Innovation and sustainability as a crucial trend in energy sector project management – literature review

• Autorzy: Jarosz Szymon , Sołtysik Mariusz , Zakrzewska Małgorzata , Włodyka Karol , Mesjasz Czesław , Kozłowski Artur

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2022.157.11

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: Project management is a universally recognized methodology for business and project activities. Organisations are increasingly using project activities to achieve strategic benefits. It is purposed to optimize the time, human and financial resources, without deviating from the planned quality of the final product of the project and while maintaining the principles of sustainability. The energy sector is no exception. The purpose of this paper is to determine trends in energy sector project management. Design/methodology/approach: To present the research concerning project management in energy sector innovations the literature review process was carried out. The analysis of keywords, abstract, and on this basis further deeper analysis of scientific texts allowed to identify trends in project management in the energy sector. There is a research gap in research summarizing trends in the description of the issue of project management in the energy sector. Findings: The literature analysis presented indicates that the interest of scientists is largely directed towards sustainable projects in the energy sector. This has to do with global trends not only in the energy sector but in every sector of the economy. Energy project management should continue to focus on becoming more sustainable, especially when more and more organizations are aware that their strategy should include ecological sustainability, such as eco-innovation and environmental innovation. Originality/value: It is one of the few scientific texts that touches on the problem of project management in the energy sector. In terms of implications, studies have shown that particular emphasis should be placed on the aspects of project teams creating sustainable innovations for the sector, as well as neutralizing the carbon footprint of the project teams themselves.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

project management; energy sector; sustainability; review

PL

zarządzanie projektami; sektor energetyczny; zrównoważony rozwój; recenzja

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: z. 157
• Strony: 173--194
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 107 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Jarosz Szymon

• Cracow University of Economics, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2150-6193

autor

Sołtysik Mariusz

• Cracow University of Economics, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8240-1099

autor

Zakrzewska Małgorzata

• Cracow University of Economics, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7914-1313

autor

Włodyka Karol

• Cracow University of Economics, Poland

autor

Mesjasz Czesław

• Cracow University of Economics, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0893-5823

