Assessment of the Interrelationship and the Influence Degree of Lean Dimensions Based on Fuzzy DEMATEL

• Autorzy: Al-Baldawi Zainab Allawi , Kassam Alla Eldin H. , Al-Zubaidi Sawsan Sabeeh A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12913/22998624/169575

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Lean manufacturing is a world class philosophy and a well-approved strategy for improving quality, productivity and reduce cost to makes the organization more competitive in the changing global markets, where every organization pursues continuously to improve their lean performance by reducing or eliminating all types of waste. Fuzzy DEMATEL has been utilizes to develop assessment model to help focusing more on the most influence lean dimensions for driving the improvement process. Five essential lean dimensions have been studied that extracted by a survey to assess degree of relation, importance, and category the lean dimensions and determine the interrelationships among them. The assessment model has been developed using MICROSOFT EXCEL and applied by surveying five companies for soft drink and healthy water by a questionnaire to get their opinion about importance and the influence each lean dimension on another. Interrelationship diagram show top management has highest effect on all lean dimensions so it is considered as driving lean dimension.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Cause-effect-Importance Diagram; F-DEMATEL Interrelationship diagram; Lean Dimensions

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology ; Polish Society of Ecological Engineering (PTIE), Branch of PTIE in Lublin
• Czasopismo: Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 17, no 4
• Strony: 215--226
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Al-Baldawi Zainab Allawi

• Department of Production and Metallurgy Engineering, University of Technology, Bagdad, Iraq

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9399-8081

autor

Kassam Alla Eldin H.

• Department of Production and Metallurgy Engineering, University of Technology, Bagdad, Iraq

autor

Al-Zubaidi Sawsan Sabeeh A.

• Department of Production and Metallurgy Engineering, University of Technology, Bagdad, Iraq

