PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Analysis of the use of artificial intelligence in the management of Industry 4.0 projects. The perspective of Polish industry

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Artificial Intelligence (AI) supports project management in industry projects increasingly more often. The article documents research results regarding the use of AI in Industry 4.0 projects. The aim of the article is to define the range of AI use in Industry 4.0 projects throughout their entire life cycle and to indentify the main stages of AI development in project management. Additionally, the article indicates the main barriers to AI use in project management identified in the studied projects. In order to identify and systemise the range of AI use, the Conceptual Framework of Using AI in Project Management presented in literature is applied. Research results indicate that we are in the early stages of AI use in projects. The studied projects use AI mainly in project administration, i.e. to complete the following tasks: simple automation of routine activities, support, and, to a very limited extent, in the area of project management, i.e. in identifying anomalies and predicting the phenomena where the anomalies will occur. The research uses the case study method, where four projects were studied: an ERP system upgrade, an implementation of an IT system supporting high-bay warehouse management, an implementation of an IoT as a data-collection sensor platform and an E-learning platform implementation. The study was conducted between 2019 and 2021, and covered the entire project life cycle, including its three stages, i.e. preparation, implementation and operation.
Rocznik
Strony
56--63
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 46 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Warsaw University of Technology, Plac Politechniki 1, 00-661 Warszawa, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Andrews, C.J., Baptista, A.I., Patton, S.L.W., 2005. Grounded theory and multi-agent simulation for a small firm. (in) Agent-Based Simulation: From Modelling Methodologies to Real-World Applications, Terano T., Kita H., Kaneda T., Arai K., Deguchi H., eds., Springer, Tokio, Japan.
  • 2. Auksztol, J., 2008. Outsourcing Informatyczny w Teorii i Praktyce Zarządzania. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk, Poland.
  • 3. Auth, G., Jokisch, O., Dürk, Ch., 2019. Revisiting automated project management in the digital age – a survey of AI approaches. eJournal of Applied Knowledge Management, 7(1), DOI: 10.36965/OJAKM.2019.7(1)27-3910.36965/OJAKM.2019.7(1)27-39
  • 4. Bendel, O., 2016. 300 Keywords Informationsethik: Grundwissen aus Computer-, Netz- und Neue-Medien-Ethik sowie Maschinenethik. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, Germany.
  • 5. Best Practice Solutions, https://www.axelos.com/best-practice-solutions/prince2 (accessed 16.04.2021).
  • 6. Bradley, K., 2002. Podstawy Metodyki PRINCE II CRM S.A. Centrum Rozwiązań Menadżerskich, Warszawa, Poland.
  • 7. Bukłaha, E., Juchniewicz, M., 2019. Kluczowe wyzwania i bariery oraz trendy w zarządzaniu projektami z punktu widzenia projektów realizowanych w Polsce. Przegląd Organizacji, 3 (950), 14-20.10.33141/po.2019.03.03
  • 8. Cao, J.Q., Zhang, S.H., 2016. ITIL Incident Management Process Reengineering in Industry 4.0 Environments. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Informatics (AMEII 2016), 73, 1011-1016.10.2991/ameii-16.2016.193
  • 9. Chang, S.I., 2004. ERP Life Cycle Implementation, Management and Support. Implications for Practice and Research, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA.
  • 10. Czakon, W. (ed.), 2011. Podstawy Metodologii Badań w Naukach o Zarządzaniu, Oficyna Wolters Kluwer Business, Warszawa, Poland.
  • 11. Daly, A. et al., 2019. Artificial Intelligence, governance and ethics: global perspectives, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Law Research, 2019(15), Hong Kong, China, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.341480510.2139/ssrn.3414805
  • 12. Davis, J., Hoffert, J., Vanlandingham, E., 2016. A taxonomy of artificial intelligence approaches for adaptive distributed real-time embedded systems. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT), DOI: 10.1109/EIT.2016.753524610.1109/EIT.2016.7535246
  • 13. Esteves J., Bohorquez V., 2007. An updated ERP systems annotated bibliography 2001–2005. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19(1), 1-59, DOI: 10.17705/1CAIS.0191810.17705/1CAIS.01918
  • 14. Esteves, J., Pastor, J., 2006. Organizational and technological critical success factors behavior along 35 the ERP implementation phases, (in) 36 Enterprise Information Systems VI. Seruca, I., Cordeiro, J., Hammoudi, S., Felipe, J. (eds), Springer, Netherlands.
  • 15. European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu (accessed 05.03.2021).
  • 16. Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., Welch, M., 2013. Embracing digital technology: a new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/embracing-digital-technology/ (accessed 28.03.2019).
  • 17. Gaton, J., 2017. Rise of the project bots, Microsoft Project User Group (MPUG). https://www.mpug.com/articles/rise-project-bots/
  • 18. Groover, M.P., 2008. Automation, Production Systems, and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, third ed., Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
  • 19. ITIL, https://www.itlibrary.org/ (accessed 16.04.2021).