autor

Kozłowski Artur

• Cracow University of Economics, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Alavi, S. & Mirmohammadsadeghi, S. (2021). Risk Assessment and Prioritization of ERP Implementation Based on BSC. Journal of Human, Earth, and Future, Vol. 2, No. 1, DOI: 10.28991/HEF-2021-02-01-02.
• 2. Alias, Z., Zawawi, E.M.A., Yusof, K., Aris, N.M. (2014). Determining Critical Success Factors of Project Management Practice: A Conceptual Framework. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences., 153, 61-69.
• 3. Armenia, S., Dangelico, R.M., Nonino, F., Pompei, A. (2019). Sustainable project management: A conceptualization-oriented review and a framework proposal for future studies. Sustainability, 11, 2664.
• 4. Bamgbade, J.A., Kamaruddeen, A.M., Nawi, M.N.M. (2017). Malaysian construction firms’ social sustainability via organizational innovativeness and government support: The mediating role of market culture. Journal of Cleaner Production, 154, 114-124.
• 5. Bauer, W., Schuler, S., Hornung, T., Decker, J. (2019). Development of a Procedure Model for Human-Centered Industry 4.0 Projects. Procedia Manufacturing, 39, 877-885.
• 6. Baxter, D., Casady, C.B. (2020). Proactive and Strategic Healthcare Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in the Coronavirus (Covid-19) Epoch. Sustainability, 12, 5097.
• 7. Berssaneti, F.T., Carvalho, M.M. (2015). Identification of variables that impact project success in Brazilian companies. International Journal of Project Management, 33, 638-649.
• 8. Bryde, D. (2008). Perceptions of the Impact of Project Sponsorship Practices on Project Success. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 800-809.
• 9. Bukarica, V., Tomsic, Z. (2017). Design and Evaluation of Policy Instruments for Energy Efficiency Market. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 8(1), 354-362. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2016.2599584.
• 10. Cabała, P., Jarosz, S., Sołtysik, M., Zakrzewska, M. (2020). Kompetencje kierownika projektu w świetle wytycznych Individual Competence Baseline v. 4.0. In: Zarządzanie organizacjami w społeczeństwie informacyjnym. Projekty – procesy – struktury. Toruń: Dom organizatora, ISBN 978-83-7285-937-2.
• 11. Caetano, N.S., Mata, T.M., Martins, A.A., Felgueiras, M.C. (2017). New Trends in Energy Production and Utilization. Energy Procedia, Vol. 107. Elsevier Ltd., 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.122.
• 12. Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., del Río, P., Könnölä, T. (2010). Diversity of eco-innovations: reflections from selected case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1073e1083.
• 13. Casey, Z. (2012). Fossil Fuel Subsidies Are ‘Public Enemy Number One’. European Wind Energy Association, available online: http://www.ewea.org/blog/2013/02/fossil-fuel-subsidies-are-public-enemy-number-one/, 02.05.2021.
• 14. Cerezo-Narváez, A., Otero-Mateo, M., Pastor, A. (2017). Development of Professional Competences for Industry 4.0 Project Management. Proceedings of the 7th IESM Conference. 11-13 October 2017. Saarbrücken, Germany.
• 15. Chan, A.P.C., Scott, D., Chan, A.P.L. (2004). Factors Affecting the Success of a Construction Project. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130, 153-155.
• 16. Chan, D.W.M., Chan, A.P.C., Lam, P.T.I., Wong, J.M.W. (2011). An empirical survey of the motives and benefits of adopting guaranteed maximum price and target cost contracts in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 577-590.
• 17. Chang, C.-Y. (2013). A critical analysis of recent advances in the techniques for the evaluation of renewable energy projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(7), 1057-1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.03.001.
• 18. Chen, C., Kyei, R.O., Ping, A., Chan, C. (2019). Developing a project sustainability index for sustainable development in transnational public – private partnership projects, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1954.
• 19. Chen, J. (2021). Energy Sector, Investopedia, available online: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/energy_sector.asp, 10.02.2022.
• 20. Consuelo, N. (2020). Advanced Design for Manufacturing of Integrated Sustainability “Off-Shore” and “Off-Site” Prototype - MVP “S2_HOME”. Civil Engineering Journal, 6, 1752-1764. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091580.
• 21. Dobrovolskienė, N, Pozniak, A, Tvaronavičienė, M. (2021). Assessment of the Sustainability of a Real Estate Project Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Sustainability, 13(8), 4352. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084352.
• 22. Doskočil, R., Lacko, B. (2018). Risk management and knowledge management as critical success factors of sustainability projects. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051438.
• 23. Danish, M.S.S., Senjyu, T.S. (2020). Green Building Efficiency and Sustainability Indicators. Hershey, PA, USA: Green Building Management and Smart Automation, IGI Global, pp. 128-145.
• 24. Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Seyboth, K., Kadner, S., Zwickel, T., et al. (2011). Summary for policy makers. In: O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow (eds.), Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (pp. 1-28). Cambridge University Press.