Bibliografia

• 1. Pakdil F., Leonard K.M. Criteria for a lean organisation: Development of a lean assessment tool. Int J Prod Res. 2014; 52(15): 4587–607.
• 2. Rajpurohit L. Leanness Assessment of Manufacturing Organizations Using Fuzzy Topsis: a Case Study. Int J Adv Eng Res Dev. 2017; 4(11): 2–7.
• 3. Kumar S., Singh B., Qadri M.A., Kumar Y.V.S., Haleem A. A framework for comparative evaluation of lean performance of firms using fuzzy TOPSIS. Int J Product Qual Manag. 2013; 11(4): 371–92.
• 4. International Labour Organization. Lean Manufacturing Techniques For Textile Industry. ILO Cataloging in Publication Data/ Lean Manufacturing Techniques for Textile Industry. 2017.
• 5. Elrhanimi S., El L., Abouabdellah A. Lean manufacturing : From the craft production to the global emergence Lean manufacturing : from the craft production to the global emergence. 2020; (January 2018).
• 6. Scherrer-Rathje M., Boyle T.A., Deflorin P. Lean, take two! Reflections from the second attempt at lean implementation. Bus Horiz. 2009; 52(1): 79–88.
• 7. Manea D. Lean Production – Concept and Benefits. Rev Gen Manag. 2013; 17(1): 164–71.
• 8. Alkhoraif A., Rashid H., McLaughlin P. Lean implementation in small and medium enterprises: Literature review. Oper Res Perspect. 2019; 6(December).
• 9. Ghushe S., Deshmukh S. Study : Implementation of Lean Manufacturing Tools on a Coir Product Manufacturing Industry. 2017; 5(2): 60–5.
• 10. Kaplanog V., Durmus Z.D.U., Cenk S. Fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection. Expert Syst Appl. 2013; 40: 899–907.
• 11. Nazir M., Cavus N. Fuzzy DEMATEL method for identifying LMS evaluation criteria. Procedia Comput Sci [Internet]. 2017; 120: 742–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. procs.2017.11.304
• 12. Altuntas S., Yİlmaz M.K. Fuzzy DEMATEL methodto evaluate the dimensions of marketing resources: an application in SMEs. J Bus Econ Manag. 2016; 17(3): 347–64.
• 13. Xiaoyong Z., Yu L., Yongmao X., GX 1 and XD 1. Identification of Key Brittleness Factors for the Lean–Green Manufacturing System in a Manufacturing Company in the Context of Industry 4.0, Based on the DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC Method. Processes. 2023; 11(49).
• 14. Kilic H.S., Yurdaer P., Aglan C. A leanness assessment methodology based on neutrosophic DEMATEL. J Manuf Syst [Internet]. 2021; 59(June 2019): 320–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.03.003
• 15. Cathay Kuo-Tai Kang C.-Y.L., Y.-H.H. Key Factors to Increasing Free Cash Flow for Manufacturers Utilizing Lean Production: An AHP-DEMATEL Approach. Inf Manag Bus Rev. 2022; 14(2): 28–45.
• 16. Tayaksi C., Sagnak M., Kazancoglu Y. A new holistic conceptual framework for leanness as- sessment. Int J Math Eng Manag Sci. 2020; 5(4): 567–90.
• 17. Qadrir Vsardma. Empirical assessment of the causal relationships among lean criteria using DEMATEL method. Benchmarking An Int J. 2016; 23(7).
• 18. Azadeh A., Zarrin M., Abdollahi M., Noury S., Farahmand S. Leanness assessment and optimization by fuzzy cognitive map and multivariate analysis. Expert Syst Appl [Internet]. 2015; 42(15–16): 6050–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. eswa.2015.04.007
• 19. Harjanto D.D., Karningsih P.D. Development of Lean Assessment Tools Dimensions and Indicators for MSMEs in Indonesia. Prozima. 2021; 5(1): 21–9.
• 20. Elnadi M., Shehab E. Product-service system leanness assessment model: study of a UK manufacturing company. Int J Lean Six Sigma. 2021; 12(5): 1046–72.
• 21. Bueno W.P., Benitez G.B., Fernandes E.D.S., Godoy L.P. Fuzzy in Lean To Evaluate the Decision Degree. Rev Gestão e Desenvolv. 2020; 17(1): 4.
• 22. Dahda S.S., Andesta D., Wicaksono A.S. Measuring leanness index using fuzzy logic approach. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020; 1469(1).
• 23. Vishal A.W., Ankur Chaurasia N.K. Leanness assessment of an organization using fuzzy logic approach. J Eng Pract Futur Technol. 2019; 2(1): 1–6.
• 24. Yadav V., Khandelwal G., Jain R., Mittal M.L. Development of leanness index for SMEs. Int J Lean Six Sigma. 2019; 10(1): 397–410.
• 25. Agrawal R., Asokan P., Vinodh S. Benchmarking fuzzy logic and ANFIS approaches for leanness evaluation in an Indian SME: A case study. Benchmarking. 2017; 24(4): 973–93.
• 26. A. Abreu, J.M.F.C. A Fuzzy Logic Model to Evaluate the Lean Level of an Organization. Int J Artif Intell Appl. 2017; 8(5): 59–75.
• 27. Rajpurohit L. A Study of Leanness Assessment of Manufacturing Organizations. 2017.
• 28. Balasubramanian P.K., Hemamala K. Leanness Assessment using Fuzzy Logic Approach: A Case of Indian Horn Manufacturing Company. Int J Data Min Tech Appl. 2016; 5(2): 102–9.
• 29. Vidyadhar R., Sudeep Kumar S., Vinodh J.A. Application of fuzzy logic for leanness assessment in SMEs: a case study. J Eng Des Technol. 2016; 14(1).
• 30. Başhan V., Demirel H. Application of Fuzzy Dematel Technique to Assess Most Common Critical Operational Faults of Marine Boilers. J Polytech. 2019; 22(3): 545–55.
• 31. P.E, J.J. An integrated DEMATEL and AHP approach multi criteria green supplier selection process for public procurement. Int J Eng Technol. 2017; 9(1): 113–24.
• 32. Yunus Aydinel. Investigating Causal Relationship Among Lean Maintenance Factors Using Fuzzy Dematel Method. 2020.
• 33. Falatoonitoosi E., Leman Z., Sorooshian S., Salimi M. Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2013; 5(13): 3476–80.
• 34. Yazdani-Chamzini A., Shariati S., Yakhchali S.H., Zavadskas E.K. Proposing a new methodology for prioritising the investment strategies in the private sector of Iran. Econ Res Istraz [Internet]. 2014; 27(1): 320–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2014.947150

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).