  • 20. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., Vayena, E., 2019. The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines, Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 389-399, DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-210.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
  • 21. Kotarba, M., 2018. Digital transformation of business models, Foundations of Management, 10, DOI: 10.2478/fman-2018-001110.2478/fman-2018-0011
  • 22. Lahmann, M., 2018. AI will transform project management. Are you ready? PwC, https://www.pwc.ch/en/insights/risk/ai-will-transform-project-management-are-you-ready.html (accessed 13.09.2021)
  • 23. Larsson, S., Heintz, F., 2020. Transparency in Artificial Intelligence. Internet Policy Review, 9 (2), 1-16, DOI: 10.14763/2020.2.146910.14763/2020.2.1469
  • 24. Lee, J., 2013. Industry 4.0 in Big Data environment. German Harting Magazine, 26, 8-10.
  • 25. Leviathan, Y., Matias, Y., 2018. Google Duplex: an AI system for accomplishing real-world tasks over the phone. https://ai.googleblog.com/2018/05/duplex-ai-system-for-natural-conversation.html (accessed 13.09.2021).
  • 26. Maes, P., 1994. Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 31-40.10.1145/176789.176792
  • 27. Metzinger, T., 2019. Ethics washing made in Europe. Der Tagesspiegel, https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/eu-guidelines-ethics-washing-made-in-europe/24195496.html (accessed 15.09.2020).
  • 28. Microsoft, https://www.microsoft.com (accessed 13.09.2021).
  • 29. Nguyen, T.H., Sherif, J.S., Newby, M. 2007. Strategies for successful CRM implementation. Information Management & Computer Security, 15(2), 102-115, DOI: 10.1108/0968522071074800110.1108/09685220710748001
  • 30. Nimavat, K., Champaneria, T., 2017. Chatbots: an overview. Types, architecture, tools and future possibilities. IJSRD – International Journal for Scientific Research & Development, 5(7), 1019-1024.
  • 31. Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., Murray, R.M., 2007. Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems, Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(1), 215-233.10.1109/JPROC.2006.887293
  • 32. Project Management Institute, 2008. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Fourth edition, Newtown Square.
  • 33. Rowley, J., 2007. The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163-180.10.1177/0165551506070706
  • 34. Ruchi, S., Srinath, P., 2018. Big Data Platform for Enterprise Project Management Digitization Using Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA), Coimbatore, India.10.1109/ICECA.2018.8474799
  • 35. Russell, S. J., Norvig, P., 2010. Artificial intelligence – A Modern Approach. third ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
  • 36. SAP, http://www.sap.com, (accessed 13.09.2021).
  • 37. Schoen, M., 2017. Hype cycle for project and portfolio management, https://www.gartner.com/doc/3772090/hype-cycle-project-portfolio-management, (accessed 13.09.2021).
  • 38. Skorek, N., Trojanowski, M., Wilczak, A., 2010. Studium przypadku w nauczaniu marketingu. (in) Marketing w Realiach Współczesnego Rynku. Strategie i Działania Marketingowe, PWE, Warszawa, Poland, 549-556.
  • 39. Spałek S., 2017, Zarządzanie projektami w erze przemysłu 4.0. Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsiębiorstwa, 9, 106-112.
  • 40. Sullivan III, M., 2016. Statistics: Informed Decisions Using Data, fifth ed., Person, Harlow, England, ISBN-10: 0134135377.
  • 41. Vanhoucke, M., 2012. Project Management with Dynamic Scheduling: Baseline Scheduling. Risk Analysis and Project Control, second ed., Springer, Berlin, Germany.10.1007/978-3-642-25175-7
  • 42. Wachnik, B., 2016. Wdrażanie Systemów Informatycznych Wspomagających Zarządzanie, PWE, Warszawa, Poland.
  • 43. Wachnik, B. 2020a. Możliwość wykorzystywania botów zintergrowanych z Dynamics 365 BC/NAV, Alna, https://alna.pl/pl/blog/mozliwosc-wykorzystania-botow-zintegrowanych-z-dynamics-365-bc-nav (accessed 13.09.2021).
  • 44. Wachnik, B., 2020b. Luka Informacyjna w Przedsięwzięciach Informatycznych. Problemy i Rozwiązania, PWE, Warszawa, Poland.
  • 45. Walker, W.E., Marchau, V.A.W.J., Swanson, D., 2010. Addressing deep uncertainty using adaptive policies: Introduction to section 2. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Elsevier, 77, 917-923.10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.004
  • 46. Ziółkowski A., Orłowski C., 2007, Concept of the agent system for the information technology evaluation. Information systems architecture and technology: information systems and computer communication networks, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Wrocław, Poland, 61-69.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-deeb84b5-5925-4ba2-a1a5-75dd329adfb2
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.