• 25. El-Saboni, M., Aouad, G., Sabouni, A. (2009). Electronic Communication Systems Effects on the Success of Construction Projects in United Arab Emirates. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 23, 130-138.
• 26. Fortune, J., White, D., Jugdev, K., Walker, D. (2011). Looking Again at Current Practice in Project Management. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4, 553-572.
• 27. Geels, F.W., Deuten, J.J. (2006). Local and global dynamics in technological development: a socio-cognitive perspective on knowledge flows and lessons from reinforced concrete. Science and Public Policy, 33, 265-275.
• 28. Geels, F.W., Hekkert, M.P., Jacobsson, S. (2008). The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20, 521-536.
• 29. Gottschamer, L., Zhang, Q. (2016). Interactions of factors impacting implementation and sustainability of renewable energy sourced electricity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 164-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.017.
• 30. Hamann, R., April, K. (2013). On the role and capabilities of collaborative intermediary organisations in urban sustainability transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 12-21.
• 31. Hekala, W. (2012). Why Donors Should Care More About Project Management. Available online: https://www.devex.com/news/why-donors-should-care-more-about 36 project-management-77595, 01.05.2021.
• 32. Hill, R.C., Bowen, P.A. (1997). Sustainable construction: Principles and a framework for attainment. Construction Management and Economics, 15, 223-239.
• 33. Hitzeroth, M, Megerle, A. (2013). Renewable energy projects: Acceptance risks and their management. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, 576-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.022.
• 34. Hodge, G., Greve, C. (2010). Public-Private Partnerships: Governance Scheme or Language Game? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69, S8-S22.
• 35. Hodson, M., Marvin, S., Bulkeley, H. (2013). The intermediary organisation of low carbon cities: a comparative analysis of transitions in greater London and greater Manchester. Urban Studies, 50, 1403-1422.
• 36. Hoeft, M., Pieper, M., Eriksson, K., Bargstädt, H.J. (2021). Toward life cycle sustainability in infrastructure: The role of automation and robotics in ppp projects. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073779.
• 37. Hoogma, R., Kemp, R., Schot, J., Truffer, B. (2002). Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management. London: Spon Press.
• 38. Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy 35, 715-728.
• 39. Hyväri, I. (2006). Success of Projects in Different Organizational Conditions. Project Management Journal, 37, 31-41.
• 40. Jarosz, S., Sołtysik, M., Zakrzewska, M. (2020). The Fourth Industrial Revolution in the Light of Social and Competence Changes. European Research Studies Journal, Vol. XXIII, Special Iss. 1, 530-548, https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1776.
• 41. Jarosz, S., Zakrzewska, M. (2020). Świadomość studentów w zakresie konsekwencji Czwartej Rewolucji Przemysłowej w sektorze. In: Interesariusze w gospodarce cyfrowej – modele zachowań współczesnego rynku. Szczecin: Naukowe Wydawnictwo IVG, ISBN PL (IVG) 978-83-62062-85-0.
• 42. Jha, K.N., Iyer, K.C. (2006). Critical Determinants of Project Coordination. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 314-322.
• 43. Jia, L., Qian, Q.K., Meijer, F., Visscher, H. (2021). Exploring key risks of energy retrofit of residential buildings in China with transaction cost considerations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126099.
• 44. Kern, F., Rogge, K.S., Howlett, M. (2019). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies. Research Policy, 48, 103832.
• 45. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
• 46. Khairulzaman, H.A., Usman, F. (2018). Automation in civil engineering design in assessing building energy efficiency. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7, 722-727.
• 47. Khang, D.B., Moe, T.L. (2008). Success Criteria and Factors for International Development Projects: A Life-Cycle-Based Framework. Project Management Journal, 39, 72-84.
• 48. Kiani Mavi, R., Gengatharen, D., Kiani Mavi, N., Hughes, R., Campbell, A., Yates R. (2021). Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 13(4), 1932. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041932.
• 49. Kinelski, G. (2020). The main factors of successful project management in the aspect of energy enterprises’ efficiency in the digital economy environment. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal, 23(3), 5-20, https://doi.org/10.33223/epj/126435.
• 50. Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., Klerkx, L. (2018). Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006.
• 51. Kivimaa, P. (2014). Government-affiliated intermediary organisations as actors in system 11 level transitions. Research Policy, 43, 1370-1380.
• 52. Klakegg, O.J., Pollack, J., Crawford, L. (2021). Preparing for successful collaborative contracts. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010289.
• 53. Larsson, J., Lasson, L. (2020). Integration, Application and Importance of Collaboration in Sustainable Project Management. Sustainability, 12, 585.
• 54. Leach, M., Rockström, J., Raskin, P., Scoones, I., Stirling, A. C., Smith, A., Thompson, J., Millstone, E., Ely, A., Arond, E., Folke, C., Olsson, P. (2012). Transforming innovation for sustainability. Ecology and Society, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04933-170211.
