Leadership in social economy entities illustrated with an example of the Mazowieckie province

• Autorzy: Adamiak Katarzyna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.199.1

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The aim of the paper is to present the results of a quantitative research conducted among social economy entities operating within the Mazowieckie Province and to illustrate the effects of the literature review on leadership, resulting in the identification of determinants affecting the analysed concept. The topic was pursued by the author due to the dynamic development of social economy entities and the importance of leadership in the development of each organisation. Design/methodology/approach: The ongoing research serves as an introduction to the in-depth analyses that will be carried out in the Mazowieckie Province. This province was chosen for the study due to the fact that according to the Polish Central Statistical Office (GUS), the number of non-governmental organisations, which comprise social economy entities, is significant and stands at 15,200 (data from 2021 – the most recent data available). In recent years, the subject of social economy has been gaining importance, particularly due to the legal conditions in this area, which emerged with the Act on social economy implemented in 2022. Due to the dynamics of the development of social economy entities, the importance of the entities in the reemployment of excluded individuals and many unexplored areas in this field, it can be assumed that the subject should be researched. The process has been initiated with the conduct of the quantitative research described in this paper and will be continued in further in-depth research. Findings: The research conducted resulted in the verification of the prepared survey questionnaire and a very general outline of the approach of the selected representatives of the surveyed social economy entities in the area of leadership styles. Originality/value: The discussed topic of social economy entities in the context of leadership is new and partially fills the research gap.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

social economy entities; Mazowieckie Province; leadership; leader; determinants of leadership

PL

podmioty ekonomii społecznej; województwo mazowieckie; przywództwo; lider; czynniki determinujące przywództwo

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: z. 199
• Strony: 9--19
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Adamiak Katarzyna

• University of Justice, Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4165-8844

Bibliografia

• 1. Bittel, L.R. (1994). A Short Course in Management. Warsaw: PWN, p. 171.
• 2. Boguski, J. (2003). Przywództwo i władza. Ostrołęka: Ostrołęckie Towarzystwo Naukowe im. Adama Chętnika, pp. 29-30.
• 3. Bojar, E., Rakowska, A., Zarębska, A., Bojar, M. (2010). Przywództwo w zarządzaniu rozwojem lokalnym. Białystok: Białystok Foundation for Personnel Education, pp. 263-275.
• 4. Defournay, J., Develtere, P. (2006). The Social Economy. The worldwide making of a third sector. In: Third sector for the advanced. Contemporary theories of the third sector - selection of texts. Warsaw: Klon/Jawor Association, pp. 4-6.
• 5. Fairholm, M.R. (2007). Trans-leadership. Linking Influential Theory and Contemporary Research. In: R.S. Morse, T.F. Buss, C.M. Kinghorn (ed.), Transforming Public Leadership for 21st Century. Armonk/New York/London, p. 114.
• 6. https://www.ekonomiaspoleczna.gov.pl/czym-jest-ekonomia-spoleczna/
• 7. Katz, D., Kahn, R.L. (1979). Social Psychology of Organizations, Library of Contemporary Psychology. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers, pp. 35-43.
• 8. Koontz, W., O'Donnel, C. (1959). Principles of management. Analysis of Managerial Functions. London/New York/Toronto: Mac Graw-Hill Book Company.
• 9. Kopijek, P. (ed.) (2003). Przywództwa można się nauczyć. Personel, no. 6, 16 March. Warsaw, p. 56.
• 10. Koźmiński, A. (2013). Ograniczone przywództwo. Warsaw: Poltext, p. 31.
• 11. Lachiewicz, S. (2007). Menedżer w strukturach władzy organizacji gospodarczych. Warsaw: Polish Economics Publishers, p. 19.
• 12. Northouse, P.G. (2009). Introduction to leadership: Concepts and practice. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, p. 34.
• 13. Pondy, L.R. (1978). Leadership is a language game. M.W. McCall Jr, M.M. Lombardo (eds.). Duke University Press.
• 14. Robbins, S., Judge, T. (2012). Organisational Behaviour. Warsaw: Polish Economics Publishers.
• 15. Smircich, L., Morgan, G. (1982). Leadership. The management of meaning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, pp. 257-273.
• 16. Smith, Ph.M. (1996). Leadership. In: A.S.R. Manstead, M. Hewstone (ed.), Warsaw: Jacek Santorski & Co.
• 17. Stoner, Ch.R., Stoner, J.S. (2012). Building Leaders. Paring the Path for Emerging Leaders. Routledge, p. 62.
• 18. Tannenbaum, R., Wechsler, R., Massarik, F. (1961). Leadership Organization: A behavioral approach. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 19-30.
• 19. Terry, G.R. (1960). Principles of management. California: University of California, pp. 60-75.
• 20. The Social Economy Act of 5 August 2022, p. 2.
• 21. Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the social process of leadership and organizing. Lincoln: University of Nebraska, pp. 654-676.
• 22. Winch, S. (2016). Substytuty przywództwa w przedsiębiorstwie - koncepcja teoretyczna i jej implikacje praktyczne. Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics, p. 14.
• 23. Wyrębek, H. (2013). Znaczenie przywództwa w procesie zarządzania organizacjami o strukturach zhierarchizowanych. The Scientific Papers of the Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities. Series: Administration and Management, No. 99. Siedlce, pp. 241-250.
• 24. Yukl, G.A. (1989). Leadership in Organization. Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice-Hall, p. 5.
• 25. Żukiewicz, P. (2011). Przywództwo polityczne. Teoria i praktyka. Warsaw: Difin, p. 48

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).