

PL

Nowe media (narzędzia Web 2.0) zostały uznane jako nowe i skuteczne sposoby odkrywania i udostępniania naukowej wiedzy. W rzeczywistości jednak, nie wykazują żadnej rewolucji w tej dziedzinie. Z drugiej strony nie możemy zaprzeczyć, że naukowcy nie korzystają z nowych mediów, są skłonni zaakceptować te nowe metody, jeśli poprawiają badania i nie zagrażają ich ważności. Przyjmują nowe praktyki medialne pod warunkiem, że nie powodują one zmiany dotychczasowych priorytetów i zasad. Nie dziwi więc fakt, że nowe media są często używane do obsługi nieformalnej wymiany informacji i rozmów między badaczami, podczas gdy nie ma dowodów na to, że funkcjonują jako alternatywny sposób publikowania wyników badań. Pracownicy informacji, szczególnie bibliotekarze akademiccy, powinni zwracać uwagę na te zmiany, szczególnie dostęp do danych, cytowania oraz otwartego dostępu do wiedzy, uwzględniając jednak podstawowe zadania biblioteki akademickiej.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

professional information; new developments; scholarship

PL

informacja profesjonalna; nowe rozwiązania; nauka

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Informacji Naukowej
• Czasopismo: PTINT Praktyka i Teoria Informacji Naukowej i Technicznej
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: T. 21, nr 4
• Strony: 10--15
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kotlay T.

• Szent István University, JÁSZBERÉNY

Bibliografia

• [1] AACU: Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college.Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2002.
• [2] ACRL: Information literacy and competency standards for higher education. Association of College and Research Libraries. 2004. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.cfm
• [3] ALA: ALA Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. Final report. Chicago, Ill.: American Library Association, 1989.
• [4] Arms W. Y.: What are the alternatives to peer review? Quality control in scholarly publishing on the web. “Journal of Electronic Publishing” 2008 Vol. 8 http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/ 08-01/arms.html
• [5] Badke W.: Information overload? Maybe not. “Online” 2010 Vol. 34 p. 52-54.
• [6] Bawden D. Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. “Journal of Documentation” 2001 Vol. 57 p. 218-259.
• [7] Bawden D., Robinson L.: The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. “Journal of Information Science” 2009 Vol. 35 p. 180-191.
• [8] Bawden D., Robinson L.: Introduction to information science. London 2012.
• [9] Becher T., Trowler P.L.: Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Open University Press, Buckingham 2001.
• [10] Björk B.-Ch.: Open access to scientific publications – an analysis of the barriers to change? “Information Research” 2004 Vol. 9 [online]. http://InformationR.net/ir/9-2/paper170.html
• [11] Carpenter J., Wetheridge L. and Smith N.: Researchers of Tomorrow: Annual Report 2009–2010. British Library/JISC, 2010.
• [12] Collins E.: Social media and scholarly communications: the more they change, the more they stay the same? In: Shorley D. and Jubb M. (Eds): The Future of Scholarly Communication. London 2013, p. 89-102.
• [13] D’Angelo B.J., Maid B.M.: Moving Beyond Definitions: Implementing Information Literacy Across the Curriculum. “Journal of Academic Librarianship” 2004 Vol. 30 p. 212-217.
• [14] Davies A., Fidler D., & Gorbis M.: Future work skills 2020. 2011.
• [15] Davis N.: Information Overload, Reloaded. “Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology” 2011 Vol. 37 p. 45-9 [online]. http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Jun-11/JunJul11_Davis.html
• [16] Elmborg J.: Critical Information Literacy: Implications for Instructional Practice. “Journal of Academic Librarianship” 2006 Vol. 32 p. 192-199.
• [17] Ginsparg P.: Next-Generation Implications of Open Access. “CTWatch Quarterly” 207 Vol. 3 [online]. http:// www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2007/08/next-generation-implications-of-open-access/
• [18] Harley D. et al.: Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines. Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley, 2010, http://escholarship. org/uc/cshe_fsc
• [19] Herman E., Nicholas D.: The information enfranchisement of the digital consumer. “Aslib Proceedings” 2010 Vol. 62 p. 245-260.
• [20] James L. et al.: The lives and technologies of early career researchers, 2009 [online]. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/reports/2009/earlycareerresearchersstudy.aspx
• [21] Jones W., Maier D.: Report from the Session on Personal Information Management. Workshop of the Information and Data Management Program. Seattle, WA: National Science Foundation Information, 2003.
• [22] Lankshear C., Knobel M.: “New” Literacies: Research and Social Practice. [online] 2004, http://www.cs.uta.fi/~mm77802/A3/dokkari.doc
• [23] Lau J.: Conceptual Relationship of Information Literacy and Media Literacy. In: Conceptual Relationship of Information Literacy and Media Literacy in Knowledge Societies Paris: Unesco, 2013, p. 76-91.
• [24] Lee A. Y.: Literacy and Competencies Required to Participate in Knowledge Societies. In: Conceptual Relationship of Information Literacy and Media Literacy in Knowledge Societies Paris: Unesco, 2013. p. 3-75.
• [25] Livingstone S., van Couvering E. J., & Thumin N.: Converging traditions of research on media and information literacies: Disciplinary and methodological issues. In D.J. Leu D.J. et al. (Eds.) Handbook of Research on New Literacies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 2008, p. 103–132.
• [26] Macfarlane B., Cheng M.: Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-Examining Contemporary Support Among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. “Journal of Academic Ethics” 2008 Vol. 6 p. 67-78.
• [27] Morville P.: Ambient Findability. Sebastopol, CA 2005.
• [28] Procter et al.: Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications. “Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society” 2010 Vol. 368 p. 4039-4056.
• [29] Rheingold H.: Attention, and Other 21st-Century Social Media Literacies. “Educause Review” 2010. Vol. 45 p. 14-16.
• [30] Seely Brown J.: In context. “Information Outlook” 2000 Vol. 4 p. 39-50.
• [31] Špiranec S., Banek Zorica M.: Information Literacy Meets “Research 2.0”: Exploring Developments in Croatian Academic Libraries. In: E-Science and Information Management. Berlin Heidelberg 2012, p. 87-101.
• [32] Tidline T. J.: The Mythology of Information Overload. “Library Trends” 1999 Vol. 3 p. 487-508.
• [33] Weller M.: The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, 2011.
• [34] Karvalics Z., L.: From Scientific Literacy to Lifelong Research: A Social Innovation Approach. 2013. (in press)