• 55. Lee, J.Y., Kumari, R., Jeong, J.Y., Kim, T.H., Lee, B.H. (2020). Knowledge discovering on graphene green technology by text mining in national R&D projects in South Korea. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(23), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239857.
• 56. Maltzman, R., Shirley, D. (2014). Sustainability and project management. In: P.C. Dinsmore, J. Cabanis-Brewin (Eds.), The AMA Handbook of Project Management.New York, NY, USA: American Management Association.
• 57. Marcelino-Sádaba, S., González-Jaen, L.F., Pérez-Ezcurdia, A. (2015). Using project management as a way to sustainability. From a comprehensive review to a framework definition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 1-16.
• 58. Marnewick, C., Silvius, G., Schipper, R. (2019). Exploring patterns of sustainability stimuli of project managers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185016.
• 59. Martiskainen, M., Kivimaa, P. (2018). Creating innovative zero carbon homes in the United Kingdom — Intermediaries and champions in building projects. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26(June), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.08.002.
• 60. Mavi, R.K., Gengatharen, D., Mavi, N.K., Hughes, R., Campbell, A., Yates, R. (2021) Sustainability in construction projects: A systematic literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041932.
• 61. Müller, R., Jugdev, K. (2012). Critical Success Factors in Projects: Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott—The Elucidation of Project Success. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5, 757-775.
• 62. Müller, R., Turner, R. (2007). The Influence of Project Managers on Project Success Criteria and Project Success by Type of Project. European Management Journal, 25, 298-309.
• 63. Noppers, E.H., Keizer, K., Bolderdijk, J.W., Steg, L. (2014). The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives. Global Environmental Change, 25(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.012.
• 64. Økland, A. (2015). Gap Analysis for Incorporating Sustainability in Project Management. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 103-109.
• 65. Oskolkova, M. (2020). Project management in environmental construction, E3S Web of Conferences, 217, 11012, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021711012.
• 66. Paiva, G., Agra, R., de Tomi, G. (2017). Application challenges for information and automation technologies in an underground mine in Brazil. Rev. Esc. De Minas, 70, 93-97.
• 13 67. Peters, T.J., Waterman, R.H. (1982). Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best 14 Run Companies. New York, NY, USA: Harper Business.
• 68. Raven, R.P.J.M., Jolivet, E., Mourik, R.M., Feenstra, Y.C.F.J. (2009). ESTEEM: Managing societal acceptance in new energy projects. A toolbox method for project managers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(7), 963-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.02.005.
• 69. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (France), Renewables (2013).Global Status Report. Paris (REN21 Secretariat).
• 70. Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation – eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32, 319-332.
• 71. Report no.: DOE/EIA-0484 (2009). United States Department of Energy. International Energy Outlook, Washington (DC), Energy Information Administration (US), Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting.
• 72. Ribeirinho, M.J., Mischke, J., Strube, G., Sjödin, E., Blanco, J.L., Palter, R., Biörck, J., Rockhill, D., Andersson, T. (2020). The Next Normal in Construction: How Disruption Is Reshaping the World’s Largest Ecosystem. Zurich, Switzerland: McKinsey & Company.
• 73. Rodríguez-Rivero, R., Ortiz-Marcos, I., Ballesteros-Sánchez, L., Sánchez, M.J. (2019).Improving the management of international development projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.
• 74. Rolstadås, A, Johansen, A. (2021). The Dawn of a New Era for Project Management. Sustainability, 13(2), 695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020695.
• 75. Rostova, O., Shirokova, S., Sokolitsyna, N., Shmeleva, A. (2019). Management of investment process in alternative energy projects. E3S Web of Conferences, 110, 02032. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911002032.
• 76. San Cristóbal, J.R., Carral, L., Diaz, E., Fraguela, J.A., Iglesias, G. (2018). Complexity and Project Management: A General Overview. Complexity, 1-10.
• 77. Sánchez, M.A. (2015). Integrating sustainability issues into project management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.087.
• 78. Sanhudo, L.P.N., Martins, J. (2018). Building information modelling for an automated building sustainability assessment. Civil Engineering and Environmental System, 35, 99-116.
• 79. Sauser, B.J., Reilly, R.R., Shenhar, A.J. (2009). Why Projects Fail? How Contingency Theory Can Provide New Insights—A Comparative Analysis of NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter Loss. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 665-679.
• 80. Schaeffer, G.J. (2015). Energy sector in transformation, trends and prospects. In: Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 52. 866-875. Elsevier B.V., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.144.
• 81. Schmidt, T.S. (2014). Low-carbon investment risks and de-risking. Nature Climate Change, 4, 237-239. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2112.
• 82. Schot, J., Geels, F.W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 537-554.
• 83. Shenhar, A.J., Levy, O., Dvir, D. (1997). Mapping the dimensions of project success. Project Management Journal, 28(2), 5-9.
• 84. Shenhar, A.J., Tishler, A., Dvir, D., Lipovetsky, S., Lechler, T. (2002). Refining the Search for Project Success Factors: A Multivariate, Typological Approach. R&D Management, 32, 111-126.
• 85. Silvius, A.J.G., Schipper, R., Planko, J., Van den Brink, J., Köhler, A. (2012). Sustainability in Project Management. Surrey, UK: Gower Publishing, p. 182.
• 86. Silvius, A.J.G., Schipper, R.P.J. (2014). Sustainability in Project Management: A Literature Review and Impact Analysis. Business & Society, 4, 63-96.
• 87. Silvius, G. (2017). Sustainability as a new school of thought in project management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 1479-1493.
• 88. Starynina, J., Ustinovichius, L. (2020). A multi-criteria decision-making synthesis method to determine the most effective option for modernising a public building. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26, 1237-1262.
• 89. Steffen, B. (2017). The importance of project finance for renewable energy projects. Energy Economics, 69, 280-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.006.
• 90. Stewart, J., Hyysalo, S (2008). Intermediaries: users and social learning in technological innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12, 295-325.
• 91. Suprapto, M., Bakker, H.L.M., Mooi, H.G., Moree, W. (2015). Sorting out the essence of owner–contractor collaboration in capital project delivery. International Journal of Project Management, 33, 664-683.
• 92. Tishler, A., Dvir, D., Shenhar, A., Lipovetsky, S. (1996). Identifying Critical Success Factors in Defense Development Projects: A Multi-variate Analysis. Technol. Forecast. Social Change, 51, 151-171.
• 93. Toljaga-Nikolić, D., Todorović, M., Dobrota, M., Obradović, T., Obradović, V. (2020).Project management and sustainability: Playing trick or treat with the planet. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(20), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208619.
• 94. Turner, J.R. (2009). The Handbook of Project-Based Management: Leading Strategic Change in Organizations. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, ISBN 978-0-07-154974-5.
• 95. UN Environment and International Energy Agency. Towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient, and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector (2017). Global Status Report. Nairobi, Kenya: UN Environment and International Energy Agency.
• 96. Van den Brink, J. (2009). Duurzaam Project management: Verder Kijken Dan Je Project Lang Is [Sustainable Project Management: Looking beyond the Project]. Projectie, 4, 128.
• 97. Van Hal, A. (2000). Beyond the Demonstration Project. The Diffusion of Environmental Innovations in Housing. Delft University of Technology.
• 98. Van Tulder, R., van Tilburg, R., Francken, M., da Rosa, A. (2013). Managing the Transition to a Sustainable Enterprise: Lessons from Frontrunner Companies. London, UK:Routledge.
• 99. Victor, D. (2009). The politics of fossil-fuel subsidies. The Global Subsidies Initiative. Untold billions: Fossil-fuel subsidies, their impacts and the path to reform. Geneva, Switzerland: International Institute for Sustainable Development, pp. 1-34.
• 100. Vrchota, J, Řehoř, P, Maříková, M, Pech, M. (2021). Critical Success Factors of the Project Management in Relation to Industry 4.0 for Sustainability of Projects.Sustainability, 13(1), 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010281.
• 101. Walker, D.H.T., Vines, M.W. (2000). Australian Multi-Unit Residential Project Construction Time Performance Factors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 7, 278-284.
• 102. White, D., Fortune, J. (2002). Current Practice in Project Management—An Empirical Study. International Journal of Project Management, 20, 1-11.
• 103. Wolniak, R., Saniuk, S., Grabowska, S., Gajdzik, B. (2020). Identification of energy efficiency trends in the context of the development of industry 4.0 using the Polish steel sector as an example. Energies, 13(11), 2867, 1-16.
• 104. Wu, Y., Li, J., Wang, J., Huang, Y. (2012). Project portfolio management applied to building energy projects management system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 718-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.037.
• 105. Xue, J., Yue, G.Y. (2020). Visualizing the Intellectual Structure of Risk Management in Renewable Energy Projects. Earth and Environmental Science, 586, 012013.2nd International Conference on Environment Sciences and Renewable IOP Conf. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/586/1/012013.
• 106. Yang, Y., Tang, W., Shen, W., Wang, T. (2019). Enhancing Risk Management by Partnering in International EPC Projects: Perspective from Evolutionary Game in Chinese Construction Companies. Sustainability, 11, 5332.
• 107. Zakrzewska, M., Jarosz, S., Sołtysik, M. (2020). The Core of Managerial Competences in Managing Innovation Projects. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology – Organization & Management Series, https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2020.148.60.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).